References

Aakhus, M. (1999). Science court: A case study in designing discourse to manage policy con­troversy. Knowledge, Technology and Policy, 2, 20-37.

Aakhus, M. (2003). Neither naive nor norma­tive reconstruction: Dispute mediators, impasse, and the design of argumentation.

Aakhus, M. (2007). Communication as design. Communication Monographs, 74, 112-117.

Aakhus, M. (2010). Conversations for reflection: Augmenting transitions and transformations in expertise. In C. R. McInerney & R. E. Day (Eds.), Rethinking knowledge management: From knowledge objects to knowledge pro­cesses (pp. 1 -22). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer-Verlag.

Aakhus, M., & Jackson, S. (2005). Technology, interaction, and design. In K. Fitch & R. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 411-436). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Alvesson, M., & Karreman, D. (2000). Taking the linguistic turn in organizational research. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 36, 136-158.

Arrow, H., Poole, M. S., Henry, K. B., Wheelan,

S., & Moreland, R. (2004). Time, change, and development: The temporal perspective on groups. Small Group Research, 35, 73-105.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1993). Toward a philosophy of the act. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Barge, J. K. (2003). Hope, communica­tion, and community building. Southern Communication Journal, 69, 63-81.

Barge, J. K. (2004). Reflexivity and managerial practice. Communication Monographs. 71, 70-96.

Barge, J. K. (2006). Dialogue, conflict, and com­munity. In J. Oetzel & S. Ting-Toomey (Eds.), The handbook of conflict management (pp. 517-544). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Barge, J. K., & Craig, R. T. (2009). Practical theory in applied communication scholarship.

Barge, J. K., Lee, M., Maddux, K., Nabring, R., & Townsend, B. (2008). Managing dualities in planned change initiatives. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36, 364-391.

Barge, J. K., & Little, M. (2002). Dialogical wisdom, communicative practice, and orga­nizational life. Communication Theory, 12, 365-397.

Barge, J. K., & Little, M. (2008). A discursive approach to skilful activity. Communication Theory, 18, 505-534.

Barge, J. K., & Oliver, C. (2003). Working with appreciation in managerial practice. Academy of Management Review, 28, 124-142.

Baxter, L. A. (2004). Relationships as dialogues. Personal Relationships, 1 1, 1-22.

Baxter, L. A., & Montgomery, B. (1996). Relating: Dialogues and dialectics. New York, NY: Guildford Press.

Bayley, C. (2008). Public participation. In E. L. Melnick & B. S. Everitt (Eds.), Encyclopedia of quantitative risk analysis and assessment (pp. 1381-1391). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Benner, P. (2000). The roles of embodiment, emotion and lifeworld for rationality and agency in nursing practice. Nursing Philosophy, 1, 5-19.

Bluedorn, A. C., & Jaussi, K. S. (2008). Leaders, followers, & time. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 654-668.

Bluedorn, A. C., & Standifer, R. L. (2004). Groups, boundary spanning, and the tem­poral imagination. Research on Managing Groups and Teams, 6, 169-182.

Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the implicate order. London, England : Routledge.

Bohm, D. (1985). Unfolding meaning: A weekend of dialogue. London, England: Routledge.

Bohm, D. (1990). David Bohm: On dialogue. Ojai, CA: David Bohm Seminars.

Bohm, D. (1996). On dialogue. New York, NY: Routledge.

Bohman, J. (1998). The coming of age of delib­erative democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy, 6, 400-425.

Buber, M. (1958). I and thou (2nd ed.; R. G. Smith, Trans.). New York, NY: Scribner.

Burgess, J., & Clark, J. (2006). Evaluating public and stakeholder engagement strategies in environmental governance. In A. G. Pereira, S. G. Vaz, & S. Tognetti (Eds.), Interfaces between science and society (pp. 225-252). Shefield, England: Greenleaf.

Burgess, J., Stirling, A., Clark, J., Davies, G., Eames, M., Staley, K., & Williamson, S. (2007). Deliberative mapping: A novel ana­lytic-deliberative methodology to support contested science-policy decision. Public Understanding of Science, 16, 299-322.

Burnham, J. (1992). Approach-method-technique: Making distinctions and creating connection. Human Systems, 3, 3-26.

Callahan, K. (2007). Citizen participation: Models and methods. International Journal of Public Administration, 30, 1179-1196.

Chilvers, J. (2009). Deliberative and participatory approaches in environmental geography. In N. Castree, D. Demeritt, & D. Lieverman (Eds.), A companion to environmental geog­raphy (pp. 400-417). Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.

Cooke, M. (2000). Five arguments for deliberative democracy. Political Studies, 48, 947-969.

Cooperrider, D. L., & Whitney, D. (1999). Appreciative inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.

Cox, R. (2007). Nature’s “crisis disciplines”: Does environmental communication have an ethical duty? Environmental Communication, 1(1), 5-20.

Craig, R. T., & Tracy, K. (1995). Grounded practi­cal theory: The case of intellectual discussion. Communication Theory, 5, 248-272.

Daniels, S. E., & Walker, G. B. (2001). Working through environmental conflict: The collab­orative learning approach. New York, NY: Praeger.

Deetz, S., & Simpson, J. (2004). Critical organiza­tional dialogue. In R. Anderson, L. A. Baxter, & K. N. Cissna (Eds.), Dialogue: Theorizing difference in communication studies (pp. 141-158). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Durant, R. F. (1995). The democracy deficit in America. Political Science Quarterly, 110, 25-47.

Elliot, M. (2003). Risk perception frames in envi­ronmental decision making.

Fiorino, D. J. (1990). Citizen participation and environmental risk: A survey of institutional mechanisms. Science, Technology and Human Values, 15, 226-243.

Forester, J. (1999). The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning practices. Boston: MIT Press.

Forester, J. (2009). Dealing with differences: Dramas of mediating public disputes. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Freire, P. (2007). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). New York, NY: Continuum.

French, S., & Bayley, C. (2011). Public participa­tion: Comparing approaches. Journal of Risk Research, 14, 241-257.

Gadamer, H. G. (2005). Truth and method (2nd ed.; J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). New York, NY: Continuum.

Gergen, K. J., Gergen, M. M., & Barrett, F. J. (2004). Dialogue: Life and death of the organization. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, N. Phillips, & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), Handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 39-60). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.

Gladwell, M. (2000). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.

Hamilton, J. D. (2007). Convergence and diver­gence in the public dialogue on nuclear weap­ons cleanup. In B. Taylor, W. J. Kinsella, S. P. Depoe, & M. S. Metzler (Eds.), Nuclear lega­cies: Communication, controversy, and the U.S. nuclear weapons complex (pp. 41-72). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

Hamilton, J. D., & Wills-Toker, C. (2006). Reconceptualizing dialogue in environmental public participation. Policy Studies Journal, 34(3), 755-775.

Harter, L. (2004). Masculinity(s), the agrarian fron­tier myth, and cooperative ways of organizing: Contradictions and tensions in the experience and enactment of democracy. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32, 89­118. doi:10.1080/0090988042000210016

Heath, R. G. (2007). Rethinking commu­nity collaboration through a dialogic lens: Creativity, democracy, and diversity in community organizing.

Heifetz, R. (1994). Leadership without easy answers. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.

Isaacs, W. (1999). Dialogue and the art of thinking together. New York, NY: Currency.

Jackson, S. (1998). Disputation by design. Argumentation, 12, 183-108.

Jackson, S. (2002). Designing argumentation pro­tocols for the classroom. In F. H. van Emeren (Ed.), Advances in pragma-dialectics (pp. 105-120). Amsterdam, Netherlands: SICSAT.

Jacobs, S., & Aakhus, M. (2002). What mediators do with words: Implementing three models of rational discussion in dispute mediation. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 2 0, 177-204.

Latour, B. (2004). Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy (C. Porter, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Lazaro, A., Cabecinhas, R., & Carbalho, A. (2007, June). P erceptions of climate change risks and mitigation behaviors: Understanding inconsistencies between representations and actions. Paper presented at the Conference on Communication and the Environment, Chicago, IL.

Lee, C. W. (2007). Is there a place for private conversation in public dialogue? Comparing stakeholder assessments of informal commu­nication in Ccllaborative regional planning. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 41-96.

Leong, K. M., McComas, K. A., & Decker, D. J. (2007). Matching the forum to the fuss: Using coorientation contexts to address the paradox of public participation in national resource management. Environmental Practice, 9, 195-205.

Lewis, L. (2005). The civil society sector: A review of critical issues and research agenda for organizational communication scholars. Management Communication Quarterly, 19, 238-267.

Lowe, T., Brown, K., Dessai, S., Doria, M., Haynes, K., & Vincent, K. (2006). Will tomorrow ever come? Disaster narrative and perceptions of climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 15, 435-457.

Lynam, T., De Jong, W., Sheil, D., Kusumanto,

T., & Evans, K. (2007). A review of tools for incorporating community knowledge, prefer­ences, and values into decision-making in natu­ral resources management. Ecology & Society, 12. Retrieved from www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol.12/iss1/

McComas, K. A. (2001). Theory and practice of public meetings. Communication Theory, 11(1), 36-55.

McComas, K. A. (2003a). Citizen satisfaction with public meetings used for risk commu­nication. J ournal of Applied Communication Research, 31, 164-184.

McComas, K. A. (2003b). Trivial pursuits: Participant views of public meetings. Communication, 15(2), 91-115.

Moore, L. (2008). Experience from the environ­mental dispute resolution field: Adjusting the process for maximum inclusion of inter­ests and knowledge. In B. Trujillo, M. A. Bowland, Y. Myers, L. J. Richards, & P. M. Roy (Eds.), Re-centering culture and knowl­edge in conflict resolution practice (pp. 128­143). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.

Mouffe, C. (2000). The democratic paradox. London, England: Verso.

Nabatchi, T. (2010). Addressing the citizen­ship and democratic deficits: The poten­tial of deliberative democracy for public administration. A merican Review of Public Administration, 40, 376-399.

Norton, T. (2009). Situating organizations in politics: A diachronic view of con­trol-resistance dialectics. Management Communication Quarterly, 2 2(4), 525-554. doi:10.1177/0893318908331099

O’Connor, R. E., Bord, R. J., & Fisher, A. (1999). Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change. Risk Analysis, 10(3), 461-471.

Oswick, C., Putnam, L. L., & Keenoy, T. (2004). Tropes, discourse, and organizing. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & L. Putnam (Eds.), Handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 105-127). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Pearce, W. B., & Pearce, K. A. (2000). Extending the theory of the coordinated management of meaning (CMM) through a community dialogue process. Communication Theory, 10, 405-424.

Peterson, T. R., Peterson, M. N., & Grant, W. E. (2004). Social practice and biophysical pro­cess. In S. L. Senecah (Ed.), Environmental communication yearbook (Vol. 1, pp. 15-32). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.

Plough, A., & Krimsky, S. (1987). The emergence of risk communication studies: Social and political context. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 12, 4-10.

Powley, E. H., Fry, R. E., Barrett, F. J., & Bright, D. S. (2004). Dialogic democracy meets com­mand and control: Transformation through the Appreciative Inquiry Summit. Academy of Management Executive, 18, 67-80.

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The col­lapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.

Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A litera­ture review. Biological Conversation, 141, 2417-2431.

Renn, O., Webler, T., & Wiedemann, P. (Eds.). (1995). Fairness and competence in citizen participation: Evaluating models for environ­mental discourse. Boston, MA : Kluwer.

Sager, T. (2009). Planners’ role: Torn between dialogical ideals and neo-liberal realities. European Planning Studies, 17, 65-84.

Scharmer, C. O. (2009). Theory U: Leading from the future as it emerges. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.

Senecah, S. (2004). The trinity of voice: The role of practical theory in planning and evaluating the effectiveness of environmental participatory processes. In S. P. Depoe, J. W. Delicath, & M.-F. A. Elsenbeer (Eds.), Communication and public participation in environmental decision making (pp. 13-33). Albany: SUNY Press.

Senge, P. M., Scharmer, C. O., Jaworski, J., & Flowers, B. S. (2004). Awakening faith in an alternative future: A consideration of pres­ence. Reflections, 5, 1-11.

Seo, M., Putnam, L. L., & Bartunek, J. M. (2003). Dualities and tensions of planned organiza­tional change. In M. S. Poole & A. V. de Ven (Eds.), Handbook of organizational change (pp. 73-107). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Shotter, J. (2005). Inside the moment of manag­ing: Wittgenstein and the everyday dynam­ics of our expressive-responsive activities. Organization Studies, 26, 113-135.

Shotter, J. (2008). Dialogism and polyphony in organizing theorizing in organization studies: Action guiding anticipations and the continu­ous creation of novelty. Organization Studies, 29, 501-524.

Shotter, J. (2009). Listening in a way that rec- ognizes/realize the world of “the other.” International Journal of Listening, 23, 1-23.

Shotter, J. (2010). Movement of feeling and move­ments of judgement: Towards an ontological social constructionism. International Journal of Action Research, 6, 1-23.

Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24, 311-322.

Smith, S. R. (2003, May). Government and non­profits in the modern age. Society, 40, 36-45.

Spano, S. (2001). Public dialogue and participa­tory democracy: The Cupertino community project. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

Stewart, J., & Zediker, K. E. (2000). Dialogue as tensional, ethical practice. Southern Communication Journal, 6 3, 224-242.

Stewart, J., Zediker, K. E., & Black, L. (2004). Relationships among philosophies of dia­logue. In R. Anderson, L. A. Baxter, & K. N. Cissna (Eds.), Dialogue: Theorizing differ­ence in communication studies (pp. 21-38). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Stirling, A., & Mayer, S. (2001). A novel approach to the appraisal of technological risk: A multi-criteria mapping study of a genetically modified crop. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 19, 529-555.

Stroobants, V. (2005). Stories about learning in narrative biographical research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18, 47-61.

Taylor, B. C. (1996). Make bomb, save world: Reflections on dialogic nuclear ethnogra­phy. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 25(1), 120-143.

Taylor, B. C. (1997). Shooting downwind: Depicting the radiated body in epidemiol­ogy and documentary photography. In M. Huspek & G. P. Radford (Eds.), Transgressing discourses: Communication and the voice of other (pp. 289-328). Albany: SUNY Press.

Taylor, B. C., & Kinsella, W. J. (2007). Introduction: Linking nuclear legacies and communication studies. In B. C. Taylor, W. J. Kinsella, S. P. Depoe, & M. S. Metzler (Eds.), Nuclear lega­cies: Communication, controversy, and the

U.S. nuclear weapons complex (pp. 1-40). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

Todes, S. (2001). Body and world. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Wang, C. C. (2003). Using photovoice as a partici­patory assessment and issue selection tool: A case study with the homeless in Ann Arbor. In M. Minkler, N. Wallerstein, & B. Hall (Eds.), Community-based participatory research for health (pp. 179-196). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Wynne, B. (1992). Risk and social learning: Reification to engagement. In S. Krimsky & D. Golding (Eds.), S ocial theories of risk (pp. 275-297). Westport, CT: Praeger.

Yankelovich, D. (1991). Coming to public judg­ment: Making democracy work in a complex world. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press. Zoller, H. M. (2000). “A place you haven’t visited before”: Creating the condi­tions for community dialogue. Southern Communication Journal, 6 5(2-3), 191-207. doi:10.1080/10417940009373167