References
Bateup C (2006) The Dialogic Promise: Assessing the Normative Potential of Theories of Constitutional Dialogue. Brooklyn Law Review 71:1109-1180
Bickel A M (1962) The Least Dangerous Branch.
The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. Yale University Press, New HavenBorman T C (2000) De wetgevingsadvisering door de Raad van State in Nederland (preadvies voor de vereniging voor de vergelijkende studie van het recht van Belgie en Nederland). W.E.J. Tjeenk Willink, Deventer
Broeksteeg J L W et al (2005) Zicht op wetgevingskwaliteit. Een onderzoek naar de wetgevingsadvisering van de Raad van State. Boom Juridische uitgevers, The Hague/Meppel
Carolan E (2016) Dialogue isn’t working: the case for collaboration as a model of legislative-judicial relations. Legal Studies 36:209-229
Claes M, De Visser M (2012) Are You Networked Yet? On Dialogues in European Judicial Networks. Utrecht Law Review 8:100-114
De Poorter J C A, Van Roosmalen H J Th M (2010) Rol en betekenis van de Grondwet. Constitutionele toetsing in relatie tot de Raad van State. Raad van State, The Hague
De Visser M (2015) Constitutional review in Europe: a comparative analysis. Hart Publishing, Oxford
De Visser M (2022) Non-Judicial Constitutional Interpretation: the Netherlands. In: Law D S (ed) Constitutionalism in Context. Cambridge University Press, 216-235
Hogg P W, Bushell A (1997) The Charter Dialogue between Courts and Legislatures (Or Perhaps the Charter of Rights Isn’t Such a Bad Thing after All). Osgoode Hall Law Journal 35:75-124
Hogg P W, Bushell Thornton A, Knight W K (2007) Charter Dialogue Revisited: Or “Much Ado About Metaphors”. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 45:1-65
Kelly J B, Hennigar M A (2012) The Canadian Charter of Rights and the Minister of Justice: Weak- form Review within a Constitutional Charter of Rights. International Journal of Constitutional Law 10:35-68
Knopff R et al (2017) Dialogue: Clarified and Reconsidered.
Osgoode Hall Law Journal 54:609-644 Kokott J, Kaspar M (2012) Ensuring Constitutional Efficacy. In: Rosenfeld M, Sajo A (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 795-805Konijnenbelt W (2008) Grondwetsinterpretatie door de Raad van State: wetgevingsadvisering en grondwetsbepalingen in de Grondwet. In: De Lange R (ed) Wetgever en grondrechten. Wolf Legal Publishers, Nijmegen, pp 61-84
Kuo M-S (2016) In the Shadow of Judicial Supremacy: Putting the Idea of Judicial Dialogue in Its Place. Ratio Juris 29:83-104
Meuwese A C M, Snel M (2013) Constitutional Dialogue: An Overview. Utrecht Law Review 9:123-140
Nap M (2021) Constitutionele toetsing door de Raad van State. Wolters Kluwer, Deventer
Newman D (2019) Canada’s Notwithstanding Clause, Dialogue, and Constitutional Identities. In: Sigalet G, Webber G, Dixon R (eds) Constitutional Dialogue: Rights, Democracy, Institutions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 209-234
Polak J M (1997) Toetsing in de adviezen. In: Berg E L et al (eds) De Raad van State. Een stand van zaken. W.E.J. Tjeenk Willink, Deventer, pp 43-53
Schutgens R B J (2012) Toetsing in het wetgevingsproces versterkt. RegelMaat 4:196-211
Sigalet G, Webber G, Dixon R (2019) Introduction: The ‘What’ and ‘Why’ of Constitutional Dialogue. In: Sigalet G, Webber G, Dixon R (eds) Constitutional Dialogue: Rights, Democracy, Institutions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1-32
Tremblay L (2005) The legitimacy of judicial review: The limits of dialogue between courts and legislatures. International Journal of Constitutional Law 3:617-648
Tushnet M (1995) Policy Distortion and Democratic Debilitation: Comparative Illumination of the Countermajoritarian Difficulty. Michigan Law Review 94:245-301
Van den Berg W A (1997) Weerklank, weerlegging of weggeschreven. In: Berg E L et al (eds) De Raad van State. Een stand van zaken. W.E.J. Tjeenk Willink, Deventer, pp 83-96
Weiler P (1984) Rights and Judges in a Democracy: A New Canadian Version. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 1:51-92
Young A L (2018) Dialogue, Deliberation and Human Rights. In: Levy R et al (eds) The Cambridge Handbook of Deliberative Constitutionalism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 125138
Young A L (2019) Dialogue and Its Myths. ‘Whatever People Say I Am, That’s What I’m Not’. In: Sigalet G, Webber G, Dixon R (eds) Constitutional Dialogue: Rights, Democracy, Institutions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 35-67
Mentko Nap currently works as a senior policy advisor on legislative quality at the Ministry of Justice and Security of the Dutch Government. Earlier, he was a lecturer in constitutional law at the University of Groningen, the Netherlands. All views expressed in this chapter are strictly personal.