References

Agazzi, Evandro. 1969. Temi e problemi di filosofia della fisica. Milano, Manfredi (2^nd ed. Roma: Abete 1974).

Agazzi, Evandro. 1979 Proposta per una nuova caratterizzazione dell’oggettivita scientifica.

Agazzi, Evandro. 2014. Scientific Objectivity and its Contexts. Cham: Springer.

Alai, Mario. 1989. A Critique of Putnam’s Anti-realism. Ann Arbor, Mi.: U.M.I. Online: http:// www.proquest.com/products-services/dissertations/.

Alai, Mario. 1990. L’equivoco del “realismo interno” di Hilary Putnam. Rivista di Filosofia LXXXI, 2: 263-290.

Alai, Mario. 1994. Modi di Conoscere il Mondo. Milano: Franco Angeli.

Alai, Mario. 2005. Dal realismo scientifico al realismo metafisico. Hermeneutica: 167-189.

Alai, Mario. 2006. Science and Non-Observable Reality. In The Controversial Relationships between Science and Philosophy: A Critical Assessment, ed. G. Auletta: 211-250. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.

Alai, Mario. 2008. Sagainst Alleged Counterexamples. In Defending Realism. Ontological and Epistemological Investigations, ed. G. Bonino, G. Jesson, J. Cumpa: 265-290. Boston-Berlin-Munich: De Gruyter.

Alai, Mario. 2014c. Why Antirealists Can’t Explain Success. In Metaphysics and Ontology Without Myths, ed. F. Bacchini, S. Caputo and M. Dell’Utri: 48-66. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Alai, Mario. 2014d. Explaining the Novel Success of Science. Metascience 23,1: 125-130.

Alai, Mario. 2016. Resisting the Historical Objections to Realism: Is Doppelt’s a Viable Solution? Synthese: 1 -24,

DOI 10.1007/s11229-016-1087-z.

Alai, Mario. Forthcoming. The Metaphysical Scope of the New Realism: Confronting Eco’s and Parrini’s Strictures”. In New Perspectives on Realism, ed. L. Taddio, K. W Molin: 9-31.

Alai, Mario, Buzzoni, Marco and Tarozzi, Gino (eds.). 2015. Science between Truth and Ethical Responsibility. Evandro Agazzi in the Contemporary Scientific and Philosophical Debate. Cham: Springer.

Aronson, Jerrold L., 1984. A Realist Philosophy of Science. London: The Macmillan Press, New York: St. Martin's Press.

Bird, Alexander. 2015. Is there meta-scientific knowledge? Against both the no-miracles argument and the pessimistic meta-induction. Draft.

Carnap, Rudolf. 1923. Uber die Aufgabe der Physik und die Andwendung des Grundsatze der Einfachstheit. Kant-Studien 28: 90-107.

Carnap, Rudolf. 1928. Der logische Aufbau der Welt. Berlin-Schlachtensee: Weltkreis.

Carnap, Rudolf. 1936. Testability and Meaning. Philosophy of Science 3.

Celsus, A. C., 1935, De Medicina, Prooemium, Loeb Classical Library edition, vol. II., http:// penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/L/Roman/Texts/Celsus/Prooemium*.html.

Chakravartty, Anjan. 1998. Semirealism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A29 (3): 391-408.

Chakravartty, Anjan. 2007. A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism: Knowing the Unobservable. Cambridge: University Press.

Churchland, Paul M. and Hooker, Clifford A. (eds.) 1985. Images of Science: Essays on Realism and Empiricism. Chicago: University Press.

Clarke, Steve and Lyons, Timothy D. eds. 2002. Recent Themes in the Philosophy of Science. Scientific Realism and Commonsense. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Cruse, Pierre, and Papineau, David. 2002. Scientific Realism Without Reference. In The Problem of Realism, ed. Michele Marsonet: 174-189. Aldershot-Burlington: Ashgate.

Dalla Chiara, M. Luisa and Toraldo di Francia, Giuliano. 1999. Introduzione alla filosofia della scienz,a. Roma-Bari: Laterza.

