<<
>>

Social Emotional Learning: Building the Foundation

At the heart, CRE helps children be more socially and emotionally competent so they can lead happier lives and contribute more positively to society (Jones & Compton, 2003). Both regular and special-needs students can benefit from programs that teach them the competencies delineated below (Feuerborn & Tyre, 2009).

As Elksnin and Elksnin (2006) concluded, between 15% and 22% of children in U.S. schools have socioemotional problems that warrant intervention; and special-needs children with learning and/or other disabilities have greater social skills deficits than children without special needs (Elias, 2004).

The Collaborative for Academic, Social and Emotional Learning (CASEL) articulated five core areas of social and emotional competency (Zins & Elias, 2007):

1. Self-awareness—accurately assessing one’s feelings

2. Self-management—regulating one’s emo­tions and controlling impulses

3. Social awareness—taking the perspective of and empathizing with others

4. Relationship skills—establishing and main­taining healthy and rewarding relationships based on cooperation; resisting inappropri­ate social pressure; preventing, managing, and resolving interpersonal conflict; seek­ing help when needed

5. Responsible decision making—making decisions based on consideration of ethi­cal standards, safety concerns, appropriate social norms, respect for others, and likely consequences of various actions

While all of these competencies are impor­tant, research suggests that developing empa­thy is one of the most critical (Irimia, 2011). Empathy, even more than aggression, dif­ferentiates youth offenders and nonoffend­ers (Cohen & Strayer, 1996). Jolliffe and Farrington’s (2004) meta-analysis concluded that low empathic response predicts antisocial behaviors in adolescents. Empathy is nega­tively related to physical, verbal, and relational aggression (Kaukiainen et al., 1999); and more empathic students are more likely to defend targets of bullies (Gini, Albiero, Benelli, & Altoe, 2007; Kumar & Ryan, 2009).

Comprehensive reviews of SEL programs report that they are effective in developing students’ competencies. Two recent meta­analyses of SEL programs deserve special mention. Payton et al.’s (2008) meta-analysis of 317 studies involved 324,303 children in K-8 populations. Durlak et al. (2011) reported results from a meta-analysis of 213 school-based, universal SEL programs involv­ing 270,034 kindergarten through high school students. Both meta-analyses provide strong support for positive effects of SEL on students’ SEL skills, attitudes, positive social behavior, conduct problems, and academic achieve­ment. Compared with controls, SEL par­ticipants demonstrated significantly improved social and emotional skills, attitudes, behav­ior, and academic performance that reflected an 11-percentile-point gain in achievement (Durlak et al., 2011).

<< | >>
Source: Oetzel John, Ting-Toomey Stella. The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Communication: Integrating Theory, Research and Practice. SAGE Publications,2013. — 912 p.. 2013

More on the topic Social Emotional Learning: Building the Foundation:

  1. Oetzel John, Ting-Toomey Stella. The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Communication: Integrating Theory, Research and Practice. SAGE Publications,2013. — 912 p., 2013