<<
>>

PARTICIPATION IN PHYSICAL ACTIVITY

A number of scales have been developed to measure participation in activities. One example is the World Health Organization Health Behavior in Schoolchildren (WHO HBSC) survey. It is a self-reported measure of participation in vigorous activity that correlates well with aerobic fitness and has been shown to be reli­able and valid (52).

The Previous Day Physical Activity Recall (PDPAR) survey has been shown to correlate well with footsteps and heart rate monitoring, and may be useful in assessing moderate-to-vigorous activ­ity of a short time span (53).

The Physical Activity Scale for Individuals with Physical Disabilities (PASIPD) records the number of days a week and hours daily of participation in recrea­tional, household, and occupational activities over the past seven days. Total scores can be calculated as the average hours daily times a metabolic equivalent value and summed over items (54).

The Craig Hospital Inventory of Environmental Factors (CHIEF) is a 25-item survey that identifies presence, severity, and frequency of barriers to par­ticipation, and is applicable to respondents of all ages and abilities. A 12-item short form, CHIEF-SF is also available. When applied to a population with diverse disabilities, the CHIEF measure revealed the most commonly identified barriers to participation are weather and family support (55).

Pediatric measures include CAPE, which stands for Children’s Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment. This tool has been validated in AB and DA children aged 6-21 years. It is used in combination with the PAC, the Preferences for Activities of Children. Together, they measure six dimensions of participation (ie, diversity, intensity, where, with whom, enjoyment and prefer­ence) in formal and informal activities and five types of activities (recreational, active physical, social, skill­based, and self-improvement) without regard to level of assistance needed.

The scales can be used to identify areas of interest and help develop collaborative goal setting between children and caregivers. Identification of interests and barriers can facilitate problem solving and substitution of activities fulfilling a similar need (56). The European Child Environment Questionnaire (ECEQ), has been used to show that intrinsic and extrinsic barriers are equally important in limiting PA among DA youth (57).

Using these and other measures, one finds that participation in physical activity varies widely, even among nondisabled populations. The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination survey found that the prevalence of little to no leisure-time physical activ­ity in adults was between 24% and 30%. The groups with higher levels of inactivity included women, older persons, Mexican Americans, and non-Hispanic blacks

(58). A number of factors have been positively asso­ciated with participation in healthy adults, including availability and accessibility of facilities, availability of culture-specific programs, cost factors, and edu­cation regarding the importance of physical activity

(59). Likewise, in healthy adolescents, physical activ­ity is less prevalent among certain minorities, espe­cially Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic blacks. Participation in school-based PE or community rec­reation centers are positively correlated with physical activity, as are parental education level and family income. Paternal physical activity, time spent out­doors, and attendance at nonvocational schools are more common among children with higher levels of physical activity (60). Access to parks increases partic­ipation, especially in boys. Lower levels of moderate or vigorous physical activity are seen in those who reside in high-crime areas (61).

When followed over time, adolescents tend to decrease their participation in physical activity from elementary to high school. Boys who are active have a tendency to pursue more team sports, whereas girls are more likely to participate in individual pursuits (62).

Coaching problems, lack of time, lack of interest, and limited awareness have been cited as other barri­ers to physical activity (63). Overall, however, informal activities account for more participation in children and teens than formalized activities (64).

Ready access to technology is associated with a decline in healthy children’s participation in phys­ical activity. Television watching is inversely related to activity levels and positively correlates with obe­sity, particularly in girls (65). Increased computer time is also related to obesity in teenage girls (66). Interestingly, playing digital games has not been linked with obesity, and active video games have, in fact, increased levels of physical activity among chil­dren and adolescents (67,68,69).

It is not surprising to learn that many of the bar­riers to physical activity identified by AB are the same as those experienced by DA children. The most commonly cited are lack of local facilities, limited physical access, transportation problems, attitudinal barriers by public and staff, and financial concerns. Lack of sufficiently trained personnel and of appro­priate equipment have also been identified (32,70,71). Among those children with severe motor impairments, the presence of single-parent household, lower fam­ily income, and lower parent education are significant barriers (64). Pain is more frequently reported in chil­dren with CP and interferes with participation in both activities of daily living (ADLs) and PA (72). The pres­ence of seizures, intellectual impairment, impaired walking ability, and communication difficulties pre­dict lower levels of physical activity among children with CP (73). Many children are involved in formal physical and occupational therapy.

Therapists as a whole have been limited in their promotion of recreation and leisure pursuits for their pediatric clientele (74). Therapy sessions and school­based programs provide excellent opportunities for increasing awareness of the need and resources available for physical activity.

Policy and law changes related to the Americans with Disabilities Act are resulting in improved access to public facil­ities and transportation. Many localities are provid­ing adapted programs and facilities that are funded through local taxation (Fig. 5.2). Impairment-specific sports have grown from grassroots efforts, often with

Figure 5.2 Many public facilities have wheelchairs available for rent or use that are designed for use on the beach.

the assistance or guidance of rehabilitation profes­sionals. Organizations such as BlazeSports (www. blazesports.org) have developed programs through­out the United States. The bedrock of BlazeSports America is made up of the community-based, year- round programs delivered through local recreation providers. It is open to youth with all types of physi­cal disabilities. Winners on Wheels “empowers kids in wheelchairs by encouraging personal achieve­ment through creative learning and expanded life experiences that lead to independent living skills.” Chapters exist in many cities across the United States and incorporate physical activity into many of the activities they sponsor.

The American Association of Adapted Sports Programs (AAASP) employs athletics through a sys­tem called the adaptedSPORTS Model. “This award­winning model is an interscholastic structure of multiple sports seasons that parallels the traditional interscholastic athletic system and supports the concept that school-based sports are a vital part of the education process and the educational goals of students” (www.adaptedsports.org). The sports fea­tured in the adaptedSPORTS model have their ori­gin in Paralympic and adult disability sports, and are cross-disability in nature. The program provides standardized rules for competition, facilitating wide­spread implementation. Application in the primary and high school levels can help students develop skills that can lead to collegiate-, community-, and elite-level competition.

In some communities, AB teams or athletes have partnered with groups to develop activity-specific opportunities. Fore Hope is a nationally recognized, nonprofit organization that uses golf as an instrument to help in the rehabilitation of persons with disabili­ties or an inactive lifestyle. The program is facilitated by certified recreational therapists and golf profession­als (www.forehope.org). A similar program known as KidSwing is available to DA children in Europe and South Africa (www.kidswing-international.com). Several National Football League (NFL) football play­ers have sponsored programs targeting disabled and disadvantaged youth. European soccer team players have paired with local organizations to promote the sport to DA children.

Financial resources are also becoming more available. The Challenged Athletes Foundation (CAF) supports athletic endeavors by providing grants for training, competition, and equipment needs for people with physical challenges. Athletes Helping Athletes (www.athleteshelpingathletes.org) is a nonprofit group that provides handcycles to children with disabilities at no cost. The Golden Opportunities fund (www. dsusa.org) provides support and encouragement to DA youth in skiing. More resources can be found at the Disaboom Web site (www.disaboom.com).

<< | >>
Source: Alexander M.A., Matthews D.J.. Pediatric Rehabilitation: Principles and Practice. 4 th. åd. — New York: Demos Medical Publishing,2010. — 540 ð.. 2010
More medical literature on Medic.Studio

More on the topic PARTICIPATION IN PHYSICAL ACTIVITY: