Final remarks
This chapter has developed a unified and yet tractable framework that integrates many key insights of the fields of international trade and economic growth. Its distinguishing feature is that it provides a global view of the growth process, that is, a view that treats different regions of the world as parts of a single whole.
This framework incorporates the standard idea that economic growth in the world economy is determined by a tension between diminishing returns and market size effects to capital accumulation. A substantial effort has been made to show how trade frictions of various sorts determine the shape of the world income distribution and its dynamics.Despite the length of this chapter, some important topics have been left out. The first and most glaring omission is asset trade. This type of trade allows the world economy to redirect its investment towards regions that offer the highest risk-adjusted return.[332] To the extent that patterns of trade are determined by comparative advantage, these are the regions where capital is scarce and productive and this raises efficiency in the world economy. To the extent that patterns of trade are determined by luck, asset trade magnifies the effect of this randomness and this could either raise or lower the efficiency of the world economy. If this were all there is to asset trade, it would not be too difficult to add to this chapter a section on asset trade in which we endow the world economy with a complete set of asset markets. But asset trade does not seem to work as the standard theory of complete markets would suggest. Empirically asset trade seems both much smaller and much more volatile than it would be warranted by its fundamentals, i.e. savings, human capital and industry productivities. To understand these aspects of asset trade it seems necessary to incorporate to the theory features such as sovereign risk, asymmetric information and asset bubbles.
Although this is a very important task, it would require another chapter of this magnitude and must therefore be left for future work.[333]A second important omission of this chapter is government policy. A central aspect of globalization so far has been its imbalanced nature. While economic integration has proceeded at a relatively fast pace, political integration is advancing at a slower pace or not advancing at all. The world economy today features global (or semi-global) markets but local governments. In this context, globalization can lead to a decline in growth and income through a reduction in the quality of policies. International spillovers eliminate the incentives to adopt good but costly policies. Trade also “bails out” regions with bad policies since they can spare some of their costs by specializing in industries where bad policies have little effects. As a result of these forces, globalization could create a “race to the bottom” in policies that lowers savings, human capital, and industry productivities. And this could potentially mitigate or even reverse the benefits from economic integration.[334] Understanding the circumstances under which this “race to the bottom” can happen and the appropriate policy corrections that are required to allow the world economy to take full advantage of globalization is another important task. But this task would also require another chapter of this magnitude and cannot be undertaken here.
At first sight, factor movements might seem a third important omission. But I think it is less so. As mentioned in Section 2, the notion that physical and human capital is geographically immobile seems a fair description of reality. Moreover, the benefits of factor mobility might be reaped without factors having to move at all. What is really important about factor movements is that they permit factors located in different regions to work together and produce. Advances in telecommunications technology and the standardization of software allow producers around the world to combine physical and human capital located in different regions in a single production process.
We can always think of this situation as one in which the production process has been broken down into intermediate inputs. An increased ability to combine factors located in different regions could therefore be modeled as an increase in the tradability of intermediate inputs, or as an increase in the share of intermediate inputs, or as the development of additional inputs with more extreme factor intensities. All of these possibilities could be (and some have already been) analyzed within the framework developed in this chapter.[335]The goal of this chapter has been to convey a global way of thinking about the growth process. To claim success, you should be persuaded by now that developing and systematically studying world equilibrium models is a necessary condition to gain a true understanding of the growth process. By “true”, I mean the sort of understanding that allows us to frame clear and unambiguous hypotheses about why some countries are richer than others or what are the main forces that drive economic growth in the world economy. To claim success, you should also be convinced by now that much is already known about the structure of world equilibrium models. But you should also be aware that the global view of economic growth that these models reveal is still somewhat fuzzy and blurred. Sharpening this view is a major challenge for growth and trade theorists alike.
Acknowledgements
I dedicate this research to the memory of Rudi Dornbusch, the best mentor, colleague and friend a young economist could have hoped for, and always capable of making others see things differently. I am thankful to Fernando Broner, Gino Gancia, Francesc Ortega and Diego Puga for their useful comments and to Matilde Bombardini, Philip Saure and Ruben Segura-Cayuela for providing excellent research assistance. I am also grateful to the Fundacion Ramon Areces for its generous financial support.
References
Acemoglu, D. (2003). “Patterns of skill premia”. Review of Economic Studies 70, 199-230.
Acemoglu, D., Ventura, J. (2002). “The world income distribution”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107, 659-694.
Acemoglu, D., Zilibotti, F. (1997). “Was Prometheus unbound by chance? Risk, diversification and growth”. Journal of Political Economy 105, 709-751.
