<<
>>

Harmony, Health and Virtue in Antiquity[467]

Several strands of thought from Presocratic, Platonic and Stoic sources pro­vide a context in which we can better understand Athanasius's presentation of harmony and discord in monastic spirituality.

Nienke Vos has recently high­lighted the tendency of critics working on the Life of Antony to place Athanasius’s presentation of the soul in a Stoic framework, suggesting that this gives rise to a “static” understanding of the soul, which is not entirely compatible with monastic notions of spiritual development.[468] [469] [470] Although she considers the com­monalities between Stoicism and Platonism, and allows for a more complex understanding of “internal conflict” in Stoic philosophy than has been gener­ally acknowledged, Vos nevertheless reaffirms the binary opposition between “static” Stoic philosophy and “dynamic” Platonic philosophy. She argues that the Life is best approached from the Platonic perspective, since, in taking this approach, “it becomes possible to visualize a fissure in the soul. This motive of ‘fissure’ springs from a more dynamic view of demonic impact. From there it leads to a more dynamic interpretation of the saint’s development”. While Vos reveals a thorough knowledge of the debate on the connections between demons and the progress of the soul, and provides a valuable contribution, she is largely reliant on received opinion about Stoicism and Platonism. By essentially maintaining the traditional binary between the Stoic understand­ing of the soul as an integrated entity and the Platonic understanding of the soul as something which can be infiltrated and fissured, she overlooks a third way, common to both Stoicism and Platonism: the understanding of the soul as something which can be brought into harmony. Analogies between the health of the body and the virtue of the soul, the understanding of health and virtue as kinds of harmony, and the idea that the harmony of the universe proclaims a divine creator^2 appear in writings associated with both schools.
While these strands were part of a larger tapestry of ancient thought about the health of the soul, and lines of influence are difficult to trace, it is nevertheless impor­tant that we establish particular ancient ideas of health and harmony as intel­lectual background to the enquiry that will follow?3

According to many ancient thinkers, harmony existed on a macro- and a micro-cosmic scale, though the ways in which άρμονία was understood varied. Perhaps the most well-known example of harmony on a cosmic scale is that of the music of the spheres, a concept which came to be associated with the Pythagoreans. According to Aristotle’s Metaphysics, Pythagorean philosophy was characterised by its over-arching concern with mathematics and its first prin­ciple, number, to the extent that the Pythagoreans believed the whole universe to be made up of harmony (άρμονία) or number (άριθμός).[471] [472] [473] [474] [475] In On the Heavens, Aristotle refers to the supposedly Pythagorean theory that stars, due their size and speed of rotation, emit a sound as they spin. The ratios of the speeds, judged by their relative distances, correspond to ratios in a musical scale, and thus the movement of heavenly bodies produces a concordant sound. The human ear, accustomed to the harmony, cannot discern it?5 On the Pythagorean Way of Life, written by Iamblichus of Chalcis in the fourth century CE, shows how Pythagoras used his knowledge of heavenly harmony. Iamblichus claims that Pythagoras alone was able to hear and understand the harmony and con­cord produced by the movements of heavenly bodies, which he then imitated with instrument or voiced6 The performance of Pythagoras’s music was thought to heal diseases of body and soul. In the narrative, passions of the soul are con­strued as a spiritual illness, and Pythagoras uses music in place of medicine to turn disruptive emotions around and lead them in a contrary direction?7 The soul that is brought into balance resembles the body, in which opposite powers are made peaceful (είρήνευσιν) and reconciled with one another (συμβιβασμόν) through health and temperance, in imitation of the well-functioning cosmos?8

Fragments of what may be the earliest Pythagorean book, written by Philolaus of Croton (c.470-385 bce) help us to better understand what har­mony meant to these Presocratics.

Translated literally as “fitting together,” apgovia was widely used in a musical sense to mean the tuning of an instru­ment, “a structure of relations that can be used to form the basis of a melody”.[476] Philolaus applied the word to cosmology, arguing that the cosmos and all it contains arose from the harmony of “limiters and unlimiteds”.[477] [478] [479] [480] [481] [482] [483] In this case, ‘harmony’ refers to the fitting together of two contrary things: ‘stuffs,’ including opposing elements such as hot and cold, and continua (unlimiteds), and the things that mark boundaries along continua (limiters).2i Later writers attrib­uted the theory of the soul as harmony to Philolaus and the Pythagoreans in general, though such attributions are problematic.22 Plato’s Phaedo, for example, features the character of Simmias, a pupil of Philolaus, who demon­strates the inadequacy of the proofs of the immortality of the soul presented so far in the dialogue by making an analogy between the soul and the invis­ible, incorporeal, valuable and divine qpgovia of a lyre. If the lyre is destroyed, the apgovia, here meaning the correct tension of the strings, ceases to exist. The soul, a blending or apgovia of (opposing) elements of the body (hot, cold, dry and moist and other things in in their due proportion) also cannot sur­vive the destruction of the physical form.23 As H. B. Gottschalk has argued, Simmias’s views may have been partly constructed by Plato for the purpose of the dialogue, and do not sit comfortably with Philolaus’s belief in the immor­tality of the soul. The theory seems to have had currency in the fourth cen­tury, however. Aristotle refutes the theory of soul as harmony in On the Soul, in which he argues that it would be more fitting to use the word ‘harmony’ to refer to bodily health.24 This view is in-keeping with that of Arcmaeon of Croton, who asserted that health is a balanced mixture of opposites?5

Socrates argues for the immortality of the soul in the Phaedo and the Republic.

The Myth of Er in the final part of the text presents the soul as an entity which pre-exists the body and survives the body upon death. 26 The Myth presents a version of the music of the spheres, in which the cosmos is envis­aged as eight concentric whorls, rotating around the spindle of Necessity. On each whorl is a Siren, singing a note. The eight notes together form a harmony.

While Plato makes no clear connection between this universal harmony and the harmony of an individual soul, Socrates does draw an analogy between the soul and another macrocosmic unit, the city.

In book four of Plato's Republic, Socrates establishes the relationship between goodness, harmony (meaning, in this case, temperance) and health. Goodness consists of the four cardinal virtues—wisdom, courage, temper­ance and justice.[484] These virtues exist in the city and the individual soul alike.[485] Temperance (σωφροσύνη) is understood as the harmony between the higher and lower parts of society and the soul.2[486] Plato uses a musical metaphor to describe how the three parts of the soul are brought into harmony like high, middling and low notes.[487] The logic of this analogy is flawed, however, as rea­son has a dominant role in the soul, subjugating the spirited and appetitive parts. It does not follow that the balanced soul is like a three-part harmony, for the high note of a harmony does not act to order and co-ordinate the other notes. Still, Plato's sense is clear—harmony or temperance arises from right relation between parts.3[488] [489] [490] [491] Justice consists in each part of either the soul or the city performing the function to which it is most suited.32 Justice in the soul is analogous to health in the body: to have a healthy body is to have each com­ponent in its proper place, in right relation to the others, and likewise, to have a just soul is to establish its components in a harmonious hierarchy, with rea­son presiding over the irrational parts.

Just as sickness in the body arises from an unnatural imbalance of elements, so too, injustice in the soul occurs when parts of the soul rule, or are ruled, in a way that is contrary to nature. Virtue, Socrates concludes, is a sort of health.33

In the Timaeus, too, Plato draws an analogy between harmony in the wider environment and order in the soul. In this dialogue, Plato claims that the divine part of the human soul has an affinity with the motions of the universe.34 The soul, buffeted about by sense impression and disoriented, can be re-aligned with the motions of the universe if the individual learns about harmonies and cosmic revolutions[492] Humans gain knowledge of these things through their senses: God gave people sight so that they could trace the movements of the heavenly intelligences and imitate their courses.[493] Speech and hearing were also given for the purpose of accessing external sources of order and concord; the harmonious nature of music, like the revolutions of the universe, is akin to the natural revolutions of the soul[494] Music should not be used for the purpose of irrational pleasure, but to bring the soul into an orderly state.3[495]

Music and dramatic performance play a central role in the maintenance of a balanced soul and just society. As Aristotle explains in the Politics, music is exceptional amongst all forms of art for representing the states of the soul most closely. Musical composition can be used to represent certain moods of the soul, and can thereby alter or reinforce the emotional state of the listener[496] So too, in the Republic, there is a recognition that rhythm and melody can pen­etrate the innermost parts of the soul and affect them for better or worse.[497] Furthermore, Socrates argues that imitative art can affect the state of the soul. Actors who narrate stories in the first person, regardless of the morality of the characters, who make their own sound effects like thunder, wind, instru­ments, machinery and animals, and who switch between modes and rhythms to suit their ever-changing voice, imitate things indiscriminately[498] Since imita­tion leads to habituation, mimicking things of a bad or base nature results in degeneration of character[499] [500] [501]

The Stoics believed that passions disrupted inner balance, and frequently used medical analogies which revealed that emotions had the capacity to make the soul diseased or sick.43 Summarising Stoic thought, Cicero remarks that a soul is healthy “when its judgements and beliefs are in harmony” (“cum eius iudicia opinionesque concordant”).44 He defines sickness as a deep and persistent belief that something is desirable when in fact it is undesirable[502] Sickness arises in the first place out of a state of confusion of belief (“[e]x perturbationibus”).[503] For the early Stoics, the mind (νους) was not divided into rational and irrational parts, but was entirely rational, and thus even pas­sions—false judgements or beliefs—had their basis in reason.

However, in order for the soul to be healthy, such passions had to be expunged[504] Harmony of mind was therefore envisaged not as the balancing of rational and irrational components, but the balancing of good qualities or a consistent state of mind or character[505] The wise and virtuous individual would ideally be unmoved by external happenings, existing in an impassive state, απάθεια. Even threats of torture would not move the ideal Stoic to a state of fear: external evils only seem bad, fears are delusional; they cannot do harm to one whose soul is impervious to disruption?[506]

Stoic texts classify the four basic emotions—delight, desire, distress and fear—into types or species. A word must be said here about a particularly intriguing species of fear, θόρυβος, which is found in tables of species-emo­tions by Diogenes Laertius, Stobaeus and Pseudo-Andronicus.[507] [508] [509] [510] The defini­tion given by the former is “φόβος μετά κατεπείξεως φωνής” and Ps-Andronicus gives a similar definition, though he uses the participle form κατεπείγων, which may be translated as ‘pressing down' or ‘hastening’?1 A parallel text edition of Ps-Andronicus gives “festinans” as a Latin translation for this word. Margaret Graver translates the definition as “fear which hastens with the voice,” which is a somewhat unsatisfactory and mystifying translation?2 A Latin parallel text version of Stobaeus’s On the Passions gives “metus cum voce trepidas,” fear with an agitated voice?3 This seems to suggest that θόρυβος can be understood as fear which presses upon the voice, inflecting it with anxiety. Nevertheless, some ambiguity remains. Could these writers also be suggesting that fear is stirred up by the sound of an approaching voice? In the Greek New Testament, θόρυβος is used to mean ‘riot,’ carrying connotations of uproar, noise, trouble.[511] [512] [513] In the Life of Antony, the word appears frequently to describe the commo­tion made by demons (see below). It is worth bearing in mind that the word has a history both as a Stoic and a New Testament term, indicating, on one hand, a species of fear associated with the voice, and, on the other, a clamor­ous gathering.

While the use of άρμονία varies across texts, it consistently denotes things that held in right relation to one another, whether they be planets, the unlim- iteds and limiters that make up the cosmos, tuned strings of an instruments or parts of the soul. A well-balanced soul functions like a healthy body. Sickness is essentially an imbalance which upsets these delicately adjusted relations.

<< | >>
Source: Bhayro Siam, Rider Catherine (eds.). Demons and Illness from Antiquity to the Early-Modern Period. Leiden, Boston: Brill,2017. — xiv, 434 p.. 2017

More on the topic Harmony, Health and Virtue in Antiquity[467]:

  1. The Spirituality of Gangs
  2. Fear and Harmony in Athanasius’s Against the Heathen
  3. Communal harmony and the self
  4. Changing Contexts for Harmony versus Adversarial Models
  5. E Tutela mulierum in late antiquity
  6. Bhayro Siam, Rider Catherine (eds.). Demons and Illness from Antiquity to the Early-Modern Period. Leiden, Boston: Brill,2017. — xiv, 434 p., 2017
  7. 8.2 RIGHTS AND HARMONY