Paradigms and Metatheoretical Traditions
Over a decade after Denzin and Lincoln (2000) introduced a list of key paradigms in qualitative research (i.e., interpretivism, hermeneutics, and social constructionism), the latest edition of Denzin and Lincoln’s handbook on qualitative research (2011) expanded these classic areas by adding “paradigms and perspectives in contention,” displaying tensions found in critical ethnography and
race theory scholarships, cultural studies, and critical humanism and queer theory.
Paradigms overlap with and differ from phenomenological, sociocultural (e.g., ethnomethodological, symbolic interactionist, social constructionist, ethnographic, structurational, actor network theoretical inquiry), and critical (e.g., feminist, postcolonialist, critical race, and cultural studies) traditions and theories espoused by Lindlof and Taylor (2010). In the following sections, we rely on the work of Denzin and Lincoln (2000, 2011), Craig (1999), and Lindlof and Taylor (2010) for our overviews. Table 3.1 summarizes all the major theoretical paradigms adopted in qualitative research onTable 3.1 Summary of Selected Qualitative Research on Communication and Conflict
Contexts
| Paradigm | Overview | Methods Used | Considered | Examples |
| Phenomenological | Conflict is rooted | Phenomenology | Interpersonal, | Krider and Ross |
| in conflict of | organizational | (1997) and | ||
| meaning. This | Oduro-Frimpong | |||
| paradigm focuses on individuals’ | (2007) | |||
| unique experience, emotions, and interpretations of conflict. | ||||
| Sociocultural/ | Conflict is | Ethnography, | Interpersonal, | Aakhus and |
| social | constructed by | narrative, | organizational, | Rumsey (2010), |
| construction | participants | grounded | community, | Barak (2007), |
| through group, | theory, case | public | Brummans et al. | |
| community, | study, and | relations, | (2008), Coleman, | |
| and cultural | mixed methods | interethnic/ | Hacking, Stover, | |
| interactions. | intercultural, | Fisher-Yoshida, | ||
| Norms of conflict | international | and Nowak | ||
| (macrolevel) | and | (2008), Daiute | ||
| are worked | geopolitical, | and Turniski, | ||
| out through | and online | (2005), D. Ellis | ||
| communication | (2012), Goodwin | |||
| (microlevel). | (2008), Moriizumi | |||
| Conflict occurs | (2011), Papa, | |||
| when there is a | Mapendere, and | |||
| lack of shared | Dillon (2010), and | |||
| rules, rituals, | Smith-Sanders and | |||
| or expectations among members. | Harter (2007) |
(Continued)
Table 3.1 (Continued)
| Paradigm | Overview | Methods Used | Contexts Considered | Examples |
| Critical/cultural | Conflict is | Ethnography, | Interpersonal, | Buzzanell and Liu |
| studies | embedded in a | narrative, | organizational, | (2007), Cloud |
| society’s power | grounded | community, | (2005), D’Enbeau | |
| structures, be | theory, case | and | and Buzzanell | |
| it economic, | study, and | interethnic/ | (2011), Eckman | |
| social, cultural, or ideological. Conflict is a locale for investigating how power is constituted and normalized. Praxis and social change start with awareness of and resistance to power imbalance. | mixed methods | intercultural conflict | and Lindlof (2003), Goldberg (2009), Jameson (2003), Lambert and Dollahite (2006), Palmeri (2009), Plowman (2008), Roscigno and Hodson (2004), and Wieland (2010) | |
| Poststructuralist/ | Conflict is | Narrative, | Interpersonal, | Buzzanell and Liu |
| postmodernist | nonlinear, | grounded | organizational, | (2005), Faulkner |
| emergent, unstable, | theory, and case | and public | and Hecht (2011), | |
| and unpredictable. Multiple emergent realities, rooted in historical and cultural contexts, can give rise to ambiguities, ironies, and identity considerations in and about conflict. | study | bgcolor=white>relationsNey, Blank, and Blank (2007), Watts (2009), and Weaver (2010) |
NOTE: Qualitative conflict studies featured in this table are referenced in alphabetic order.
conflict communication as well as the methods, specific communicative contexts, and key publications for each paradigm.