Conclusion
This entry has reviewed the economic approach to property law. Owing to space limitations, the scope of the discussion was necessarily limited. In particular, it was primarily in the context of real property and focused on a few fundamental principles, including the role of property rights in promoting efficient exchange and investment, and on optimal ownership regimes in the presence of externalities, economies of scale and transaction costs.
The basic theme, however, was general - namely, that economic theory provides a unifying framework for understanding many aspects of property rights institutions.Acknowledgement
I wish to acknowledge the comments of Bob Ellickson, Derek Johnson, Dean Lueck, Kathy Segerson, C.F. Sirmans and an anonymous reviewer.
List of cases
Boomer v. Atlantic Cement Co., 26 N.Y.2d 219, 257 N.E.2d 870 (1970).
Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, 112 S.Ct. 2886 (1992).
Mugler v. Kansas, 123 U.S. 623 (1887).
Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon, 260 U.S. 393 (1922).
Spur Industries v. Del E. Webb Development Co., 494 P.2d 701 (Ariz. 1972).
References
Alston, L., G. Libecap and R. Schneider (1996), ‘The determinants and impact of property rights: land titles on the Brazilian frontier’, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 12 (1), 25-61.
Anderson, C. and E. Swimmer (1997), ‘Some empirical evidence on property rights of first peoples’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 33 (1), 1-22.
Anderson, T. and Dean Lueck (1992), ‘Land tenure and agricultural productivity on Indian reservations’, Journal of Law and Economics, 35, 427-54.
Baird, D. and T. Jackson (1984), ‘Information, uncertainty and the transfer of property’, Journal of Legal Studies, 13 (2), 299-320.
Baker, M., T. Miceli, C.F. Sirmans and G. Turnbull (2001), ‘Property rights by squatting: land ownership risk and adverse possession statutes’, Land Economics, 77, 360-70.
Barzel, Y. (1989), Economic Analysis of Property Rights, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Besley, T. (1995), ‘Property rights and investment incentives: theory and evidence from Ghana’, Journal of Political Economy, 103 (5), 903-37.
Blume, L., D. Rubinfeld and P. Shapiro (1984), ‘The taking of land: when should compensation be paid?’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 99, 71-92.
Bostick, C.D. (1987), ‘Land title registration: an English solution to an American problem’, Indiana Law Journal, 63, 55-111.
Buchanan, J. and W. Stubblebine (1962), ‘Externality’, Economica, 29, 371-84.
Calabresi, G. and A.D. Melamed (1972), ‘Property rules, liability rules and inalienability: one view of the cathedral’, Harvard Law Review, 85, 1089-128.
Coase, R. (1937), ‘The nature of the firm’, Economica, (n.s.), 4, 386-405.
Coase, R. (1960), ‘The problem of social cost’, Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1-44.
Coleman, J. (1982), ‘The economic analysis of law’, in J. Pennock and J. Chapman (eds), Ethics, Economics and the Law: NOMOS XlXIV, New York: New York University Press, pp. 83-103.
Coleman, J. (1988), Markets, Morals and the Law, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cooter, R. (1982), ‘The cost of Coase', Journal of Legal Studies, 11 (1), 1-33.
Cornes, R. and T. Sandler (1986), The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods and Club Goods, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cosgel, M., T. Miceli and J. Murray (1997), ‘Organization and distributional equality in a network of communes: the Shakers', American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 56 (2), 129-44.
Cribbet, J. (1975), Principles of Property Law, Mineola, NY: The Foundation Press.
De Soto, H. (2000), The Mystery of Capital, New York: Basic Books.
Demsetz, H. (1967), ‘Toward a theory of property rights', American Economic Review, 57 (2), 347-59.
Demsetz, H. (1972), ‘When does the rule of liability matter?', Journal ofLegal Studies, 1, 1328.
Ellickson, R. (1973), ‘Alternatives to zoning: covenants, nuisance rules and fines as land use controls', University of Chicago Law Review, 40, 681-782.
Ellickson, R. (1986), ‘Adverse possession and perpetuities law: two dents in the libertarian model of property rights', Washington University Law Quarterly, 64 (3), 723-37.
Ellickson, R. (1991), Order without Law, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ellickson, R. (1993), ‘Property in land', Yale Law Journal, 102 (6), 1315-400.
Epstein, R. (1985), Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Epstein, R. (1986), ‘Past and future: the temporal dimension of property law', Washington University Law Quarterly, 64 (3), 667-722.
Field, B. (1989), ‘The evolution of property rights', Kyklos, 42, 319-45.
