<<
>>

References

Abraham M (2000) In: Andenas M (ed) Judicial role in constitutional amendments in India: the basic structure doctrine, pp 195, 204

Ackerman B (1993) We the people: foundations.

Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 20-21 Akzin B (1956) On the stability and reality of constitutions. Scripta Hierosolymitana 3:313, 332 Akzin B (1967) The place of the constitution in the modern state. Isr Law Rev 2(1):1, 12 Albert R (2008) Counterconstitutionalism. Dalhousie Law J 31:1, 37-44

Albert R (2010) Constitutional handcuffs. Ariz State Law Rev 42:663, 698

Albert R (2013a) The expressive function of constitutional amendment rules. McGill Law J 59 (2):225, 254

Albert R (2013b) The unamendable Corwin amendment (27.02.2013). Available via ICONnect. www.iconnectblog.com/2013/02/the-unamendable-corwin-amendment

Albert R (2014a) Constructive unamendability in Canada and the United States. Supreme Court Law Rev 67:181

Albert R (2014b) Constitutional disuse or desuetude. Boston Univ Law Rev 94:1029, 1043 Albert R (2015) Amending constitutional amendment rules. Int J Const Law 13(3):655 Albert R (2016) The unamendable core of the United States constitution. In: Koltay A

(ed) Comparative perspectives on the fundamental freedom of expression. Wolters Kluwer, Netherlands, p 13

Amar AR (1988) Philadelphia revisited: amending the constitution outside article V. Univ Chicago Law Rev 55:1043, 1054-1058

Arendt H (2006) [1963] On revolution, rev. edn. Penguin Classics, London, p 142

Baker TE (2000) Towards a more perfect union: some thoughts on amending the constitution. Widener J Public Law 10:1, 3

Balkin JM (2003) Respect-worthy: Frank Michelman and the legitimate constitution. Tulsa Law Rev 39:485, 486

Barak A (2009) The judge in a democracy. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 23-26 Baranger D (2011) The language of eternity: constitutional review of the amending power in

France (Or the absence thereof).

Isr Law Rev 44(3):389, 396

Barber SA (1984) On what the constitution means. Johns Hopkins University Press, USA, p 43 Bardutzky S (2010) The Strasbourg court on the Dayton constitution: judgment in the case of

Sejdic and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, 22 December 2009 (October 19, 2010). Eur Const Law Rev 6(2):309

Beaud O (1994) La puissance de l’etat. Presses Universitaires de France, France, p 345

Bernal C (2013) Unconstitutional constitutional amendments in the case study of Colombia: an analysis of the justification and meaning of the constitutional replacement doctrine. Int J Const Law 11:339, 349

Bickel AM (1962) The least dangerous branch: the Supreme Court at the bar of politics. Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, pp 16-23

Bishin WR (1977-1978) Judicial review in democratic theory. South Calif Law Rev 50:1099 Black CL Jr (1963) The proposed amendment of article V: a threatened disaster. Yale Law J

72:957, 959

Borucka-Arctowa M (1991) Innovation and tradition against the background of revolutionary changes of law—a conceptual and functional analysis. In: Bankowski Z (ed) Revolutions in law and legal thought. Aberdeen University Press, Aberdeen, pp 79, 80

Brandon M (1995) The “Original” thirteenth amendment and the limits to formal constitutional change. In: Levinson S (ed) Responding to imperfection: the theory and practice of constitutional amendment. Princeton University Press, Princeton

Burdeau G (1930) Essai d’une Theorie de la Revision des Lois Constitutionnelles en Droit Franjais. These, Faculte de droit de Paris, pp 78-83

Burdeau G (1983) Traite de Science Politique, 3rd edn. LGDJ, pp 231-232

Cahill M (2016) Ever closer remoteness of the peoples of Europe? Limits on the power of amendment and national constituent power. Camb Law J 75(2):245, 249-258

Carrozza P (2007) In: Loughlin M, Walker N (eds) Constitutionalism’s post-modern opening. pp 168, 174-175

Chandrachud C (this volume) Constitutional falsehoods: the fourth judges case and the basic structure doctrine in India

Child SR (1926) Revolutionary amendments to the constitution.

