The Formation of the Cossack Myth
Despite the initial spread of Cossack formations over the vast territories of Left- and Right-Bank Ukraine, Volhynia, and Podilia, the origins of Cossack mythology are associated with the relatively small part of LeftBank Ukraine once controlled by the Cossacks - the Hetmanate.
This was the only Cossack region that enjoyed a degree of autonomy for a relatively long period and in which the maintenance of the historical memory of the Cossacks was essential for the survival of the ruling elite.There is enough evidence to assert that the creation of certain elements of Cossack mythology began as early as the first decades of the seventeenth century. Nevertheless, until the turn of the eighteenth century there was a lack of 'bearers of high culture' closely associated with the Cossacks to create any semblance of elaborated mythology. The process began on a large scale only in the first decades of the eighteenth century. This period saw the emergence in the Hetmanate of a new social stratum comprised of a mixture of Cossack officers and the older nobility, defined by Zenon Kohut as the Ukrainian gentry.20 The gentry strived to maintain the autonomy of the Hetmanate and to legitimize it on the basis of past Cossack treaties with the tsars, thereby laying a foundation for the development of Cossack mythology. In fact, the myth was shaped in such a way as to support the power of the emerging gentry, which needed the Cossack past to secure not only the political rights of the Hetmanate but also its own economic rights, based on the Cossack-Muscovite treaties of the second half of the seventeenth century.21
The defeat of Hetman Ivan Mazepa at the Battle of Poltava in 1709 was in many ways a turning point in the development of Cossack mythology. Threatened by Peter I, the gentry mobilized in defence of the rights of Cossack officers first obtained from the tsar by Hetman Bohdan Khmelnytsky.
It was in the atmosphere of the Poltava defeat that the Cossack chronicles of Hryhorii Hrabianka and Samiilo Vely- chko were written and the cult of Bohdan Khmelnytsky reemerged, acquiring new characteristics. It would later develop into one of the pillars of Ukrainian national ideology.22 The next wave of commemoration and celebration of the heroic Cossack past came in the second half of the eighteenth century. This was the period in which the gentry made its last attempt to preserve and extend the Hetmanate's autonomy and found itself involved more deeply than ever before in a struggle for official recognition of its nobiliary rights by the imperial authorities. Historical arguments were considered extremely important in both cases, and a number of works recalling the glorious Cossack past were written at this time, beginning with Semen Divovych's 'Conversation between Great Russia and Little Russia' and ending with the anonymous 'History of the Rus'.'23It was the gentry of the Hetmanate - the ruling elite of a comparatively small part of what is now Ukrainian territory - that created the Cossack myth as a reflection of its own political needs and historical beliefs. A new generation of Ukrainian patriots would have to enter the political arena to turn that myth from a local cult into a national ideology extending to the remotest parts of Ukrainian ethnic territory. That task was accomplished by the nation builders of the nineteenth century.
The most prominent role in the development and popularization of Cossack mythology belongs to the apostle of the nineteenth-century Ukrainian national revival - the poet and artist Taras Shevchenko (1814-61).24 His views on the Cossack past were based on two main sources - popular memory and the Cossack mythology elaborated by the Hetmanate elite and popularized by the 'History of the Rus'.' The outstanding event in Cossack history remembered by the simple peasants of Right-Bank Ukraine (Shevchenko's homeland) was the Koli- ivshchyna of 1768-9, a popular uprising against Polish rule led by the Cossack officers Ivan Gonta and Maksym Zalizniak.
Shevchenko described it in his poem Haidamaky. This revolt was launched under the slogan of protecting Orthodoxy against a Uniate offensive and was accompanied by massacres of Jews and Catholics. Shevchenko also brought into his poems the popular memory of the Zaporozhian Cossack Host on the lower Dnipro, generally viewed without heroization by the authors of the Hetmanate. Although Shevchenko challenged the Khmelnytsky myth because of the hetman's pro-Russian policy, he managed to combine the historical experience and views on the Cossack past of two social strata, the descendants of the Left-Bank Cossack officers and the Right-Bank peasants, and presented this unified vision in his historical verses and poems, first published in the 1841 edition of the Kobzar (Minstrel), the bible of the Ukrainian national revival.Without a doubt, the new type of Cossack mythology created and popularized by Shevchenko's poetry won the hearts of readers in eastern and central Ukraine, where the Cossack past still lived in popular memory, much more easily than in western Ukraine, where the Cossack experience was but a short-lived phenomenon of the seventeenth century. Shevchenko's poetry was also a much better vehicle for propagating the new Cossack mythology than the writings of the Hetmanate elite. Unlike the 'History of the Rus',' which was written in the highly Russified, bookish language of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, read and understood only in Russian Ukraine, Shevchenko's poems were written in the Ukrainian vernacular. This opened the way for the dissemination of his writings and the Cossack mythology that they promoted in Ukrainian ethnic territories under Austro-Hungarian rule.
