<<
>>

FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS

Our findings indicate the importance of selected variables in evaluating the effects of FDI flow on US states employment. Also, they emphasize the need for US to selectively target FDI in specific states and industries and make a host government’s aware of importance of promotional effort to attract foreign direct investment and stimulate employ­ment and growth at the state level contributing to overall output growth and employment in the US economy.

Encouraging more FDI and expanding the number of countries investing in the United States can lead potentially to higher employment and higher output growth.

The recent economic crises negatively im­pacted world FDI flows in 2008 and 2009 and opened a period of major uncertainty. IFDI flows into the United States fell in 2009 but rose in 2010 and 2011, recovering toward the pre-crisis level, but remaining well below their pre-crisis peak. The effectiveness of government policy responses at both the national and international levels in addressing the financial crisis and its economic aftermath will play a crucial role for creating favorable conditions for a continued recovery of FDI inflows into the United States. Public policies will obviously play a major role in the implementation of favorable conditions for such a recovery. Structural reforms aimed at ensuring more stability in the world financial system, a renewed commitment to an open environment for FDI and the implementation of policies aimed at favoring investment and innovation are key issues in this respect (UNCTAD, 2009).

Solutions and Recommendations

IFDI represents an integral part of the US econ­omy, with its stock growing from US$ 83 billion in 1980 to US$ 3.5 trillion in 2011. The United States, which had earlier been primarily a home for multinational enterprises (MNEs) rather than a host for affiliates of foreign MNEs, has become a preferred host country for FDI since the 1980s.

Foreign MNEs have contributed robust flows of FDI into diverse industries of the US economy, and total FDI inflows reached US$ 227 billion in 2011, equivalent to 15% of global inflows, the single largest share of any economy. US FDI flows, with a peak of US$ 314 billion in 2000 and another of US$ 306 billion in 2008, have been an important factor contributing to sustained economic growth in the United States.

The recent financial and economic crises negatively impacted FDI flows to the United States and opened a period of major uncertainty. The effectiveness of government policy responses at both the national and international levels in addressing the financial crisis and its economic consequences will play a crucial role for creating favorable conditions for a rebound in FDI inflows.

Unlocking the full potential of the future global inward FDI developments for the United States, as elsewhere, will depend on wise policymak­ing and institution building by governments and international organizations.

REFERENCES

Ajaga, E., & Nunnen, P. (2008). Inward FDI, value added and employment in US states: A panel cointegration approach. Retrieved from www.ifw-members.ifw-kiel.de/publications/.../ KWP_final.pdf

Alfaro, L. (2003). FDI and growth: Does the sec­tor matter? Harvard Business School. Retrieved from http://www.51lunwen.org/UploadFile/org2 01101310901063260/20110131090106459.pdf

Axarloglou, K. (2005). What attracts foreign direct investment inflows in the United States. The International Trade Journal, 19(3), 285-308. doi:10.1080/08853900591007438

Axarloglou, K., Casey, W., & Han, H. (2006). Inward foreign direct investments in the US: An empirical analysis of their impact on state econo­mies. Eastern Economic Journal, 37(4), 508-529. doi:10.1057/eej.2010.5

Axarloglou, K., & Pournarakis, M. (2005). Do all foreign direct investments benefit the local economy. In The World Economy: Second Revi­sion. Epanomi.

Barefoot, K. B., & Ibarra-Caton, M.

(2012). Di­rect investment positions for 2011: country and industry detail. Retrieved from www.bea.gov/scb/ pdf/2012/07%20July/0712_dip.pdf

BEA. (2013a). The US department of commerce, bureau of economic analysis (BEA). Retrieved from http://www.bea.gov

BEA. (2013b). The US department of commerce, bureau of economic analysis, FDI database. Re­trieved from www.bea.gov/international

BEA. (2013c). Bureau of economic analysis, com­prehensive financial and operating data archive by industry of affiliate. Retrieved from http://www. bea.gov/international/di1fdiop.htm

BLS. (2013). The US department of labor, bureau of labor statistics. Retrieved from http://www. bls.gov

Bode, E., & Nunnenkamp, P. (2011). Does foreign direct investment promote regional development in developed countries? A Markov chain approach for US states. Review of World Economics, 147(2), 351-383. doi:10.1007/s10290-010-0086-2

Borstorff, P. C., Collum, T. H., & Newton, S. (2007). FDI in the southern U.S: A case study of the Alabama and the automotive sector allied academies international conference. Proceedings of the International Academy for Case Studies, 14(1).

Census. (2013). The US census bureau. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov

Coughlin, C. C., Terza, J. V., & Arromdee, V. (1991). State characteristics and the location of foreign direct investment within the United States. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 68, 67-83.

Foreign direct investment confidence index. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.atkearney.com/index. php/Publications/foreign-direct-investment- confidence-index.html

Goss, E., Wingender, J. R., & Torau, M. (2007). The contribution of foreign capital to US produc­tivity growth. The Quarterly Review of Econom­ics and Finance, 7(3), 383-396. doi:10.1016/j. qref.2006.09.001

Head, C. K., Ries, J. C., & Swenson, D. L. (1995). Agglomeration benefits and location choice: Evi­dence from Japanese manufacturing investments in the United States.