Acemoglu, D., Zilibotti, F. (2001). “Productivity differences”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 563-605. Ades, A., Glaeser, E.L. (1999). “Evidence on growth, increasing returns, and the extent of the market”. Quarterlyjournal of Economics 114(3), 1025-1045.
Alcala, F., Ciccone, A. (2003). “Trade, extent of the market, and economic growth 1960-1996”. Mimeo. Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
Alcala, F., Ciccone, A. (2004). “Trade and productivity”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 119 (2), 613-646.
Alesina, A., Spolaore, E., Wacziarg, R. (2000). “Economic integration andpolitical disintegration”. American Economic Review 90 (5), 1276-1296.
Alvarez, F., Lucas, R. (2004). “General equilibrium analysis of the Eaton-Kourtum model of international trade”. Manuscript. University of Chicago.
Aoki, M. (1986). “Dynamic adjustment behaviour to anticipated supply shocks in a two-country model”. Economic Journal 96, 80-100.
Arnold, L.G. (2002). “Onthe growth effect ofNorth-Southtrade: The role oflabormarket flexibility”. Journal of International Economics 58, 451-466.
Atkeson, A., Kehoe, P. (1998). “Paths of development for early and late bloomers in a dynamic Hecksher- Ohlin model”. StaffReport 256. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
Backus, D., Kehoe, P., Kydland, F. (1992). “International real business cycle”. Journal of Political Economy 100, 745-775.
Baldwin, R. (1992). “Measurable dynamic gains from trade”. Journal of Political Economy 100, 162-174.
Baldwin, R., Forslid, R. (2000). “Trade liberalization and endogenous growth. A q-theory approach”. Journal of International Economics 50, 497-517.
Baldwin, R., Martin, P., Ottaviano, G.I.P (2001). “Global income divergence, trade, and industrialization: The geography of growth take-offs”.
Journal of Economic Growth 5, 5-37.Baldwin, R., Forslid, R., Martin, P., Ottaviano, G., Robert-Nicaud, F. (2003). Economic Geography and Public Policy. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, ISBN 0-691-10275-9.
Bardham, P. (1965a). “Equilibrium growth in the international economy”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 79, 455-464.
Bardham, P. (1965b). “Optimal accumulation and international trade”. Review of Economics Studies 32, 241-244.
Bardham, P. (1966). “On factor accumulation and the pattern of international specialization”. Review of Economics Studies 33, 39-44.
Barro, R.J. (1991). “Economic growth in a cross section of countries”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (2), 407-443.
Basu, S., Weil, P. (1998). “Appropriate technology and growth”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113, 10251053.
Baxter, M. (1992). “Fiscal policy, specialization in the two-sector model: The return of Ricardo?”. Journal of Political Economy 100, 713-744.
Bourguignon, F., Morrisson, C. (2002). “Inequality among world citizens: 1820-1992”. American Economic Review 92 (4), 727-744.
Brems, H. (1956). “The foreign trade accelerator and the international transmission of growth”. Economet- rica 24, 223-238.
Brems, H. (1970). “A growth model of international direct investment”. American Economic Review 60, 320-331.
Brezis, S.L., Krugman, P., Tsiddon, D. (1993). “Leapfrogging in international competition: Atheory of cycles in national technological leadership”. American Economic Review 83, 1211-1219.
Broner, F., Ventura, J. (2005). “Managing financial integration”. Manuscript. CREI.
Buiter, W.H. (1981). “Time preference and international lending and borrowing in an overlapping-generations model”. Journal of Political Economy 79, 769-797.
Caselli, F., Esquivel, G., Lefort, F. (1996). “Reopeningthe convergence debate: Anew look at cross-country growth empirics”. Journal of Economic Growth.
Chang, R. (1990). “International coordination of fiscal deficits”.
Journal of Monetary Economics 25, 347-366.Chui, M., Levine, P., Pearlman, J. (2001). “Winners and losers in aNorth-South model of growth, innovation and product cycles”. Journal of Development Economics 65, 333-365.
Cunat, A., Mafezzoli, M. (2004a). “Neoclassical growth and commodity trade”. Review of Economic Dynamics 7 (3), 707-736.
Cunat, A., Mafezzoli, M. (2004b). “Heckscher-Ohlin business cycles”. Review of Economic Dynamics 7 (3), 555-585.
Davis, D. (1995). “Intra-industry trade: A Heckscher-Ohlin-Ricardo approach”. Journal of International Economics 39, 201-226.
Deardorff, A.V. (2001). “Rich and poor countries in neoclassical trade and growth”. Economic Journal 61, 277-294.
Devereux, M., Lapham, B.J. (1994). “The stability of economic integration and endogenous growth”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 59, 299-305.