Especially important for the fate of the Ukrainian national movement was the case of Galicia in the Austro-Hungarian Empire.25 For a host of political, confessional, and historical reasons, it was difficult for Cossack mythology to make its way into Galicia, where there had never been any Cossack organization, even though many of its natives, such as the seventeenth-century Hetman Petro Konashevych-Sahaidachny, had taken part in the Cossack movement in Dnipro Ukraine.
Presenting Galicians as active participants in Cossackdom was the only logical approach to linking the Galician national revival with the Cossack past. Special subsidiary myths and family legends were created in Galicia to bring the Cossack past closer to its population: for example, a theory of migration from Galicia to Dnipro Ukraine and then back to Galicia was developed and popularized among the Galician intelligentsia.This situation was complicated not only by the fact that the Cossack system had never existed in Galicia but also by the pro-Orthodox and very often anti-Uniate character of Cossack mythology. Accepting that mythology full-blown, with all its anti-Uniate trappings, was no easy task for the Ukrainian movement in Uniate Galicia. The myth was accordingly modified and reshaped for adaptation to local circumstances. In a very short time, owing to the spread of the Shevchenko cult and the activity of the narodovtsi (populists), Galician Ukrainians became even more zealous adherents of the Cossack mythology than their eastern Ukrainian counterparts.
The triumph of Cossack mythology as the unifying factor of the Ukrainian national revival came with the Ukrainian Revolution of 1917-20. Detachments of Sich Riflemen, named after the traditional headquarters (Sich) of the Zaporozhian Cossack Host on the lower Dni- pro, were formed in Galicia during the First World War and later played an important role in the struggle for independence in both western and eastern Ukraine. In 1918 eastern Ukraine, occupied by German forces after the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, witnessed the rule of Hetman Pavlo Skoropadsky, who sought to restore Hetmanate traditions. The armed forces of the Directory, the Ukrainian government that took over from Skoropadsky after the withdrawal of German troops, were also dedicated to the preservation of Cossack tradition. Even the Bolshevik army that fought Ukrainian forces for control of Ukrainian territory claimed to be an heir to the Cossack tradition: special units of 'Red Cossacks' were formed as an integral part of the Red Army.26
When the Bolsheviks took over eastern and central Ukraine, they initially tolerated and then attempted to take over the Ukrainian national and cultural revival, but finally crushed it in the early 1930s.
Cossack mythology was restructured by Soviet historians to meet the demands of vulgar Marxism and growing Russian nationalism. Only those Ukrainian hetmans who had served Russia were tolerated in the new textbooks of Ukrainian history. Peasants replaced Cossacks as the principal heroes of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries: since they had little connection with the tradition of Ukrainian nation building, they presented no threat to the communist rulers.27 'Independentist' Cossack mythology survived only in western Ukraine (Galicia and Vol- hynia), which was under Polish occupation from 1920 to 1939. In 1943-4, when Soviet troops fighting the Germans entered western Ukraine, official Soviet propaganda was forced to take account of the national aspirations of the local Ukrainian population. The Ukrainian government began to present itself as independent; Soviet army groups (fronts) that fought in Ukraine were renamed 'Ukrainian fronts'; and, finally, a special military award named after the Cossack hetman Bohdan Khmelnytsky was introduced by the Soviet authorities in the autumn of 1943.28 This was only a temporary liberalization of official Soviet ideology. After the war, most expressions of Ukrainian national ideology tolerated in the course of the war were officially banned.Cossack mythology, revived in Ukraine after Stalin's death, became quite popular in the 1960s but was banned again in 1972. At that time, Petro Shelest, the first secretary of the Communist Party of Ukraine, was accused of 'idealization of the past' and replaced by his rival Volodymyr Shcherbytsky. A purge of 'Cossackophiles' began in the institutes of the Ukrainian Academy of Sciences and in the universities, and many of the academics who specialized in Ukrainian history and the literature of the Cossack era were removed from their positions or forced to shift to the study of other topics unconnected with the officially condemned Cossack past.29 Despite the persecution of Cossack studies, Cossack mythology appeared to be deeply rooted in the historical consciousness of Ukraine and reemerged with the beginning of perestroika and glasnost.