Demopoulos, William, and Friedman, Michael. 1985. Critical notice: Bertrand Russell's The Analysis of Matter: its Historical Context and Contemporary Interest. Philosophy of Science 52: 621-639.

Devitt, Michael. 1984.

Dilworth, Craig. 1981. Scientific Progress. Dordrecht: Kluwer (Springer 2008^4ed.).

Dilworth, Craig. 2015. The Perspectivist Conception of Science. In Alai, Buzzoni, and Tarozzi, (eds.) 2015: 21-25. Cham: Springer.

Doppelt, Gerald. 2007. Reconstructing Scientific Realism to Rebut the Pessimistic Meta-induction. Philosophy of Science, 74: 96-118.

Doppelt, Gerald. 2011. From Standard Scientific Realism and Structural Realism to Best Current Theory Realism. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 42: 295-316.

Doppelt, Gerald. 2013. Explaining the Success of Science: Kuhn and Scientific Realists. Topoi, 32: 43-51.

Doppelt, Gerald. 2014. Best Theory Scientific Realism. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 4: 271-291.

Dorato, Mauro. 2007. Cosa c’entra l’anima con gli atomi? Roma-Bari: Laterza.

Duhem, Pierre. 1906. La theorie physique. Son objet et sa structure. Paris: Riviere.

Fahrbach, Ludwig. 2011. Theory Change and Degrees of Success. Philosophy of Science, 78: 1283-1292.

Fano, Vincenzo. 2005. Comprendere la scienza Un’introduzione all’epistemologia delle scienze naturali, Napoli: Liguori.

Fano, Vincenzo and Macchia, Giovanni. 2015. Scientific Progress. In Alai, Buzzoni, and Tarozzi, (eds.) 2015: 65-80. Cham: Springer.

Ferraris, Maurizio. 2012. Manifesto del nuovo realismo, Roma-Bari: Laterza.

Fine, Arthur. 1984. The Natural Ontological Attitude. In J. Leplin (ed.) 1984: 83-107.

Fine, Arthur. 1986. Unnatural Attitudes: Realist and Instrumentalist Attachments to Science”, Mind 95: 149.

Fine, Arthur. 1991. Piecemeal Realism. Philosophical Studies 61: 79.

Foucault, Michel. 1966. Les mots et les choses. Paris: Gallimard 1966.

French, Steven. 2011. Metaphysical underdetermination: Why Worry? Synthese 180, 2: 205-221.

French, Steven. 2014. The Structure of the World. Oxford: University Press.

French, Steven and Ladyman, James. 2003a. Remodelling Structural Realism: Quantum Physics and the Metaphysics of Structure.

French, Steven and Ladyman, James. 2003b, The Dissolution of Objects: between Platonism and Phenomenalism. Synthese 136: 73-77.

French, Steven and Ladyman, James. 2011. In Defence of Ontic Structural Realism. In Scientific Structuralism, ed. Alisa Bokulich and Peter Bokulich: 25-42. Dordrecht: Springer.

Friedman. Michael. 1983. Foundations of Space-Time Theories, Chicago: University Press.

Frigg, Roman and Votsis, Ioannis. 2011. Everything you Always Wanted to Know about Structural Realism but Were Afraid to Ask. European Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1 (2): 227-276.

Giere, Ronald N. 1988. Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach. Chicago: University Press.

Giere, Ronald N. 2006. Scientific Perspectivism. Chicago: University Press.

Glymour, Clark 1980. Theory and Evidence. Princeton, NJ.: University Press.

Goodman, Nelson. 1978. Ways of Worldmaking. Indianapolis-Cambridge: Hackett.

Hacking, Ian. 1983. Representing and Intervening. Cambridge: University Press.

Hardin, Clyde L., and Rosenberg, Alexander. (1982). In Defence of Convergent Realism. Philosophy of Science, 49: 604-615.

Heisenberg, Werner. 1955. Das Naturbild der heutigen Physik. Hamburg: Rohwolt.

Hempel, Carl G. 1952. Fundamentals of Concept Formation in Empirical Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Hempel, Carl. G. 1958. The Theoretician’s Dilemma. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 2: 37-98.

