<<
>>

Background

At the end of the Second World War, the Allied governments prioritized the repatriation of troops but in addition had to provide passages for any dependents the troops had acquired while on overseas duty.

War brides' migration was an international exchange that resulted in the relocation of hundreds of thousands of women between 1942 and 1952. They moved in great numbers from Britain to the Dominions but also from Britain, Australia, and New Zealand to the United States, from Europe to the United Kingdom, and so on. The magnitude of the movement is illustrated by the fact that over 100,000 women left Japan for the United States; 80,000 British women and 14,000 children also went to the United States; Canada received 40,000 British women and approximately 20,000 chil­dren.7 New Zealand was part of this international exchange. While marriage on active service was officially banned, as many as 4,000 servicemen applied to have spouses and fiancees transported “home.” The 4,000 women (and 1,000 children) who entered New Zealand came mainly from Britain and Canada, with smaller numbers from Italy, Greece, Crete, and other European countries, the Middle East, North Africa, and Japan.8

New Zealand's War Cabinet dictated the conditions under which marriages of servicemen were permissible, and the Defence Department vet­ted intending brides (and grooms), restricted opportunities to marry, granted wives' allowances as they saw fit, and controlled access to transport. The government devised policies couched in terms of immigration quotas about “acceptable” and “unacceptable” spouses. In this way, the government exer­cised powerful economic, legal, and administrative control over the lives of the war brides and shaped gendered perceptions of them as well. Becoming engaged to a New Zealand serviceman transformed them from love interests of individuals into a part of a military operation.

The Defence Department had a vested interest in controlling the relationships of servicemen, as the wartime marriages of military personnel were anathema to tacticians focused on victory. Major-General W. G. Stevens (commanding officer in the Middle East) wrote that officers were plagued by the ongoing “very great expenditure of thought and work out of all proportion to the numbers involved and at times such as the [military] crisis of 1942 was definitely embarrassing to our war effort.”9 In the face of ever-changing government guidelines, the Defence Department attempted to accommodate individuals' wishes to marry while keeping its eye firmly fixed on military priorities.

So while most war-bride marriages started out as romantic encounters, the private commitments to marry foreign servicemen proved more com­plicated than war brides might have imagined, when their marriages were treated as events in the “public” interest. These women unwittingly invited Defence Department and government officials to adjudicate on their per­sonal decisions. Marrying and migrating as a war bride under the auspices of the Defence Department imposed constraints that shaped war brides' experiences. Conditions of entry to New Zealand were dictated to war brides, and politicians framed war-bride migration in ways that fitted post­war reconstructive, economic, and population strategies. The multifaceted projections of war brides and their migration by these agencies suggest how their experiences could be utilized to fit various cultural, social, and political agendas. War brides were never simply choosing love, marriage, and domes­tic life: they were embarking on a journey that exposed their private affairs to official and media interpretation and intervention.

From the government's perspective at least, gendered expectations of the war brides' roles in New Zealand were made abundantly clear. Information supplied to war brides on board ships, on arrival at the wharfs, and at receptions, both public and private, emphasized their role in New Zealand society as the wives of servicemen and the mothers (and future mothers) of their children. For example, in one Weekly Review newsreel of returning fighter pilots escorting their wives and children off the ships with carrycots and other parenting paraphernalia, the commentator remarked that

proud fathers carry their offspring ashore in the latest portable bassinets. When they left New Zealand they never bargained on this but right now they can't think of a better homecoming. Showing off their bright-eyed-babies means more to them than their deeds in the air.10

Returning servicemen were presented as committed to family values to the extent that their war service was almost, but not quite, relegated to second place. War brides in this instance were designated as the supporting cast in the homecoming display of returning war heroes.

<< | >>
Source: Abbenhuis Maartje, Buttsworth Sara. Restaging War in the Western World: Noncombatant Experiences, 1890-Today. Palgrave Macmillan,2009. — 242 p.. 2009

More on the topic Background:

  1. BACKGROUND
  2. Background
  3. Necessary background and a look ahead
  4. On the Background
  5. Background Context
  6. Chapter 2 Background
  7. Background and Principles of Neonatal-Pediatric Interfacility Transport
  8. Background: The Presentation of Paper Documents under Documentary Letters of Credit with Special Focus on Bills of Lading and Insurance Certificates
  9. The Background to the Code
  10. Background