Bibliography

Aarnio, A. (1976), On Legal Reasoning. Loimaa: Turun Yliopisto.

Aarnio, A. (1978), Mitä lainoppi on? Helsinki: Tammi (What is the Doctrinal Study of Law). In German: Denkweisen der Rechtswissenschaft [1979].

Aarnio, A. (1979a), Denkweisen der Rechtswissenschaft. Wien: Springer.

Aarnio, A. (1979b), Linguistic Philosophy and Legal Theory, Rechtstheorie Beiheft 1, 17 ff.

Aarnio, A. (1980), The Form and Content of Law. Aspects of Legal Positivism, Archivum Juridicum Cracoviense XIII, 17 ff.

Aarnio, A. (1981a), On the Paradigm Articulation in Legal Research, Rechtstheorie Beiheft 3, 45 ff.

Aarnio, A. (1981b), On the Truth and Acceptability of Interpretative Propositions in Legal Dogmatics, Rechtstheorie Beiheft 2, 33 ff.

Aarnio, A. (1981c), Why Coherence? - A Philosophical Point of View, in: On Coherence Theory, edited by Aulis Aarnio, Robert Alexy, Aleksander Peczenik, Wlodek Rabinowics, and Jan Wolenski, 7 ff.

Aarnio, A. (1983a), Argumentation Theory and Beyond. Some Remarks on the Rationality of Legal Justification, Rechtstheorie 4, 385 ff.

Aarnio, A. (1983b), Eternal and Changing Law, in: Philosophical Perspectives in Jurisprudence, Acta Philosophica Fennica, 94 ff. Helsinki: Societas Philosophica Fennica.

Aarnio, A. (1983c), Outline of a Hermeneutic Approach in Legal Theory, n: Philosophical Perspectives in Jurisprudence. Acta Philosophica Fennica 6, 47 ff. Helsinki: Societas Philosophica Fennica.

Aarnio, A. (1983d), The Development of Legal Theory and Philosophy of Law in Finland. Philosophical Perspectives in Jurispridence, Acta Philosophica Fennica 6, 9 ff. Helsinki: Societas Philosophica Fennica.

Aarnio, A. (1985a), On Interpretation of Facts, in: Communication & Cognition 18, edited by G. Holmstrom and Jaakko Hintikka, 22 ff.

Aarnio, A. (1985b), On the Justification of Legal Interpretation, Revue de Syntese 118-119, 269 ff.

Aarnio, A. (1986), On Changes in the Systematics of Law, in: Vernunft und Erfahrunbg im Rechtsdenken der Gegenwart, edited by Torstein Eckhoff, Lawrence M. Friedman, and Jyrki Uusitalo, Rechtstheorie Beiheftt 10, 161 ff. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

Aarnio, A. (1987), The Rational as Reasonable. Dordrecht: Reidel.

Aarnio, A. (1989a), An Introduction, in: Aleksander Peczenik, On Law and Reason, Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Aarnio, A. (1989b), Laintulkinnan teoria (The Theory of Legal Interpretation). Porvoo: WSOY.

Aarnio, A. (1989c), Regulative Prinzip der Gesetzesauslegung, Rechtstheorie 20, 409 ff.

Aarnio, A. (1990), Taking Rules Seriously, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie Beiheft 42, 180 ff.

Aarnio, A. (1991), Precedent in Finland, in: Interpreting Precedents. A Comparative Study, edited by D. Neil MacCormick and Robert S. Summers, 65 ff. Aldershot, ON: Dartmouth.

Aarnio, A. (1993), On the Knowledge of Legal Facts Through Norms, in: Sprache, Performanz und Ontologie des Rechts. Festgabe für Kazimierz Opalek zum 75. Geburtstag, edited by Werner Krawietz und Jerzy Wroblewski, 3 ff. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

Aarnio, A. (1994), Is Legal Science a Social Science? in: Prescriptive Formality and Normative Rationality in Modern Legal Systems: Festschrift for Robert S. Summers, edited by Werner Krawietz, Neil MacCormick and G. H. von Wright, 3 ff. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

Aarnio, A. (1997), Reason and Authority. A Treatise on the Dynamic Paradigm of Legal Dogmatics. Aldershot. Ashgate.

Aarnio, A. (1999a), Law and Action, in: Perspectives in Analytical Philosophy. Actions, Norms, Values. Discussion with Georg Henrik von Wright, edited by Georg Meggle and Andreas Wojcik, 37 ff. Berlin: de Gruyter.

Aarnio, A. (1999b), On Semantic Ambiguity of Legal Interpretation, in: Dialectic of Law and Reality, edited by Lars D. Eriksson and Samuli Hurri, 17 ff.

Aarnio, A. (2005), On the Concept of One Right Answer, in: Memorial Seminar dedicated to Aleksander Peczenik, edited by Kjell Ake Modeer, 8 ff.

Aarnio, A., Alexy, R., and Peczenik, A. (1981), The Foundation of Legal Reasoning, Rechstheorie 133 ff, 257 ff and 423 ff. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

Aarnio, A., Atienza, M., and Laporta, F. J. (2010), Bases teoricas del la interpretation juridical. Madrid: Fundacion Coloquio Juridico Europeo.

Aarnio, A. and Peczenik, A. (1985), Mas alla del realism. Una critica de la reconstruccion del la dogmatic juridical por Alf Ross, Revistade Sciencias Sociales 5, 127 ff.

Aarnio, A. and Peczenik, A. (1996), On Values. Universal or Relative, Ratio Juris 9, 321 ff.

Aarnio, A. and Peczenik, A. (1995), Suum Cuique Tribuere. Some Reflections on Law, Freedom and Justice, Ratio Juris 8, 142 ff.

Aarnio, A. and Uusitalo, J. (1983/1984), Paradigm i rättsadogmatiken. Mot en teori om forändring och framsteg inom rättsvetenskapen (Paradigm in the Doctrinal Study of Law. Toward a Theory of Change and Development in Legal Research). Tidskrift for rättssociologi. 1 (4), 263 ff.

Alchourron, C. (1986), Systematization and Change in the Science of Law, in: Vernunft and Erfahrung in Rechtsdenken der Gegenwart, Hrsg. Torstein Eckhoff, Lawrence K. Friedman, and Jyrki Uusitalo, Rechtstheorie, Beiheft 10, 81 ff.

Alchourron, C. and Bulygin, E. (1971), Normative Systems. Wien - New York: Springer.

Alexy, R. (1985), Rechtsregeln und Rechtsprinzipien, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophy Beiheft 25, 72 ff.

Alexy, R. (1988), Problems of Discourse Theory, Critica 20, 43 ff.

Alexy, R. (1989), A Theory of Legal Argumentation. Translated Ruth Adler and Neil MacCormick. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Alexy, R. (1992), A Discourse-Theoretical Conception of Practical Reason, Ratio Juris 5, 231 ff.

Alexy, R. (1996), Discourse Theory and Human Rights, Ratio Juris 9, 209 ff.

Alexy, R. (1999), The Special Case Thesis, Ratio Juris 12, 374 ff.

Alexy, R. (2001), A Defense of Radbruch's Formula, in: Lloyd’s Introduction to Jurisprudence, 7th edn., edited by M.D.A.

Alexy, R. (2002a), Theory of Constitutional Rights. Translated Julian Rivers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Alexy, R. (2002b), The Argument from Injustice. A Reply to Legal Positivism. Translated by Bonnie Litschewski Paulson and Stanley L. Paulson, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Alexy, R. (2003a), On Balancing and Subsumption, Ratio Juris 16, 433 ff.

Alexy, R. (2003b), The Nature of Arguments About the Nature of Law, in: Rights, Culture and the Law. Themes from the Legal and Political Philosophy of Joseph Raz, edited by Lucas H. Meyer, Stanley L. Paulson, and Thomas W. Pogge, 3 ff. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Alexy, R. (2004a), Menschenrecht ohne Metaphysik, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 52, 15 ff.

Alexy, R. (2004b), The Nature of Legal Philosophy, Ratio Juris 17, 156 ff.

Alexy, R. (2007), The Weight Formula, in: Studies in the Philosophy of Law, Vol. 3, edited by Jerzy Stelmach, Bartosz Brozek, and Wojziech Zaluski, 20 ff. Krokow: Jagellonian University.

Alexy, R. (2008), On the Concept and Nature of Law, Ratio Juris 21, 281 ff.

Alexy, R. (2009a), The Dual Nature of Law, in: IVR 24th World Congress. Papers Plenary Sessions, 275 ff.

Alexy, R. (2009b), Ideales Sollen, in: Grundrechte, Prinzipien und Argumentation, edited by Laura Clerico and Jan-Reinard Sieckmann, 21 ff.

Alexy, R. (2010), The Dual Nature of Law, Ratio Juris 23, 167 ff.

Alexy, R. (2011), Some Reflections on How My Thinking About Law has Changed Over the Years, in: The Tampere Club Series, Vol. 4, edited by Aulis Aarnio Tampere: The Tampere Club. (forthcoming).

Alexy, R. and Peczenik, A. (1990), The Concept of Coherence and Its Significance for Discoursive Rationality, Ratio Juris 2, 13 ff.

Anscombe, G. E. M. (1958), On Brute Facts, Analysis 18, 69 ff.

Anscombe, G. E. M. (1959/1971), An Introduction to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. London: Hutchinson.

Aristotle (2001). Topiikka; Teokset II (Topics; Works II) Finnish translation Juha Sihvola.

Atienza, M. (1990), On the Reasonable in Law, Ratio Juris 2, 145 ff.

Atienza, Manuel (1993), Practical Reason and Legislation, Ratio Juris 3, 269 ff.

Avila Bergmann, H. (2006), Theorie der Rechtsprinzipien. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

Bankowski, Z., MacCormick, N., Morasowski, L., and Alfonso Ruiz, M. (1997), Rationales for Precedent, in: Interpreting Precedent. A Comparative Study, edited by D. Neil MacCormick and Robert S. Summers, 481 ff. Dartmouth: Aldershot.

Bergholtz, G. (1987), Ratio et auctoritas. Ett komparativrättslig bidrag till frägan om domsmo- tiveringens betydelse i tvistemäl (A Comparative Study on Justification on Legal Decision). Lund: Juridiska foreningen i Lund.

Berlin, I. (2002), Liberty (Revised and expanded edition of Four Essays on Liberty), in: Berlin, Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bhaskar, R. (1975), A Realist Theory of Science. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Press.

Bhaskar, R. (1978), The Possibility of Naturalism. Brighton: Harvester Press.

Bird, A. (2004), Thomas Kuhn, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu 1 ff. Bjarup, J. (1978), Skandinavisches Rechtsrealismus. Freiburg: Alber.

Bjarup, J. (1980), Reason and Passion. A Basic Theme in Hägerstroms Legal Philosophy, in: Rechtstheorie 11. 1980. 152 ff.

Bjorne, L. (1980), Matthias Calonius och Olof Rabenius, in: JFT (Tidskrif utgiven av juridiska foreningen i Finland), 117 ff. Helsinki: Juridiska foreningen i Finland.

Bjorne, L. (1984), Deutsche Rechtssysteme in 18. und 19, Jahrhundert: Turku.

Bjorne, L. (2001), Brytningstiden. Den nordiska rättsvetenskapens historia. Del II. 1815-1870 (The History of the Nordic Legal Research. 1815-1870).

Brusiin, O. (1951), Über das juristiche Denken. Helsinki: Societas scientiarum Fennica.

Bulygin, E. (1986), Legal Dogmatics and the Systematization of Law, in: Vernunft und Erfahrung im Rechtsdenken der Gegenwart, edited by Torstein Eckhoff, Lawrence M.

Burke, K. (1945), A Grammar of Motives. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Burke, K. (1966), Language as Symbolic Action. Essays on Life, Literature and Method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Burke, K. (1969), A Rhetoric of Motives (1st edition 1950). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Calonius, M. (1810), Praelectiones in Jurisprudentiam Civilem, In Finnish 1908 and 1998 Helsinki: Werner Soderstrom lakitieto.

Carter, I. (2007), Positive and Negative Liberty, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 1 ff.

Cohen, J. L. (1970), The Implication of Induction. London: Methuen.

Coleman, J. (1997), Practice and Corrective Justice, Philosophical Foundation of Tort Law 1997, 53 ff.

Conte Almedeo, G. and Cabrera Alarcon, C. (1995), Deontica de la Validez. Madrid: Editorial Tecnos.

Dalberg-Larsen, J. (1977), Retsvidenskab som samfundsvidenskab (Legal Science as Social Science). Kopenhavn.

Dalberg-Larsen, J. (1984), Five Essays on Legal Science. Aarhus: Universitetsforlaget.

Dessau, C. (2008), Nationale Aspekte einer transnationalen Disziplin. Zur rechtskulturellen Einbettung der Rechtstheorie in Finnland, Schweden und Deutschland zwischen 1960 - 1990. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

Dreier, R. (1978), Zur Theoriebildung in der Jurisprudenz, in: Recht und Gesellschaft. Festschrift für Helmut Schelsky zum 65. Geburtstag. Herausgeben von Friedrich Kaulbach und Werner Krawietz. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

Dworkin, R. (1977a), Is Law a System of Rules, in: The Philosophy of Law, edited by Ronald Dworkin, 38 ff. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dworkin, R. (1977b), No Right Answer? in: Law, Morality and Society. Essays in Honour ofH. L. A. Hart, edited by J. M. S. Hacker and Joseph Raz, 58 ff. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Dworkin, R. (1981), Taking Rights Seriously, 2nd edn. London: Duckworth.

Dworkin, R. (1986), Law’s Empire. London: Fontana Press.

Eckhoff, T. (1987), Rettskildelaere, 2nd edn. Oslo: Tano.

Eckhoff, T. and Sundby, N. (1976), Rettssystemer (Legal Systems). Oslo: Tano.

Ekelof, P. (1958), Teleological Construction of Statues, Scandinavian Studies in Law 2, 84 ff.

Eng, S. (2003), Analysis of Dis/agreement - with particular reference to Law and Legal Theory. Dordrecht. Kluwer.

Eng, S. (2011), Lost in the System or Lost in the Translation. The Exchanges between Hart and Ross, Ratio Juris 24, 194 ff.

Fann, K. (1969), Wittgenstein’s Conception of Philosophy. Berkeley, CA. University of California Press.

Finch, H. (1977), Wittgenstein - The Later Philosophy. An Exposition of the “Philosophical Investigations. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.

Finnis, J. (1987), Natural Law and Legal Reasoning, in: Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence, edited by J. Ekelaar and J. Bell, 144 ff. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Friedmann, L. (1994), Is there a Modern Legal Culture?, Ratio Juris 2, 117 ff.

Garzon Valdes, E. (1987), Modelle normativer Geltung, Rechtstheorie 1, 41 ff.

Garzon Valdes, E. (2006a), Cual es la relevancia moral del concepto de dignididad humana? in: Tolerancia, dignididad y democracia, 231 ff.

Garzon Valdes, E. (2006b), Lo intimo, lo privado y lo public, Tolerancia, dignidad y democracia 2006, 61 ff.

Garzon Valdes, E. (2006c), Tolerancia, dignididad y democracia. Madrid. Universidad inca garcilasco de la vega.

Gizbert-Studnicki, T. (1988), Das hermeneutische Bewusstsein der Juristen, Rechtstheorie 1, 151 ff.

Golding, M. (1970), Principled Decision-Making and the Supreme Court, in: Essays in Legal Philosophy, edited by Robert S. Summers, 208 ff. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Gonzales Lagier, D. (2003), The Paradoxes of Action (Human Action, Law and Philosophy). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Gregg, B. (2010), Anti-Imperialism: Generating Universal Human Rights Out of Local Norms, Ratio Juris 23, 289 ff.

Günther, K. (1993), Critical Remarks on Robert Alexy’s “Special Case-Thesis”, Ratio Juris 6, 143 ff.

Habermas, J. (1973), Wahrheitstheorien, in: Wirklichkeit und Reflexion. Festschrift für W Schulz. Hrsg H. Fahrenbach. 211 ff, Pfullingen: Neske.

Habermas, J. (1981), Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Zur Kritik der funktionalistischen Vernunft I-II. 1981. Frankfurt am Main. Suhrkamp.

Habermas, J. (1983), Moralbewusstsein und kommunikatives Handeln. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Habermas, J. (1987), The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Twelve Lectures. Transl. Frederick Lawrence. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Habermas, J. (1989), Technik und Wissenschaft als “Ideologie”. Frankfurt am Main. Suhrkamp.

Habermas, J. (1990), Kommunikativt handlande, in: Texter om sprak, rationalitet och samhälle (Communicative behaviour. Texts on Language, Rationality and Society), edited by Anders Molander. Uddevalla: Daidalos.

Habermas, J. (1992), Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Habermas, J. (1999), Wahrheit und Rechtfertigung. Philosophische Aufsätze. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Hägerstrom, A. (1929), Selbstdarstellung, in: Die Philosophie der Gegenwart in Selbsdar- stellungen, edited by R. Schmidt, Vol. 7. Leipzig: Felix Heiner.

Hägerstrom, A. (1953), Inquiries into the Nature of Law and Morals. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksells.

Hardin, R. (2007), David Hume: Moral & Political Theorist. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hare, R. (1952), The Language of Morals. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Hare, R. (1981), Moral Thinking. Its Levels, Method and Point. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Hart, H. L. A. (1961), The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Hart, H. L. A. (1963), Law, Liberty and Morality. London: Oxford University Press.

Hart, H. L. A. (1983), Scandinavian Realism, in: Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy, 161 ff. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Helin, M. (1983), On the Semantics of the Interpretative Sentences in Legal Dogmatics, in: Essays in legal Theory in Honor ofKaarle Makkonen. Oikeustiede-Jurisprudentia XVI, 63 ff.

Hertzberg, L. (1976), On the Factual Dependence of the Language-Game, in: Essays on Wittgenstein in Honour of G.H von Wright, 126 ff, New York, NY: The Garland Publishers.

Hertzberg, L. (1981), Science and Certainty, in: Essays in Philosophical Analysis, edited by Ingemar Porn, Acta Philosophica Fennica, 60 ff. Helsinki: Societas Philosophica Fennica.

Hintikka, J. (1976), Essays on Wittgenstein in Honour of G. H. von Wright, in: Acta Philosophica Fennica, edited by Jaakko Hintikka, 516 ff. New York, NY: The Garland Publishers.

Hintikka, J. (1999a), Interrogative of Logic as a General Theory of Reasoning, in: Selected Papers 5, edited by Jaakko Hintikka, 47 ff (with Ilpo Halonen and Arto Mutanen). New York, NY: Springer.

Hintikka, J. (1999b), Semantics and Pragmatics for Why-Questions, in: Selected Papers 1, edited by Jaakko Hintikka, 183 ff (with Ilpo Halonen). Springer.

Hintikka, J. (1996a), Language Games, in: Selected Papers 1, edited by Jaakko Hintikka, 275 ff. New York, NY: Springer.

Hintikka, J. (1996b), Rules, Games and Experiences: Wittgenstein’s Discussion of Rule - Following in the Light of His Development, in: Selected Papers 1, 315 ff. Springer.

Hintikka, J. (1996c), Wittgenstein as a Philosopher of Immediate Experience, in: Selected Papers 1, edited by Jaakko Hintikka, 191 ff. Springer.

Hintikka, M., and Hintikka, J. (1986), Investigating Wittgenstein. Oxford: Blackwell.

Hintikka, M., and Hintikka, J. (1996a), Different Language Games in Wittgenstein, in: Selected Papers 5, edited by Jaakko Hintikka, 335 ff. Springer.

Hintikka, M., and Hintikka, J. (1996b), Wittgenstein. Some Perspectives on the Development of His Thought, in: Selected Papers 5, edited by Jaakko Hintikka, 297 ff. New York, NY: Springer.

Hoerster, N. (1983), Moralbegründung Ohne Metaphysik, in: Erkenntnis 19, 1 ff, edited by Wilhelm K. Essler, Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Hohfeld, W. (1913), Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning, Yale Law Journal 16, 23 ff.

Holmes, O. (1897), The Path of the Law, Harvard Law Review 10, 457 ff.

Hume, D. (1777), An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, appl.l, ed. L.A. Selby-Bigge. Oxford: Clarendon.

Illum, K. (1968), Some Reflections on the Method of Legal Science and on Legal Reasoning, in: Scandinavian Studies in Law, 49 ff, Stockholm.

Jareborg, N. (1975), Värderingar (On Evaluations). Stockholm: Norstedt.

Jorgensen, S. (1969), Argumentation and Decision, in: Festskrift till professor, dr. jur. & phil. Alf Ross, 381 ff.

Jorgensen, S. (1978), Values in Law. Ideas, Principles and Rules. Aarhus: Jurist for bundet.

Jorgensen, S. (1982), Pluralis Juris: Towards a Relativistic Theory of Law. Aarhus.

Kagan, S. (1989), The Limits of Morality. London: Oxford University Press.

Kangas, U. and Timonen, P. (1998), Johdatus Matthias Caloniuksen teokseen Praelectiones in Jurisprudentiam Civilem (Introduction to Calonius Praelectiones), vii ff.

Kelsen, H. (1928), Die philosophischen Grundlagen der Naturrechtslehre und Rechtspositivismus. Wien: Springer.

Kelsen, H. (1970), The Pure Theory of Law. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Kenny, A. (1970), Intention and Purpose in Law, in: Essays in Legal Philosophy, edited by Robert S. Summers, 146 ff. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Kenny, A. (1975), Wittgenstein. London: Allen Lane.

Kenny, A. (1982), Wittgenstein on the Nature of Philosophy, in: Wittgenstein and his Times, edited by Anthony Kenny and Brian Mc Guinness, 20 ff. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Krawietz, W. (1978a), Recht und Rationalität in dcr modernen Systemtheorie, in: Objektivierung des Rechtsdenkens. Gedächtnisschrift für Ilmar Tammelo, edited by Werner Krawietz, Theo Mayer-Maly, and Ota Weinberger, 724 ff. Berlin Duncker & Humblot.

Krawietz, W. (1978b), Juristische Entscheidung und wissenschaftliche Erkenntnis. Eine Untersuchung zum Verhältnis von dogmatischer Rechtswissenschaftlicher und rechtswis­senschaftlicher Grundlagenforschung. Forschungen aus Staat und recht 38. Wien - New York.

Krawietz, W. (1981), Rechtssystem und Rationalität in der juristischen Dogmatik, Rechtstheorie Beiheft 2, 299 ff.

Krawietz, W. and Alexy, R. (1983), Metatheorie juristischer Argumentation. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

Kotkavirta, J. (1987), Järki ja kommunikaatio (Ratio and Communication). Jürgen Habermas. Tekstejä (Texts) 1981-1985. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.

Kuhn, T (1959), The Essential Tension: Tradition and Innovation in Scientific Research, in: The Third University of Utah Research Conference on the Identification of Scientific Talent, edited by C. Taylor, 162 ff. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kuhn, T (1962/1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolution, 2nd edn. 1970 (with postscript). Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Kuhn, T (1970), Reflections on my Critics, in: Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, edited by I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave, 231 ff. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kuhn, T (1983), Rationality and Theory Choice, Journal of Philosophy 80, 563 ff.

Kuhn, T (1991), The Natural and Human Sciences, in: The Interpretative Turn, Science, Culture, edited by D. Hiley, J. Bohman, and R. Shusterman, 17 ff. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Lagerspetz, E. (1988), Reflexive Predictions and Strategic Actions, Social Science Information 27, 307 ff.

Lagerspetz, E. (1989), A Conventionalist Theory of Institutions. Helsinki: Acta Philosophica Fennica.

Lagerspetz, E. (1995), The Opposite Mirrors. An Essay on the Conventionalist Theory of Institutions. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Lagerspetz, E. (2009), Oikeusajattelun vuosisata (The Century of Legal Theory). Turku : Areopagus.

Lakatos, I. (1970), Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, in: Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, edited by I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave, 132 ff. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Laporta, F. (2011), Legal Principles, in: Actions, Norms, Values. Discussions with Georg Henrik von Wright, Perspectives in Analytical Philosophy. Band 21, edited by George Meggle assisted by Andreas Wojcik, 279 ff. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Lucas, J. (1966), The Principles of Politics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Lyons. D. (1977), Principles, Positivism and Legal Theory, Yale Law Journal 3, 414 ff.

MacCormick, N. (1974a), Law as Institutional Fact, Law Quaterly Review 90, 102 ff.

MacCormick, N. (1974b), Principles of Law, Juridical Review 10, 217 ff.

MacCormick, N. (1978a), Dworkin as Pre-Benthamite, Philosophical Review LXXXVII (4), 385 ff.

MacCormick, N. (1978b), Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

MacCormick, N. (1984), Coherence in Legal Justification, in: Theory of Legal Science, edited by A. Peczenik, 235 ff. Dordrecht: Reidel.

MacCormick, N. (1991), Interpreting Statutes in United Kingdom, in: Interpreting Statutes, eds by Neil MacCormick and Roberts S. Summers, 359 ff, Aldershot: Dartmouth.

MacCormick, N. (1993), Argumentation and Interpretation in Law, Ratio Juris 6, 16 ff.

MacCormick, N. (1995), Defeasibility in Law and Logic, in: Informatics and the Foundations of Legal Reasoning, edited by Zenon Bankowski, Jan White, and Ulrike Hahn, 99 pp. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

MacCormick, N. (2005), Rhetoric and the Rule of Law. A Theory of Legal Reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

MacCormick, N. (2007), Institutions of Law. AnEssay in Legal Theory. London: Oxford University Press.

MacCormick, N. (2008), Practical Reason in Law and Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

MacCormick, N. and Weinberger, O. (1986), An Institutional Theory of Law. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

MacCormick, D. N. and Summers, R. S. (1997), Appendix. Final Version of the Common Questions, Comparative Legal Precedent Study, September 1994, in: Interpreting Statutes. A Comparative Study, eds by D. Neil MacCormick and Robert S. Summers, 551 ff, Aldershot: Dartmouth.

Makkonen, K. (1959), Ajatuksia juridisen kielen loogisesta analyysista (Thoughts on the Logical Analysis of the Legal Language), in: Lakimies (Lawyer), 49 ff. Vammala: Suomalainen lakimiesyhdistyl.

Makkonen, K. (1965), Zur Problematik der juridischen Entscheidung. Turun Yliopisto. Humaniora, Tom. 93, Turun: Turun Yliopisto Jathaisuja.

Malem Sena, J. (1995), Carlos Santiago Nino; A Bio-Biographical Sketch, Inter-American Law Review 27, 45 ff.

Malcom, N. (1995), Wittgensteinian Themes. in: Essays 1978-1989, edited by G. H. von Wright. New York, NY: Cornell University Press.

Mann, M. (1986/92), The Sources of Social Power, in: A History of Power from the Beginning to

A. D. 1760 1, 1 ff.

Marc-Wogau, K. (1963), Studier till Axel Hägerstoms filosofi (Studies on Axel Hägerstrom’s philosophy). Stockholm: Prisma.

Marmor, A. (1993), No Easy Cases? in: Wittgenstein and Legal Theory, edited by Dennis M. Patterson, 189 ff. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Marshall, G. (1997), What is Binding in a Precedent, in: Interpreting Precedents. A Comparative Study, edited by Neil MacCormick and Robert S. Summers, 503 ff. Dartmouth: Aldershot.

McPherson, T. (1970), Social Philosophy. New York, NY: Van Nostrand-Reinhold.

Mellema, G. (1988), Individuals, Groups and Shared Moral Responsibility, Vol. 61. Michigan: American University Studies.

Merton, R. (1996), On Social Structure and Science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Mikkola, P, Aarnio, A., and Poyhonen, J. (1988), The Scientif Community and the Images of Legal Science, in: Reports from the Project for the Study of Legal Research, Nr 4, 18 ff, Helsinki: University of Helsinki.

Mill, J. (1859), On Liberty. London: Longman, Roberts & Green.

Modeer, K. (1979), Introduction to Daniel Nehrman- Ehrensträhle, in: Nehrman 1 and 2. Lund: Juridiska foreningen.

Mohnhaupt, H. (2000), Europäische Rechtsgeschichte und europäische Einigung. Historische Beobachtungen zu Einheitlichkeit und Vielfalt des Rechts und der Rechtsentwicklungen in Europa, in: Recht, Idee Geschichte. Beiträge für Rolf Lieberwirth, edited by H. Luck und

B. Schildt, 657 ff. Koln, Weiman, Wein: Bohlau Verlag.

Moore, G. E. (2002), On Defining “Good”, in: Analytic Philosophy, Classic Readings, ed. by Steven D. Hales, 1 ff. Stanford, CT: Wadsworth.

Moral Soriano, L. (2003), A Modest Notion of Coherence in Legal Reasoning. A Model for the European Council of Justice, Ratio Juris 16, 296 ff.

Musgrave, A. (1979), How to Avoid Incommensurability?, in: The Logic and Epistemology of Scientific Change, edited by Ilkka Niiniluoto and Raimo Tuomela, 336 ff. Helsinki: Societas Philosophica Fennica.

Musgrave, A. (1980), Kuhn's Second Thought, in: Paradigms and Revolutions, edited by G. Gutting, 39 pp. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

Naess, A. (1961/1995), Empirisk semantik. Stockholm: Svenska bokforlaget.

Nehrman, D. (1729), Inledning Til Then Swenska Jurisprudentiam Civilem. Faximile edition 1979 (Introduction to the Swedish Jurisprudentiam Civilem). Lund: Juridiska foreningen.

Nehrman, D. (1746), Then Swenska Jurisprudentia Civilis. Faximile edition 1979 (The Swedish Jurisprudentia Civilis). Lund: Juridiska foreningen.

Nelson, E. (2005), Liberty: One Concept Too Many, Political Theory, 58 ff. edited by Marry G. Dietz, California: Sage Publication.

Niiniluoto, I. (1976), Inductive Explanation, Propensity and Action, in: Essays on Explanation and Understanding, edited by J. Manninen and R. Tuomela, 335 ff. New York, NY: Synthese Library.

Niiniluoto, I. (1980a), Inductive Logic and Probability, Vol. 2, 157 ff. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Niiniluoto, I. (1980b), Johdatus tieteenfilosofiaan. Käsitteen- ja teorianmuodostus (An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Formation of Concepts and Theories). Helsinki: Otava.

Niiniluoto, I. (1981a), Analogy and Inductive Logic, in: Erkenntnis 16, edited by A. Aarnio, I. Niiniluoto, and J. Uusitalo, Rechtstheorie, Beiheft 2, 362 ff. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

Niiniluoto, I. (1981b), Language, Norms and Truth, in: Essays in Philosophical Analysis. Acta Philosophica Fennica 32, edited by Ingmar Porn, 168 ff. Helsinki: Societas Philosophica Fennica.

Niiniluoto, I. (1982a), On the Truth of Norm Propositions, Rechtstheorie Beiheft 3, 171 ff. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

Niiniluoto, I. (1982b), Tieteellinen päättely ja selittäminen (Scientific Inference and Explanation). Helsinki: Otava.

Niiniluoto, I. (1983), Analogy and Legal Reasoning, in: Essays in Legal Theory in Honor ofKaarle Makkonen, Oikeustiede-Jurisprudentia, 177 ff. Vammala: Suomalainen lakimiesyhdistyl.

Niiniluoto, I. (1984), Tiede, filosofiaja maailmankatsomus (Science, Philosophy and World View). Helsinki: Otava.

Niiniluoto, I. (1985), Truth and Legal Norms, in: Condition of Validity and Cognition in Modern Legal Thought, edited by Neil MacCormick, Stavros Panou, and Luigi Lombardi Vallauri. Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, Beiheft 25, 168 ff.

Niiniluoto, I. (1986), Truthlikeness and the Bayesian Estimation, Synthese 66 (1), 321 ff.

Nino, C. (1994), Positivism and Communitarianism; Between Human Rights and Democacy, Ratio Juris 4, 14 ff.

Nussbaum, M. (2011), Rawls's Political Liberalism. A Reassessment, Ratio Juris 24, 1 ff.

O’Connor, D. (1969), Tuomas Akvinolainen ja luonnollinen moraalilaki (Thomas von Aquinas and the Natural Moral Law). Transl. in Finnish T Nieminen. Helsinki: Kirjapaja.

Olivecrona, K. (1971), Law as Fact, 2nd edn. London: Stevens.

Paulson, S. (1993), Continental Normativism and Its British Counterpart. How are They? Ratio Juris 3, 227 ff.

Perelman, C. (1963), The Idea of Justice and the Problem of Argument. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Peczenik, A. (1967), Doctrinal Study of Law and Science, in: Osterreichise Zeitschrift für offentliches Recht 1, 80 ff, Vienna: Springer.

Peczenik, A. (1970), Essays in Legal Theory. Lund: Juridiska foreningen.

Perelman, C. (1971), The New Rhetoric, in: Pragmatics of Natural Language, edited by Y. Bar-Hillel, 148 ff. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame.

Peczenik, A. (1975), The Structure of Legal System, Rechtstheorie 1, 1 ff.

Peczenik, A. (1981), On the Nature and Function of the Grundnorm, in: Rechtstheorie. Beiheft 2: Duncker & Humblot, 279 ff.

Peczenik, A. (1983), Is there Always a Right Answer to a Legal Question? in: Essays in Legal Theory in Honor ofKaarle Makkonen. Oikeustiede - Jurisprudentia, 239 ff, Vammala.

Peczenik, A. (1984a), Creativity and Transformation in Legal Research, in: Theorie der Normen. Festschrit für Ota Weinberger zum 65 Geburtstag, edited by Werner Krawietz, Helmut Schelsky, Günther Winkler, and Alfred Schramm, 277 ff. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

Peczenik, A. (1984b), Legal Data. An Essay About the Ontology of Law, in: Theory of Legal Science, edited by A. Peczenik, 97 ff. Dordrecht: Reidel.

Peczenik, A. (1984c), Legal Research. Growth of Science and Moral Theory, in: Objektivierung des Rechtsdenkens. Gedächtnisschrift für Ilmar Tammelo, 137 ff, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

Peczenik, A. (1988), Rätten och fornuftet (Law and Reason), 2nd edn. Stockholm: Norstedt.

Peczenik, A. (1989), On Law and Reason. Dordrecht: Reidel.

Peczenik, A. (1990a), Coherence, Truth and Rightness in Law, in: Law, Interpretation and Validity, edited by Patrick Nerhot, 275 ff. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Peczenik, A. (1990b), Juridisk argumentation. En lärobok I allmän rättslära (Legal Argumentation. A Textbook in Jurisprudence). In co-operation of Aulis Aarnio and Gunnar Bergholtz. Stockholm: Norstedt.

Peczenik, A. (1991), Statutory Interpretation in Sweden, in: Interpreting Statutes. A Comparative Study, edited by Neil MacCormick and Robert S. Summers, 311 ff. Dartmouth: Aldershot.

Peczenik, A. (1997a), Precedent in Sweden, in: Interpreting Precedents. A Comparative Study, edited by D. Neil MacCormick and Robert S Summers, 293 ff. Dartmouth: Aldershot.

Peczenik, A. (1997b), The Binding Force of Precedent, in: Interpreting Precedents, A Comparative Study, edited by D. Neil MacCormick and Robert S Summers, 461 ff. Dartmouth: Aldershot.

Perelman, C. (1968), Rhetoric and Philosophy, Philosophy and Rhetoric I, 15 ff.

Perelman, C. (1979a), Juristische Logik als Argumentationslehre. Freiburg/München: Verlag Karl Alber.

Perelman, C. (1979b); The Rational and Reasonable, in: The New Rhetoric and the Humanistic. Essays in Rhetoric and Its Application, 117 ff, Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Perelman, C. and Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1950/1951), Act and Person in Argument, Ethics 61, 252 ff.

Pettit, P. (2008), The Basic Liberties, in: The Legacy ofH. L. A. Hart: Legal, Political and Moral Philosophy, edited by Matthew Kramer et al., 201 ff. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pettit, P. (2009), Law and Liberty, in: Law and Republicanism, edited by Samantha Besson and Jose Luis Marti, 39 ff. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pietarinen, J. (2002), Eettiset perusvaatimukset tyossä (The Ethical Requirements in Scientific Work) in: Tutkijan eettiset valinnat (Ethical Choices of the Scholar), edited by Sakari Karjalainen, Veikko Launis, Risto Pelkonen, and Juhani Pietarinen, 58 ff. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.

Pole, D. (1958), The Later Philosophy of Wittgenstein. Bristol: University of London.

Popper, K. (1959), The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.

Popper, K. (1963), Conjectures and refutations. The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Popper, K. (1972), Objective Knowledge. An Evolutionary Approach (2nd 1980). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Poscher, R. (2007), Einsichten, Irrtümer und Selbsmissverständnisse der Prinzipientheorie, in: Die Prinzipientheorie der Grundrechte, ed by Jan-Reinard Sieckmann, 62 ff. Bamberg: Nomos.

Postema, G. (1987), The Normativity of Law, in: Issues in Contemporary Legal Philosophy. The Influence ofH. L. A. Hart, edited by Ruth Gavinson, 81 ff. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Poyhonen, J. (1981), Juridisista teorioista. Helsinki: Reports from the Project for the Study Law and Legal Research.

Radbruch, G. (2006), Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law, in: Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26, Trans. Bonnie Litschewski Paulson and Stanley L. Paulson, 1 ff. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rawls, J. (1973), A Theory of Justice. 1973. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Ray, J. (1978), Perelman’s Universal Audience, The Quaterly Journal of Speech 4 (64), 361 ff.

Raz, J. (1970), The Concept of Legal System (2nd ed. 1980). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Raz, J. (1972), Legal Principles and the Limits of Law, Yale Law Journal, 823 ff. New Haven: Yale University.

Raz, J. (1975), Practical Reason and Norms (2nd ed. 1990). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Raz, J. (1979), The Authority of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Raz, J. (1993), On the Autonomy of Legal Reasoning, Ratio Juris 6, 1 ff.

Rescher, N. (1985), Truth as Ideal Coherence, Review of Metaphysics 38, 795 ff.

Ross, A. (1929), Theorie der Rechtsquellen. Ein Beitrag zur Theorie des positive Rechts auf Grundlage dogmenhistorischer Untersuchungen. Leipzig-Wien: Deuticke.

Ross, A. (1946), Towards a Realistic Jurisprudence. Criticism of the Dualism of Law. Copenhagen: E. Munksgeard.

Ross, A. (1953), Om ret og retfaerdighed (2nd ed. 1966). Kpbenhavn: Ny nordisk forlag.

Ross, A. (1957), “Tu.tu”, Harvard Law Review 70 (1956/57), 812 ff.

Ross, A. (1958), On Law and Justice. London: Stevens.

Ross, W. (1930), The Right and the Good. Oxford (Reprinted with an introduction by Phillip Stratton-.Lake. 2002). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sandbacka, C. (1987), Understanding Other Cultures. Helsinki: Acta Philosophica Fennica.

Sandel, N. (1982), Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 174 ff.

Sartor, G. (1995), Defeasibility in Legal Reasoning, in: Informatics and the Foundation of Legal Reasoning, edited by Zenon Bankowski, Jan White, and Ulrike Hahn, 119 ff. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Sartorius, R. (1971), Hart’s Concept of Law, in: More Essays in Legal Philosophy, edited by Roberts S. Summers, 131 ff. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

von Savigny, F. (2008), Pandekten. Obligationenrecht. Allgemeiner Teil. Nach Savignys Vorlesungsmanuskript hrsg Martin Avenarius. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Schauer, F. (1988), Formalism, The Yale Law Journal, 509 ff. New Haven: Yale University.

Schauer, F. (1991), Playing by the Rules. A Philosophical Examination of Rule-Based Decision­Making in Law and in Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Schauer, F. (1992), Rules and Rule-Following Argument, in: Wittgenstein and Legal Theory, edited by Dennis M. Patterson, 225 ff. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Searle, J. (1969), Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Searle, J. (1972), What is a Speech Act? in: The Philosophy of Language, edited by J. R. Searle, 39 ff. London: Oxford University Press.

Searle, J. (1978), Prima Facie Obligations, in: Practical Reasoning, edited by J. Raz, 81 ff. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Searle, J. (1996), The Construction of Social Reality. London: Penguin.

Shiner, R. (1985), Rules vs. Principles, in: Conditions of Validity and Cognition in Modern Legal Thought, edited by N. MacCormick, S. Panou, and L. Lombardi Vallauri, 61 ff. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.

Siltala, R. (2000), A Theory of Precedent. From Analytical Positivism to a Post-Analytical Philosophy of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Siltala, R. (2003), Oikeustieteen tieteenteoria (The Theory of Science of Legal Science). Helsinki: Suomalainen lakimiesyhdistys.

Simmonds, N. (1980), Law as a Rational Science, in: Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 535 ff.

Simmonds, N. (1984), The Decline of Judicial Reason. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Sintonen, M. (1981), Problems of Interpretation and Truth in Legal Dogmatics, Rechtstheorie Beiheft 2, 77 ff.

Skinner, Q. (1983), Convention and Speech Acts, in: The History of Ideas, edited by P. King, 253 ff. London: Croom Helm.

Skinner, Q. (1984), The Idea of Negative Liberty. Philosophical and Historical Perspectives, in: Philosophy in History, edited by R. Rorty, J. B. Schneewind, and Q. Skinner, 193 ff. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Skinner, Q. (2003), Kolmas vapauden käsite (The Third Notion of Liberty). Translated by Sami Syrjämäki. Tampere: Vastapaino.

Soeteman, A. (1989), Logic in Law. Remarks on Logic and Rationality in Normative Reasoning. Especially in Law. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Stromholm, S. (1986), A Short History of Legal Thinking in the West. Lund: Fred B Rothman & Co.

Stromholm, S. (1988), Rätt, rättskällor och rättstillämpning (Law, Sources of Law and Application of Law), 3rd edn. Stockholm: Norstedt.

Summers, R. (1978), The Types of Substantive Reasons: The Case of the Theory of Common Law Justification, Cornell Law Review 63, 724 ff.

Summers, R. (1982), Instrumentalism and American Legal Theory. Cornell: Cornell University Press.

Summers, R. (1992a), Essays on the Nature of Law and Legal Reasoning, in: Schriften z.ur Rechtstheorie, Heft 151. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

Summers, R. (1992b), The Formal Character of Law, Cambridge Law Journal 51(2), 242 ff. Great Britain: Cambridge University.

Summers, R. (2006), Form and Function in Legal System. A General Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Summers, R. and Eng, S. (1997), Departures from Precedent, in: Interpreting Precedents. A Comparative Study, edited by Neil MacCormick and Robert S Summers, 519 ff. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Sundberg, J. (1978), Fr. Eddan t. Ekelof. Repetitiorum om rättskällor in Norden (From Eddan to Ekelof. A Repetition on the Sources of Law in the Nordic Countries). Stockholm.

Taylor, C. (1964), Explanation of Behaviour. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Taylor, C. (1976), Tulkinta ja ihmistieteet (Interpretation and Human Sciences), in: Yhteiskuntatieteiden filosofiset perusteet (The Philosophical Foundations of Social Sciences), edited by Raimo Tuomela and Ilkka Patoluoto, 214 ff. Helsinki: Gaudeamus.

Taylor, C. (1985), Human Agency and Language. Philosophical Papers 1. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.

Taylor, C. (1991), The Ethics of Authenticity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Toulmin, S. (1950), An Examination of the Place of Reason in Ethics (reprinted 1958, 1970). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Toulmin, S. (1968), The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Toulmin, S. (1970), Does the Distinction Between Normal and Revolutionary Science Hold Water, in: Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, edited by I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave.

Toulmin, S. (1976), Knowing & Acting. An Invitation to Philosophy. New York, NY: Macmillan.

Tranoy, K. (1964), Aquinas, in: A Critical History of Western Philosophy, edited by D. J. O'Connor, 98 ff. New York, NY: Free Press.

Tuori, K. (1988), The Limits of Law, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie Suppl. 3, 168 ff.

Tuori, K. (1989), Discourse Ethics and the Legitimacy of Law, Ratio Juris 2, 125 ff.

Tuori, K. (1997), Legal Science as/and Social Science, Archiv fur Rechts- und Sozialphiloisophie 79 IV, 127 ff.

Tuori, K. (2003), Fundamental-Rights Principles: Disciplining the Instrumentalism of Politics, Associations 7, 327 ff.

Ullman-Margalit, E. (2006), Out of the Cave. A Philosophical Inquiry into the Dead Sea Scrolls Research. Jerusalem: The Hebrew University Magnes Press.

Van Caenegem, R. (2002), European Law in The Past and the Future. Unity and Diverse in Two Milennia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Van Caenegem, R. (2006), The Unification of European Law: A Pipedream?, European Review nr 1, 33 ff.

Veitch, S. (1999), Moral Conflict and Legal Reasoning. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

Verronen, V. (1986), The Growth of Knowledge. An Inquiry into the Kuhnian Theory. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylän yliopisto.

Victor, D. (1977) Rättssystem och vetenskap: studier kring en analysmodell for ideologiska system (Legal System and Science: Studies on a Model to Analyze the Ideological Systems. Stockholm: Norstedt.

Viehweg, T (1993), Topics and Law. A Contribution to Basic Research in Law. Transl. and Foreword W. Cole Durham Jr. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Villa, V. (1984), Legal Science and Hermeneutic Point of View, in: Theory of Legal Sciences, edited by A. Peczenik, 509 ff. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Von Wright, G. (1963), The Varieties of Goodness. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Von Wright, G. (1968a), An Essay on Deontic Logic and the General Theory of Action. Helsinki: Acta Philosophica Fennica.

Von Wright, G. (1968b), Normien eksistenssi (The Existence of Norms; Lecture in Finnish, mimeograph). Helsinki.

Von Wright, G. (1971), Explanation and Understanding. New York, NY: Cornell University Press.

Von Wright, G. (1972), Wittgenstein on Certainty, in: Problems in the Theory of Knowledge, edited by G. H. von Wright, 3 ff. Hagg: Martinus Nijhott.

Von Wright, G. (1974), Causality and Determinism. Columbia: Columbia University Press.

Von Wright, G. (1985), Is and Ought, in: Man, Law and Modern Forms of Life, edited by Eugenio Bulygin, J.-L. Gardies, and Ilkka Niiniluoto, 263 ff. Dordrecht: Reidel.

Weber, M. (1972), Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologi. Studienausgabe 5, rev. von Johannes Winckelmann. Tübingen-Mohr. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

Wedberg, A. (1947), Johdatus nykyiseen logiikkaan (An Introduction to the Contemporary Logic). Helsinki: Otava.

Weinberger, O. (1973), Topik und Plausibilitätsargumentation, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 1, 17 ff.

Weinberger, O. (1982), Jenseits Positivismus und Naturrecht, Contemporary Conception of Law. Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie Beiheft 1, Part 1, 43 ff.

Weinberger, O. (1992), Conflicting Views on Practical Reason. Again Pseudo-Arguments in Practical Philosophy, Ratio Juris 3, 252 ff.

Weinberger, O. (1993), Institutional Theory of Action and Its Significance for Jurisprudence, Ratio Juris 2, 171 ff.

Weinberger, O. (1994), Die Theorie der Argumentation. Was heisst rational begründet? in: Institution und Recht. Grazer internationales Symposion zu Ehre von Ota Weinberger, Rechtstheorie, Beiheft 14, 8 ff.

Williams, B. (1985), Ethics and Limits of Philosophy. London: Fontana Press.

Williams, G. (1970), The Concept of Legal Liberty, in: Essays in Legal Philosophy, edited by Robert S. Summers, 121 ff. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Wimmer, F. (1979), By What Criteria Can Progress in Legal Theory be Determined?, Rechtstheorie Beiheft 3, 35 ff.

Winch, P (1958), The Idea of Social Sciences and its Relation to Philosophy (2nd edn. 1990). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Wintgens, L. (1993), Coherence of the Law, Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 483 ff. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.

Wittgenstein, L. (1961), Tractatus Logico Philosophicus. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Wittgenstein, L. (1967), Philosophical Investigations. Oxford. Finnish translation by Heikki Nyman 1981. Porvoo. WSOY.

Wittgenstein, L. (1969), On Certainty, edited by G. M. E. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Wroblewski, J. (1972), System of Norms and Legal System, Rivista Internationale di Filosofia del Diritto 2, 281 ff.

Wroblewski, J. (1974), Legal Syllogism and Rationality of Legal Decision, Rechtstheorie 5, 33 ff.

Wroblewski, J. (1979a), Justification of Legal Decisions, Revue Internationale de Philosophie. La Novelle Rhetorique. Essais en homage a Chaim Perelman, 277 ff.

Wroblewski, J. (1979b), Verification and Justification in the Legal Sciences, Rechtstheorie Beiheft 1, 195 ff.

Wroblewski, J. (1983a), Fuzziness of Legal System, Essays in Legal Theory in Honour ofKaarle Makkonen. Oikeustiede-Jurisprudentia, 311 ff. Vammala: Suomalainen lakimiesyhdistyl.

Wroblewski, J. (1983b), Meaning and Truth in Judicial Decision, edited by Aulis Aarnio, 2nd edn. Helsinki: A-tieto.

Wroblewski, J. (1984a), Dilemmas of the Normativistic Concept of Legal System, Rechtstheorie Beiheft 5, 319 ff.

Wroblewski, J. (1984b), Paradigms of Justifying Legal Decisions, in: Theory of Legal Science, edited by A. Peczenik, 253 ff. Dordrecht: Reidel.

Wroblewski, J. (1991), Statutory Interpretation in Poland, in: Interpreting Statutes. A Comparative Study, edited by Neil MacCormick and Robert S. Summers, 257 ff. Dartmouth: Aldershot.

Wroblewski, J. (1992), The Judicial Application of Law, edited by Neil MacCormick and Zenon Bankowski. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Zahle, H. (1974), Kritik af en retsteori. Om Alf Ross's opfattelse af retsvidenskapen (Critical Study on a Legal Theory. On Alf Ross'View of Legal Science), Tidskrift for Rettsvitenskap 86, 333 ff.

Zitting, S. (1959), An Attempt to Analyse the Owner's Legal Position, Scandinavian Studies in Law 3, 227 ff.

A

Aarnio, A., 6, 17, 19-24, 28, 32, 35, 39, 53, 57,

60, 82, 95, 102-104, 117-119, 121-122, 124, 129, 131, 144-145, 148, 157-161, 163, 165-167, 171-172, 174, 181-182, 185, 187, 190, 192

Alchourron, C., 179-181, 183-184, 195 Alexy, R., 16, 27, 54-55, 57, 61, 77, 103, 112, 119, 121, 123, 141-145, 148, 169, 171, 173

Anscombe, G. E. M., 48-49

Aristotle, 4, 54, 97-100, 144 Avila, H., 119

B

Bankowski, Z., 158

Bayes, 112

Bergholtz, G., 21

Berkeley, 45

Berlin, I., 65-68

Bird, A., 185-186

Bjarup, J., 46, 81

Bjorne, L., 10-11

Bobbio, N., 6

Bulygin, E., 179-183, 185 Burke, K., 99

C

Cabrera, C., 125

Calonius, M., 9-11, 14-17

Carnap, R., 185

Carter, I., 65

Conte, G., 125

D

Dessau, C., 148

Dilthey, W., 95 Dworkin, R., 6, 56-57, 61, 102, 119, 121-122,

126, 145, 162, 166-170, 174

E

Eckhoff, T, 120, 147, 160

Eng, S., 132, 138

F

Finch, H., 35, 43, 120

Frege, G., 99

Friedman, L. M., 3

G

Gadamer, H.-G., 95

Garzon Valdes, E., 27, 66, 103, 125

Geiger, T., 83

Gizbert-Studnicki, T, 104

Golding, M., 120

Gregg, B., 61

Grundlig, N. G., 11

Günther, K., 144

H

Habermas, J., 27, 29, 65, 74, 102, 135,

140-144

Hägerstrom, A., 37, 46-47, 54, 81-82

Hare, R., 54

Harris, M., 61

Hart, H. L. A., 6, 49, 54-56, 81, 86, 162

Heidegger, M., 95

Hertzberg, L., 31, 39

Hiley, 191

Hintikka, J & M., 32-36, 38

Hobbes, T., 67

Hoerster, N., 27, 103

Hume, D., 54, 56,63,

I

Illum, K., 81, 128-129

Irnerius, 3-4

J

Jorgensen, S., 53, 81

Justinian, 4-5, 17, 188

K

Kagan, S., 59-60

Kant, I., 16,27

Kelsen, H., 82, 126, 128, 140

Kenny, A., 35, 154

L

Lagerspetz, E., 47-48, 50-51, 55, 67,

81, 155

Laporta, F. J., 120, 123-124

Lavonius, W., 10

Leibnitz, 60

Levi, I., 78

Lucas, J., 55

Lyons, D., 119

M

MacCormick, N., 43, 48-49, 56, 119-121, 130,

144-145, 151-152, 166-170

Malcom, N., 32-33

Mann, M., 157

Marc-Wogau, K., 46

Marmor, A., 32

Marshall, G., 158

Marx, K., 187

McPherson, T., 55

Merton, R. K., 73-78

Mikkola, P., 185

Modeer, K., 11-13, 15

Mohnhaupt, H., 4

Moore, G. E., 53, 59

Moral Soriano, L., 144

Musgrave, A., 185

N

Nehrman, D., 9-17, 187-188, 198

Nelson, E., 65

Neurath, O., 185

Niiniluoto, I., 73, 76-78, 112, 122, 129,

166, 188

Nino, C. S., 37

Nussbaum, M., 141-142

O

O'Connor, D., 55-56, 62

Olivecrona, K., 46, 54, 154

P

Paulson, S., 4

Peczenik, A., 41-42, 46, 53-54, 56-57,

59-60, 81-82, 114, 119, 124, 134-135, 137, 144-145, 147-148, 150, 153-154, 158-161, 165-166, 185,187

Perelman, C., 97, 99-104, 138, 158, 170 Petri, O., 133

Pettit, P., 65, 67

Popper, K., 49, 73, 78, 112, 154-155,

166, 186

Poscher, R., 119

Poyhonen, J., 178, 195

R

Rabenius, O., 10-11

Radbruch, G., 27, 55

Rawls, J., 55, 141-142

Raz, J., 119-120

Reichenbach, H., 83

Rescher, N., 144

Ross, A., 46, 78, 81-94, 97, 101, 104,

128-129, 196

Ross, D., 55, 59, 62

Ross, W., 55, 59, 62

S

St Aquinas, T.,4, 62, 144

Sandbacka, C., 22, 34, 37

Sandel, N., 50

Sartor, G., 121, 123

Sartorius, R., 55

Schauer, F., 32, 120

Schleiermacher, F., 95

Searle, J. R., 29, 48-50, 60, 65, 102,

168, 171

Shiner, R., 121

Siltala, R., 57, 75-76

Simmonds, N., 50

Skinner, Q., 29, 66-70, 141

Stevenson, C. L., 54

Stromholm, S., 4-5, 20, 147-148,

154, 158

Summers, R. S., 91-92, 149-151,

161-162

Sundberg, J., 147

T

Taylor, C., 35, 37, 41, 43, 57-58, 173 Thomasius, C., 5

Toulmin, S., 61, 66, 96-97, 101, 104, 142 Tranoy, K., 55

Tuori, K.,22,49, 122, 141, 147

U

Ullman-Margalit, E., 105-106, 108-112, 114

V

Van Caenegem, R., 3, 188

Veitch, S., 61, 65

Verronen, V., 185-186, 190

Viehweg, T, 99, 104

Villa, V., 95

Von Savigny, F., 5-6, 13

Von Wright, G. H., 37, 39-42, 65, 67, 70, 78,

84-85, 87, 96-97, 124, 156, 186, 195

W

Weber, M., 6, 118, 139-140

Weinberger, O., 48-49, 57, 99, 163

Williams, B., 50, 59

Wimmer, F., 187

Winch, P., 22-24, 32, 35

Wittgenstein, L., 29-43, 50, 62, 83, 85-86, 96, 120, 128, 171, 177

Wroblewski, J., 43, 123, 125-126, 128,

130-131, 134, 151-152, 166, 179, 185

Z

Zahle, H., 81, 92