Howson, Colin. 2000. Hume’s Problem: Induction and the Justification of Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hoyningen-Huene, P. 2011. Reconsidering the Miracle Argument on the Supposition of Transient Underdetermination. Synthese 180: 173-187.

Ivanova, Milena (ed.) Scientific Semi-Realism. PhilPapers. http://philpapers.org/browse/scientific- semirealism.

Kincaid, Harold, 2008. Structural Realism and the Social Sciences. Philosophy of Science, 75: 720-731.

Kosso, Peter. 1992. Reading the Book of Nature. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, Cambridge: University Press.

Kitcher, Philip. 1993, The Advancement of Science, Oxford: University Press.

Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Theories. Chicago: The University Press.

Ladyman, James. 1998. What is Structural Realism? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 29: 409-24.

Ladyman, James. 2002. Understanding Philosophy of Science, London, New York: Routledge.

Ladyman, James. 2011. Structural Realism versus Standard Scientific Realism: the Case of Phlogiston and Dephlogisticated Air. Synthese 180: 87-101.

Ladyman, James. 2014. Structural Realism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato. stanford.edu/entries/structural-realism/.

Ladyman, James and Ross, Don, with Spurrett, David and Collier, John 2007. Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalised. Oxford: University Press.

Lange, Marc. 2002. Baseball, Pessimistic Inductions and the Turnover Fallacy. Analysis, 62: 281­285.

Latour, Bruno. 1998. Ramses II est-il mort de la tubercolose? La Recherche.

Laudan, Larry. 1981. A Confutation of Convergent Realism. Philosophy of Science 48: 19-49. Repr. in D. Papineau (ed.) 1996: 107-138.

Laudan, Larry. 1984a. Explaining the Success of Science. In Science and Reality: Recent Work in the Philosophy of Science, ed. James T. Cushing, Cornelius F. Delaney and Gary M. Gutting: 83-105. Notre Dame: University Press.

Laudan, Larry. 1984b. Discussion: Realism without the Real. Philosophy of Science, 51: 156-162.

Laudan, Larry. 1996. Beyond Positivism and Relativism. Boulder, Co.: Westview Press.

Laudan, Larry, Leplin, Jarrett. 1991. Empirical Equivalence and Underdetermination. Journal of Philosophy 88: 449-472.

Laudan, Larry, Leplin, Jarrett. 1993. Determination Underdeterred: Reply to Kukla. Analysis 53: 8-16.

Leplin, Jarrett (ed.). 1984. Scientific Realism, Berkeley: University of California Press.

Leplin, Jarrett. 1987. Surrealism. Mind 96: 519.

Lewis, Peter. 2001. Why the Pessimistic Induction is a Fallacy. Synthese, 129: 371-380.

Lipton, Peter. 1991. Inference to the Best Explanation. London: Routledge (2004²).

Lyons, Timothy D. 2002. The Pessimistic Meta-Modus Tollens. In Clarke, Lyons (eds.): 63-90.

Lyons, Timothy D. 2006. Scientific Realism and the Stratagema de Divide et Impera Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 57: 537-560.

Lyre, Holger. 2011. Is Structural Underdetermination Possible? Synthese 180, 2: 235-247.

Magnus, P.D. and Callender, Craig. 2004. Realist Ennui and the Base Rate Fallacy. Philosophy of Science 71 (3): 320-338.

Massimi, Michela. 2012. Scientific Perspectivism and its Foes. Philosophica 84: 25-52.

Massimi, Michela. 2016. Four Kinds of Perspectival Truth. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. doi:10.1111/phpr.12300.

Maxwell, Grover. 1970. Theories, Perception, and Structural Realism. In Nature and Function of Scientific Theories, ed. R. Colodny: 3-34. Pittsburgh: University Press.

McMullin, Eranan. 1984. A Case for Scientific Realism. In Leplin (ed.): 8-40.

Muller, Frederick A. 2011. Withering Away, Weakly. Synthese 180, 2: 223-233.

Musgrave, Alan. 1985. Realism vs. Constructive Empiricism. In Churchland and Hooker (eds.) 1985: 197-221.

Musgrave, Alan. 1988. The Ultimate Argument for Scientific Realism. In Realism and Relativism in Science, ed. R. Nola: 229-252. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Musgrave, Alan. 2006-2007. The ‘Miracle Argument' for Scientific Realism. The Rutherford Journal 2. http://www.rutherfordjournal.org/article020108.html.

Nanay, Bence. 2013. Singularist Semirealism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (2): 371-394.

Nanay, Bence. 2016. Entity Realism and Singularist Semirealism. Synthese online. DOI 10.1007/ s11229-016-1179-9.

Nickles, Thomas. Forthcoming^a. Perspectivism versus Copernicanism. Axiomathes.

Nickles, Thomas. Forthcoming^b. Strong Realism as Scientism: Are We at the End of History? In Science Unlimited? The Challenges of Scientism, ed. M. Boudry, M. Pigliucci. Chicago: University Press.

Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1886. Jenseits von Gut und Bose. Vorspiel einer Philosophie der Zukunft. Leipzig: C. G. Naumann.

Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1901. Der Wille zurMacht. Versuch einer Umwerthung aller Werthe. hrsg. v. Ernst Horneffer, August Horneffer und Peter Gast. Leipzig: C. G. Naumann.

Niiniluoto, Ilkka. 1987. Truthlikeness, Dordrecht: Reidel.

Niiniluoto, Ilkka. 1998. Verisimilitude: the Third Period. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49.1: 1-29.

Niiniluoto, Ilkka. 1999. Critical Scientific Realism, Oxford: University Press.

Nola, Robert. 2002. Realism Through Manipulation. In Clarke, Lyons (eds.): 1-23.

Oddie, Graham. 1986, Likeness to Truth, Dordrecht: Reidel.

Papineau, David (ed.). 1996. The Philosophy of Science. Oxford: University Press.

Perrin, Jean. 1913. Les atomes. Paris: Alcan.

Peters, Dean. 2014. What Elements of Successful Scientific Theories are the Correct Targets for “Selective” Scientific Realism? Philosophy of Science 81: 377-397.

Poincare, Henry. 1902. La science et l’hypothese. Paris: Flammarion. Engl. transl. Science and Hypothesis. New York: Dover Publications 1952.

Popper, Karl R. 1963. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Psillos, Stathis. 1999. Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth. London-New York: Routledge.

Psillos, Stathis. 2011a. Choosing the Realist Framework. Synthese 190: 301-316.

Psillos, Stathis. 2011b. The Scope and Limits of the No-Miracles Argument. In The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective, ed. Friedrich Stadler et al. Vol. II: 23-35, Cham: Springer.

Putnam, Hilary. 1975a. Mathematics, Matter and Method. Philosophical Papers vol. 1. Cambridge: University Press.

Putnam, Hilary. 1975b. Philosophical Papers, Vol. II: Mind Language and Reality. Cambridge: University Press.

Putnam, Hilary. 1975c. The Meaning of ‘Meaning’. In Putnam 1975b: 215-271.

Putnam, Hilary. 1975d. Language and reality. In Putnam 1975b: 272-290.

Putnam, Hilary, 1978a. Meaning and the Moral Sciences, Boston-London-Henley: Rout- ledge&Kegan Paul.

Putnam, Hilary, 1978b. Realism and Reason. In Putnam (1978a): 123-140.

Putnam, Hilary. 1978c. Equivalenza. In Enciclopedia Einaudi, vol. V: 547-564. Torino: Einaudi. Engl. transl.: Equivalence. In Putnam 1983: 26-45.

Putnam, Hilary. 1981. Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge: University Press.

Putnam, Hilary. 1994. Sense, Nonsense, and the Senses: an Inquiry into the Powers of the Human Mind. The Journal of Philosophy XCI, n. 9, 445-517.

Putnam, Hilary. 2012. Philosophy in an Age of Science. Cambridge, Mass.- London: Harvard University Press.

