References

Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. § 551 et seq. (1946).

Ahteensuu, M., & Sippi, H. (2009). A critical assessment of public consultations on GMOs in the European Union.

Amnesty International & The Sierra Club. (2000). Environmentalists under fire: 10 urgent cases of human rights abuses. Retrieved from http:// www.sierraclub.org/human-rights/amnesty/ report.pdf

Appelstrand, M. (2002). Participation and soci­etal values: The challenge for lawmakers and policy practitioners. Forest Policy and Economics, 4, 281-290.

Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen partici­pation. J ournal of the American Institute of Planners, 25, 216-224.

Brogden, M. J., & Greenberg, J. B. (2003). The fight for the west: A political ecology of land use conflicts in Arizona. Human Organization, 62, 289-298.

Brummans, B. H. J. M., Putnam, L. L., Gray, B., Hanke, R., Lewicki, R. J., & Wiethoff, C. (2008). Making sense of intractable multi­party conflict: A study of framing in four environmental disputes. Communication Monographs, 75, 25-51.

Carolan, M. S. (2006). Ecological representation in deliberation: The contribution of tactile spaces. Environmental Politics, 15, 345-361.

Carolan, M. S. (2009). “I do therefore there is”: Enlivening socio-environmental theory. Environmental Politics, 18(1), 1-17.

Costanza, R., & Jorgenson, S. E. (2002). Understanding and solving environmental problems in the 21st century: Toward a new, integrated hard problem science. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.

Cox, J. R. (2012). E nvironmental communication and the public sphere (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Daniels, S. E., & Walker, G. B. (2001). Working through environmental conflict: The collabora­tive learning approach. Westport, CT: Praeger.

Dewulf, A., Francois, G., Paul-Wostl, C., & Taillieu, T.

Dustin, D. L., Schneider, I. E., McAvoy, L. H., & Frakt, A. N. (2002). Cross-cultural claims on Devils Tower National Monument: A case study. Leisure Sciences, 24, 79-88.

Enck-Wanzer, D. (2006). Trashing the system: Social movement, intersectional rhetoric, and collective agency in the Young Lord’s Organization’s Garbage Offensive. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 92, 174-201.

Fabricius, C., Koch, E., & Magome, H. (2001). Towards strengthening collaborative ecosys­tem management: Lessons from environmen­tal conflict and political change in southern Africa. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 31, 831-844.

Fernandez-Gimenez, M. E., Ballard, H. L., & Sturtevant, V. E. (2008). Adaptive manage­ment and social learning in collaborative and community-based monitoring: A study of five community-based forestry organizations in the western USA. Ecology and Society, 13(2), 4. Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art4/

Fischer, A., & Marshall, K. (2010). Framing the landscape: Discourses of woodland restora­tion and moorland management in Scotland. Journal of Rural Studies, 26, 185-193.

Fletcher, A. L. (2009). Clearing the air: The contribu­tion of frame analysis to understanding climate policy in the United States. Environmental Politics, 18, 800-816.

Fontaine, G. (2010). The effects of energy co-gover- nance in Peru. Energy Policy, 38, 2234-2244.

Giri, K., & Darnhofer, I. (2010). Nepali women using community forestry as a platform for social change. Society & Natural Resources, 23, 1216-1229.

Gray, B. (2003). Framing of environmental dis­putes. In R. Lewicki, B. Gray, & M. Elliot (Eds.), Making sense of intractable environ­mental conflicts: Concepts and cases (pp.

Gray, J. (2010a). Reflection. Text & Performance Quarterly, 30, 220-221.

Gray, J. (2010b). Trail mix: A sojourn on the muddy divide between nature and cul­ture. Text & Performance Quarterly, 30, 201-219.

Gregory, R., McDaniels, T., & Fields, D. (2001). Decision aiding, not dispute resolution: Creating insights through structured environ­mental decisions. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20, 415-432.

Gwartney, P. A., Fessenden, L., & Landt, G. (2002). Measuring the long-term impact of a community conflict resolution process: A case study using content analysis of public docu­ments. Negotiation Journal—On the Process of Dispute Settlement, 18, 51-74.

Habron, G. (2003). Role of adaptive manage­ment for watershed councils. Environmental Management, 31, 29-41.

Hamilton, J. D. (2003). Exploring technical and cultural appeals in strategic risk communica­tion: The Fernald radium case. Risk Analysis, 23, 291-302.

Hobson, K. (2006). Enacting environmental jus­tice in Singapore: Performative justice and the green volunteer network. Geoforum, 37, 671-681.

Ivie, R. L. (2002). Rhetorical deliberation and democratic politics in the here and now. Rhetoric and Public Affairs, 5, 277-285.

Ivie, R. L. (2004). Prologue to democratic dissent in America. Javnost—The Public: Journal of the European Institute for Communication and Culture, 11, 19-35.

Kallis, G., Kiparsky, M., & Norgaars, R. (2009). Collaborative governance and adaptive man­agement: Lessons from California’s CALFED water program. Environmental Science & Policy, 12, 631-643.

Laessoe, J. (2007). Participation and sustainable devel­opment: The post-ecologist transformation of citizen involvement in Denmark. Environmental Politics, 16, 231-250.

Lewicki, R., Gray, B., & Elliot, M. (Eds.). (2003). Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: Concepts and cases. Washington, DC: Island Press.

Littlejohn, S. W., & Domenici, K.

Low, D. (2008). Dissent and environmental com­munication: A semiotic approach. Semiotica, 172, 47-64.

Maguire, L. A. (2003). Interplay of science and stakeholder values in Neuse River total maxi­mum daily load process. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management-A, 129(4), 261-270.

Mander, S. L., Bows, A., Anderson, K. L., Shackley, S., Agnolucci, P., & Ekins, P. (2008). The Tyndall decarbonisation scenarios: Part I. Development of a backcasting methodol­ogy with stakeholder participation. Energy Policy, 3 6, 3754-3763.

Martin, R., & Piper, J.-E. (Eds.). (2001). Native voices: An informal collection of papers pre­sented at the AAA Meeting, November 2000. American Indian Quarterly, 25(1), 1-40.

Mascarenhas, M., & Scarce, R. (2004). “The intention was good”: Legitimacy, consensus­based decision making, and the case of for­est planning in British Columbia, Canada. Society & Natural Resources, 1 7, 17-38.

Mason, M. (2008). Information disclosure and environmental rights: The Aarhus Convention. Global Environmental Politics, 1 0, 10-31.

McComas, K. A., Trumbo, C. W., & Besley, J. C. (2007). Public meetings about suspected can­cer clusters: The impact of voice, interactional justice, and risk perception on attendees’ atti­tudes in six communities. Journal of Health Communication, 1 2, 527-549.

McGill, K. (2006). Reading the valley: Performance as a rhetoric of dimension. Text & Performance Quarterly, 2 6, 389-404.

Moore, M. (2004). Colliding ironies and Clinton’s salvage rider rhetoric in the Northwest timber controversy. In T. R. Peterson (Ed.), Green talk in the White House: The rhetorical presidency encounters ecology (pp. 181-206). College Station: Texas A&M University Press.

National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq. (1969).

Neff, M. (2007). Scenario planning for wildlife management: A case study of the National Elk Refuge, Jackson, Wyoming.

Ostrom, E. (1990). G overning the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Perreault, T., & Valdivia, G. ( 2010). Hydrocarbons, popular protest and national imaginaries: Ecuador and Bolivia in comparative context. Geoforum, 41, 689-699.

Peters, J. D. (1999). Speaking into the air: A his­tory of the idea of communication. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Peterson, M. N., Allison, S. A., Peterson, M. J., Peterson, T. R., & Lopez, R. R. (2004). A tale of two species: Habitat conservation plans as bounded conflict. Journal of Wildlife Management, 68, 743-761.

Peterson, M. N., Birckhead, J., Leong, K., Peterson, M. J., & Peterson, T. R. (2010). Rearticulating the myth of human-wildlife conflict. Conservation Letters, 3, 74-82.

Peterson, M. N., Peterson, M. J., & Peterson, T. R. (2005). Conservation and the myth of con­sensus. Conservation Biology, 19, 762-767.

Peterson, M. N., Peterson, M. J., & Peterson, T. R. (2006). Why conservation needs dissent. Conservation Biology, 20, 576-578.

Peterson, M. N., Peterson, M. J., & Peterson, T. R. (2007). Environmental communication: Why this crisis discipline should facilitate environmental democracy. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture, 1, 74-86.

Peterson, M. N., Peterson, T. R., Peterson, M. J., Lopez, R. R., & Silvy, N. J. (2002). Cultural conflict and the endangered Florida Key deer. Journal of Wildlife Management, 66, 947-968.

Peterson, T. R. (2003). Social control frames: Opportunities or constraints. Environmental Practice, 5, 232-238.

Peterson, T. R., & Franks, R. R. (2006). Environmental conflict communication. In J. Oetzel & S. Ting-Toomey (Eds.), Handbook of conflict communication (pp. 419-445). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Peterson, T. R., Peterson, M. J., & Grant, W. E. (2004). Social practice and biophysical pro­cess.

Peterson, T. R., Peterson, M. N., Peterson, M. J., Allison, S. A., & Gore, D. C. (2006). To play the fool: Can environmental conser­vation and democracy survive social capi­tal? Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 3, 116-140.

Pezzullo, P. C. (2007). Toxic tourism: Rhetorics of pollution, travel, and environmental justice. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.

Poncelet, E. C. (2001). “A kiss here and a kiss there”: Conflict and collaboration in environmental partnerships. Environmental Management, 27, 13-25.

Prelli, L. (2004). Sustainable forestry in New Hampshire. In T. R. Peterson (Ed.), Green talk in the White House: The rhetorical presidency encounters ecology (pp. 233-257). College Station: Texas A&M University Press.

Putnam, L. L., Burgess, G., & Royer, R. (2003). We can’t go on like this: Frame changes in intractable conflicts. Environmental Practice, 5, 247-255.

Riemer, J. W. (2004). Chippewa spearfishing, lake property owners/anglers, and tourism: A case study of environmental social conflict. Sociological Spectrum, 2 4, 43-70.

Robbins, S. M. (2010). Play nice or pick a fight? Cooperation as an interest group strategy at implementation. P olicy Studies Journal, 3 8, 515-535.

Salzman, J., & Thompson, B. H. (2010). Environmental law and policy (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Foundation Press.

Schwarze, S. (2006). Environmental melodrama. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 92, 239-261.

Senecah, S. L. (2004). The process trinity of access, standing, and influence: The role of practi­cal theory in planning and evaluating the effectiveness of environmental participatory processes. In S. P. Depoe, J. W. Delicath, & M. A. Elsenbeer (Eds.), Communication and public participation in environmental decision making (pp. 13-33). Albany: SUNY Press.

Singleton, S. (2002). Collaborative environmental planning in the American West: The good, the bad and the ugly. Environmental Politics, 11, 54-75.

Thompson, J., Forster, C. B., Werner, C., & Peterson, T. R. (2010). Mediated modeling: Using collaborative processes to integrate sci­entist and stakeholder knowledge about green­house gas emissions in an urban ecosystem. Society & Natural Resources, 2 3, 742-757.

Toker, C. W. (2004). Public participation or stake­holder frustration: An analysis of consen­sus-based participation in the Georgia Port Authority’s stakeholder evaluation group. In S. P. Depoe, J. W. Delicath, & M. A. Elsenbeer (Eds.), C ommunication and public participation in environmental decision mak­ing (pp. 175-199). Albany: SUNY Press.

Turnhout, E., Van Bommel, S., & Aarts, N. (2010). How participation creates citizens: Participatory governance as performative practice. Ecology and Society, 1 5(4), 26. Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org./vol.15/iss4/art26/

van den Belt, M. J. (2004). Mediated model­ing: A system dynamics approach to envi­ronmental consensus building. Washington, DC: Island Press.

Walker, G. B., & Daniels, S. E. (2004). Dialogue and deliberation in environmental conflict: Enacting civic science. In S. L. Senecah (Ed.), E nvironmental communication year­book (Vol. 1, pp. 135-152). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Walker, G. B., Senecah, S. L., & Daniels, S. E. (2006). From the forest to the river: Citizens’ views of stakeholder engagement. Human Ecology Review, 13, 193-202.

Walker, P. A., & Hurley, P. T. (2004). Collaboration derailed: The politics of community-based resource management in Nevada County. Society & Natural Resources, 17, 735-751.

Webler, T., Tuler, S., & Krueger, R. (2001). What is a good public participation process? Five perspectives from the public. Environmental Management, 27, 435-450.

World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Yearley, S., Cinderby, S., Forrester, J., Bailey, P., & Rosen, P. (2003). Participatory modeling and the local governance of the politics of UK air pollution: A three-city case study. Environmental Values, 1 2, 247-262.

Zhong, L. J., & Mol, A. P. J. (2008). Participatory environmental governance in China: Public hearings on urban water tariff setting. Journal of Environmental Management, 88, 899-913.