<<
>>

Legal Citations

Canterbury v. Spence, 462 F.2d 772 (1972).

Chapsky v. Wood, 26 Kansas 650 (1881).

Cobbs v. Grant 8 Cal. 3d 229 (1972).

Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157 (1986).

Cooper v.

Oklahoma, 116 S.Ct. 1373 (1996).

Coyote v. United States, 380 F.2d 305 (1967).

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993).

Davis v. Davis, 372 A.2d 231 (1977).

Dickerson v. U.S., 166 F.3d 667 (2000).

Drope v. Missouri, 420 U.S. 162 (1975).

Durham v. United States, 214 F.2d 862 (1954).

Dusky v. United States, 362 U.S. 402 (1960).

Exparte Devine, 398 So. 2d 686 (Ala. 1981).

Fare v. Michael C., 442 U.S. 707 (1979).

Feguer v. United States, 302 F.2d 214 (1962).

Finlay v. Finlay, 148 N.E. 624 (1925).

Frye v. United States, 392 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir. 1923).

Gallegos v. Colorado, 370 U.S. 49 (1962).

Godinez v. Moran, 113 S.Ct. 2680 (1993).

Griswold v. Connecticut, 381, U.S. 479 (1965).

Haley v. Ohio, 332 U.S. 596 (1948).

Hansford v. United States, 124 U.S. App. D.C. 387, 365 F.2d 920 (1966).

Harris v. State, 499 N.E.2d 723 (Ind. 1986).

In re custody of a minor (1990).

In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1(1967).

In re Kelly (Conn. App. Ct 1992).

In re PatrickW., 148 Cal. Rptr. 735 (1978).

In re Rathburn, 266 A.2d 423 (1970).

In the Interest of S.H., a Child, 469 S.E.2d 810 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996).

Jackson v. Indiana, 406 U.S. 715 (1972).

Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 (1938).

K.N. v. State, 856 P.2d 468 (Alaska, 1993).

Kaimowitz v. Department of Mental Health, Civ. No. 73-19434-AW (Cir. Ct. Wayne County, July 10, 1973).

Kumho Tire Company, Ltd. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999)

Lyles v. United States, 254 F.2d 725 (1957).

Matter of Conroy, 486 A.2d 1209 (N.J. 1985).

Matter of O'Brian, 517 N.Y.S.2d 364 (Sup. Ct. 1986).

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966).

McNaughten's Case, 8 Eng.

Rep. 718 (1843).

Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390 (1923).

Michigan v. Daoud, 614 N.W.2d 152 (2000).

Natanson v. Kline, 350 P.2d 1093 (1960).

People v. Bernasco, 562 N.E.2d 958 (Ill. 1990).

Pate v. Robinson, 383 U.S. 375 (1966).

People v. Crews, 122 ΠH,2d 266 (1988).

People v. Lara, 432 P.2d 202 (1967).

People v. Pennington, 426 P.2d 942 (1967).

Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth, 428 U.S. 52 (1976).

Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158 (1944).

Quilloin v. Walcott, 434 U.S. 246 (1978).

Relf v. Weinberger, 372 F. Supp. 1196 (1974).

Rennie v. Klein, 462 F. Supp. 1131 (1978); modified, 476 F. Supp. 1294 (1979); stay denied, 481 F. Supp. 552 (1979); modified and remanded, 653 F.2d 836 (1981); vacated and remanded, 50 USLW 3998.27 (1982).

Riggins v. Nevada, 504 U.S. 127 (1992).

Rogers v. Commissioner of Mental Health, 390 Mass. 489 (1983).

Rogers v. Okin, 478 F. Supp. 1342 (1979); affirmed in part, reversed in part, vacated in part, and remanded 643 F.2d 650 (1980); vacated and remanded sub. nom.

Mills v. Rogers, 457 U.S. 291 (1982); certified questions answered sub. nom. Rogers v. Commissioner of Mental Health, 390, Mass. 489 (1983).

Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745 (1982).

Sieling v. Eyman, 478 F.2d (9th Cir., 1973).

Stanfield v. Stanfield, 435 S.W.2d 690 (1968).

Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645 (1972).

State v. Jackson, 304 S.E.2d 134 (1983).

State v. McDonald, 201 N.W.2d 447 (1972).

State v. Prater, 463 P.2d 640 (1970).

Swisher v. United States, 237 F. Supp. 291 (1965).

Tuter v. Tuter, 120 S.W.2d 203 (1938).

United States v. Adams, 297 F. Supp. 596 (1969).

United States v. Sermon, 228 F. Supp. 972 (W. D. Mo., 1964).

United States ex rel. Simon v. Maroney, 228 F. Supp. 800 (1964).

United States v. Wilson, 391 F.2d 460 (1966).

West v. United States, 399 F.2d 467 (1968).

Westbrook v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 150 (1965).

Wieter v. Settle, 193 F. Supp. 318 (W.D. Mo., 1967).

Zinermon v. Burch, 494 U.S. 113 (1990).

This page intentionally left blank

<< | >>
Source: Grisso T.. Evaluating Competencies: Forensic Assessments and Instruments. 2nd edition. — Springer,2002. — 564 p.. 2002
More legal literature on Laws.Studio

More on the topic Legal Citations:

  1. Key Chapter Points
  2. 13.3.1 DECIDING WHAT POINTS TO ARGUE
  3. 8.4.5 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
  4. Many courts use the term standard of review to describe the standards used to decide some trial-level motions.37
  5. 12.1 METHODS TOUSE ON THE COMPUTER
  6. 8.5.6 OPINIONS BELOW
  7. 6.2.1 NOTE NOUGH CONTEXT
  8. 13.10 SUMMARY
  9. 14.4.1 DIVIDING UP THE WORK
  10. Summary of Contents