References

Abebe A, Fombad C (2013) The Advisory Jurisdiction of Constitutional Courts in Sub-Sahara Africa. George Washington International Law Review 46(1):55-118

Adams M (2009) Toekomstmuziek bij de Hoge Raad: waarom geen jaarverslagen a la frangaise? Nederlands Juristenblad 23:1098

Allan T R S (2003) Constitutional Dialogue and the Justification of Judicial Review.

Archard R (2021) Philosophical Advice. Philosophy 96(4):603-623

Aust A (2010) Advisory Opinions. Journal of International Dispute Settlement 1(1):123-151

Bauw E (2006) Rechterlijke terugkoppeling door middel van de wetgevingsadvisering van de Raad voor de rechtspraak. RegelMaat (6):203-209

Bezemek C (2012) A Kelsenian model of constitutional adjudication - The Austrian Constitutional Court. Zeitschrift fur offentliches Recht 67(1):115-128

Bignami F (2013) Comparative Administrative Law. In: Bussani M, Mattei U (eds) The Cambridge Companion to Comparative Law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 145-170

Blackstone W (1765/2007) Commentaries on the Laws of England - Book I. The Lawbook Exchange, Clark, NJ

Bobek M (2016) The Court of Justice, the national courts, and the spirit of cooperation: between Dichtung and Wahrheit. In: Lazowski A, Blockmans S (eds) Research Handbook of EU Institutional Law. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 353-375

Bok A J (2005) Judicial Review of Administrative Decisions by the Dutch Administrative Courts. Recours Objectif or Recours Subjectif? A Survey, including French and German law. In: Stroink FAM, Van der Linden E C H J (eds) Judicial Lawmaking and Administrative Law. Intersentia, Antwerp, pp 153-179

Boogaard G (2013) Het wetgevingsbevel. Over constitutionele verhoudingen en manieren om een wetgever tot regelgeving aan te zetten. Wolf Legal Publishers, Oisterwijk

Boogaard G (2019) Bipolar Constitutionalism in The Netherlands and Its Consequences for the Independence and Accountability of the Judiciary.

Burmeister F (1998) Gutachten des Bundesverfassungsgerichts zu volkerrechtlichen Vertragen. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin

Carolan E (2009) The New Separation of Powers: A Theory for the Modern State. Oxford University Press, New York

Claes M, De Visser M (2012) Are You Networked Yet? On Dialogues in European Judicial Networks. Utrecht Law Review 8(2):100-114

Cohen-Eliya M, Porat I (2011) Proportionality and the Culture of Justification. American Journal of Comparative Law 59(2):463-490

Cuyvers A (2017) Judicial Protection under EU Law: Direct Actions. In: Ugirashebuja E et al (eds) East African Community Law Institutional, Substantive and Comparative EU Aspects. Brill, Leiden, pp 254-164

Dalal R S, Bonaccio S (2010) What types of advice do decision-makers prefer? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 112:11-23

Dalla-Pozza D, Williams G (2007) The Constitutional Validity of Declarations of Incompatibility in Australian Charters of Rights. Deakin Law Review 12(1):1-39

De Poorter J (2013) Constitutional review in the Netherlands: a joint responsibility. Utrecht Law Review 9(2):89-105

De Visser M (2014) Constitutional Review in Europe - A Comparative Analysis. Bloomsbury, Oxford

De Visser M (2020) Non-Judicial Constitutional Interpretation: The Netherlands. In: Law D S (ed) Constitutionalism in Context. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Dhagamwar A, Dash S (2010) The Advisory Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of India: A Study. International Journal of Law and Legal Jurisprudence Studies 5(1):158-174

Dicey A V (1982) Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. Liberty Fund, Indianapolis

Duclos N, Roach K (1991) Constitutional Remedies as “Constitutional Hints”: A Comment on R. v. Schachter. McGill Law Journal 36(1):1-38

Dworkin R (1986) A Matter of Principle. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

Dyzenhaus D (2012) Dignity in Administrative Law: Judicial Deference in a Culture of Justification.

Ellingwood A R (1918) Departmental Cooperation in State Government. MacMillan, New York

Farahat A (2020) The German Federal Constitutional Court. In: Von Bogdandy A et al (eds) The Max Planck Handbooks in European Public Law: Volume III: Constitutional Adjudication: Institutions. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 279-355

Feldman D (2004) Remedies for Violations of Convention Rights. In: Feldman D (ed) English Public Law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 825-848

Feteris M W C (2018) Signalen van de Hoge Raad naar de wetgever. RegelMaat 33:349-362

Fischer S (2007) Die gesetzlich nicht geregelten Entscheidungsvarianten des Bundesverfassungs- gerichts. Peter Lang, Frankfurt a.M..

Frankfurter F (1924) A Note on Advisory Opinions. Harvard Law Review 37(8):1002-1009

Garlicki L (2007) Constitutional Courts versus Supreme Courts. International Journal of Constitu­tional law 5(1):44-68

Gerards J H (2014) Advisory Opinions, Preliminary Rulings and the New Protocol No. 16 to the European Convention of Human Rights: A Comparative and Critical Appraisal. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 21:630-651

Gerards J H (2017) Protocol 16 EVRM: advisering door het Europees Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens. Tijdschrift voor Constitutioneel Recht 16:307-322

Giegerich Th (1997) Verfassungsgerichtliche Kontrolle der auswartigen Gewalt im europaisch- atlantischen Verfassungsstaat: Vergleichende Bestandsaufnahme mit Ausblick auf die neuen Demokratien in Mittel- und Osteuropa. ZaoRV 57:409-564

Giesen I, Schelhaas H (2006) Samenwerking bij rechtsvorming: De installing van een Periodiek Overleg van Rechtsvormers (POR). Ars Aequi 55:159-172

Halberstam D (2015) “It’s the Autonomy, Stupid!” A Modest Defense of Opinion 2/13 on EU Accession to the ECHR, and the Way Forward. German Law Journal 16(1):105-146

Hickman T (2015) Bill of Rights Reform and the Case for Going Beyond the Declaration of Incompatibility Model.

Hirsch Ballin E M H (2019) Constitutional Genealogy of Judicial Review in the Administrative State. In: De Poorter J, Hirsch Ballin E M H, Lavrijssen S (eds) Judicial Review of Administrative Discretion in the Administrative State. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague, pp 28-39

Hirschl R (2008) The Judicialization of Mega-Politics and the Rise of Political Courts. Annual Review of Political Science 11:93-118

Huffman J L, Saathoff M (1990) Advisory Opinions and Canadian Constitutional Development: The Supreme Court’s Reference Jurisdiction. Minnesota Law Review 75:1251-1336

Huscroft G (2010) Politics and the Reference Power. Paper presented at the Canadian Political Science Association annual conference, pp 1-16

Huybrechts L (2009) A Commentary on Lasser’s Analysis from the Belgian Court of Cassa­tion’s Perspective. In: Huls N et al (eds) The Legitimacy of Highest Court’s Rulings - Judicial Deliberations and Beyond. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague, pp 189-196

Irving H (2004) Advisory Opinions, the Rule of Law, and the Separation of Powers. Macquarie Law Journal 4:105-134

Irving H (2010) The Dilemmas in Dialogue: A Constitutional Analysis of the NHRC’s Proposed Human Rights Act. UNSW Law Review 33(1):60-87

Jahn J (2014) Normative Guidance from Strasbourg Through Advisory Opinions. Heidelberg Journal of International Law 74:821-846

Jay S (1994) Servants of Monarchs and Lords: The Advisory Role of Early English Judges. The American Journal of Legal History 38:117-96

Jay S (1997) Most Humble Servants: The Advisory Role of Early Judges. Yale University Press, New Haven

Jha P (2000) Supreme Court’s Advisory Jurisdiction under Article 143. Journal of the Indian Law Institute 42(2/4):458-468

Katyal N K (1998) Judges As Advicegivers. Stanford Law Review 50:1709-1824

Kavanagh A (2009) Constitutional Review under the UK Human Rights Act. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Kavanagh A (2015) What’s so weak about “weak-form review”? The case of the UK Human Rights Act 1998.

Kavanagh A (2016) The Constitutional Separation of Powers. In: Dyzenhaus D, Thorburn M (eds) Philosophical Foundations of Constitutional Law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 221-240 Kelsen H (1929/2010) Wesen und Entwicklung der Staatsgerichtsbarkeit. Uberprufung von Verwal- tungsakten durch die ordentlichen Gerichte. In: Klecatsky H R et al (eds) Die Wiener Rechtsthe- oretische Schule - Schriften von Hans Kelsen, Adolf Merkl, Alfred Verdross. Verlag Osterreich, Vienna, pp 1485-1531

Kelsen H (1942) Judicial Review of Legislation: A Comparative Study of the Austrian and the American Constitution. Journal of Politics 4(2):183-200

Kennedy R H (1989) Advisory Opinions: Cautions About Non-Judicial Undertakings. University of Richmond Law Review 23:173-201

King J (2015) Parliament’s Role following Declarations of Incompatibility under the Human Rights Act. In: Hooper H, Hunt M, Yowell P (eds), Parliaments and Human Rights. Hart Publishing, London, pp 165-192

King J (2019) Dialogue, Finality and Legality. In: Sigalet G et al (eds) Constitutional Dialogue. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 186-206

King M T (2002) Towards practical convergence: The dynamic uses of judicial advice in United States federal courts and the Court of Justice of the European Communities. University of Pittsburgh Law Review 63(3):703-740

Koh J L (1998) Book Review: More Humble Servants: A Second Look at the Advisory Role of Judges. Yale Law Journal 107:1151-56

Koopmans T (2003) Courts and political institutions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Korenica F (2020) “Advise and Rule” or “Rule by Advising”: The Changing Nature of the Advisory

Jurisdiction of the Constitutional Court of Kosovo. German Law Journal 21:1570-1585

Kosar D (2018) Beyond Judicial Councils: Forms, Rationales and Impact of Judicial Self­Governance in Europe. German Law Journal 19(7):1567-1612

Kosar D, Vyhnanek L (2020) The Constitutional Court of Czechia.

Kumm M (2008) Institutionalising Socratic Contestation: The Rationalist Human Rights Paradigm, Legitimate Authority and the Point of Judicial Review. European Journal of Legal Studies 1(2):153-183

Kummeling H R B M (1988) Advisering in het publiekrecht: een rechtsvergelijkende studie. SDU, The Hague

Kuo M-S (2019) Between Choice and Tradition: Rethinking Remedial Grace Periods and Unconstitutionality Management in a Comparative Light. Pacific Basin L.J. 36:157-200

Mathen C (2019) Courts Without Cases: The Law and Politics of Advisory Opinions. Bloomsbury Publishing, London

McCormick P (2000) Supreme at Last. The Evolution of the Supreme Court of Canada. James Lorimer & Co, Toronto

McHugh J T (2000) Making Public Law, Public: An Analysis of the Quebec Reference Case and its Significance for Comparative Constitutional Analysis. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 49(2):445-462

McKeever P C, Perry B D (1962) The Case for an Advisory Function in the Federal Judiciary. Georgetown Law Journal 50(4):785-818

McWhinney E (1986) Supreme Courts and Judicial Law-Making: Constitutional Tribunals and Constitutional Review. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht

Mendes C H (2015) Constitutional Courts and Deliberative Democracy. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Mollers C (2013) The Three Branches: A Comparative Model of Separation of Powers. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Moonen T, Lavrysen L (2021) Abstract but Concrete, or Concrete but Abstract? A Guide to the Nature of Advisory Opinions under Protocol 16 to the ECHR. Human Rights Law Review 21(3):1-34

Oellers-Frahm K (2012) Beyond Dispute: International Judicial Institutions as Lawmakers. German Law Journal 12:1033-1056

Persky J D (2005) Ghosts that Slay: A Contemporary Look at State Advisory Opinions. Connecticut Law Review 37(4):1155-1234

Peters A (2006) Compensatory Constitutionalism: The Function and Potential of Fundamental International Norms and Structures. Leiden Journal of International Law 19:579-610

Popkin W D (1962) Advisory Opinions in India. Journal of the Indian Law Institute 4:401-434 Quint P E (2020) The Influence of the United States Supreme Court on Judicial Review in Europe.

In: Von Bogdandy A et al (eds) The Max Planck Handbooks in European Public Law: Volume III: Constitutional Adjudication: Institutions. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 842-888 Reid JSC (Lord) (1972) The judge as Lawmaker. Journal of the Society of Public Teachers of Law 12(1):22-29

Roach K (2001b) The Supreme Court on Trial. Judicial Activism or Democratic Dialogue. Irwin Law, Toronto

Roach K (2018) The separation and Interconnection of Powers in Canada: The Role of Courts, the Executive and the Legislature in Crafting Constitutional Remedies. Journal of International & Comparative Law 5(2):315-336

Rogers J R, Vanberg G (2002) Judicial Advisory Opinions and Legislative Outcomes in Comparative Perspective. American Journal of Political Science 46:379-397

Salacuse J W (2018) Advice in Government and Policy Making. In: MacGeorge E L, Van Swol L M (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Advice. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 321-341 Sathanapally A (2012) Beyond Disagreement - Open Remedies in Human Rights Adjudication.

Oxford University Press, Oxford

Schmid J C (2006) Advisory Opinions on Human Rights: Moving Beyond a Pyrrhic Victory. Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 16:415-455

Solyom L (2020) The Constitutional Court of Hungary. In: Von Bogdandy A et al (eds) The Max Planck Handbooks in European Public Law: Volume III: Constitutional Adjudication: Institutions. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 357-446

Stephenson S (2013) Constitutional reengineering: Dialogue’s migration from Canada to Australia. International Journal of Constitutional Law 11(4):870-897

Stone Sweet A (2003) Why Europe Rejected American Judicial Review. And Why It May Not Matter. Michigan Law Review 101:2744-2780

Stone Sweet A, Ryan C (2018) A Cosmopolitan Legal Order. Kant, Constitutional Justice, and the European Convention on Human Rights. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Topf M A (2001) State supreme court advisory opinions as illegitimate judicial review. Law Review of Michigan State University Detroit College of Law 2001(1):101-138

Topf M A (2011) A Doubtful and Perilous Experiment: Advisory Opinions, State Constitutions, and Judicial Supremacy. Oxford University Press, New York

Tremblay L B (2005) The legitimacy of judicial review: The limits of dialogue between courts and legislatures. International Journal of Constitutional Law 3(4):617-648

Tushnet M (2011) The Rise of Weak-Form Judicial Review. In: Ginsburg T, Dixon R (eds) Comparative Constitutional Law. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 321-333

Tushnet M (2016) Dialogue and Constitutional Duty. In: Kahana T, Scolnicov A (eds) Boundaries of State, Boundaries of Rights. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 94-108

Uzman J (2013) Constitutionele remedies bij schending van grondrechten. Kluwer, Deventer.

Uzman J, Barkhuysen T, Van Emmerik M E (2011) The Dutch Supreme Court - A Reluctant Positive Legislator. In: Brewer-Carias A (ed) Constitutional Courts As Positive Legislators. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 546-688

Uzman J, Boogaard G (2018) ‘Make It a Better Place’, Transnational Public Interest Litigation and the Separation of Powers. In: Ten Napel H M Th D, Voermans W J M (eds) The Powers That Be. Rethinking the Separation of Powers. Leiden University Press, Leiden, pp 295-319

Vadapalas V (1995) Opinion of the Constitutional Court of Lithuania in the Case Concerning the Conformity of the European Convention on Human Rights with the Constitution of Lithuania. ZaoRV 55:1077-1094

Van Klink B M J, Witteveen W J (2003) Machtenscheiding of machtendeling? Over de rol van de rechterin hetZweedse wetgevingsproces. RegelMaat 1:2-14

Van Sasse van Ysselt P (2019) Constitutionele toetsing in een weerbare democratische rechtsstaat. Nederlands Juristen Blad 7:452-461

Vidmar J (2019) Unilateral Revocability in Wightman: Fixing Article 50 with Constitutional Tools- Case Note ECJ 10 December 2018, Case C-621/18, Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union. European Constitutional Law Review 15:359-375

Vile M J C (1998) Constitutionalism and the Separation of Powers. Liberty Fund, Indianapolis Vincent J (1982) La justice et ses institutions. Dalloz, Paris

Voermans W J M (2003) Councils for the Judiciary in Europe: Trends and Models. In: Segado F R (ed) The Spanish constitution in the European Constitutional context. Dykinson, Madrid, pp 2133-2144

Voland T, Schiebel B (2017) Advisory Opinions of the European Court of Human Rights: Unbalancing the System of Human Rights Protection in Europe? Human Rights Law Review 17:73-95

Waldron J (1999) Law and Disagreement. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Wilson Stark S (2017) Facing Facts: Judicial Approaches to Section 4 of the Human Rights Act 1998. Law Quarterly Review 133:631-655

Yang TH (2003) Die Appellentscheidungen des Bundesverfassungsgerichts. Nomos, Baden-Baden

Yaniv I (2004) Receiving other people’s advice: Influence and benefit. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 93:1-13

Willem Mingelen is an LLM student at the Legal Research Master of Utrecht University. His thesis concerns judicial review of actions by the European Central Bank. More generally, his research interests include both European and comparative constitutional law, normative legal- political theory, empirical legal studies, and law & political economy.

Jerfi Uzman is Professor of Constitutional Law at Utrecht University. His fields of expertise concern constitutional law and fundamental rights in a national, international and comparative perspective. He currently focuses on constitutional remedies, the emergence of a body of consti­tutional procedure in the Netherlands, and the impact of populism on constitutional doctrine.

We are grateful to the editors of this volume, the anonymous reviewer, and our friends at Utrecht University, for valuable suggestions and insights. The customary disclaimer applies.