Const Rev 10:27, 28

Christopher Bryant A (2003) Stopping time: the pro-slavery and “irrevocable” thirteenth amendment. Harvard J Law Pub Policy 26:501

Comella VF (2009) Constitutional courts & democratic values—a European perspective. Yale University Press, USA, pp 104-107

Conrad D (1970) Limitation of amendment procedures and the constituent power. Indian Yearb Int Aff 15-16:380, 394

Conrad D (2003) Basic structure of the constitution and constitutional principles. In: Sorabjee SJ (ed) Law and justice: an anthology. Universal Law Publishing, Uttar Pradesh, pp 186, 192

Da Silva VA (2004) A fossilised constitution? Ratio Juris 17(4):454, 456-458

Davis J (1881) The rise and fall of the confederate government. D. Appleton, USA, p 197

Del Duca LF, Del Duca P (2006) An Italian federalism? the state, its institutions and national culture as rule of law guarantor. Am J Comp Law 54:799, 800-801

Dellinger W (1983-1984) The legitimacy of constitutional change: rethinking the amendment process. Harvard Law Rev 97:386, 414-415

Derosier JP (2017) In: Albert R, Contiades X, Fotiadou A (eds) The French people’s role in amending the constitution. p 315

Dhamija A (2007) Need to amend a constitution and doctrine of basic features. Wadhwa, Nagpur, p 223

Dixon R (2011) Constitutional amendment rules: a comparative perspective. In: Ginsburg T, Dixon R (eds) Comparative constitutional law. Edward Elgar Publishing, UK, pp 96, 98

Dodd WF (1921) Amending the federal constitution. Yale Law J 30(4):321, 330-332

Dow DR (1990-1991) When the words mean what we believe they say: the case of article V. Iowa Law Rev 76:1

Dow DR (1995) In: Levinson S (ed) The plain meaning of article V. p 127

Doyle O (2017) In: Albert R, Contiades X, Fotiadou A (eds) Constraints on constitutional amendment powers. p 73

Dworkin R (1990) A bill of rights for Britain. Chatto & Windus, UK, pp 14, 35

Dworkin R (1995) Constitutionalism and democracy. Eur J Philos 3(1):2

Eisgruber CL (1997) The living hand of the past: history and constitutional justice.

Fordham Law Rev 65:1611, 1616

Elkins Z, Ginsburg T, Melton J (2009) The endurance of national constitutions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 129

Elster J (2000) Ulysses unbound—studies in rationality, precommitment, and constraints. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 102

Ely JH (1980) Democracy and distrust: a theory of judicial review. Harvard University Press, USA, p 11

Escarras JC (1993) Presentation Du Rapport Italien De Massimo Luciani’ and Massimo Luciani, ‘La Revision Constituzionale in Italia’ in La Revision De La Constitution. Economica, pp 105, 112-116, 117, 130-138

Feldman D (2011) ‘“Which in your case you have not got”: constitutionalism at home and abroad’. Curr Legal Probl 64(1):117, 142-144

Feldman D (2012) The nature and effect of constitutional rights in post-conflict Bosnia and Herzegovina. In: Harvey C, Schwartz A (eds) Rights in divided societies. Hart Publishing, UK, pp 151, 164

Fleming JE (1994-1995) We the exceptional American people. Const Comment 11:355, 366

Fombad CM (2007) Limits on the power to amend constitutions: recent trends in Africa and their potential impact on constitutionalism. Univ Botswana Law J 6:27, 57-58

Fox GH, Nolte G (1995) Intolerant democracies. Harvard Int Law J 36:1, 19

Freeman S (1990-1991) Constitutional democracy and the legitimacy of judicial review. Law Philos 9(4):327, 353-354

Friedman A (2011) Dead hand constitutionalism: the danger of eternity clauses in new democracies. Mexican Law Rev 4:77, 93-96