Devereux, M.B., Saito, M. (1997). “Growth and risk-sharing with incomplete international assets markets”. Journal of International Economics 42, 453-481.
Devereux, M.B., Shi, S. (1991). “Capital accumulation and the current account in a two-country model”. Journal of International Economics 50, 1-25.
Dinopoulos, E., Segerstrom, P. (1999). “A Schumpeterian model of protection and relative wages”. American Economic Review 89 (3), 450-472.
Dinopoulos, E., Syropoulos, C. (1997). “Tariffs and Schumpeterian growth”. Journal of International Economics 42, 425-452.
Dixit, A.K., Norman, V. (1989). Theory of International Trade. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, NY; Port Chester, Melbourne, Sydney, ISBN 0-521-23481-6, 1989.
Dollar, D. (1986). “Technological innovation, capital mobility, and the product cycle in North-South trade”. American Economic Review 76, 177-190.
Dollar, D., Kraay, A. (2003). “Institutions, trade, and growth”. Journal of Monetary Economics 50 (1), 133162.
Dornbusch, R., Fischer, S., Samuelson, P.A. (1977). “Comparative advantage, trade, and payments in a Ricardian model with a continuum of goods”. American Economic Review 67 (5), 823-839.
Dornbusch, R., Fischer, S., Samuelson, P.A. (1980). “Heckscher-Ohlin trade theory with a continuum of goods”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 95 (2), 203-224.
Eaton, J., Kortum, S. (2002). “Technology, geography, and trade”. Econometrica 70, 1741-1779.
Feenstra, R.C. (1996). “Trade and uneven growth”. Journal of Development Economics 49, 229-256.
Findlay, R. (1978). “An ‘Austrian’ model of international trade and interest rate equalization”. Journal of Political Economy 86, 989-1007.
Findlay, R. (1980). “The terms of trade and equilibrium growth in the world economy”. American Economic Review 70, 291-299.
Findlay, R., Kierzkowski, H. (1983). “International trade and capital: A simple general equilibrium model”. Journal of Political Economy 91, 957-978.
Fisher, O’N. (1995). “Growth, trade, and international transfers”. Journal of International Economics 41, 143-158.
Flam, H., Helpman, E. (1987). “Vertical product differentiation and North-South trade”. American Economic Review 77, 810-822.
Francois, J.F. (1996). “Trade, labour force growth and wages”. Economic Journal 439, 1586-1609.
Frankel, J.A., Romer, D. (1999). “Does trade cause growth?”. American Economic Review 89 (3), 379-399.
Frenkel, J., Razin, A. (1985). “Government spending, debt, and international economic interdependence”. Economics Journal 95, 619-636.
Frenkel, J., Razin, A. (1986). “Fiscal policies in the world economy”. Journal of Political Economy 94, 564594.
Fujita, M.P, Krugman, PR., Venables, A.J. (1999). The Spatial Economy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, ISBN 0-262-06204-6.
Fukao, K., Benabou, R. (1993). “History vs. expectations: A comment”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108, 535-542.
Gale, D. (1971). “General equilibrium with imbalance of trade”. Journal of International Economics 1, 141158.
Galor, O., Polemarchakis, H.M. (1987). “Intertemporal equilibrium and the transfer paradox”. Review of Economic Studies 54, 147-156.
Gancia, G. (2003). “Globalization, divergence and stagnation”. IIES Working Paper 720.
Gertler, M., Rogoff, K. (1990). “North-South lending and endogenous domestic capital market inefficiencies”. Journal of Monetary Economics 26, 245-266.
Glass, A.J., Saggi, K. (1998). “International technology transfer and the technology gap”. Journal of Development Economics 55, 369-398.
Glass, A.J., Saggi, K. (2002). “Intellectual property rights and foreign direct investment”. Journal of International Economics 56, 387-410.
Greenwood, J., Williamson, S.D. (1989). “International financial intermediation and aggregate fluctuations under alternative exchange rate regimes”. Journal of Monetary Economics 23, 401-431.
Grossman, G., Helpman, E. (1989). “Product development and international trade”. Journal of Political Economy 97, 1261-1283.
Grossman, G.M., Helpman, E. (1990). “Comparative advantage and long-run growth”. American Economic Review 53, 796-815.
Grossman, G., Helpman, E. (1991a). “Quality ladders in the theory of growth”. Review of Economic Studies 58, 43-61.
Grossman, G.M., Helpman, E. (1991b). “Quality ladders and product cycles”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 100, 557-586.
Grossman, G.M., Helpman, E. (1991c). Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, ISBN 0-262-07136-3.
Hall, R.E., Jones, C.I. (1999). “Why do some countries produces more output per worker than others?”. Quarterly Journal of Economics.
Heathcote, J., Perri, F. (2002). “Financial autarky and international business cycles”. Journal of Monetary Economics 49, 601-627.
Helpman, E. (1993). “Innovation, imitation, and intellectual property rights”. Econometrica 61, 1247-1280.
Helpman, E., Krugman, P.R. (1985). Market Structure and Foreign Trade. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA; London, England, ISBN 0-262-08150-4.
Howitt, P. (2000). “Endogenous growth and cross-country income differences”. American Economic Review 190, 829-846.
Jensen, R., Thursby, M. (1987). “A decision theoretic model of innovation, technology transfer and trade”. Review of Economic Studies 54, 631-647.
Klenow, P.J., Rodriguez-Clare, A. (1997). “The neoclassical revival in growth economics: Has it gone too far?”. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 73-102.
Knight, M., Loayza, N., Villanueva, D. (1993). “Testing the neoclassical theory of economic growth”. IMF StaffPapers 40, 512-541.
Kraay, A., Loayza, N., Serven, L., Ventura, J. (2005). “Country portfolios”. Journal of the European Economic Association 3 (4), 914-945.
Krugman, P. (1979). “A model of innovation, technological transfer and the world distribution of income”. Journal of Political Economy 87, 253-266.
Krugman, P. (1981). “Trade, accumulation, and uneven growth”. Journal of International Economics 8, 149161.
Krugman, P. (1987). “The narrow moving band, the Dutch disease, and the competitive consequences of Mrs. Thatcher”. Journal of Development Economics 27, 41-55.
Krugman, P. (1991a). “Increasing returns and economic geography”. Journal of Political Economy 99, 483499.
Krugman, P. (1991b). “History vs. expectations”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107, 651-667.
Krugman, P., Venables, A. (1995). “Globalization and the inequality of nations”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 109, 857-880.
Lai, E.L.-C. (1995). “The product cycle and the world distribution of income. A reformulation”. Journal of International Economics 41, 369-382.
Lai, E.L.-C. (1998). “International intellectual property rights protection and the rate of product innovation”. Journal of Development Economics 55, 133-153.
Levchenko, A. (2004). “Institutional quality and international trade”. Manuscript. MIT.
Loayza, N.V., Knight, M., Villanueva, D. (1993). “Testing the neoclassical theory of economics growth: A panel data approach”. IMF Staff Papers.
Lundborg, P., Segerstrom, P.S. (2002). “The growth and welfare effects of international mass migration”. Journal of International Economics 56, 177-204.
Mankiw, N.G., Romer, D., Weil, D.N. (1992). “A contribution to the empirics of economic growth”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107 (2), 407-437.
Martin, P., Rey, H. (2002). “Globalization and emerging markets: With or without crash”. CEPR Working Paper DP3378.
Martin, P., Rey, H. (2004). “Financial super-markets: Size matters for asset trade”. Journal of International Economics 64, 335-661.
Matsuyama, K. (1991). “Increasing returns, industrialization and indeterminacy of equilibrium”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 617-650.
Matsuyama, K. (2000). “A Ricardian model with a continuum of goods under nonhomothetic preferences: Demand complementarities, income distribution, and North-South trade”. Journal of Political Economy 108, 1093-1120.
Matsuyama, K. (2004a). “Beyond icebergs: Modeling globalization as biased technical change”. Working Paper. Northwestern University.
Matsuyama, K. (2004b). “Financial market globalization, symmetry-breaking and endogenous inequality of nations”. Econometrica 72 (3), 853-884.
Matsuyama, K., Takahashi, T. (1998). “Self-defeating regional concentration”. Review of Economic Studies 65,211-234.
Modigliani, F., Ando, A. (1963). “The life cycle hypothesis of saving”. American Economic Review 53 (1), 55-84.
Molana, H., Vines, D. (1989). “North-South growth and the terms of trade: A model on Kaldorian lines”. Economic Journal 99, 443-453.
Mountford, A. (1998). “Trade, convergence and overtaking”. Journal of International Economics 46, 167-182.
Myers, M.G. (1970). “Equilibrium growth and capital movements between open economies”. American Economic Review 60, 393-397.
Obstfeld, M. (1989). “Fiscal deficits and relative prices in a growing world economy”. Journal of Monetary Economics 23, 461-484.
Obstfeld, M. (1994). “Risk-taking, global diversification, and growth”. American Economic Review 84, 1310-1329.
Oniki, H., Uzawa, H. (1965). “Patterns of trade and investment in a dynamic model of international trade”. Review of Economics Studies 32, 15-38.
Ono, Y., Shibata, A. (1991). “Spill-over effects of supply-side changes in a two-country economy with capital accumulation”. Journal of International Economics 33, 127-146.
Ortega, F. (2004). “Immigration policy and the welfare state”. Manuscript. Universitat Pompeu, Fabra.
Pritchett, L. (1997). “Divergence, big time”. Journal of Economic Perspectives 11 (3), 3-17.
Puga, D. (1999). “The rise and fall of regional inequalities”. European Economic Review 43, 303-334.
Puga, D., Venables, A.J. (1999). “Agglomeration and economic development: Import substitution vs. trade liberalisation”. Economic Journal 109, 292-311.
Rauch, J.E. (1991). “Reconciling the pattern of trade with the pattern of migration”. American Economic Review 81, 775-796.
Rivera-Batiz, L., Romer, PM. (1991). “Economic integration and endogenous growth”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 531-555.
Rodriguez, F., Rodrik, D. (2000). “Trade policy and economic growth: A skeptic’s guide to the cross-national evidence”. NBER Macroeconomics Annual.
Ruffin, R.J. (1979). “Growth and the long-run theory of international capital movements”. American Economic Review 69, 832-842.
Sachs, J., Warner, A. (1995). “Economic reform and the process of global integration”. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1.
Samuelson, P.A. (1948). “International trade and the equalization of factor prices”. Economic Journal 58, 163-184.
Samuelson, P.A. (1949). “International trade and the equalization of factor prices, again”. Economic Journal 59, 181-197.
Saure, P. (2004a). “Revisiting the infant industry argument”. Manuscript. Universitat Pompeau, Fabra.
Saure, P. (2004b). “How to use industrial policy to sustain trade agreements”. Manuscript. Universitat Pom- peau, Fabra.
Segerstrom, P.S., Anant, T.C.A., Dinopoulos, E. (1990). “A Schumpeterian model of the product life cycle”. American Economic Review 80, 1077-1091.
Sener, F. (2001). “Schumpeterian unemployment, trade and wages”. Journal of International Economics 56, 119-148.
Sibert, A. (1985). “Capital accumulation and foreign investment taxation”. Review of Economic Studies 52, 331-345.
Solow, R.M. (1956). “A contribution to the theory of economic growth”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 70 (1), 65-94.
Stiglitz, J.E. (1970). “Factor price equalization in a dynamic economy”. Journal of Political Economy 78, 456-488.
Stokey, N.L. (1991). “The volume and composition of trade between rich and poor countries”. Review of Economic Studies 58, 63-80.
Taylor, M.S. (1993). “Quality ladders and Ricardian trade”. Journal of International Economics 34, 225-243.
Taylor, M.S. (1994). “Once-off and continuing gains from trade”. Review of Economic Studies 61, 589-601.
Trefler, D. (1993). “International factor price differences: Leontief was right!”. Journal of Political Economy 101 (6), 961-987.
van Elkan, R. (1996). “Catching up and slowing down: Learning and growth patterns in an open economy”. Journal of International Economics 41, 95-111.
van de Klundert, T., Smulders, S. (1996). “North-South knowledge spillovers and competition: Convergence versus divergence”. Journal of Development Economics 50, 213-232.
van de Klundert, T., Smulders, S. (2001). “Loss of technological leadership of rentier economies: A two- country endogenous growth model”. Journal of International Economics 54, 211-231.
Vanek, J. (1971). “Economic growth and international trade in pure theory”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 85, 377-390.
Venables, A. (1999). “The international division of industries: Clustering and comparative advantage in a multi-industry model”. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 101 (4), 495-513.
Ventura, J. (1997). “Growth and interdependence”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (1), 57-84.
Ventura, J. (2002). “Bubbles and capital flows”. NBER Working Paper No. 9304.
Wang, J.-Y. (1990). “Growth, technology transfer, and the long-run theory of international capital movements”. Journal of International Economics 29, 255-271.
Wilson, C. (1980). “On the general structure of Ricardian models with a continuum of goods: Applications to growth, tariff theory, and technical change”. Econometrica 48, 1675-1702.
Yanagawa, N. (1996). “Economic development in a world with many countries”. Journal of Development Economics 49, 271-288.
Yang, G., Maskus, K.E. (2001). “Intellectual property rights, licensing, and innovation in an endogenous product-cycle model”. Journal of International Economics 53, 169-387.
Young, A. (1991). “Learning by doing and the dynamic effects of international trade”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (2), 369-405.
Young, A. (1995). “The tyranny of numbers: Confronting the statistical realities of the East Asian growth experience”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 (3), 641-680.