<<
>>

The As, Bs and Cs

When investing in bonds, the larger banks, fund managers and corporates often conduct their own credit analysis of individual bond issues, but the majority of the huge volume of bond investments are made using CRA ratings for guidance.

The top part of Table 5.1 shows the ratings regarded as investment grade (prime grade). This is important because many institu­tional investors are permitted to invest only in investment-grade securities. The difference in bond yield between the different grades can be as little as 30 basis points, but this can rise dramatically at times of financial trauma, e.g. in early 2009.

The ratings that CRAs give to countries, sovereign ratings, can vary - see Table 5.2. A notch is a one-stage move on the rating scale, e.g. moving from A- to BBB+. The UK lost its AAA rating with some of the CRAs in 2013, due to concern about future financial stability. S&P downgraded the US to AA+ in 2011 after the prolonged political wranglings over the US government debt level, and the Chinese agency, Dagong, caused controversy by downgrading the US rating by several notches, from AAA to A-, in 2013 when the US government could not agree on its financial policy (again, arguments in Congress over the debt ceiling) and came dangerously close to being unable to meet the payments due on its bonds. The Chinese are concerned about the US debt burden as they are the biggest holders of US Treasury securities, at $1.3 trillion:

For a long time the U.S. government maintains its solvency by repaying its old debts through raising new debts, which constantly aggravates the vulnerability of the federal government’s solvency. Hence the government is still approaching the verge of default crisis, a situation that cannot be substantially alleviated in the foreseeable future.

Dagong Global (http://en.dagongcredit.com)

Table 5.1 Credit rating systems for long-term debt (more than one year)

Moody's S&P Fitch Dagong
Investment grade
Aaa AAA AAA Highest quality, minimal credit risk AAA Highest credit quality
Aa1 AA+ AA+ AA+
Aa2 AA AA High grade, high quality, very low credit risk AA Very high credit quality
Aa3 AA- AA- AA-
A1 A+ A+ A+
A2 A A Upper medium grade, low credit risk A High credit quality
A3 A- A- A-
Baa1 BBB+ BBB+ Lower medium grade, moderate credit risk, possessing certain BBB+
Baa2 BBB BBB BBB Medium credit quality
Baa3 BBB- BBB- speculative characteristics BBB-
Non-investment grade (speculative grade)
Ba1 BB+ BB+ BB+
Ba2 BB BB Speculative elements, subject to significant credit risk BB Low-medium credit quality
Ba3 BB- BB- BB-
B1 B+ B+ B+
B2 B B Speculative, high credit risk B Relatively low credit quality
B3 B- B- B-
Caa CCC+ Poor standing, very high credit risk CCC Low credit quality
Highly speculative, likely, in the near Very low credit quality
Ca CCC CCC future, to default with some prospect of principal and coupon recovery CC
C CCC- Typically in default with little prospect for recovery of principal or interest C Lowest credit quality
In default. These trade on the
D D assumed recovery rate following
default

Source: Data from Rating agencies

Table 5.2 Sovereign ratings

bgcolor=white>Baa2
Dagong S&P Moody’s Fitch
Australia AAA AAA Aaa AAA
Belgium A+ AA Aa3 AA
Brazil A- BBB+ Baa2 BBB
Canada AA+ AAA Aaa AAA
China AA+ AA- Aa3 A+
Egypt B- B- Caa1 B-
Finland AAA AAA Aaa AAA
France A+ AA Aa1 AA+
Germany AA+ AAA Aaa AAA
Greece CC B- Caa3 B
Hong Kong AAA AAA Aa1 AA+
India BBB BBB- Baa3 BBB-
Ireland BBB A- Baa1 BBB+
Italy BBB- BBB BBB+
Japan A AA- Aa3 A+
Luxembourg AAA AAA Aaa AAA
Mexico BBB A A3 BBB+
Netherlands AA+ AA+ Aaa AAA
New Zealand AA+ AA+ Aaa AA
Norway AAA AAA Aaa AAA
Portugal BB BB Ba1 BB+
Russia A BBB Baa1 BBB
Singapore AAA AAA Aaa AAA
South Africa A- BBB+ Baa1 BBB
South Korea AA- AA- Aa3 AA-
Spain BBB+ BBB Baa3 BBB+
Sweden AAA AAA Aaa AAA
Switzerland AAA AAA Aaa AAA
UK A+ AAA Aa1 AA+
USA A- AA+ Aaa AAA

Source: Data from CRAs' websites

When the rating agencies disagree we have a split rating - as you can see, this occurs quite often.

The rating and re-rating of bonds is followed with great interest by borrowers and lenders and can give rise to some heated argument. Italians were very upset in 2014 when S&P was accused of taking insufficient account of the country's qualities - see Article 5.1.

<< | >>
Source: Arnold G.. FT Guide to Bond and Money Markets (Financial Times Series. Harlow.: FT Publishing International,2015. — 488 p.. 2015
More financial literature on Economics.Studio

More on the topic The As, Bs and Cs: