<<
>>

Guidelines for Systems Development

The organizational and systems challenges in education are considerable. To guarantee benefits of CRE, educators must be strategic about what it takes to build programs in sys­tems with poor resources, crowded curriculum, expectations of inclusive school community, and economic upheaval (Bird & Sultmann, 2010).

CASEL has provided suggestions for best practices to implement programs at the classroom, school, and district levels (Zins, Bloodworth, Weissberg, & Walberg, 2007). Among their guidelines for developing SEL initiatives are direct teaching and modeling of skills, developmentally and culturally appropri­ate instruction, integration into extracurricular activities, school-family-community partner­ships, quality staff development and support, outcomes evaluation, and dissemination fac­tors (Zins & Elias, 2007; Zins, Weissberg, Wang, & Walberg, 2004).

Linking with the larger community is important but difficult. Looking at peace and reconciliation work in Northern Ireland, Cairns (1996) and Smith, Daunic, Miller, and Robinson (2002) both confirm that school­based initiatives require community links and support to succeed. While school-based pro­grams may be able to develop individual skills, without involvement of community mem­bers in the program, the skills wane and the impacts to intergroup and social peace build­ing are less likely to happen (Williams, 2004).

<< | >>
Source: Oetzel John, Ting-Toomey Stella. The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Communication: Integrating Theory, Research and Practice. SAGE Publications,2013. — 912 p.. 2013

More on the topic Guidelines for Systems Development: