References
Arulanantham, Ahilan T. 1998. Breaking the rules? Wittgenstein and legal realism. Yale Law Journal 107: 1853-1884.
Bix, Brian. 1993a. Law, language and legal determinacy. Oxford: Clarendon.
Bix, Brian. 1993b. The application (and mis-application) of Wittgenstein’s rule-following considerations to legal theory. In Law, language and legal determinacy, ed. Brian Bix, 36-62. Oxford: Clarendon.
Burley, Justine (ed.). 2005. Dworkin and his critics: With replies by Dworkin. Malden: Blackwell. Cavell, Stanley. 1969. Must we mean what we say? Nova York: Scribner.
Cohen, Marshall (ed.). 1983. Ronald Dworkin and contemporary jurisprudence. Totowa: Rowman and Allanheld.
Coleman, Jules, and Scott Shapiro (eds.). 2002. The Oxford handbook of jurisprudence and philosophy of law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dworkin, Ronald. 1965. Philosophy, morality and law: Observations prompted by professor Fuller’s novel claim. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 113: 668-690.
Dworkin, Ronald. 1977. Taking rights seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dworkin, Ronald. 1983a. My reply to Stanley Fish (and Walter Benn Michaels): Please don’t talk about objectivity any more. In The politics of interpretation, ed. Thomas W.J. Mitchell, 287313. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dworkin, Ronald. 1983b. Reply by Ronald Dworkin. In Ronald Dworkin and contemporary jurisprudence, ed. Marshall Cohen, 247-300. Totowa: Rowman and Allanheld.
Dworkin, Ronald. 1985. A matter of principle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dworkin, Ronald. 1986. Law’s empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dworkin, Ronald. 1996a. Freedom’s law: The moral reading of the American Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dworkin, Ronald. 1996b. Objectivity and truth: You’d better believe it. Philosophy and Public Affairs 25: 87-139.
Dworkin, Ronald. 2000. Sovereign virtue: The theory and practice of equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dworkin, Ronald. 2006a. Justice in robes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dworkin, Ronald. 2006b. Hart and the concepts of law. Harvard Law Review 119: 95-104.
Dworkin, Ronald. 2011. Justice for hedgehogs. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dworkin, Ronald. 1972. A special supplement: The Jurisprudence of Richard Nixon. The New York Review of Books, May 4.
Dworkin, Ronald. 2007. Can we disagree about law or morals? Conference by Dworkin at the New York Institute of Philosophy (NYU). Available at http://www.thirteen.org/forum/topics/ can-we-disagree-about-law-or-morals/14/. Accessed in 20 Aug 2012.
Ewald, Francois. 1986. L’Etat providence. Paris: Grasset.
Fernandes, Millor. 1996. Milldr definitivo, 8th ed. Porto Alegre: L&PM.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 2002. Verdade e metodo: traqos fundamentais de uma hermeneuticafiloso- fica. Trans. Flavio Paulo Meurer, vol. 1 & 2, 4th ed. Petropolis: Vozes.
Gallie, W.B. 1956a. Art as an essentially contested concept. The Philosophical Quarterly 6(23): 97-114.
Gallie, W.B. 1956b. Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56: 167-198.
Gallie, W.B. 1964. Philosophy and the historical understanding. London: Chatto & Windus.
Green, Leslie. 1987. The political content of legal theory. Philosophy of Social Sciences 17: 1-20. Guest, Stephen. 1997. Ronald Dworkin, 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University.
Guest, Stephen. 2010. Ronald Dworkin. Trans. Luis Carlos Borges. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier. Habermas, Jurgen. 1984. The theory of communicative action. Boston: Beacon.
Hart, H.L.A. 1994a. The concept of law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hart, H.L.A. 1994b. O conceito de direito, 3rd ed. Trans. de A. Ribeiro Mendes. Lisboa: Calouste Gulbenkian.
Heidegger, Martin. 1989. Ser e Tempo, vol. I. Petropolis: Vozes.
Hobbes, Thomas.
1651. Leviathan or the Matter, the Form, & Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiastical and Civil. London: Adam Crooke. Reprinted for the McMaster University Archive of the History of Economic Thouht. Available at http://socserv2.socsci.mcmaster.ca/ econ/ugcm/3ll3/hobbes/Leviathan.pdf.Hume, David. 2000. A treatise on human nature, ed. David Fate Norton and Mary J. Norton. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kronman, Anthony. 1983. Max Weber. Stanford: Stanford University Press. (Kronman, Anthony. 1983. Max Weber. Tradugao de John Milton. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2009. (Colegao Teoria e Filosofia do Direito))
Kuhn, T. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. MacCormick, Neil. 2007. Institutions of law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Macedo Jr., Ronaldo Porto. 2010. Como levar Ronald Dworkin a serio ou como fotografar um porco-espinho em movimento. In Ronald Dworkin, ed. Stephen Guest, VII-XVIII. Trans. Carlos Borges. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.
Macedo Jr., Ronaldo Porto. 2011. Carl Schmitt e a fundamentagao do direito, 2nd ed. Sao Paulo: Saraiva.
Marmor, Andrei. 2005. Interpretation and legal theory, 2nd ed. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Marmor, Andrei. 2006. How law is like chess. Legal Theory 12: 347-371.
Morawetz, Thomas. 1992. Understanding disagreement: the root issue of jurisprudence: Applying Wittgenstein to positivism, critical theory, and judging. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 141: 371-456.
Patterson, Dennis. 1988. Wittgenstein and the code: A theory of good faith performance and enforcement under article nine. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 137: 335-430.
Patterson, Dennis (ed.). 1992. Wittgenstein and legal theory. Boulder: Westview Press.
Patterson, Dennis. 1994. Wittgenstein and constitutional theory. Texas Law Review 72: 1837-1856.
Postema, Gerald J. 2011. A treatise of legal philosophy and general jurisprudence, vol. 11. New York: Springer.
Schauer, Frederick.
2006. (Re)Taking Hart. Harvard Law Review 119: 852-883.Schauer, Frederick. 2009. Institutions and the concept of law: A reply to Ronald Dworkin (with some help from Neil Maccormick). In Law as institutional normative order: Essays in honour of Sir Neil Maccormick, ed. Zenon Bancowsky and Maksymilian del Mar, 35-44. Burlington: Ashgate. Also available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1403311. Accessed in 07 Sept 2012.
Schiavello, Aldo. 2001. On “coherence” and “law”: An analysis of different models. Ratio Juris 14(2): 233-243.
Schmitt, Carl. 1992. O conceito do politico. Trans. Alvaro Valls. Petropolis: Vozes.
Schmitt, Carl. 2006. Teologia politica: quatro ensaios sobre a soberania. Trans. Elisete Antoniuk. Belo Horizonte: Del Rey.
Sebok, Anthony J. 1999. Finding Wittgenstein at the core of the rule of recognition. Southern Methodist University Law Review 52: 75-110.
Shapiro, Scott. 2011. Legality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Stavropoulos, Nicos. 2003. Interpretivist theories of law. In Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (2010 edition). Avalibale at http://stanford.library.usyd.edu.au/archives/sum2010/entries/ law-interpretivist/.
Weber, Max. 1968. Economy and society, vol. 1. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Weinrib, Ernest. 1988. Legal formalism: On the immanent rationality of law. Yale Law Journal 97: 949-1016.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical investigations. Trans. G.E.M. Anscombe. New York: Macmillan.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1972. On certainty (Uber Gewissheit), ed. G.E.M. Anscombe, and G.H. von Wright. Trans. Denis Paul, and G.E.M. Anscombe. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2009. Philosophical investigations, ed. P.M.S. Hacker, and Joachim Schulte. 4th ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Wolcher, Louis E. 1997. Ronald Dworkin’s right answers thesis through the lens of Wittgenstein. Rutgers Law Journal 29: 43-66.