Journal of International Economics, (38): 223-247. doi:10.1016/0022- 1996(94)01351-R

Head, C. K., Ries, J. C., & Swenson, D. L. (1999). Attracting foreign manufacturing: Investment promotion and agglomeration. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 29, 197-218. doi :10.1016/ S0166-0462(98)00029-5

Kearney’s FDI Confidence Index. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.atkearney.com/gbpc/foreign- direct-investment-confidence-index

Kornecki, L. (2013). Inward FDI in the United States and its policy context. Columbia FDI Profiles.

Location, U. S. A. (2013). Area development. Retrieved from http://www.areadevelopment. com/LocationUSA/

lomstrom, M., Fors, G., & Lipsey, R. (1997). Foreign direct investment and employment: Home country experience in the United States and Swe­den. The Economic Journal, 107(445), 1787-1797.

NSF. (2013). National science foundation, divi­sion of science resources statistics, science and engineering indicators. Retrieved from http:// www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind10/

The Organization for International Investment & RSM McGladrey. (n.d.). Retrieved from http:// www.ofii.org/resources

The US Department of Commerce. Annual Survey of State Government Finances. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/govs/state/

UNCTAD. (2009). United Nations confer­ence on trade and development (UNCTAD), assessing the impact of current financial and economic crisis on global FDI flows. Retrieved from https://wpqr1.adb.org/.../0918 BE1C- 4C9148EC48257567000D8869/.

UNIONSTATS. (2013). Union membership and coverage database from the CPS. Retrieved from http://www.unionstats.com

KEY TERMS AND DEFINITIONS

Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Financial Structure: Equity capital, reinvested earnings, intercompany debts. Equity capital is the foreign direct investor’s purchase of shares of an enter­prise in a country other than its own. Reinvested earnings comprise the direct investor’s share (in proportion to direct equity participation) of earn­ings not distributed as dividends by affiliates, or earnings not remitted to the direct investor.

Such retained profits by affiliates are reinvested intercompany debts. Intra company loans or intra company debt transactions refer to short or long term borrowing and lending of funds between direct investors (parent enterprises) and affiliate enterprises.

Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Flow: The FDI inflow measures the amount of FDI entering a country during a one year period. FDI refers to an investment made to acquire lasting interest in enterprises operating outside of the economy of the investor. The investor’s purpose is to gain an effective voice in the management of the enter­prise. FDI refers to an investment made to acquire lasting interest in enterprises operating outside of the economy of the investor. A threshold of 10 per cent of equity ownership qualifies an investor as a foreign direct investor, having an effective voice in the management of an enterprise FDI may be undertaken by individuals as well as busi­ness entities. (www.unctad.org/Templates/Page. asp?intItemID=3146&lang=1).

Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) Stock: The FDI stock represents the total amount of produc­tive capacity owned by foreigners in the host country. FDI stock grows over time and includes all retained earnings of foreign-owned firms held in cash and investments.

Greenfield Investments: A form of foreign direct investment where a parent company starts a new venture in a foreign country by construct­ing new operational facilities from the ground up. In addition to building new facilities, most parent companies also create new long-term jobs in the foreign country by hiring new em­ployees (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green- field_project#Greenfield_investment.

Inward Foreign Direct Investment (IFDI): Inward operations refer to the activities of for­eign affiliates in the host economy (business enterprises in which there is an FDI relationship in the host country) (http://unctad.org/en/Docs/ wir2007p4_en.pdfI)

Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A): Refers to the consolidation of companies.

A merger is a combination of two companies to form a new company, while an acquisition is the purchase of one company by another in which no new company is formed. Cross-border M&A statistics include mergers and acquisitions between foreign affili­ates and firms located in the same host economy.

This work was previously published in Globalization and Governance in the International Political Economy, edited by Umit Hacioglu and Hasan Dinςer, pages 85-103, copyright 2014 by Information Science Reference (an imprint of IGI Global).

APPENDIX: WEB SITES

The 2012 A.T. Kearney FDI Confidence Index, (http://www.atkearney.com/index.php/ Publications/foreign-direct-investment-confidence-index.html)

National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics, Science and Engineering Indicators, (http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind10/).

The US Census Bureau, (http://www.census.gov).

The US Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), (http://www.bea.gov).

The US Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, FDI database, (www.bea.gov/ international)

The US Department of Commerce. Annual Survey of State Government Finances, (http://www. census.gov/govs/state/).

The US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, (http://www.bls.gov)

Union Membership and Coverage Database from the CPS, (http://www.unionstats.com)

Location USA- Area Development, (http://www.areadevelopment.com/LocationUSA/)

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), Assessing the impact of cur­rent financial and economic crisis on global FDI flows, January 2009 (https://wpqr1.adb.org/.../0 918BE1C4C9148EC48257567000D8869/...)

The Organization for International Investment & RSM McGladrey, (http://www.ofii.org/resources) Bureau of Economic Analysis, Comprehensive Financial and Operating Data Archive by Industry of Affiliate, (Tables F7 & G7), (http://www.bea.gov/international/di1fdiop.htm)

Thomson ONE Banker, Thomson Reuters (2011), (http://banker.thomsonone.com/)

108

<< | >>
Source: Banking, Finance, and Accounting: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. IGI Global,2014. — 1593 p.. 2014
More financial literature on Economics.Studio

More on the topic FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS: