References

Abeyratne R (2017) Upholding judicial supremacy in India: the NJAC judgment in comparative perspective, George Wash Law Rev 49:101, 129-130

Ackerman B (2007) The living constitution (2007) Harvard Law Rev 120:1738, 1744

Albert R (2015) How unwritten constitutional norms change written constitutions.

Andhyarujina TR (2011) The Kesavananda Bharati case: the untold story of struggle for supremacy by supreme court and parliament, Universal Law Publishing, pp 63-7

Balkin JM (2009) Fidelity to text and principle. In: Balkin JM, Riva BS (eds) The constitution in 2020, Oxford University Press, p 21

Baxi U (2016) Demosprudence and socially responsible/response-able criticism: the njac decision and beyond NUJS Law Rev 9:152, 157

Chandrachud C (2015a) Debating the NJAC judgment of the supreme court of India: three dimensions’ UK constitutional law blog, 3 Nov 2015

Chandrachud C (2015b) Interpretive remedies in NJAC case. The Hindu, 31 July 2015, http:// www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/interpretive-remedies-in-njac-case/article7482864.ece

Chandrachud C (2016) Interpretation. In: Choudhry S, Khosla M, Mehta PB (eds) The oxford handbook of the Indian constitution. Oxford University Press

Chandrachud C (2017) Balanced constitutionalism: courts and legislatures in India and the United Kingdom, Oxford University Press, p 44

Field O (1926) Effect of an unconstitutional statute. Indiana Law J 1:1, 13

Gardner J (2011) Can there be a written constitution? Oxford Stud Philos Law 1:162

Ginsburg T, Elkins Z, Melton J (2007) The lifespan of written constitutions, American law and economics association annual meetings working paper 33

Ginsburg T, Elkins Z, Melton J (2009) The endurance of national constitutions. CUP, 48

Seervai HM (1996) Constitutional law of India, 4th edn. N.M. Tripathi, p 3114

Jacob A (1987) Government’s power to nullify andhra pradesh administrative tribunal’s orders ultra vires the amending power of parliament.

Jacobsohn GJ (2005) The wheel of law: India’s secularism in comparative constitutional context. Princeton, p. 140

Khosla M (2016) Constitutional amendment. In: Choudhry S, Mehta PB (eds) The oxford handbook of the Indian constitution. Oxford University Press, p 235

Krishnaswamy S (2009) Democracy and constitutionalism in India—a study of the basic structure doctrine, Oxford University Press, p 42

Kumar V (2007) Basic structure doctrine of the Indian constitution: doctrine of constitutionally controlled governance. J Indian Law Inst 49:365

Mehta PB (2005) The inner conflict of constitutionalism: judicial review and the basic structure. In: Hassan Z et al (eds) India’s living constitution: ideas, practices, controversies. Anthem, p 188

Nariman FS (2006) The silences in our constitutional law. SCC J 15(2)

Palkhivala N (1980) Rekindling the light of the constitution. Indian Express, 16 May 1980

Powell HJ (1986) Parchment matters: a mediation on the constitution as a text. Iowa Law Rev 71:1427, 1429

Ramachandran R (2001) The supreme court and the basic structure doctrine. In: Kirpal BN et al (eds) Supreme but not Infallible: essays in honour of the supreme court of India, Oxford University Press

Raz J (1979) The authority of law: essays on law and morality, Oxford University Press, p 214 Sathe SP (2007) From positivism to structuralism. In: Golsworthy J (ed) Interpreting constitutions: a comparative study, Oxford University Press

Sudarshan R (2005) “Stateness” and “Democracy” in India’s constitution’. In: Hassan Z et al (ed) India’s living constitution: ideas, practices, controversies, Anthem, p 167

Thiruvengadam AK (2016) Tribunals. In: Choudhry S, Khosla M, Mehta PB (eds) The oxford handbook of the Indian constitution. Oxford University Press

Tripathi PK (1974) Kesavananda bharati v state of Kerala: who wins? SCC J 1:3

Tushnet M (2009a) Citizen as lawyer, lawyer as citizen. William Mary Law Rev 50:1379, 1383 Tushnet M (2009b) Citizen as lawyer, lawyer as citizen. William Mary Law Rev 50:1379, 1393 Venkatraman S (1960) The status of an unconstitutional statute. J Indian Law Inst 2:401, 406 Waldron J (2006) The core of the case against judicial review. Yale Law J 115:1346, 1354