Friedrich CJ (1968) Constitutional government and democracy—theory and practice in Europe and America, 4th edn. Blaisdell Publishing Company, New York, pp 138, 143-146

Fusaro C (2011) ‘Italy’. In: Oliver D, Fusaro C (eds) How constitutions change—a comparative study. Hart Publishing, UK, pp 211, 215

Galizzi P (2000) In: Andenas M (ed) Constitutional revisions and reforms: the Italian experience. pp 235, 241

Gardos-Orosz F (this volume) The role of non-amendable clauses in judicial review of constitutional amendments: theoretical considerations inspired by Hungarian Constitutional Court case law

Garlicki L, Garlicka ZA (2012) Review of constitutionality of unconstitutional amendments (an imperfect response to imperfections?) Anayasa Hukuku Dergisi: J Const Law 1:185

Geertjes GJ, Uzman J (this volume) Conventions of unamendability; unamendable constitutional law in politically enforced constitutions

Goerlich H (2008) Concept of special protection for certain elements and principles of the constitution against amendments and article 79(3), Basic law of Germany.

NUJS Law Rev 1:397, 404

Goren Z (2009) Anayasa Koyan Erk Ve Anayasa - Degi^ikliklerinin Sinirlari’. Istanbul Ticaret Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 16:1, 12-13 [The constitution-making power and the limitations on constitutional amendments]. http://siyasaliletisim.org/pdf/anayasadegisikligi.pdf

Gozler K (2008) Judicial review of constitutional amendments—a comparative study. Ekin, Bursa, pp 69-71

Griffin SM (2007) Constituent power and constitutional change in American constitutionalism. In: Loughlin M, Walker N (eds) The paradox of constitutionalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 49

Groppi T (2012) Constitutional revision in Italy—a marginal instrument for constitutional change. In: Contiades X (ed) Engineering constitutional change: a comparative perspective on Europe, Canada and the USA. Routledge, London, pp 203, 210

Guberman S (1967) Israel’s supra-constitution. Isr Law Rev 2:455, 457

Hamilton A (1817) In: Hamilton A, Jay J, Madison J (eds) The federalist no. LXXVIII. pp 418, 421

Hamilton A, Jay J, Madison J (1817) [1788] Federalist, on the new constitution. Benjamin Warner, Philadelphia, pp 233, 274

Han WT (2010) Chain novels and amendments outside article V: a literary solution to a constitutional conundrum. Hamline Law Rev 33:71, 82

Harris WF II (1993) The interpretable constitution. Johns Hopkins University Press, USA, pp 167, 193

Hauriou M (1923) Precis de Droit Constitutionnel, 1st edn. Sirey, Paris, p 297 (my translation) Hickory G [Webster N] (1787-1788) Government. I Am Mag 138-139, 140-141

Holding AM (1923) Perils to be apprehended from amending the constitution. Am Law Rev 57:481, 487

Holmes S (1993) Precommitment and the paradox of democracy. In: Elster J, Slagstad R (eds) Constitutionalism and democracy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 195, 239 Hoque R (this volume) Eternal provisions in the constitution of Bangladesh: a constitution once and for all?

Hutchinson AC, Colon-Rios J (2011) Democracy and constitutional change.

Theoria 43

Ingham JF (1928-1929) Unconstitutional amendments. Dickinson Law Rev 33:161, 165-166

Issacharoff S (2012) In: Harvey C, Schwartz A (eds) Managing conflict through democracy. pp 33, 45

Iyer K (2003) A constitutional miscellany, 2nd edn. Eastern Book Company, Uttar Pradesh, pp 1, 2

Jackson V (2013) Unconstitutional constitutional amendments: a window into constitutional theory and transnational constitutionalism. In: Wallrabenstein A, Dann P, Bauerle M (eds) Demokratie-Perspektiven Festschrift fur Brun-Otto Bryde zum 70, Mohr Siebeck, Germany, p 47

Jacobsohn GJ (2006) Constitutional identity. Rev Politics 68:361, 363

Jacobsohn GJ (2010a) Constitutional identity. Harvard University Press, USA, pp 133, 335

Jacobsohn GJ (2010b) The disharmonic constitution. In: Tulis JK, Macedo S (eds) The limits of constitutional democracy. Princeton University Press, Princeton, p 47

Joseph PA, Walker GR (1987) A theory of constitutional change. Oxford J Legal Stud 7:155, 159

Katz E (1995-1996) On amending constitutions: the legality and legitimacy of constitutional entrenchment. Columbia J Law Soc Probl 29:251, 273

Kay RS (1997) Legal rhetoric and revolutionary change. Caribbean Law Rev 7:161, 163

Keshavamurthy CV (1982) Amending power under the Indian constitution—basic structure limitations. Deep & Deep, New Delhi, p 89

Klarman MJ (1997) Antifidelity. South Calif Law Rev 70:381, 382

Klein C (1999) A propos constituent power: some general views in a modern context. In: Jyranki A (ed) National constitutions in the era of integration. Kluwer Law International, pp 31, 37-38

Koyba^i S (this volume) Amending the unamendable: the case of article 20 of the German basic law

Kyvig DE (1996) Appealing Supreme Court decisions: constitutional amendments as checks on judicial review. J Supreme Court Hist 21(2):106

Kyvig DE (2000) Arranging for amendment: unintended outcome of constitutional design. In: Kyvig DE (ed) Unintended consequences of constitutional amendment. University of Georgia Press, USA, pp 9, 10

Lakshminath A (1978) Justiciability of constitutional amendments. In: Dhavan R, Jacob A (eds) Indian constitution—trends and issues. N.M. Tripathi Private Ltd., Mumbai, pp 144, 159 Landau D (2013) Abusive constitutionalism. UC Davis Law Rev 47(1):189

Landfried C (1988) Constitutional review and legislation in the federal Republic of Germany. In: Landfried C (ed) Constitutional review and legislation: an international comparison. Nomos, Germany, p 154

Law DS, Versteeg M (2013) Sham constitutions. Calif Law Rev 101(4):863

Linder D (1981) What in the constitution cannot be amended? Ariz Law Rev 23:717

Lowernstein K (1972) Constitutions, constitutional law. In: Kenig CD (ed) Marxism, communism, and western society: a comparative encyclopedia (Herder and Herder 1972), p 169

Loughlin M (2014) The concept of constituent power. Eur J Polit Theor 13(2):218, 231-232 Lowell L (1918) Greater European governments. Harvard University Press, USA, p 103 Machen AW (1909-1910) Is the fifteenth amendment void? Harvard Law Rev 23:169-170 Madhava Menon NR (2006) Basic structure: after 30 years’ and R.K.P, Shankardass, ‘anomalies of the ‘doctrine’’. In: Chopra P (ed) The Supreme Court versus the constitution: a challenge to federalism. Sage, USA, pp 59, 137, 138

Maia L (2000) The creation and amending process in the Brazilian constitution. In: Andenas M (ed) The creation and amendment of constitutional norms. BIICL, London, pp 54, 60

Marbury WL (1919-1920) The limitations upon the amending power. Harvard Law Rev 33:223, 225

Masri M (this volume) Unamendability in Israel: a critical perspective

Mazzone J (2005) Unamendments. Iowa Law Rev 90:1747, 1818

McConnell MW (1998) Textualism and the dead hand of the past. Geo Wash Law Rev 60:1127­1128

McGovney DO (1920) Is the eighteenth amendment void because of its contents? Columbia Law Rev 20:499, 511-513

McIlwain CH (1975) Constitutionalism: ancient and modern. Liberty Fund Inc., Indianapolis, p 132

Mendes CH (2005) Judicial review of constitutional amendments in the Brazilian Supreme Court. Fla J Int Law 17:449, 461, 721

Michel S, Cofone IN (this volume) Credible commitment or paternalism? the case of unamendability

Michelman FI (1998) Brennan and democracy. Calif Law Rev 86:399, 419

Mohallem MF (2011) Immutable clauses and judicial review in India, Brazil and South Africa: expanding constitutional courts’ authority. Int J Hum Rights 15(5):765, 766-767

Morris JMF (1909) The fifteenth amendment to the federal constitution. North Am Rev 189:82, 85 Moses B (1891) Constitution of the United States of Mexico: antecedents. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc

Sci 2:1, 4

Mulford E (1870) The nation: the foundations of civil order and political life in the United States. Hurd and Houghton, New York, p 155

Muniz-Fraticelli VM (2009) The problem of a perpetual constitution. In: Gosseries A, Meyer L (eds) Intergenerational justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 379-380

Murphy WF (1987) Slaughter-house, civil rights, and limits on constitutional change. Am J Juris 32:1, 12-13

Murphy WF (1992) Staggering toward the new jerusalem of constitutional theory: a response to ralph F. Gaebler. Am J Juris 37:337, 348

Murphy WF (1995) In: Levinson S (ed) Merlin’s memory: the past and future imperfect of the once and future polity. pp 163, 177

Murphy WF (2007) Constitutional democracy: creating and maintaining a just political order. Johns Hopkins University Press, USA, p 506

Nahar S, Dadoo A (2008) Constituent power & sovereignty: in light of amendments to the Indian constitution. NUJS Law Rev 1:559, 571

Nielsen K (1979) On the choice between reform and revolution. In: Johnson HJ, Leach JJ, Muehlmann RG (eds) Revolutions, systems, and theories—essays in political philosophy. D. Reidel Publishing Company, USA, pp 155, 157

Nogueira CG (2005) A Impossibilidade de as clausulas petreas vincularem as gerajoes futuras. Revista de Informajao Legislativa 42(166):79, 84

O’Connell R (1999) Guardians of the constitution: unconstitutional constitutional norms. J Civ Liberties 4:48, 51

Olcay T (this volume) Unamendability of amendable clauses: the case of the Turkish constitution Opsahl T (1991-1992) The reflection of social values in the constitutional history of Norway— some illustrations. Holdsworth Law Rev 15:181, 185-186

Orfield LB (1929-1930) The scope of the federal amending power. Mich Law Rev 28:550, 581 Orfield LB (1942) The amending the federal constitution. Callaghan & Company, Pennsylvania, p 85

Paine T, Philp M (1998) In: Philp M (ed) Rights of man, common sense, and other political writings. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 91-92

Pettys TE (2008) Popular constitutionalism and relaxing the dead hand: can the people be trusted? Wash Univ Law Rev 86:313, 332

Pfersmann O (2009) Ontological and epistemological complexity in comparative constitutional law. In: Engelbrekt AB, Nergelius J (eds) New directions in comparative law. Edward Elgar Publishing, UK, pp 81, 88

Pfersmann O (2012) Unconstitutional constitutional amendment: a normativist approach. Zeitschrift fur offentliches Recht 67:81, 103

Pillsbury AE (1909) The war amendment. North Am Rev 189:741-743

Pilpilidis K (this volume) A constitution for eternity: an economic theory of explicit unamendability

Ponthoreau MC, Ziller J (2002) The experience of the French Conseil Constitutionnel: political and social context and current legal-theoretical debates. In: Wojciech S (ed) Constitutional justice, east and west: democratic legitimacy and constitutional courts in post-communist Europe in a comparative perspective. Springer, Berlin, pp 119, 140

Radin M (1934-35) The judicial review of statutes in continental Europe. W Va Law Q 41:112, 115

Roel S (1968) History of Mexican constitutional experience: from Zitacuaro, 1811, to Queretaro, 1917. Calif W Law Rev 4(2):251, 256-259

Rosenfeld M (1994-1995) The identity of the constitutional subject. Cardozo Law Rev 16:1049 Rosenfeld M (2005) Constitutional adjudication in Europe and the United States: paradoxes and contrasts. In: European and US constitutionalism. Council of Europe, pp 165, 186 fn 80

Rostow EV (1952) The democratic character of judicial review. Harvard Law Rev 66(2):193, 195 Rousseau D (1994) The constitutional judge: master or slave of the constitution? In: Rosenfeld M (ed) Constitutionalism, identity, difference, and legitimacy: theoretical perspectives. Duke University Press, USA, pp 261, 273-282

Roznai Y (2012) The migration of the indian basic structure doctrine. In: Lokendra M (ed) Judicial activism in India—a festschrift in honour of justice V. R. Krishna Iyer. Universal Law Publishing Co., Uttar Pradesh, p 240

Roznai Y (2013a) Is judicial review of constitutional amendments undemocratic? (17.10.2013) ICONnect. http://www.iconnectblog.com/2013/10/article-review-response-carlos-bernal- pulido-and-yaniv-roznai-on-unconstitutional-constitutional-amendments

Roznai Y (2013b) The theory and practice of ‘supra-constitutional’ limits on constitutional amendments. ICLQ 62(3):557

Roznai Y (2013c) Unconstitutional constitutional amendments—the migration and success of a constitutional idea. Am J Com Law 61(3):657

Roznai Y (2014a) Amending “unamendable” provisions’ (20 October 2014) constitution-making & constitutional change blog. http://constitutional-change.com/amending-unamendable- provisions/

Roznai Y (2014b) Legisprudence limitations on constitutional amendments? reflections on the czech constitutional court’s declaration of unconstitutional constitutional act. ICL 8(1):29

Roznai Y (2015) Unamendability and the genetic code of the constitution. Eur Rev Public Law 27 (2):775

Roznai Y (2017a) ‘We the people’, ‘oui, the people’ and the collective body: perceptions of constituent power. In: Jacobsohn G, Schor M (eds) Comparative constitutional theory. Edward Elger, UK

Roznai Y (2017b) Constituent powers, amendment powers and popular sovereignty: linking unamendability and amendment procedures. In: Albert R, Contiades X, Fotiado A (eds) The foundations and traditions of constitutional amendment. Hart Publishing, UK, p 23

Roznai Y (2017c) Towards a theory of constitutional unamendability: on the nature and scope of the constitutional amendment powers. Jus Politicum - Revue de Droit Politique 18:5

Roznai Y, Suteu S (2015) Eternal territory? The crimean crisis and Ukraine’s territorial integrity as an unamendable principle. German Law J 16(3):542

Roznai Y, Yolcu S (2012) An unconstitutional constitutional amendment—the Turkish perspective: a comment on the Turkish constitutional court’s headscarf decision. Int J Const Law 10(1):175

Rubenfeld J (1997-1998) The moment and the millennium. George Wash Law Rev 66:1085

Sachs A (1996-1997) South Africa’s unconstitutional constitution: the transition from power to lawful power. Saint Louis Univ Law J 41:1249

Sager LG (1995-1996) The dead hand and constitutional amendment. Harvard J Law Public Policy 19:275

Samaha AM (2008) Dead hand arguments and constitutional interpretation. Columbia Law Rev 108:606

Sapir G (2010) The constitutional revolution—past, present and future. Miskal, Yedioth Ahronoth Books, pp 178-179 [Heb]

Schaffner J (2005) The federal marriage amendment: to protect the sanctity of marriage or destroy constitutional democracy? Am Univ Law Rev 54:1487, 1493

Schmitt C (2008) Constitutional theory (trans: Seitrzer J). Duke University Press, Durham, p 152 Schwartzberg M (2009) Democracy and legal change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, P 2

Schweber H (2007) The language of liberal constitutionalism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 137

Scotti VR (this volume) Unamendable constitutional provisions and the European common constitutional heritage. A comparison among three waves of constitutionalism

Singh DK (1966) “What cannot be done directly cannot be done indirectly”: its meaning and logical status in constitutionalism. Mod Law Rev 29:273

Smith E (2011) Old and protected? on the “supra-constitutional” clause in the constitution of Norway. Isr Law Rev 44(3):369, 375

Spiliotopoulos E (1983) Judicial review of legislative acts in Greece. Temp Law Q 56:463, 466­467

Sripati V (1998) Toward fifty years of constitutionalism and fundamental rights in India: looking back to see ahead (1950-2000). Am Univ Int Law Rev 14(2):413, 480

Stith R (1996) Unconstitutional constitutional amendments; The extraordinary power of Nepal’s supreme court. Am UJ Intl L Pol’y 11:47

Suber P (1999) Amendment. In: Gray CB (ed) Philosophy of law: an encyclopaedia I. Garland Pub. Co, New York and London, pp 31-32

Suksi M (1995) Making a constitution: The outline of an argument. Rattsvetenskapliga Institutionen, p 6

Sweet AS (2000) Governing with judges: constitutional politics in Europe. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 89

Tobisch K (2011) Public procurement law and effective legal protection. Vienna J Int Const Law 424, 427

Tribe LH (1983) A constitution we are amending: in defense of a restrained judicial role. Harvard Law Rev 97:433, 440-443

Tribe LH (2000) American constitutional law, 3rd edn. Foundation Press, pp 111-114

Troper M (2003) The logic of justification of judicial review. Int J Const Law 1(1) :99, 113 Tushnet M (2012-2013) Constitution-making: an introduction. Tex Law Rev 91:1983, 2007 Tushnet M (2015) Peasants with pitchforks, and toilers with twitter: constitutional revolutions and the constituent power. ICON 13(3):639, 642-643

Tushnet M (2018) Amendment theory. In: Jacobsohn G, Schor M (eds) Comparative constitutional theory. Edward Elger, UK

Vanossi JRA (2000) Teoria constitutional, 2nd edn. Depalma, p 188

Vedel G (1992) Schengen et Maastricht (a propos de la decision n°91-294 DC du Conseil constitutionnel du 25 juillet 1991). Revue Franjaise de Droit Administratif 8(2):173

Vile JR (1985) Limitations on the constitutional amending process. Const Comment 2:373, 383

Vile JR (1990-1991) Legally amending the united states constitution: the exclusivity of article V’s mechanisms. Cumberland Law Rev (1990-1991) 21:271, 295

Vile JR (1995) In: Levinson S (ed) The case against implicit limits on the constitutional amending process. pp 191, 198-199

Widner J, Contiades X (2013) Constitution-writing process. In: Tushnet M, Fleiner T, Saunders C (eds) Routledge handbook of constitutional law. Routledge, London, pp 57, 58

Williams GW (1928) What, if any, limitations are there upon the power to amend the constitution of the United States? Am Law Rev 62:529, 544

Wood GS (1998) The creation of the American Republic 1776-1787. University of North Carolina Press, USA, pp 377, 379

Wright S (1994) The constitutional implications in France of the Maastricht treaty. Tulane Eur Civ Law Forum 9:35, 72

Wright S (2005) The self-restraint of the French Conseil Constitutionnel in 2003 and 2004. Eur Pub Law 11(4):495

Yap PJ (2006-2007) Rethinking constitutional review in America and the commonwealth: judicial protection of human rights in the common law world. Georgia J Int Comp Law 35:99, 104-105

Yap PJ (2015) The conundrum of unconstitutional constitutional amendments. Global Constitutionalism 4:114, 116-118

Yeaman GH (1871) The study of government. Little, Brown and co., USA, pp 710-711

Yegen O (this volume) Debates on unamendable articles: deadlock on Turkey’s constitution-making process

Zweig E (1909) Die Lehre vom Pouvoir Constituant. Tiibingen, p 324

<< | >>
Source: Albert Richard, Oder Bertil E.. An Unamendable Constitution? Unamendability in Constitutional Democracies. Springer International Publishing,2018. — 389 p.. 2018
More legal literature on Laws.Studio

More on the topic References: