Conclusion
It is only natural that an event of the magnitude of the Constitutional Revolution will have an effect on the future of Israeli law. Even more remarkably, as this chapter demonstrates, the Revolution may even have an effect on its history.
Having reviewed a recent body of literature studying law and politics in 1950s Israel, this chapter has argued that it heralds a new approach to the legal historiography of that foundational era. It has illustrated that this literature is bi-focal, having one eye on the Israel’s founding moment and the other on its Constitutional Revolution and the controversy surrounding it. Bluntly put, the literature takes the 1950s' side against that of the 1990s. It favours the constitutional framework and the Court's jurisprudence of the former over those of the latter. The new literature's grasp of the 1950s legal legacy is undoubtedly rich and perceptive. Nevertheless, as illustrated in this chapter, one may wonder whether its depiction of that eventful era is not overly generous and forgiving.
More legal literature on Laws.Studio
More on the topic Conclusion:
-
Agricultural law -
Constitutional law -
Fundamentals of Advocacy -
History of state and law -
Muslim (Islamic) law -
Professional ethics of a lawyer -
Roman law -
Theory of state and law -
UK Bar -
US Bar -
-
Conflictology -
Ecology -
Economy -
Finance -
History -
Law -
Medicine -
Philosophy -
Religious studies -