Bibliography
On Marshall and the English neoclassical economists: G. Becattini, Tntroduzione' to A. Marshall, Antologia degli scritti economici (Bologne, 1981); K. Bharadwaj, ‘The Subversion of Classical Theory: Alfred Marshall's Early Writings on Value', Cambridge Journal of Economics (1978); A.
K. Dasgupta, Epochs of Economic Theory (Oxford, 1985); P. Deane, The State and the Economic System (Oxford, 1989); P. Groenewegen, A Soaring Eagle: Alfred Marshall 1842-1924 (Cheltenham, 1995); J. Maloney, Marshall, Ortodoxy and the Professionalisation of Economics (Cambridge, 1985); C. R. McCann, ‘Introduction’ to F. Y. Edgeworth, Writings in Probability, Statistics and Economics (Cheltenham, 1996): G. L. S. Shackle, The Years of High Theory (Cambridge, 1967); I. Steedman, ‘Introduction’ to P. H. Weecksteed, The Coordination of the Laws of Distribution (Cheltenham, 1992). J. K. Whitaker ed., Early Writings of Alfred Marshall (London, 1975).On neoclassical theory in America: E. R. Canterbery, The Making of Economics (Belmont, 1980); R. B. Ekelund, R. F. Hebert, A History of Economic Theory and Method (New York, 1975); G. Routh, The Origin of Economic Ideas (London, 1977); J. Schumpeter, ‘Irving Fisher’ in Ten Great Economists from Marx to Keynes (London, 1966); J. Tobin, ‘Neoclassical Theory in America: J. B. Clark and I. Fisher’, American Economic Review (1985).
On neoclassical theory in Austria and Sweden: A. M. Endres, Neoclassical Microeconomic Theory: The Founding Austrian Version (London, 1997); K. Hennings, The Austrian Theory of Value and Capital (Cheltenham, 1997); I. Kirzner, ‘Austrian School of Economics’, in The New Palgrave, A Dictionary of Economics, vol. I (London, 1987); R. W. Souter, ‘The Nature and Significance of Economic Science’, Quarterly Journal of Economics (1933); J. Schumpeter, ‘Eugen von Bohm-Bawerk and Friedrik von Wieser’, in Ten Great Economists; E.
W. Streissler, ‘Arma virumque cano: Friedrich von Wieser, the bard as economist’, in Die Wiener Schule der Nationalokonomie, ed. N. Leser (Vienna, 1986); C. G. Uhr, ‘Knut Wicksell: A Centennial Evaluation’, American Economic Review (1951); L. von Mises, Human Action (London, 1949); Epistemological Problems of Economics (Princeton, 1960); The Ultimate Foundation of Economic Science (Kansas City, 1962); F. von Wieser, Grundsdtze der politischen Oekonomie (Vienna, 1891, English edn, 1914).On Pareto and the Italian neoclassical economists: L. Bruni, Vilfredo Pareto and the Birth of Modern Economics (Cheltenham, 2002); G. Busino, ‘Vilfredo Pareto’, in The New Palgrave. A Dictionary of Economics, vol. III (London, 1987); G. Busino, P. Tommissen, Jubile du prof. V. Pareto (Geneva, 1975); J. S. Chipman, ‘The Paretian Heritage’, Revue Europeenne des Sciences Sociales (1976); J. Freund, Pareto: la theorie de l'equilibre (Paris, 1974); N. Georgescu-Roegen, ‘H. H. Gossen: His Life and Work in Historical Perspective’, in H. H. Gossen, The Laws of Human Relations (Cambridge, Mass., 1983); A. P. Kirman, ‘Pareto as an Economist’, in The New Palgrave. A Dictionary of Economics, vol. III, (London, 1987); W. Jaffe, ‘Pareto Translated: a Review Article’, Journal of Economic Literature (1972); V. Pareto, Lettere a Pantaleoni, ed. G. De Rosa, 3 vols. (Rome, 1960); U. Ricci, ‘Pantaleoni e l’economia pura’, Giornale degli Economisti (1925); G. L. S. Shackle, The Years of High Theory (Cambridge, 1967).