Bibliography

[1]    Ernest Wilcox Adams. The Logic of Conditionals: An Application of Probability to Deductive Logic.

[2]    A. J. Ayer. Language, Truth, and Logic. Gollancz, 1936.

[3]    Andrew Bacon. The broadest necessity. Journal of Philosophical Logic, (2017). https://doi. org∕10.1007∕s10992-017-9447-9

[4]    Andrew Bacon. Vagueness at every order. Unpublished, 2009.

[5]    Andrew Bacon. A new conditional for naive truth theory. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 54(1): 87-104, 2013.

[6]    Andrew Bacon. Giving your knowledge half a chance. Philosophical Studies, 171(2): 373-97, November 2014.

[7]    Andrew Bacon. Can the classical logician avoid the revenge paradoxes? Philosophical Review, 124(3): 299-352, 2015.

[8]    Elizabeth Barnes and J. R. G. Williams. Vague parts and vague identity. Pacific Philosoph­ical Quarterly, 90(2): 176-87, June 2009.

[9]    Elizabeth Barnes and J.

[10]    David Barnett. Vagueness and rationality. Unpublished.

[11]  David Barnett. Is vagueness sui generis? Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 87(1): 5-34, 2009.

[12]  David Barnett. Does vagueness exclude knowledge? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 82(1): 22-45, January 2011.

[13]  J. C. Beall. Vague intensions: A modest marriage proposal. In Richard Dietz and Sebastiano Moruzzi, editors, Cuts & Clouds: Vagueness, Its Nature, and Its Logic, page 187. Oxford University Press, 2010.

[14]    J. C. Beall and Greg Restall. Logical Pluralism. Oxford University Press, 2006.

[15]  Nuel Belnap and Mitchell Green. Indeterminism and the thin red line. Philosophical Perspectives, 8: 365-88, 1994.

[16]  Ethan D. Bolker. A simultaneous axiomatization of utility and subjective probability. Philosophy of Science, 34(4): 333-40, December 1967.

[17]  Richard Bradley. Radical probabilism and bayesian conditioning.

[18]    Ross Brady. Universal Logic. CSLI Publications, 2006.

[19]  Robert Brandom. The significance of complex numbers for Frege's philosophy of math­ematics. In Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, volume 96, pages 293-315, 1996.

[20]    David Braun and Theodore Sider. Vague, so untrue. Nous, 41(2): 133-56, 2007.

[21]  T. Burge. Individualism and the mental. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 4(1): 73-121, 1979.

[22]  Michael Caie. Vagueness and semantic indiscriminability. Philosophical Studies, 160(3): 365-77, 2012.

[23]  Michael Caie. Metasemantics and metaphysical indeterminacy. In Alexis Burgess and Brett Sherman, editors, Metasemantics: New Essays on the Foundations of Meaning, pages 55-96. Oxford University Press, 2014.

[24]  Rudolf Carnap. The Logical Syntax of Language. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner, &Co, 1937.

[25]    Rudolf Carnap. Logical Foundations of Probability. University of Chicago Press, 1950.

[26]    lang=EN-US>Alonzo Church.

[27]  Aaron J. Cotnoir. Anti-symmetry and non-extensional mereology. Philosophical Quar­terly, 60(239): 396-405, 2010.

[28]  Aaron J. Cotnoir and Andrew Bacon. Non-wellfounded mereology. Review of Symbolic Logic, 5(2): 187-204, 2012.

[29]    M. J. Cresswell. Propositional identity. Logique et Analyse, 10(39/40): 283-92, 1967.

[30]  Mark Crimmins and John Perry. The prince and the phone booth: Reporting puzzling beliefs. The Journal of Philosophy, 86(12): 685-711, 1989.

[31]  David Deutsch. Quantum theory of probability and decisions. Proceedings: Mathemat­ical, Physical and EngineeringSciences, 455(1988): 3129-37, 1999.

[32]  Richard Dietz. Betting on borderline cases. Philosophical Perspectives, 22(1): 47-88, 12, 2008.

[33]    Cian Dorr. The expressivist and the relativist. Unpublished.

[34]    CianDorrVaguenesswithoutignorance. Philosophical Perspectives, 17(1): 83-113,2003.

[35]  Cian Dorr. Iterating definiteness.

[36]  James Dreier. Meta-ethics and the problem of creeping minimalism. Philosophical Per­spectives, 18(1): 23-44, 2004.

[37]  William B. Easton. Powers of regular cardinals. Annals of Mathematical Logic, 1(2): 139-78, 1970.

[38]    DorothyEdgington. On conditionals. Mind, 104(414): 235-329, 1995.

[39]  Dorothy Edgington. Vagueness by degrees. In Rosanna Keefe and Peter Smith, editors, Vagueness: A Reader, pages 294-316. The MIT Press, 1997.

[40]    Matti Eklund. What vagueness consists in. Philosophical Studies, 125(1): 27-60, 2005.

[41]  Adam Elga. Subjective probabilities should be sharp. Philosophers’ Imprint, 10(5): 1-11,2010.

[42]    Gareth Evans. Can there be vague objects? Analysis, 38(4): 208, 1978.

[43]  Hugh Everett. The theory of the universal wave function. In Bryce S. DeWitt and Neill Graham, editors, The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, pages 3-140. Princeton Unversity Press, 1973.

[44]  Jeremy Fantl and Matthew McGrath.

[45]  Delia Graff Fara. Shifting sands: An interest relative theory of vagueness. Philosophical Topics, 28(1): 45-81, 2000.

[46]  Delia Graff Fara. Gap principles, penumbral consequence, and infinitely higher-order vagueness. Liars and Heaps: New Essays on Paradox, pages 195-222, 2003.

[47]  Hartry Field. Theory change and the indeterminacy of reference. The Journal of Philoso­phy, 70(14): 462-81, 1973.

[48]  Hartry Field. Logic, meaning, and conceptual role. The Journal of Philosophy, 74(7): 379-409, 1977.

[49]  Hartry Field. A note on Jeffrey conditionalization. Philosophy of Science, 45(3): 361-7, 1978.

[50]  Hartry Field. Disquotational truth and factually defective discourse. The Philosophical Review, 103(3): 405-52, 1994.

[51]    Hartry Field. Some thoughts on radical indeterminacy. The Monist, 81(2): 253-73,1998.

[52]    Hartry Field. Which undecidable mathematical sentences have determinate truth values.

In H. G. Dales and Gianluigi Oliveri, editors, Truth in Mathematics, pages 291-310. OxfordUniversityPress, 1998.

[53]  Hartry Field. Indeterminacy, degree of belief, and excluded middle. Nous, 34(1): 1-30, 2000.

[54]    Hartry Field. Saving truth from paradox. Oxford University Press, 2008.

[55]  Hartry Field. This magic moment: Horwich on the boundary of vague terms. In Richard Dietz and Sebastiano Moruzzi, editors, Cuts and Clouds: Vaguenesss, Its Nature, and Its Logic, pages 200-8. Oxford University Press, 2010.

[57]    Kit Fine. The question of realism. Philosophers’ Imprint, 1(2): 1-30, 2001.

[58]    Kit Fine. The impossibility of vagueness. Philosophical Perspectives, 22(1): 111-36, 2008.

[59]  DovM. GabbayandValentin B. Shehtman. Products ofmodal logics, part 1. LogicJournal of IGPL, 6(1): 73-146, 1998.

[60]  Daniel Gallin. Intensional and Higher-Order Modal Logic: WithApplications to Montague Semantics. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1975.

[61]  Andre Gallois. Occasions of Identity: A Study in the Metaphysics of Persistence, Change, and Sameness. Oxford University Press, 1998.

[62]  Daniel Garber. Field and Jeffrey conditionalization. Philosophy of Science, 47(1): 142-5, 1980.

[63]    Allan Gibbard. Contingent identity. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 4(2): 187-222, 1975.

[64]    Allan Gibbard. Thinking How to Live. Harvard University Press, 2003.

[65]    Jeremy Goodman. Knowledge and vagueness. Unpublished.

[66]    Jeremy Goodman. Matter and mereology. Unpublished.

[67]  Hillary Greaves. Understanding Deutsch's probability in a deterministic multiverse. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 35(3): 423-56, 2004.

[68]  John Hawthorne. Epistemicism and semantic plasticity. Metaphysical Essays, 1(9): 185-211,2006.

[69]  John Hawthorne. Metaphysical Essays, chapter Three-dimensionalism, pages 85-110. Oxford University Press, 2006.

[70]  John Hawthorne and Gabriel Uzquiano. How many angels can dance on the point of a needle? Transcendental theology meets modal metaphysics. Mind, 120(477): 53-81,2011.

size=1 color=black face="Times New Roman">[71]  Paul Horwich. The nature of vagueness. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 57(4): 929-35, 1997.

[72]    Paul Horwich. The sharpness of vague terms. Philosophical Topics, 28(1): 83-92, 2000.

[73]    Richard C. Jeffrey. The Logic of Decision. University of Chicago Press, 1990.