Fischel, W. (1995), Regulatory Takings: Law, Economics and Politics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fischel, W. and P. Shapiro (1988), ‘Takings, insurance and Michelman: comments on economic interpretations of “just compensation” law', Journal of Legal Studies, 17, 269-93.
Frech, H. (1979), ‘The extended coase theorem and long run equilibrium: the non-equivalence of liability rules and property rights', Economic Inquiry, 17, 254-68.
Friedman, L. (1985), A History of American Law, 2nd edn, New York: Touchstone Books.
Hardin, G. (1968), ‘The tragedy of the commons', Science, 162, 1243-8.
Hirsch, W. and C. Law (1979), ‘Habitability laws and the shrinkage of substandard rental housing stock', Urban Studies, 16, 19-28.
Holderness, C. (1989), ‘The assignment of rights, entry effects and the allocation of resources', Journal of Legal Studies, 18 (1), 181-9.
Janczyk, J. (1977), ‘An economic analysis of land title systems for transferring property', Journal of Legal Studies, 6 (1), 213-33.
Kaplow, L. and S. Shavell (1996), ‘Property rules versus liability rules', Harvard Law Review, 109 (4), 713-90.
Kitch, E. (1977). ‘The nature and function of the patent system', Journal of Law and Economics, 20, 265-90.
Landes, W. and R. Posner (1987), The Economic Structure of Tort Law, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Landes, W. and R. Posner (1989), ‘An economic analysis of copyright law', Journal of Legal Studies, 18, 325-63.
Lueck, D. (1994), ‘Common property as an egalitarian share contract', Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 25, 93-108.
Lueck, D. (1995), ‘The rule of first possession and the design of the law', Journal of Law and Economics, 38 (2), 393-436.
Merrill, T. (1985), ‘Trespass, nuisance and the cost of determining property rights', Journal of Legal Studies, 14 (1), 13-48.
Merrill, T. (1986a), ‘The economics of public use', Cornell Law Review, 72, 61-116.
Merrill, T. (1986b), ‘Property rules, liability rules and adverse possession', Northwestern University Law Review, 79, 1122-54.
Miceli, T., H. Munneke, C.F. Sirmans and G. Turnbull (2002), ‘Title systems and land values’, Journal of Law and Economics, 45, 565-82.
Miceli, T. and K. Segerson (1996), Compensation for Regulatory Takings: An Economic Analysis with Applications, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Miceli, T. and C.F. Sirmans (1995a), ‘The economics of land transfer and title insurance’, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 10, 81-8.
Miceli, T. and C.F. Sirmans (1995b), ‘An economic theory of adverse possession’, International Review of Law and Economics, 15 (2), 161-73.
Miceli, T., C.F. Sirmans and J. Kieyah (2001a), ‘The demand for land title registration: theory with evidence from Kenya’, American Law and Economics Review, 3, 275-87.
Miceli, T., C.F. Sirmans and G. Turnbull (2001b), ‘The propert-contract boundary: an economic analysis of leases’, American Law and Economics Review, 3, 165-85.
Michelman, F. (1967), ‘Property, utility and fairness: comments on ethical foundations of “just compensation” law’, Harvard Law Review, 80, 1165-258.
Munch, P. (1976), ‘An economic analysis of eminent domain’, Journal of Political Economy, 84, 473-97.
Netter, J., P. Hersch and W. Manson (1986), ‘An economic analysis of adverse possession’, International Review of Law and Economics, 6, 217-27.
Ostrom, E. (1990), Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Polinsky, A.M. (1980), ‘On the choice between property rules and liability rules’, Economic Inquiry, 18 (2), 233-46.
Posner, R. (2003), Economic Analysis of Law, 6th edn, New York: Aspen.
Rabin, E. (1984), ‘The revolution in residential landlord-tenant law: causes and consequences’, Cornell Law Review, 69, 517-84.
Sax, J. (1964), ‘Takings and the police power’, Yale Law Journal, 74, 36-76.
Sax, J. (1971), ‘Takings, private property and public rights’, Yale Law Journal, 81, 149-86.
Shick, B. and I. Plotkin (1978), Torrens in the United States: A Legal and Economic Analysis of Land Registration, Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath & Co.
Stake, J. (1995), ‘Loss aversion and involuntary transfers of title’, in R. Malloy and C. Braun (eds), Law and Economics: New and Critical Perspectives, New York: Peter Lang, pp. 33160.
Wittman, D. (1980), ‘First come, first served: an economic analysis of “coming to the nuisance”’, Journal of Legal Studies, 9 (3), 557-68.
16