<<
>>

The Baseline Overlapping Generations Model

I now discuss the baseline two-period overlapping generation economy.

9.2.1. Demographics, Preferences and Technology. In this economy, time is dis­crete and runs to infinity.

Each individual lives for two periods. For example, all individuals born at time t live for dates t and t + 1. For now let us assume a general (separable) utility function for individuals born at date t, of the form

where u :satisfies the conditions in Assumption 3 (from Chapter 8) ci (t) denotes

the consumption of the individual born at time t when young (at date t), andis

the individual’s consumption when old (at date t + 1). Also β ∈ (0,1) is the discount factor. Factor markets are competitive. Individuals can only work in the first period of their lives and supply one unit of labor inelastically, earning the equilibrium wage rate w (t).

Let us also assume that there is exponential population growth, so that total population is

The production side of the economy is the same as before, characterized by a set of com­petitive firms, and is represented by a standard constant returns to scale aggregate production function, satisfying Assumptions 1 and 2 (from Chapter 2);

To simplify the analysis let us assume that δ = 1,so that capital fully depreciates after use (see Exercise 9.3). Thus, again defining k ? K/L, the (gross) rate of return to saving, which equals the rental rate of capital, is given by

where f (k) ? F (k, 1) is the standard per capita production function.

As usual, the wage rate is

9.2.2. Consumption Decisions. Let us start with the individual consumption deci­sions. Savings by an individual of generation t, s (t), is determined as a solution to the following maximization problem

where I am using the convention that old individuals rent their savings of time t as capital to firms at time t + 1, so they receive the gross rate of return R (t +1) = 1+ r (t +1). The second constraint incorporates the notion that individuals will only spend money on their own end of life consumption (since there is no altruism or bequest motive). There is no need 362

to introduce the additional constraint that s (t) ≥ 0, since negative savings would violate the second-period budget constraint (given that c2 (t + 1) ≥ 0).

Since the utility function u (∙) is strictly increasing (Assumption 3), both constraints will hold as equalities. Therefore, the first-order condition for a maximum can be written in the familiar form of the consumption Euler equation (for the discrete-time problem, recall Chapter 6),

Moreover, since the problem of each individual is strictly concave, this Euler equation is sufficient to characterize an optimal consumption path given market prices. Combining this equation with the budget constraint, we obtain the following implicit function that determines savings per person as

whereis strictly increasing in its first argument and may be increasing or

decreasing in its second argument (see Exercise 9.4).

Total savings in the economy will be equal to

S (t) = s (t) L (t),

where L (t) denotes the size of generation t, who are saving for time t + 1. Since capital depreciates fully after use and all new savings are invested in the only productive asset of the economy, capital, the law of motion of the capital stock is given by

(9.7) K (t + 1) = L (t) s (w (t),R (t +1)).

9.2.3. Equilibrium. A competitive equilibrium in the overlapping generations economy can be defined as follows:

A steady-state equilibrium is defined in the usual fashion, as an equilibrium in which the capital-labor ratio k ? K/L is constant.

To characterize the equilibrium, divide (9.7) by labor supply at time t + 1, L(t + 1) = (1 + n) L (t), to obtain the capital-labor ratio as

Now substituting for R (t + 1) and w (t) from (9.3) and (9.4),

Figure 9.1. Various types of steady-state equilibria in the baseline overlap­ping generations model.

as the fundamental law of motion of the overlapping generations economy. A steady state is given by a solution to this equation such that k (t + 1) = k (t) = k*, that is,

Since the savings functioncan take any form, the difference equation (9.8) can lead to quite complicated dynamics, and multiple steady states are possible. The next figure shows some potential forms that eq. (9.8) can take. The figure illustrates that the overlapping generations model can lead to a unique stable equilibrium, to multiple equilibria, or to an equilibrium with zero capital stock.

In other words, without putting more structure on utility and/or production functions, the model makes few predictions.

9.2.4. Restrictions on Utility and Production Functions. In this subsection, I characterize the steady-state equilibrium and transition dynamics when further assumptions are imposed on the utility and production functions. In particular, let us suppose that the utility functions take the familiar CRRA form:

where θ > 0 and β ∈ (0,1). Furthermore, assume that technology is Cobb-Douglas, so that

The rest of the environment is as described above. The CRRA utility simplifies the first-order condition for consumer optimization and implies

Once again, this expression is the discrete-time consumption Euler equation from Chapter 6, now for the CRRA utility function. This Euler equation can be alternatively expressed in terms of savings as

which gives the following equation for the saving rate:

which ensures that savings are always less than earnings. The impact of factor prices on savings is summarized by the following derivatives:

1073" class="lazyload" data-src="/files/uch_group77/uch_pgroup317/uch_uch7365/image/image1072.jpg">

Since ψ (t + 1) > 1, we also have that 0 < sw < 1. Moreover, in this case sr > 0 if θ < 1, sr < 0 if θ > 1, and sr = 0 if θ = 1. The relationship between the rate of return on savings and the level of savings reflects the counteracting influences of income and substitution effects.

The case of θ = 1 (log preferences) is of special importance and is often used in many applied models. This special case is sufficiently common that it may deserve to be called the canonical overlapping generations model and will be analyzed separately in the next section.

In the current somewhat more general context, eq. (9.8) implies

(9.13)

or more explicitly,

The steady state then involves a solution to the following implicit equation:

Now using the Cobb-Douglas formula, the steady state is obtained as the solution to the equation

The steady-state value of R*, and thus of k*, can now be determined from eq. (9.16), which always has a unique solution. Let us next investigate the stability of this steady state. Substitute for the Cobb-Douglas production function in (9.14) to obtain

Using (9.17), the following proposition can be proved:[XVII]

Proposition 9.4. In the overlapping-generations model with two-period lived households, Cobb-Douglas technology and CRRA preferences, there exists a unique steady-state equilib­rium with the capital-labor ratio k* given by (9.15) and as long as θ ≥ 1, this steady-state equilibrium is globally stable for all k (0) > 0.

Proof. See Exercise 9.5. ?

In this particular (well-behaved) case, equilibrium dynamics are very similar to the basic Solow model, and are shown in Figure 9.2 (more specifically, the equilibrium dynamics in this figure are drawn for the canonical overlapping generations model, which will be presented in the next section). The figure shows that convergence to the unique steady-state capital-labor ratio, k*, is monotonic. In particular, starting with an initial capital-labor ratio k (0) < ê*, the overlapping generations economy steadily accumulates more capital and converge to k*. Starting with k0 (0) > ê*, the equilibrium involves lower and lower levels of capital-labor ratio, ultimately converging to k*.

9.3.

<< | >>
Source: Acemoglu Daron. Introduction to Modern Economic Growth: Parts 1-4. Department of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology,2008. — 604 p.. 2008
More economic literature on Economics.Studio

More on the topic The Baseline Overlapping Generations Model: