CONCLUSION
The institutional approach is characterised by the following features: centring the rights bearer, focusing on relational context and being sensitive to how power is exercised impersonally, through institutions.
In the first part of this book, I argued that these features make it theoretically persuasive, as a model for the application of horizontal constitutional rights. In the second part, I argued that the institutional approach can do substantive work as part of the adjudicatory process, both in the absence of and complementary to existing regimes of private law. In this final chapter, bringing together parts I and II, I have attempted to show that as more and more constitutions begin to subscribe to bounded horizontality - whether through general provisions, as in South Africa and Jamaica, or specific provisions, as in India and Kenya - the need for a principled theoretical model to adjudicate horizontal rights claims will be felt more and more.The institutional approach offers itself up as the beginning of a solution.
More legal literature on Laws.Studio
More on the topic CONCLUSION:
-
Agricultural law -
Constitutional law -
Fundamentals of Advocacy -
History of state and law -
Muslim (Islamic) law -
Professional ethics of a lawyer -
Roman law -
Theory of state and law -
UK Bar -
US Bar -
-
Conflictology -
Ecology -
Economy -
Finance -
History -
Law -
Medicine -
Philosophy -
Religious studies -