[74]    Richard C. Jeffrey. Probability and the Art of Judgment. Cambridge University Press, 1992.

[75]  James M. Joyce. A nonpragmatic vindication of probabilism. Philosophy of Science, 65(4): 575-603, 1998.

[76]  Hans Kamp. Two theories about adjectives. In E. Keenan, editor, Formal Semantics of Natural Language, pages 123-55. Cambridge University Press, 1975.

[77]  Stephen Kearns and Ofra Magidor. Epistemicism about vagueness and meta-linguistic safety. Philosophical Perspectives, 22(1): 277-304, 2008.

[78]    Rosanna Keefe. 'Theories of Vagueness. Cambridge University Press, 2000.

[79]  Rosanna Keefe. Supervaluationism, indirect speech reports, and demonstratives. In Richard Dietz and Sebastiano Moruzzi, editors, Cuts and Clouds: Vaguenesss, Its Nature, and Its Logic. Oxford University Press, 2010.

[80]    Rosanna Keefe and Peter Smith. Vagueness: A Reader. The MIT Press, 1997.

[81]  William Kneale. Modalityde dicto and de re. In E. Nagel, P. Suppes, and A. Tarski, editors, Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. Proceedings of the 1960 International Congress, pages 622-33. Stanford University Press, 1962.

[82]  Daniel Z. Korman. The argument from vagueness. Philosophy Compass, 5(10): 891-901,2010.

[83]  Charles H. Kraft, John W. Pratt, and Abraham Seidenberg. Intuitive probability on finite sets. TheAnnals of Mathematical Statistics, 30(2): 408-19, 1959.

[84]  Saul A. Kripke. A completeness theorem in modal logic. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 24(1): 1-14, 1959.

[85]  Saul A. Kripke. Outline of a theory of truth. The Journal of Philosophy, 72(19): 690-716, 1975.

[86]  Agnes Kurucz. Combining modal logics. Studies in Logic and Practical Reasoning, 3: 869-924, 2007.

[87]  Agnes Kurucz and Michael Zakharyaschev. A note on relativised products of modal logics. Advances in Modal Logic, 4: 221-42, 2002.

[88]    David Lewis. Desire as belief. Mind, 97(418): 323-32, 1988.

[89]    David K. Lewis. General semantics. Synthese, 22(1): 18-67, 1970.

[90]    David K. Lewis. Counterfactuals. Blackwell, 1973.

[91]  David K. Lewis. A subjectivist’s guide to objective chance. Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, 2: 263-93, 1980.

[92]    David K. Lewis. Logic for equivocators. Nous, 16(3): 431-41, 1982.

[93]    David K. Lewis. On the Plurality of Worlds. Blackwell Publishers, 1986.

[94]  David K. Lewis. Many, but almost one. In Keith Cambell, John Bacon, and Lloyd Reinhardt, editors, Ontology, Causality, and Mind: Essays on the Philosophy of D. M. Armstrong, pages 23-38. Cambridge University Press, 1993.

[95]  Steffen Lewitzka. Denotational semantics for modal systems S3-S5 extended by axioms for propositional quantifiers and identity. Studia Logica, 103(3): 507-44, 2015.

[96]  Luc Van Lier. A simple sufficient condition for the unique representability of a finite qualitative probability by a probability measure. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 33(1): 91-8, 1989.

[97]  John MacFarlane. Fuzzy epistemicism. In Richard Dietz and Sebastiano Moruzzi, editors, Cuts and Clouds: Vaguenesss, Its Nature, and Its Logic, pages 438-63. Oxford University Press, 2010.

[98]  D. M. Mackinnon, F. Waismann, and W C. Kneale. Symposium: Verifiability. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 19(1): 101-64, 1945.

[99]  Anna Mahtani. 'The instability of vague terms. The Philosophical Quarterly, 54(217): 570-6, 2004.

[100]    lang=EN-US>Norman Malcolm. Are necessary propositions really verbal? Mind, 49(194): 189-203, 1940.

[101]    Maarten Marx and Yde Venema. Multi-Dimensional Modal Logic. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997.

[102]    Vann McGee. Truth, Vagueness, and Paradox: An Essay on the Logic of Truth. Hackett Publishing Company Inc., 1990.

[103]    Vann McGee. Kilimanjaro. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 27(sup1): 141-63, 1997.

[104]    Vann McGee and Brian McLaughlin. Distinctions without a difference. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 33(S1): 203-51, 1995.

