<<
>>

Bibliography

On the English classical economics: S. G. Checkland, ‘The Propagation of Ricardian Economics in England’, Economica (1949); A. W. Coats (ed.), The Classical Economists and Economic Policy (London 1971); N.

M. Dobb, Theories of Value and Distribution since Adam Smith (Cambridge, 1973); R. Faucci, E. Pesciarelli (eds.), L'economia classica: Origini e sviluppo (Milan, 1976); E. J. Hobsbawm, The Age of Capital, 1848-1875 (London 1975); D. P. O’Brien, The Classical Economists (Oxford, 1975); L. Robbins, The Theory of Economic Policy in English Classical Political Economy (London, 1953); T. Sowell, Classical Economics Reconsidered (Princeton, 1974); A. C. Whitaker, History and Criticism of the Labor Theory of Value in English Political Economy (New York, 1904).

On Ricardo: M. Blaug, Ricardian Economics (New Haven, 1958); C. Casarosa, ‘A New Formulation of the Ricardian System’, Oxford Economic Papers (1978); P. Garegnani, Il capitale nelle teorie della distribuzione (Milan, 1960); S. Hollander, The Economics of David Ricardo (Toronto, 1979); L. L. Pasinetti, ‘A Mathematical Formulation of the Ricardian System’, The Review of Economic Studies (1960); P. Sraffa, ‘Introduction’ in D. Ricardo, Works and Correspondence.

On Malthus: J. Bonar, Malthus and His Work (New York, 1966); L. Costabile, Malthus: Sviluppo e ristagno della produzione capitalistica (Turin, 1980); R. L. Meek, ‘Physiocracy and the Early Theories of Underconsumption’, in The Economics of Physiocracy (London, 1962); M. Paglin, Malthus and Lauderdale: The Anti-Ricardian Tradition (New York, 1961); L. Robbins, ‘Malthus as an Economist’, The Economic Journal (1967); T. Sowell, ‘Malthus and the Utilitarians’, Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science (1962).

On Mill: A. Bain, J. S. Mill: A Criticism with Personal Recollections (London, 1882); J. Hamburger, Intellectuals in Politics: John Stuart Mill and the Philosophic Radicals (London, 1965); A.

L. Harris, ‘John Stuart Mill on Monopoly and Socialism: A Note’, JournalofPoliticalEconomy (1959); D. L. Losman, ‘J. S. MillandAlternative Economic Systems’, American Journal of Economics and Sociology (1971); M. J. Packe, The Life of John Stuart Mill (London, 1954); P. Schwartz, The New Political Economy of J. S. Mill (London, 1972); N. Urbinati, Mill on Democracy: From the Athenian Polis to Representative Government (Chicago, 2002); J. Viner, ‘Bentham and J. S. Mill: The Utilitarian Background’, American Economic Review (1949).

On the precursors of the marginalist revolution: T. Bagiotti, ‘Introduzione’, to H. H. Gossen, Lo sviluppo delle leggi del commercio umano (Padua, 1950); F. Behrens, H. H. Gossen oder die Geburt der ‘wissenschaftlichen Apologetik' des Kapitalismus (Lipsia, 1949); R. B. Ekelund, ‘Jules Dupuit and the Early Theory of Marginal Cost Pricing’, Journal of Political Economy (1968); I. Fisher, ‘Cournot and Mathematical Economics’, Quarterly Journal of Economics (1898); B. Gordon, ‘Criticisms of Ricardian Views on Value and Distribution in the British Periodicals 1820-1850’, History of Political Economy (1969); A. H. Leigh, ‘Von Thiinen’s Theory of Distribution and the Advent of Marginal Analysis’, in Journal of Political Economy (1946); R. L. Meek, ‘The Decline of Ricardian Economics in England’, Economica (1950); V. Pareto, Corso di Economia Politica, 2 vols., (Turin, 1948); R. Roy, ‘L’oeuvre economique d’Augustin Cournot’, Econometrica (1939); E. Schneider, ‘Johann Heinrich von Thiinen’, Econometrica (1934).

On Romanticism, List, and the German Historical School: C. Brinkmann, Gustav Schmoller unddie Volkswirtschaftslehre (Stitttgart, 1937); G. Eisermann, Die Grundlagen des Historismus in der Deutschen Nationaloekonomie (Stirttgart, 1956); F. Engel-Janosi, The Growth of German Historicism (Baltimore, 1944); M. E. Hirst, Life of Friedrich List and Selections from His Writings (London, 1909); G. G. Iggers, The German Conception of History: The National Historical Thought from Herder to the Present (Middletown, 1968); F.

K. Mann, ‘The Romantic Reaction’, Zeitschrift fur Nationaloekonomie (1958); A. Spiethoff (ed.), Gustav von Schmoller und die deutsche geschichtliche Volkswirtschaftslehre (Berlin, 1938); G. Vandewalle, ‘Romanticism and Neoromanti­cism in Political Economy’, History of Political Economy (1986); M. Weber, Roscher und Knies unddie logischen Probleme der historischen Nationaldkonomie (Turbigen, 1922).

On the monetary debates: T. S. Ashton, R. S. Sayers (eds.), Papers in English Monetary History (Oxford, 1953); M. Caminati, ‘The Theory of Interest in the Clas­sical Economists’, Metroeconomica (1981); B. A. Corry, Money, Saving and Investment in British Economics 1800-1850 (London, 1962); M. R. Daugherty, ‘The Currency­Banking Controversy’, Southern Economic Journal (1942, 1943); F. W. Fetter, The Development of British Monetary Orthodoxy (Cambridge, Mass., 1965); L. M. Mints, A History of Banking Theory (Chicago, 1945); D. P. O’Brien, The Classical Economists (Oxford, 1975); M. Perlman, ‘The Bullionist Controversy Revisited’, Journal of Political Economy (1986); W. Santiago-Valiente, ‘Historical Background of the Classical Monetary Theory’, History of Political Economy (1988); J. Viner, ‘English Currency Controversies’, in Studies in the Theory of International Trade (New York, 1937).

<< | >>
Source: An Outline of the history of economic thought. 2nd, ed Oxford, 2005. 2005
More economic literature on Economics.Studio

More on the topic Bibliography:

  1. Bibliographic Essay
  2. KARAITES
  3. Kuwait
  4. Qatar
  5. Brunei
  6. Early Developments
  7. The Concept of Cognition
  8. Somalia
  9. Algeria
  10. Maldives