<<
>>

References

Ahmadi, A.M. 1996. On the problems and prospects of Indian democracy: An evaluation of its working for designing the processes of change for peaceful transformation. Supreme Court Cases (Journal) 2: 1.

Berlin, Isaiah. 1969. Two concepts of liberty. In Four essays on liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bickel, Alexander. 1962. The least dangerous branch: The supreme court at the bar of politics. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

Bolingbroke, Henry St John, Viscount. 1841 [1733-4]. A dissertation upon parties: Letter X. In The works of Lord Bolingbroke, 88-96. Philadelphia: Carey & Hunt.

Braithwaite, John. 1995. Community values and Australian jurisprudence. Sydney Law Review 17: 351-372.

Brown v Board of Education 347 US 483 (1954).

Carter v Canada (Attorney General) 2015 SCC 5.

Dahl, Robert. 1970. After the revolution? Authority in a good society. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Dahl, Robert. 1972. Democracy in the United States: Promise and performance, 2nd ed. Chicago: Rand McNally.

Dahl, Robert. 1976. Democracy in the United States: Promise and performance, 3rd ed. Chicago: Rand McNally.

Dahl, Robert. 1989. Democracy and its critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Dahl, Robert. 1991. A rejoinder. Journal of Politics 53: 226-231.

Dworkin, Ronald. 1986. Law’s empire. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.

Dworkin, Ronald. 1996. Freedom’s law: The moral reading of the American constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Dworkin, Ronald. 2000. Sovereign virtue: The theory and practice of equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Dyzenhaus, David. 2010. Hard cases in wicked legal systems: Pathologies of legality, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.

Ely, John Hart. 1980. Democracy and distrust: A theory of judicial review. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Fishkin, James.

2005. Experimenting with a democratic ideal: Deliberative polling and public opinion. Acta Politica 40: 284-298.

Fishkin, James. 2009. When the people speak: Deliberative democracy and public consultation. New York: Oxford University Press.

Fishkin, James. 2010. Response to critics of When the People Speak: The deliberative deficit and what to do about it. The Good Society 19: 68-76.

Fishkin, James, and Robert Luskin. 2000. The quest for deliberative democracy. In Democratic innovation: Deliberation, representation and association, 17-28. London: Routledge.

Furman v Georgia 408 US 238 (1972).

Gardbaum, Stephen. 2013. The new commonwealth model of constitutionalism: Theory and prac­tice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gastil, John, Chiara Bacci, and Michael Dollinger. 2010. Is deliberation neutral? Patterns of atti­tude change during ‘The deliberative polls’. Journal of public deliberation 6(2): Article 3.

Ghosh, Eric. 1998. Republicanism, community values and social psychology: A response to Braithwaite’s model of judicial deliberation. Sydney Law Review 20: 5-41.

Ghosh, Eric. 2008. From republican to liberal liberty. History of Political Thought 29: 132-167.

Ghosh, Eric. 2010. Deliberative democracy and the countermajoritarian difficulty: Considering constitutional juries. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30: 327-359.

Ghosh, Eric. 2012. The Australian Constitution and expressive reform. Giornale di Storia Costituzionale (Journal of Constitutional History) 24(2): 95-116.

Goldsworthy, Jeffrey. 2008. Unwritten constitutional principles. In Expounding the constitution: Essays in constitutional theory, ed. Grant Huscroft, 277-312. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gregg v Georgia 428 US 153 (1976).

Holloway, Ian. 2002. Natural Justice and the High Court of Australia: A study in common law constitutionalism. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Issues Deliberation Australia et al. 2001. Australia deliberates: Reconciliation - Where from here? http://www.ida.org.au/deliberative.php.

Accessed 4 Sept 2015.

Kramer, Larry. 2001-2002. The Supreme Court 2000 term foreword: We the Court. Harvard Law Review 115: 5-169.

Krygier, Martin, and Arthur Glass. 1995. Shaky premises: Values, attitudes and the law. Sydney Law Review 17: 385-396.

Lafont, Cristina. 2015. Deliberation, participation, and democratic legitimacy: Should deliberative mini-publics shape public policy? Journal of Political Philosophy 23: 40-63.

Leib, Ethan. 2002. Towards a practice of deliberative democracy: A proposal for a popular branch. Rutgers Law Journal 33: 359-456.

Luskin, Robert, James Fishkin, and Roger Jowell. 2002. Considered opinions: Deliberative polling in Britain. British Journal of Political Science 32: 455-487.

Mabo v Queensland (No 2) (1992) 175 CLR 1.

Marmor, Andrei. 2005. Interpretation and legal theory, 2nd ed. Portland: Hart.

Marmor, Andrei. 2007. Are constitutions legitimate? Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 20: 69-94.

Mayo, Henry. 1960. Introduction to democratic theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

Perry, Michael. 1976. Substantive due process revisited: Reflections on (and beyond) recent cases. Northwestern University Law Review 71: 417-469.

Perry, Michael. 1982. The Constitution, the courts, and human rights: An inquiry into the legiti­macy of constitutional policymaking by the judiciary. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Pettit, Philip. 1999. Republicanism: A theory of freedom and government, paperbackth ed. Oxford: Clarendon.

Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Rodriguez v British Columbia (Attorney General) [1993] 3 SCR 519.

Roe v Wade 410 US 113 (1973).

Sadurski, Wojciech. 1987. Conventional morality and judicial standards. Virginia Law Review 73: 339-397.

Schabas, William. 1996. The death penalty as cruel treatment and torture: Capital punishment challenged in the world’s courts. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

Spector, Horacio.

2009. The right to a constitutional jury. Legisprudence III: 111-123.

Spector, Horacio. 2015. The theory of constitutional review. In Constitutional review and democ­racy, ed. Miodrag Jovanovic, 17-37. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing.

Waluchow, W.J. 2007. A common law theory of judicial review: The living tree. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Waluchow, W.J. 2008. Constitutional morality and bills of rights. In Expounding the constitution: Essays in constitutional theory, ed. Grant Huscroft, 65-92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wellington, Harry. 1973. Common law rules and constitutional double-standards: Some notes on adjudication. Yale Law Journal 83: 221-311.

Wellington, Harry. 1982. The nature of judicial review. Yale Law Journal 91: 486-520.

Zines, Leslie. 2002. Legalism, realism and judicial rhetoric in constitutional law. Constitutional law and policy review 5: 21-30.

Zurn, Christopher. 2006. Deliberative democracy and the institutions of judicial review. NewYork: Cambridge University Press.

Zurn, Christopher. 2011. Judicial review, constitutional juries and civic constitutional fora: Rights, democracy and law. Theoria 58: 63-94.

<< | >>
Source: Bustamante Thomas, Fernandes Bernardo. Democratizing Constitutional Law: Perspectives on Legal Theory and the Legitimacy of Constitutionalism. Springer International Publishing,2016. — 327 p.. 2016
More legal literature on Laws.Studio

More on the topic References:

  1. References
  2. References
  3. References
  4. References
  5. References
  6. BIBLIOGRAPHY FOR BACTERIAL AND FUNGAL INFECTIONS
  7. ‘The tactics of assemblies ought to reference the greatest happiness of society’
  8. ‘The art of the legislator’
  9. Barger A.M., MacNeill A.L. (Eds.). Small Animal Cytologic Diagnosis: Canine and Feline Disease. CRC Press,2024. — 536 p., 2024
  10. Harker C., Horschelmann K. (Eds.). Conflict, Violence and Peace. Springer,2017. — 456 p., 2017