References

Ackerman, Bruce. 1991. We the people: Foundations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Alberdi, J.B. [1852] 1981. Bases y puntos departidapara la organizationpolitica de la Republica Argentina, Plus Ultra: Buenos Aires.

Alexander, L., and F. Schauer. 1997. On extrajudicial constitutional interpretation. Harvard Law Review 110: 1359-1387.

Alexander, L., and F. Schauer. 2000. Defending judicial supremacy: A reply. Constitutional Commentary 17: 455-482.

Alexander, L., and L. Solum. 2005. Popular? Constitutionalism? Harvard Law Review 118: 1594-1640.

Bakker, B. 2008. Blogs as constitutional dialogue: Rethinking the dialogic promise. New York University Annual Survey of American Law 63: 215-267.

Bateup, C. 2007. Expanding the conversation: American and Canadian experiences of constitu­tional dialogue in comparative perspective. Temple International and Comparative Law Journal 21(2): 1-57.

Bergallo, P. 2005. Justicia y Experimentalismo: La Funcion Remedial del Poder Judicial en el Litigio de Derecho Publico en Argentina. In Publication del Seminario. Buenos Aires: Editorial del Puerto. There is an English version of the text available in http://digitalcommons. law.yale.edu/yls_sela/44/.

Bickel, A. 1962. The Least Dangerous Branch. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Bohman, J. 1996. Public deliberation: Pluralism, complexity, and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Bohman, J., and W. Rehg (eds.). 1997. Deliberative democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Brennan, G., and L. Lomasky. 1997. Democracy & decision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brown, R. 1970. Revolutionary politics in Massachussets. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Brown, R. 1983. Shays’s Rebellion and its Aftermath: A view from Springfield, Massachusetts, 1787. William and Mary Quarterly 40: 598-615.

Buchanan, J. 1975.

Calabresi, G. 1985. A common law for the Age of Statutes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Calabresi, G. 1991. The Supreme Court 1990 term. Foreword: Antidiscrimination and constitu­tional accountability (What the Bork-Brennan debate ignores). Harvard Law Review 105: 80-124.

Calabresi, G. 2012. Should the courts be allowed to repeal an obsolete law? Interview in The Atlantic, March 20th, http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/03/should-the-courts- be-allowed-to-repeal-obsolete-law/254454/.

Cameron, J. 2001. Dialogue and hierarchy in Charter interpretation: A comment on R. v. Mills. Alberta Law Review 38: 1051-1068.

Christiano, T. 1996. The rule of the many: Fundamental issues in democratic theory. Boulder: Westview Press.

Coenen, D. 2001. A constitution of collaboration: Protecting fundamental values with second-look rules of interbranch dialogue. William and Mary Law Review 42: 1575-1870.

Cohen, J. 1986. An epistemic conception of democracy. Ethics 97: 26-38.

Cone, C. 1968. The English Jacobins. Reformers in late 18th century England. New York: Scribner. Courtis, C. 2005. El caso ‘Verbitsky’: Nuevos rumbos en el control judicial de la actividad de los poderes politicos? In Colapso del sistema carcelario, 91-120. Buenos Aires: CELS/Siglo XXI.

Dahl, R. 1956. A preface to democratic theory. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Dor, G. 2000. Constitutional dialogues in sction: Canadian and Israeli experiences in comparative perspective. Indiana International & Comparative Law Review 11: 1-36.

Edley, C. 1991. The Governance crisis, legal theory, and political ideology. Duke Law Journal 3: 561-606.

Elster, J. 1991. Arguing and bargaining in the Federal Convention and the Assemble Constituante, Working Paper. University of Chicago, August.

Elster, J. (ed.). 1998. Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Estlund, D. 1993. Making truth safe for Democracy.

Fabre, C. 2000. Social rights under the constitution. Government and the decent life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Farrand, M. (ed.). 1937. The records of the federal convention of1787. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Feer, R. 1988. Shays’s rebellion. New York: Garland.

Ferraz, O. 2011. Harming the poor through social rights litigation: Lessons from Brazil. Texas Law Review 89: 1643-1668.

Fishkin, J. 2011. Deliberative democracy and constitutions. Social Philosophy and Policy 28: 242-260.

Fiss, O. 2003. The law as it could be. New York: The NYU Press.

Gardbaum, S. 2013. The new commonwealth model of constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gargarella, R. 2010. The legal foundations of inequality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Gargarella, R. 2013a. Latin American constitutionalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gargarella, R. 2013b. Tres concepciones sobre la libertad de expresion. Diario Clarin, September 3th,Availableathttp://www.clarin.com/opinion/concepciones-libertad-expresion_0_986301426. html.

Gearty, C., and V. Mantouvalou. 2011. Debating social rights. London: Hart Publishing.

Gloppen, S. 2006. Analyzing the role of courts in social transformation. In Courts and social trans­formation in new democracies, ed. R. Gargarella et al. London: Ashgate.

Goldsworthy, J. 2003. Homogenising constitutions. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 23: 483.

Goldsworthy, J. 2010. Parliamentary sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gutman, A., and D. Thompson. 2004. Why deliberative democracy? Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Habermas, J. 1992. Between facts and norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Hay, C. 1979. James Burgh, Spokesman for reform in Hanoverian England. New York: University Press of America.

Hogg, P., and A. Bushell. 1997. The Charter dialogue between courts and legislatures.

Hogg, P., A. Bushell, and W. Wright. 2007. Charter dialogue revisited, or “Much Ado About Metaphors”. Osgoode Hall Law Lournal 45(1): 1-66.

Hubner Mendes, C. 2011. Neither dialogue nor last word: Deliberative separation of powers III. Legisprudence 5: 1-31.

Hubner Mendes, C. 2013. Constitutional courts and deliberative democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hunt, P. 1996. Reclaiming social rights. Sidney: Darmouth.

Katyal, N. 1998. Judges as advicegivers. Stanford Law Review 50: 1709-1824.

Kenyon, C. 1985. The Antifederalists. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

King, J. 2012. Judging social rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kramer, L. 2004. Popular constitutionalism, Circa 2004. California Law Review 92: 959-1012.

Kramer, L. 2005. The people themselves. Popular constitutionalism and judicial review. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Krotoszynski, R. 1998. Constitutional flares: On judges, legislatures, and dialogue. Minnesota Law Review 83: 1.

Langford, M. 2009. Social rights jurisprudence: Emerging trends in international and compara­tive law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Liebenberg, S. 2012. Engaging the paradoxes of the universal and particular in human rights adju­dication. African Human Rights Law Journal 12: 1-29.

Liebenberg, S. 2014. Deepening democratic transformation in South Africa through participatory constitutional remedies, manuscript, University of Stellenbosch Law Faculty.

Manfredi, C., and J. Kelly. 1999. Six degrees of dialogue: A response to Hogg and Bushell. Osgoode Hall Law Lournal 37: 513.

Manin, B. 1997. The principles of representative government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Marx, K. 1978. Contribution to the critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of right. In The Marx-Engels reader, ed. R. Tucker. New York: Norton & Co.

Mauwese, A., and M. Snel. 2013. Constitutional dialogue: An overview. Utrecht Law Review 9(2): 123-140, March, Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2244818.

Mikva, A. 1998. Why judges should not be advicegivers. A response to professor Neal Katyal. Stanford Law Review 50: 1825.

Mill, J. [1859] 2003. On liberty, London: Dover Publications Inc.

Nino, C.S. 1991. The ethics of human rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Nino, C.S. 1992. Fundamentos de Derecho Constitutional. Buenos Aires: Astrea.

Nino, C.S. 1996. The constitution of deliberative democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press. Paine, T. 1989. Political writings, ed. B. Kucklick, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Petter, A. 2003. Twenty years of Charter justification: From liberal legalism to dubious dialogue. UNB Law Journal 52: 187-200.

Pettit, P. 2012. On the people’s terms. A Republican theory and model of democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Phillips, A. 1998. The politics of presence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Puga, M. 2012. Litigio y cambio social en Argentina y Colombia. Buenos Aires: Clacso, Serie Digital.

Rawls, J. 1991. Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.

Rios-Figueroa, J., and M. Taylor. 2002. Institutional determinants of the judicialisation of policy in Brazil and Mexico. Journal of Latin American Studies 38: 739-766.

Roach, K. 2004. Dialogic judicial review and its critics. Supreme Court Law Review 23: 49-104.

Rodnguez-Garavito, C. 2011. Beyond the courtroom: The impact of judicial activism on socioeco­nomic rights in Latin America. Texas Law Review 89: 1669-1698.

Skinner, Q. 1983. Machiavelli on the maintenance of liberty. Politics 18: 3-15.

Skinner, Q. 1984. The idea of negative liberty: Philosophical and historical perspectives. In Philosophy in history, ed. Richard Rorty, J.B. Schneewind, and Skinner Quentin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Skinner, Q. 1990. The Republican ideal of political liberty. In Machiavelli and Republicanism, ed. G. Bock, Q. Skinner, and M. Viroli. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Skinner, Q. 1998. Liberty before liberalism.

Storing, H. 1981a. The complete anti-Federalist. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Storing, H. 1981b. What the anti-Federalists were for. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Szatmary, D. 1987. Shays’ Rebellion in Springfield. In Shays’ Rebellion: Selected essays, ed.

M. Kaufman. Westfield: Westfield State College.

Tremblay, L. 2005. The legitimacy of judicial review: The limits of dialogue between courts and legislatures. International Journal of Constitutional Law 3: 617.

Tulis, J. 2003. Deliberation between Institutions. In Debating deliberative democracy, ed. P. Laslett and J. Fishkin. London: Blackwell Publishing.

Tushnet, M. 1997. Two versions of judicial supremacy. William and Mary Law Review 39: 945.

Tushnet, M. 2001. Subconstitutional constitutional law: Supplement, sham, or substitute? William and Mary Law Review 42: 1871.

Tushnet, M. 2003. Non-judicial review. Harvard Journal on Legislation 40: 453-492.

Tushnet, M. 2004. Weak-form judicial review: Its implications for legislatures. Supreme Court Law Review 23: 213.

Tushnet, M. 2006. Popular constitutionalism as political law. Chicago-Kent Law Review 81: 991.

Tushnet, M. 2008. Weak courts, Strong rights. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Tushnet, M. 2009. Dialogic judicial review. Arkansas Law Review 61: 205.

Unger, R.M. 1996. What should legal analysis become? London: Verso.

Vile, M. 1967. Constitutionalism and the separation of powers. Oxford: Clarendon.

Waldron, J. 1999a. Law and disagreement. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Waldron, J. 1999b. The dignity of legislation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Waldron, J. 2004. Some models of dialogue between judges and legislators. Supreme Court Law Review 23: 7.

Waldron, J. 2009. The core of the case against judicial review. The Yale Law Journal 115: 348.

Waldron, J. 2012. Constitutionalism, a skeptical view. New York University School of Law, Working Paper 10-87.

White, M. 1987. Philosophy, The federalist, and the constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Whittington, K. 2002. Extrajudicial constitutional interpretation: Three objections and responses. North Carolina Law Review 80: 773.

Williams, M. 2000. Voice, trust and memory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Wood, G. 1969. The creation of the American Republic. New York: W.W.Norton & Company.

Wood, G. 1992. The radicalism of the American revolution. NewYork: Alfred Knopf.

Wood, G. 1996. The creation of the American republic. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.

Wood, G. 2002. The American revolution. A history. New York: The Modern Library.

Young, I. 2001. Activist challenges to deliberative democracy. Political Theory 29: 670-690.

Young, I. 2002. Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Young, K. 2012. Constituting economic and social rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.