[105]    Christopher J. G. Meacham and Jonathan Weisberg. Representation theorems and the foundations of decision theory. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 89(4): 641-63, 2011.

[106]    HenryMehlberg. TheReach of Science. UniversityofToronto Press, 1958.

[107]    Richard Montague. Syntactical treatments of modality, with corollaries on reflexion principles and finite axiomatizability. Acta Philosophica Fennica, 16: 153-67, 1963.

[108]    Richard Montague. The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English. In Patrick Suppes, Julius Moravcsik, and Jaakko Hintikka, editors, Approaches to Natural Language, pages 221-42. Dordrecht, 1973.

[109]    Sarah Moss. Probabilistic Knowledge. Oxford University Press, forthcoming.

[110]    Francis Jeffry Pelletier. The not-so-strange modal logic of indeterminacy. Logique et Analyse, 27(8): 415-22, 1984.

[111]    Graham Priest. The logic of paradox. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8(1): 219-41, 1979.

[112]    Arthur N. Prior. Objects of Thought. Oxford University Press, 1971.

[113]    Arthur N. Prior. Changes in events and changes in things. In Robin Le Poidevin and Murray MacBeath, editors, The Philosophy of Time, pages 35-46. Oxford University Press, 1993.

[114]    Willard Van Orman Quine. Three grades of modal involvement. Proceedings of the XIth International Congress of Philosophy, 14: 65-81, 1953.

name=bookmark892>[115]    Diana Raffman. Vagueness without paradox. The Philosophical Review, 103(1): 41-74, 1994.

[116]    FrankPlumpton Ramsey. On Truth: Original Manuscript Materials (1927-1929) from the Ramsey Collection at the University of Pittsburgh, volume 16. Springer, 1991.

[117]    Agustin Rayo. A metasemantic account of vagueness. In Richard Dietz and Sebastiano Moruzzi, editors, Cuts and Clouds: Vagueness, Its Nature, and Its Logic, pages 23-45. Oxford University Press, 2010.

[118]    Stephen Read and Crispin Wright. Hairier than Putnam thought. Analysis, 45(1): 56-8, 1985.

[119]    Giuliana Regoli. Comparative probability orderings. Preprint on the Imprecise Probabil­ities Projectwebsite: http://ippserv.rug.ac.be, 1998.

[120]    Mark Richard. Propositional Attitudes: An Essay on Thoughts and How WeAscribe them. Cambridge University Press, 1990.

[121]    Bertil Rolf. A theory of vagueness. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 9(3): 315-25, 1980.

[122]    Gideon Rosen. Nominalism, naturalism, epistemic relativism. Philosophical Perspectives, 35(15): 69-91,2001.

[123]    Jeffrey Sanford Russell. Possible worlds and the objective world. Philosophy and Phe­nomenological Research, 90(2): 389-422, 2015.

[124]    Nathan Salmon. Frege’s Puzzle. 'The MIT Press, 1986.

[125]    Nathan Salmon. Vagaries about vagueness. In Richard Dietz and Sebastiano Moruzzi, editors, Cuts and Clouds: Vaguenesss, Its Nature, and Its Logic. Oxford University Press, 2010.

[126]    Stephen Schiffer. Vagueness and partial belief. Philosophical Issues, 10(1): 220-57, 2000.

[127]    Stephen Schiffer. Vague properties. In Richard Dietz and Sebastiano Moruzzi, editors, Cuts and Clouds: Vagueness, Its Nature, and Its Logic, pages 109-30. Oxford University Press, 2010.

[128]    Mark Schroeder. Expressing Our Attitudes: Explanation and Expression in Ethics. Oxford University Press, 2015.

[129]"Times New Roman"'>    Moritz Schulz. Wondering what might be. Philosophical Studies, 149(3): 367-86, 2010.

[130]    Adam Sennet. Semantic plasticity and epistemicism. Philosophical Studies, 161(2): 273-85,2012.

[131]    Stewart Shapiro. Vagueness in Context. Oxford University Press, 2006.

[132]    Theodore Sider. Williamson's many necessary existents. Analysis, 69(2): 250-8, 2009.

[133]    Theodore Sider. Writing the Book of the World. Oxford University Press, 2011.

[134]    Nicholas J. J. Smith. Degree of belief is expected truth value. In Richard Dietz and Sebastiano Moruzzi, editors, Cuts and Clouds: Vagueness, Its Nature, and Its Logic, pages 491-507, Oxford University Press, 2010.

[135]    Nicholas J. J. Smith. Vagueness, uncertainty and degrees of belief: Two kinds of indeterminacy—one kind of credence. Erkenntnis, 79(5): 1027-44, 2014.

[136]    ScottSoames. BeyondRigidity: The Unfinished SemanticAgenda of Naming and Necessity. Oxford University Press, 2002.

[137]    Roy Sorensen. Vagueness. In Edward N. Zalta, editor, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, winter 2016 edition, 2016.

[138]    RoyA. Sorensen. Blindspots. Oxford UniversityPress, 1988.

[139]    Robert Stalnaker. A defense of conditional excluded middle. In William Harper, Robert Stalnaker, and Glenn Pearce, editors, Ifs, pages 87-104, D. Reidel Publishing Co., 1980.

[140]    Robert Stalnaker. Inquiry. The MIT Press, 1984.

[141]    Robert Stalnaker. Responses to Stanley and Schlenker. Philosophical Studies, 151(1): 143-57, 2010.

[142]    Jason Stanley. ‘Assertion' and intentionality. Philosophical Studies, 151(1): 87-113, 2010.

[143]    Roman Suszko. Identity connective and modality. Studia Logica, 27(1): 7-41, 1971.

style='font-size:8.5pt;line-height: 122%'>[144]    Peter Unger. There are no ordinary things. Synthese, 41(2): 117-54, 1979.

[145]    PeterUnger. Theproblem of the many. MidwestStudies in Philosophy, 5(1): 411-68,1980.

[146]    Bas C. van Fraassen. Singular terms, truth-value gaps, and free logic. The Journal of Philosophy, 63(17): 481-95, 1966.

[147]    Bas C. van Fraassen. Probabilities of conditionals. In William L. Harper and Clifford Allan Hooker, editors, Foundations of Probability Theory, Statistical Inference, and Stat­istical Theories of Science, volume 1, pages 261-308. D. Reidel Publishing Co., 1973.

[148]    Bas C. van Fraassen. Representational of conditional probabilities. Journal of Philosoph­ical Logic, 5(3): 417-30, 1976.

[149]    David Wallace. Everettian rationality: Defending Deutsch's approach to probability in the Everett interpretation. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 34(3): 415-39,2003.

[150]    Brian Weatherson. Many many problems. The Philosophical Quarterly, 53(213): 481-501,2003.

[151]    DavidWiggins. On being in the same place at the same time. PhilosophicalReview, 77(1): 90-5, 1968.

[152]    J. Robert G. Williams. Degree supervaluational logic. Review of Symbolic Logic, 4(1): 130-49,2011.

[153]    J. Robert G. Williams. Indeterminacy and normative silence. Analysis, 72(2): 217-25,2012.

[154]    J. Robert G. Williams. Decision-making under indeterminacy. Philosophers’ Imprint, 14(4): 1-34, 2014.

[155]    TimothyWilliamson. Inexactknowledge. Mind, 101(402): 217-42, 1992.

[156]    TimothyWilliamson. Vagueness. Routledge, 1994.

[157]    Timothy Williamson. Putnam on the sorites paradox. Philosophical Papers, 25(1): 47-56, 1996.

[158]    Timothy Williamson. Imagination, stipulation and vagueness. Philosophical Issues, 8: 215-28, 1997.

name=bookmark936>[159]    Timothy Williamson. On the structure of higher-order vagueness. Mind, 108(429): 127-43, 1999.

[160]    Timothy Williamson. Knowledge and its Limits. Oxford University Press, 2000.

[161]    TimothyWilliamson. Everything. Philosophical Perspectives, 17(1): 415-65, 2003.

[162]    TimothyWilliamson. Replyto McGeeandMcLaughlin. Linguistics and Philosophy, 27(1): 113-22,2004.

[163]    Timothy Williamson. Why epistemology cannot be operationalized. In Quentin Smith, editor, Epistemology: New Essays, pages 277-300. Oxford University Press, 2008.

[164]    Timothy Williamson. Probability and danger. The Amherst Lecture in Philosophy, 4: 1-35,2009.

[165]    Timothy Williamson. Modal Logic as Metaphysics. Oxford University Press, 2013.

[166]    Jessica M. Wilson. A determinable-based account of metaphysical indeterminacy. Inquiry, 56(4): 359-85, 2013.

[167]    Crispin Wright. On being in a quandary: Relativism, vagueness, logical revisionism. Mind, 110(437): 45-98, 2001.

[168]    Juhani Yli-Vakkuri. Epistemicism with Worldlyvagueness. Unpublished, 2011.

[169]    Elia Zardini. Squeezing and stretching: How vagueness can outrun borderlineness. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 106: 421-8, 2006.