<<
>>

References

Acuna, P. and Dieks, D. (2014). Another look at empirical equivalence and underdetermination of theory choice. European Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 4, 153-180. doi:10.1007/ s13194-013-0080-3

Bell, J.

S. (1964). On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen Paradox. Physics, 1, 195-200.

Beller, M. (1999). Quantum Dialogue: The Making of a Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Bohm, D. (1952). A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of ‘Hidden’ Vari­ables, I, II. Physical Review, 85, 166-179; 180-193.

Bub, J. (1997). Interpreting the Quantum World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bub, J. (2016). Bananaworld: Quantum Mechanics for Primates. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Curd, C, Cover J.A. and Pincock C. (eds.) (2013). Philosophy of Science—The Central Issues. Second edition. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

Cushing, J.T. (1994). Quantum Mechanics: Historical Contingency and the Copenhagen Hege­mony. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

De Regt, H.W. and Dieks, D. (2005). A Contextual Approach to Scientific Understanding. Synthese 144, 137-170.

Dieks, D. and Vermaas P. (eds.) (1998). The Modal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Dor­drecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Dieks, D., van Dongen, J. and de Haro, S. (2015). Emergence in holographic scenarios for gravity. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 52, 203-216.

Dieks, D. (2017). Niels Bohr and the Formalism of Quantum Mechanics. In Niels Bohr and Phi­losophy of Physics: Twenty-First Century Perspectives, edited by H. Folse and J. Faye. London: Bloomsburg Publishing.

Dieks, D. (2017). Von Neumann’s Impossibility Proof: Mathematics in the Service of Rhetorics. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, to appear.

Durr, D., Goldstein, S., Tumulka, R., and Zanghi, N. (2004). Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Field Theory.

Physical Review Letters, 93: 090402: 1-4.

Faye, J. (2014). Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2014Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/ fall2014/entries/qm- copenhagen/

Fine, A. (1984). The Natural Ontological Attitude. In J. Leplin (ed.), Scientific Realism. Berkeley: University of California Press, 83-107. Reprinted in Curd et al., (2013), 1191-1214.

Goldstein, S. (2016). Bohmian Mechanics. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/qm- bohm/

Griffiths, R.B. (2014). The Consistent Histories Approach to Quantum Mechanics. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = http://plato. stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/qm-consistent-histories/

Kochen, S. and Specker, E.P. (1967). The Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics. Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics 17, 59-87.

Kukla, A. (1993). Laudan, Leplin, and Underdetermination. Analysis, 53, 1-7.

Kukla, A. (1996). Does Every Theory Have Empirically Equivalent Rivals? Erkenntnis, 44, 137­166.

Laudan, L. (1990). Demystifying Underdetermination, in C. Wade Savage (ed.), Scientific Theories, vol. 14, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 267-297. Reprinted in Curd et al., (2013), 288-321.

Laudan, L. and Leplin, J. (1991). Empirical Equivalence and Underdetermination. The Journal of Philosophy, 88, 449-472.

Leplin, J. and Laudan, L. (1993). Determination Underdeterred: reply to Kukla, Analysis, 53, 8-16.

Lombardi, O. and Dieks, D. (2016). Modal Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = http://plato. stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/qm-modal/

Maxwell, G. (1962). The Ontological Status of Theoretical Entities.

In H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (eds.), Scientific Explanation, Space, and Time, vol. 3, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 3-15.

Musgrave, A. (1985). Realism versus Constructive Empiricism, in P.M. Churchland and C.A. Hooker (eds.), Images of Science. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 197-221. Reprinted in Curd et al., (2013), 1083-1108.

Vaidman, L. (2016). Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. The Stanford Encyclope­dia of Philosophy (Fall 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/ archives/fall2016/entries/qm- manyworlds/

Van Fraassen, B. (1980). The Scientific Image. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Von Neumann, J. (1932). Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik. Berlin: Springer. Eng­lish translation by Robert T. Beyer: Von Neumann, John (1955), Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Wallace, D. (2012). The Emergent Multiverse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

<< | >>
Source: Agazzi E. (ed.). Varieties of Scientific Realism: Objectivity and Truth in Science. Springer,2017. — 411 pp.. 2017

More on the topic References: