Bibliography
On the ‘absolutist’ approach: M. Blaug, Economic Theory in Retrospect (London, 1964); ‘Was there a Marginal Revolution?’, in R. D. G. Black, C. D. W. Goodwin (eds.), The Marginal Revolution in Economics (Durham, 1973); J.
E. Cairnes, Essays on Political Economy (London 1873, reprint New York, 1965); F. Ferrara, Esame storico-critico dieconomistie dottrine economiche, 4 vols., (Turin, 1889); D. F. Gordon, ‘The Role of the History of Economic Thought in the Understanding of Modern Economic Theory’, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings (1965); F. H. Knight, On the History and Method of Economics (Chicago, 1956); M. Pantaleoni, Scritti varii di economia (Milan, 1904); J.-B. Say, Cours complet d'economie politique pratique (Paris, 1840); G. J. Stigler, ‘The Influence of Events and Policies on Economic Theory’, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings (1960).On the applications of Kuhn’s and Lakatos’s theories: M. Blaug, ‘Kuhn versus Lakatos or Paradigms versus Research Programmes in the History of Economics’, in Latsis (1976); M. Bronfenbrenner, ‘The ‘‘Structure of Revolutions’’ in Economic Thought’, History of Political Economy (1971); A. W. Coats, ‘Is There a Structure of Scientific Revolutions in Economics?’, Kyklos, (1969); R. Fisher, The Logic of Economic Discovery, (Brighton, 1986); T. W. Hutchison, ‘On the History and Philosophy of Science and Economics’, in Latsis (1976); L. Kunin, S.-F. Weaver, ‘On the Structure of Scientific Revolutions in Economics’, History of Political Economy, (1971); S. J. Latsis (ed.), Method and Appraisal in Economics (Cambridge, 1976); E. R. Weintraub, General Equilibrium Analysis (Cambridge, 1985).
On the ‘relativist’ approaches: M. Bronfenbrenner, ‘Trends, Cycles, and Fads in Economic Writing’, American Economic Review (1966); A. K. Dasgupta, Epochs of Economic Theory (Oxford, 1985); J.
Hicks, ‘‘‘Revolutions” in Economics’, in Latsis (1976); S. Karsten, ‘Dialectics and the Evolution of Economic Thought’, History of Political Economy, (1973); J. E. King, Economic Exiles, (London, 1988); W. C. Mitchell, Types of Economic Theory (New York, 1969); G. Myrdal, ‘Crises and Cycles in the Development of Economics’, The Political Quarterly (1973); L. Nabers, The Positive and Genetic Approaches, in S. R. Krupp (ed.), The Structure of Economic Science (Englewood Cliffs, 1966); F. Neumark, ‘Zyklen in der Geschichte okonomischen Idee’, Kyklos (1975); L. Rogin, The Meaning and Validity of Economic Theory (New York, 1956); E. Roll, A History of Economic Thought, 2nd edn. (London, 1946); J. A. Schumpeter, History of Economic Analysis (New York, 1954); G. L. S. Shackle, The Years of High Theory (Cambridge, 1967); W. Stark, The History of Economics in its Relation to Social Development (London 1944); ‘The ‘‘Classical Situation’’ in Political Economy’, Kyklos (1959).Some recent contributions: R. Backhouse, A History of Modern Economic Analysis (Oxford, 1985); M. Beaud and G. Dostaler, Economic Thought Since Keynes: A History and Dictionary of Major Economists (London, 1995); N. Bellanca and M. Guidi, ‘Uchronics and the History of Economic Knowledge’, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought (1997); R. Dehem, Histoire de la pensee economique (Quebec, 1984); P. Groenewegen and G. Vaggi, Il pensiero economico: Dal mercantilismo al monetarismo (Rome, 2002); B. Ingrao and F. Ranchetti, Ilmercato nelpensiero economico: Storia e analisi di un'idea dall'illuminismo alla teoria dei giochi (Milan, 1996); H. Landreth and D. C. Colander, History of Economic Thought (1996); F. Modigliani, ‘The Monetarist Controversy, or Should We Forsake Stabilisation Policy?’ American Economic Review (1977); E. Screpanti, ‘Cicli, rivoluzioni e situazioni classiche nello sviluppo delle idee economiche’, Economia politica, (1988); W. K. Tabb, Reconstructing Political Economy: The Great Divide in Economic Thought (London, 1999); J. Tobin, ‘Is Friedman a Monetarist?’, in J. Stein (ed.), Monetarism (Amsterdam, 1976).