References
1. Georgi, H.: Effective-field theory. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 43, 209-252 (1993)
2. Anderson, P.W.: More is different. Science 177, 393-396 (1972)
3. Cao, T.Y., Schweber, S.S.: The conceptual foundations and the philosophical aspects of renormalization theory.
Synthese 97(1), 33-108 (1993)4. Castellani, E.: Reductionism, emergence, and effective field theories. Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 33(2), 251-267 (2002)
5. Crowther, K.: Effective Spacetime: Understanding Emergence in Effective Field Theory and Quantum Gravity. Springer, Heidelberg (2016)
6. Huggett, N., Weingard, R.: The renormalisation group and effective field theories. Synthese 102(1), 171-194 (1995)
7. Crowther, K., Linnemann, N.: Renormalizability, fundamentality and a final theory: the role of UV completion in the search for quantum gravity. Br. J. Philos. Sci. axx052 (2017)
8. Giudice, G.F.: Naturally speaking: the naturalness criterion and physics at the LHC. In: Kane, G., Pierce, A. (eds.) Perspectives on LHC Physics. World Scientific, Singapore (2008)
9. Wells, J.D.: The utility of naturalness, and how its application to quantum electrodynamics envisages the standard model and Higgs boson. Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 49, 102-108 (2015)
10. Williams, P.: Naturalness, the autonomy of scales, and the 125 GeV Higgs. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. Part B Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 51, 82-96 (2015)
11. Hossenfelder, S.: Screams for explanation: finetuning and naturalness in the foundations of physics (2018). arXiv:1801.02176v2
12. Franklin, A.: Whence the effectiveness of effective field theories? Br. J. Philos. Sci. axy050 (2018)
13. Maudlin, T: On the unification of physics. J. Philos. 93(3), 129-144 (1996)
14. Belot, G.: Background-independence. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 43(10), 2865-2884 (2011)
15. Smolin, L.: The case for background independence. In: Rickles, D., French, S., Saatsi, J. (eds.) The Structural Foundations of Quantum Gravity, pp. 196-239. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006)
16. Albert, D.: Quantum Mechanics and Experience. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1992)
17. Omnes, R.: Understanding Quantum Mechanics. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1999)
18. Saunders, S., Barrett, J., Kent, A., Wallace, D. (eds.): Many Worlds? Everett. Quantum Theory Reality. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)
19. Weinberg, S.: Newtonianism, reductionism and the art of congressional testimony. Nature 330, 433-437 (1987)
20. Dawid, R.: String Theory and the Scientific Method. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013)
21. Castellani, E., Rickles, D. (eds.): Special Issue on Dualities in Physics. Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 59, 1-142 (2017)