References

Albert R (2010) Constitutional handcuffs. Ariz State Law J 42:663, 665-66

Albert R (2013) The expressive function of constitutional amendment rules. McGill Law J 59:225, 247-57

Albert R (2014) The structure of constitutional amendment rules.

Albert R (2017) How a court becomes supreme. Maryland Law Rev 77:188-189

Albert R (2018a) Amendment and revision in the unmaking of constitution. In: Landau D, Lerner H (eds) Edward Elgar handbook on comparative constitution-making. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., Cheltenham, UK

Albert R (2018b) Constitutional amendment and dismemberment. Yale Int Law J 43:29-60

Burgess J (1893) Political science and comparative constitutional law, vol I. Ginn & Company, Boston, p 137

Colon-Rios J (2013) Beyond parliamentary sovereignty and judicial supremacy: the doctrine of implicit limits to constitutional reform in Latin America. Victoria Univ Wellington Law Rev 44:521, 525

Cooke JE (ed) (1961) The Federalist. Wesleyan University Press, Hanover, New Hampshire, p 258, 263

Dellinger W (1983) The legitimacy of constitutional change: rethinking the amendment process. Harv L Rev 97:386, 431

Denning BP, Vile JR (2002) The relevance of constitutional amendments: a response to David Strauss. Tulane Law Rev 77:247, 279

Dicey AV (1915) Introduction to the study of the law of the constitution (1982), vol 66. Liberty Fund, Indianapolis

Dixon R, Ginsburg T (2011) Deciding not to decide: deferral in constitutional design. Int J Const Law 9:636, 644

Dixon R, Holden R (2012) Constitutional amendment rules: the denominator problem. In: Ginsburg T (ed) Comparative Constitutional Design. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 195

Dixon R, Landau D (2015) Transnational constitutionalism and a limited doctrine of unconsti­tutional constitutional amendment.

Giovannoni F (2003) Amendment rules in constitutions. Pub Choice 115:37

Goldsworthy J (2010) Parliamentary sovereignty. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 70 Gozler K (2008) Judicial review of constitutional amendments: a comparative study. Ekin Press Greene J (2011) Originalism’s race problem. Denver Univ Law Rev 88:517, 518-19

Halmai G (2012) Unconstitutional constitutional amendments: constitutional courts as guardians of the constitution? Constellations 19:182, 183-88, 190-91

Holmes S (1993) Gag rules or the politics of omission. In: Elster J, Slagstad R (eds) Constitutionalism and democracy. Cambridge University Press, pp 19-58

Hoque R (2016) Can the court invalidate an original provision of the constitution? Asian-Pac Law Policy J 2:13

Kommers DP (1991) German constitutionalism: a prolegomenon. Emory Law J 40:837, 846 Krishnaswamy S (2010) Democracy and constitutionalism in India: a study of the basic structure doctrine. Oxford University Press

Ku R (1995) Consensus of the governed: the legitimacy of constitutional change. Fordham Law

Rev 64:535, 571

Landau D (2013) Abusive constitutionalism. UC Davis Law Rev 47:189

Linder D (1981) What in the constitution cannot be amended? Ariz Law Rev 23:717, 721 Lutz DS (2006) Principles of constitutional design. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, p 170

Mansfield AM (2003) Ethnic but equal: the quest for a new democratic order in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Columbia Law Rev 103:2052, 2056

Marsteintredet L (2015) The Honduran Supreme Court renders inapplicable unamendable constitutional provisions. Int J Const Law. Blog Online: http://www.iconnectblogcom/2015/ 05/Marsteintredet-on-Honduras

Oder BE (2012) Turkish constitutional transformation and the EU: Europeanisation towards constitutionalism? In: Nas C, Ozer Y (eds) Europeanisation and Turkey. Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot, pp 69-98

Oder BE (2015) The much awaited and deeply controversial constitutional process: learning from Turkey’s failed process in 2013.

Preuss UK (2011) The implications of eternity clauses: the German experience. Isr Law Rev 44:429

Rasch BE, Congleton RD (2006) Amendment procedures and constitutional stability. In: Congleton RD, Swedenborg B (eds) Democratic constitutional design and public policy: analysis and evidence. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, p 319, 326

Rezie RCO (1999) The Ukrainian constitution: interpretation of the citizens’ rights provisions. Case W Reserve J Int Law 31:169, 175-81

Roznai Y (2013) Unconstitutional constitutional amendments: the migration and success of a constitutional idea. Am J Comp Law 61:657, 670-711

Roznai Y (2017) Unconstitutional constitutional amendments: the limits of amendment powers.

Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 20-21

Rubenfeld J (2001) Freedom and time: a theory of constitutional self-government. Yale University Press, New Haven, p 174

Sajo A (1999) Limiting government: an introduction to constitutionalism. Central European University Press, Budapest, pp 39-40

Schwartzberg M (2007) Democracy and legal change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 8-16

Sieyes EJ (2002) Qu’est-ce que le Tiers etat? vol 53. Editions du Boucher, Paris (originally published in 1789)

Sullivan KM (1995) Constitutional Amendmentitis. The Am Prospect 23:20, 22-23

Varol OO (2014) Temporary Constitutions. Calif Law Rev 102:409, 439-48

Wing AK (1993) Communitarianism versus individualism: constitutionalism in Namibia and South Africa. Wis Int Law J 11:295, 337-44

Zuleeg M (1997) What holds a nation together? Cohesion and democracy in the United States of America and in the European Union. Am J Comp Law 45:505, 510