<<
>>

Paradigms and Metatheoretical Traditions

Over a decade after Denzin and Lincoln (2000) introduced a list of key paradigms in qualitative research (i.e., interpretivism, hermeneutics, and social constructionism), the latest edition of Denzin and Lincoln’s hand­book on qualitative research (2011) expanded these classic areas by adding “paradigms and perspectives in contention,” displaying tensions found in critical ethnography and

race theory scholarships, cultural studies, and critical humanism and queer theory.

Paradigms overlap with and differ from phenomenologi­cal, sociocultural (e.g., ethnomethodological, symbolic interactionist, social constructionist, ethnographic, structurational, actor network theoretical inquiry), and critical (e.g., femi­nist, postcolonialist, critical race, and cultural studies) traditions and theories espoused by Lindlof and Taylor (2010). In the follow­ing sections, we rely on the work of Denzin and Lincoln (2000, 2011), Craig (1999), and Lindlof and Taylor (2010) for our overviews. Table 3.1 summarizes all the major theoretical paradigms adopted in qualitative research on

Table 3.1 Summary of Selected Qualitative Research on Communication and Conflict

Contexts

Paradigm Overview Methods Used Considered Examples
Phenomenological Conflict is rooted Phenomenology Interpersonal, Krider and Ross
in conflict of organizational (1997) and
meaning. This Oduro-Frimpong
paradigm focuses on individuals’ (2007)
unique experience, emotions, and interpretations of conflict.
Sociocultural/ Conflict is Ethnography, Interpersonal, Aakhus and
social constructed by narrative, organizational, Rumsey (2010),
construction participants grounded community, Barak (2007),
through group, theory, case public Brummans et al.
community, study, and relations, (2008), Coleman,
and cultural mixed methods interethnic/ Hacking, Stover,
interactions. intercultural, Fisher-Yoshida,
Norms of conflict international and Nowak
(macrolevel) and (2008), Daiute
are worked geopolitical, and Turniski,
out through and online (2005), D. Ellis
communication (2012), Goodwin
(microlevel). (2008), Moriizumi
Conflict occurs (2011), Papa,
when there is a Mapendere, and
lack of shared Dillon (2010), and
rules, rituals, Smith-Sanders and
or expectations among members. Harter (2007)

(Continued)

Table 3.1 (Continued)

bgcolor=white>relations
Paradigm Overview Methods Used Contexts

Considered

Examples
Critical/cultural Conflict is Ethnography, Interpersonal, Buzzanell and Liu
studies embedded in a narrative, organizational, (2007), Cloud
society’s power grounded community, (2005), D’Enbeau
structures, be theory, case and and Buzzanell
it economic, study, and interethnic/ (2011), Eckman
social, cultural, or ideological.
Conflict is a locale for investigating how power is constituted and normalized.

Praxis and social change start with awareness of and resistance to power imbalance.

mixed methods intercultural conflict and Lindlof

(2003), Goldberg

(2009), Jameson

(2003), Lambert and Dollahite

(2006), Palmeri

(2009), Plowman

(2008), Roscigno and Hodson

(2004), and

Wieland (2010)

Poststructuralist/ Conflict is Narrative, Interpersonal, Buzzanell and Liu
postmodernist nonlinear, grounded organizational, (2005), Faulkner
emergent, unstable, theory, and case and public and Hecht (2011),
and unpredictable. Multiple emergent realities, rooted in historical and cultural contexts, can give rise to ambiguities, ironies, and identity considerations in and about conflict. study Ney, Blank, and

Blank (2007),

Watts (2009), and Weaver (2010)

NOTE: Qualitative conflict studies featured in this table are referenced in alphabetic order.

conflict communication as well as the meth­ods, specific communicative contexts, and key publications for each paradigm.

<< | >>
Source: Oetzel John, Ting-Toomey Stella. The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Communication: Integrating Theory, Research and Practice. SAGE Publications,2013. — 912 p.. 2013

More on the topic Paradigms and Metatheoretical Traditions: