Abstract
Scandinavian legal culture is known for its scepticism towards granting courts too much political power at the expense of the legislature. There are no constitutional courts, nor do the ordinary courts exercise intensive judicial review of the constitutionality of the legislation.
Against that background, one would expect the prevalence of effective alternative forms of prior constitutional control or an established tradition of seeking independent advice in constitutional issues. However, even though this is the case in some Nordic countries, this is not the case in Denmark. In this chapter, the Danish model of limited constitutional advice is explored in order to illustrate and analyse an example of a confident and self-sufficient political system regarding external constitutional advice. The explanation for this development is found in a combination of different features: the legacy of Scandinavian legal realism and a preference for the legislator; a scepticism towards constitutional rightsP B. Koch (B)
The Danish Institute for Human Rights, Copenhagen, Denmark
e-mail: pkoc@humanrights.dk
© T.M.C. ASSER PRESS and the authors 2022
31
J. de Poorter et al. (eds.), European Yearbook of Constitutional Law 2021,
European Yearbook of Constitutional Law 3,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 94-6265-535- 5_3 and courts playing a more political role; and an absence of experience with authoritarian regimes during the Second World War. Even though there are indications that the coronavirus pandemic and the consequent restrictions of individual freedoms and rights might be a game changer towards a more general acknowledgement of the importance of external constitutional advice, Denmark is currently a Nordic outsider in the field of constitutional control. However, if we want to uphold the relevance of the national constitutional norms and prevent abuse of powers, the Swedish and Finnish solution of ex ante constitutional advice needs to be considered.
Keywords constitutional advice • Denmark • judicial review • human rights • legal realism • Nordic legal culture • parliamentary supremacy
3.1