Quine, Willard V.O. 1951. Two Dogmas of Empiricism. Philosophical Review 60: 20-43.

Rees, Paul. 2012. A Critique of The Arguments for Scientific Realism. Reading: Cranmore Publications.

Rescher, Nicholas. 1987. Scientific Realism: A Critical Reappraisal. Dordrecht: Reidel.

Russell, Bertrand. 1927. The Analysis of Matter. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.

Saatsi, Juha. 2016. Replacing Recipe Realism. Synthese, First Online, 2016. DOI:10.1007/s11229- 015-0962-3.

Sankey, Howard. 2008. Scientific Realism and the Rationality of Science. Aldershot and Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

Schlick, Moritz. 1938. Form and Content. An Introduction to Philosophical Thinking. In Schlick, Gesammelte Aufsatze 1926-1936, ed. F. Waisman. Wien: Gerold.

Schurz, Gerhard. 2011. Structural Correspondence, Indirect Reference, and Partial Truth: Phlogiston Theory and Newtonian Mechanics. Synthese 180: 79-85.

Smart, John J.C. 1963. Philosophy and Scientific Realism, London: Routledge&Kegan Paul.

Smart, John J.C. 1968. Between Science and Philosophy: New York: Random House.

Sosa, Ernest. 1991. Knowledge in Perspective. Selected Essays in Epistemology. Cambridge: University Press.

Stanford, Kyle P. 2000. An Antirealist Explanation of the Success of Science. Philosophy of Science 67: 266-284.

Stanford, Kyle P. 2006. Exceeding Our Grasp. Science, History, and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives. Oxford: University Press.

Stanford, Kyle P. 2013. Underdetermination of Scientific Theory. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-underdetermination/.

Suppe, Frederick. 1977. The Structure of Scientific Theories. Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press.

Teller, Paul R. Pan-Perspectival Realism Explained and Defended. http://philosophy.ucdavis.edu/ people/fzteller/site/truth-page.

Toraldo di Francia, Giuliano. 1976. L’ indagine del mondo fisico. Torino: Einaudi.

Van Fraassen, Bas C. 1980. The Scientific Image. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Van Fraassen, Bas C. 1985. Empiricism in the Philosophy of Science. In Churchland and Hooker (eds.) 1985: 245-307.

Van Fraassen, Bas C. 2002. The Empirical Stance, Yale: University Press.

Vattimo, Gianni and Rovatti, Pier A. (eds.). 1983. Il pensiero debole. Milano: Feltrinelli.

Votsis, loannis. 2011a. Saving the Intuitions: Polylithic Reference. Synthese 180: 121-137.

Votsis, loannis. 2011b. The Prospective Stance in Realism. Philosophy of Science 78:1223-1234. Votsis, loannis. 2012. Putting Realism in Perspectivism. Philosophica 84: 85-122.

White, Roger. 2003. The Epistemic Advantage of Prediction over Accommodation. Mind 112 (448): 653.

Whorf, Benjamin Lee. 1956, Language, Thought, and Reality, Cambridge: MIT Press.

Wigner, Eugene P. 1967. Remarks on the Mind-Body Question. In Wigner, Symmetries and Reflections. Bloomington, In.: Indiana University Press.

Worrall, John. 1989. Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds? Dialectica 43:99-124.

Worrall, John. 1994. How to Remain (Reasonably) Optimistic: Scientific Realism and the ‘Luminiferous Ether'. PSA 1994. vol. 1., ed. M. Forbes and D. Hull: 334-342. East Lansing, Mi.: Philosophy of Science Association.

Worrall, John. 1995. Il realismo scientifico e l'etere luminifero. In Realismo/antirealismo, ed. Alessandro Pagnini: 167-203. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.

Worrall, John. 2011. Underdetermination, Realism and Empirical Equivalence. Synthese 180, 2: 157-172.

Wright, John. 2002. Some Surprising Phenomena and Some Unsatisfactory Explanations of Them. In Clarke and Lyons (eds.): 139-153.

Wright, John. 2013. Explaining Science's Success. Understanding How Scientific Knowledge Works. Durham: Acumen.