CONCLUSION
The political economy of the Internet encompasses a vast range of issues that are rigorously debated within the field. Nevertheless, scholars are united in their commitment to the view that political economy is vital because it brings together two fields that were historically separated in the academic division of labor.
Moreover, it unites the political and the economic in the study of power in all of its forms, but with particular attention to how the Internet inflects, and is inflected by, social relations of power. In addition, political economists come together to recognize the importance of history, the social totality, moral philosophy and praxis as enduringly essential to its scholarship.As reviewed here, there are many different schools and approaches to political economy, such that its theories and methods are not homogeneous, or absent of vigorous internal critique (e.g., see Babe, 2009; Mosco, 2009; Winseck and Yin, 2011). Moreover, given its focus on the social relations of capitalism as a primary factor in understanding communication and the Internet today, the approach is inherently oriented to staying dynamically in tune with them. Accordingly, political economy avoids the technological determinism expressed through studies that see the Internet itself as a ‘revolution’ and similar work that places communication at the very center of analysis to prioritize how interpersonal networks and meanings are made. Either of these approaches can take capitalism as a given, relegate it to the background, or render power so diffuse as to make it entirely dependent on individual interpretation.
Considering political, economic and social questions in terms of local and global concentrations and practices of power - and the interconnections between them - means that the approach is complex and challenging for researchers and lay people alike, both in terms of its breadth and historical reach and its consistent skepticism in the face of dominant theories or practices.
Its explanations can be dense due to its insistence on empirical evidence, internal self-reflexivity, and dialogue with other approaches, as underpinned by its critical nature and central characteristics.As the Internet continues to evolve, more issues will emerge to test the strength and the unity of the political economy perspective. For example, one field that is emerging is the expansion of cloud computing and ‘big data’ (Mosco, 2014). Cloud computing is the first step in building what one might reasonably call the ‘Next Internet’. While it is far from fully formed and retains some of the same characteristics as the one born in 1989, the Next Internet is developing rapidly and already challenging its founders’ vision of a pluralistic, decentralized and democratic digital world with one that privileges exclusive, centralized control and ubiquitous surveillance. In addition to cloud computing, the Next Internet is made up of big data analytics, and the Internet of Things. It promises companies and government agencies centralized data storage and services in vast digital factories that process and analyze massive streams of information gathered by networked sensors stored in every possible consumer, industrial, and office device, as well as in living bodies. But it is also encourages concentrations of political-economic power and data-driven decision-making, as well as posing major environmental, privacy and labor challenges (Mosco, 2015).
The global spread of massive facilities to house the infrastructure, platforms and applications that make up the cloud are just beginning to draw the attention of political economists concerned with the ecological (Maxwell and Miller, 2012) and the ethical dimensions of this development (boyd and Crawford, 2012). Such research demonstrates that political economy is a living tradition that will continue to bring an important critical voice to the study and future development of the Internet, and also serve as a vital contributor to realizing its democratic potential as a public resource.
REFERENCES
Andrejevic, M. (2011), ‘Surveillance and alienation in the online economy’, Surveillance and Society, 8 (3), 278-87.
Artz, L., S. Macek and D.L. Cloud (eds) (2006), Marxism and Communication Studies: The Point is to Change It, New York: Peter Lang.
Babe, R. (2009), Cultural Studies and Political Economy, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Benkler, Y. (2006), The Wealth of Networks, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Bermejo, F. (2009), ‘Audience manufacture in historical perspective: From broadcasting to Google’, New Media and Society, 11 (1-2), 133-54.
Bettig, R.V. (1996), ‘Copyrighting Culture: The Political Economy of Intellectual Property’, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Bhuiyan, A.J.M. (2008), ‘Peripheral view: Conceptualizing the information society as a postcolonial subject’, The International Communication Gazette, 70 (2), 99-116.
Biltereyst, D. and P. Meers (2011), ‘The political economy of audiences’, in J. Wasko, G. Murdock and H. Sousa (eds), The Handbook of Political Economy of Communication, New York: Blackwell, pp. 415-35.
boyd, d. and K. Crawford (2012), ‘Critical questions for big data’, Information, Communication & Society, 15 (5), 662-79.
Braman, S. (2007), Change of State, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Braverman, H. (1973), Labor and Monopoly Capital, New York: Monthly Review.
Brown, F. (2006), ‘Rethinking the role of surveillance studies in the critical political economy of communication’, paper presented at the annual conference of the International Association for Media and Communication Research, Cairo, July.
Castells, M. (2012), Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age, London: Polity.
Cesareo, G. (2011), ‘From the “work of consumption” to the “work of prosumers”: New scenarios, problems, and risks’, in J. Wasko, G. Murdock and H. Sousa (eds), The Handbook of Political Economy of Communication, New York: Blackwell, pp. 401-14.
Chakravartty, P. and Y. Zhao (eds) (2008), Global Communication: Toward a Transcultural Political Economy, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Curtin, M. (2011), ‘Global media capital and local media policy’, in J. Wasko, G. Murdock and H. Sousa (eds), The Handbook of Political Economy of Communication, New York: Blackwell, pp. 541-57.
Daniels, J. (2009), ‘Rethinking cyberfeminism(s): Race, gender, and embodiment’, WSQ, 37 (1-2), 101-24.
Douglas, S. (1987), Inventing American Broadcasting, 1899-1922, Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Downing, J.D.H. (2011), ‘Media ownership, concentration, and control: The evolution of debate’, in J. Wasko, G. Murdock and H. Sousa (eds), The Handbook of Political Economy of Communication, New York: Blackwell, pp. 140-68.
Dyer-Witheford, N. (1999), Cyber-Marx: Cycles and Circles of Struggle in High Technology Capitalism, Urbana and Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Dyer-Witheford, N. and G. de Peuter (2009), Games of Empire: Global Capitalism and Video Games, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Ekecrantz, J. (2011), ‘Media and communication studies going global’, in J. Wasko, G. Murdock and H. Sousa (eds), The Handbook of Political Economy of Communication, New York: Blackwell, pp. 483-500.
Eubanks, V. (2011), Digital Dead End, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Feenberg, A. and N. Friesen (eds) (2011), Re-Inventing the Internet: Case Studies, Rotterdam and Boston, MA: Sense Publishers.
Fisher, D.E. and M.J. Fisher (1996), Tube: The Invention of Television, New York: Counterpoint.
Flichy, P. (2007), The Internet Imaginaire, MA: MIT Press.
Fuchs, C. (2010), Internet and Society: Social Theory in the Information Age, New York: Routledge.
Fuchs, C. (2011), Foundations of Critical Media and Information Studies, New York: Routledge.
Fuchs, C. (2012), ‘Dallas Smythe today - The audience commodity, the digital labour debate, Marxist political economy and critical theory: Prolegomena to a digital labour theory of value’, tripleC, 10 (2), 692-740.
Hackett, R.A. and W.K. Carroll (2006), Remaking Media: The Struggle to Democratize Public Communication, New York and London: Routledge.
Han, D. (2012), ‘Copyrighting media labor and production: A case of Chinese television’, Television & New Media, 13 (4), 283-306.
Hands, J. (2011), @ is for Activism: Dissent, Resistance and Rebellion in a Digital Culture, London: Pluto Press.
Hardt, M. and A. Negri (2000), Empire, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hardt, M. and A. Negri (2004), Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire, New York: Penguin.
Herman, E.S. and N. Chomsky (2002), Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media, New York: Pantheon.
Hirst, M., J. Harrison and P. Mazepa (2014), Communication and New Media: From Broadcast to Narrowcast, Canadian edition, Toronto: Oxford University Press.
Hope, W. (2009), ‘Conflicting temporalities: State, nation, economy and democracy under global capitalism’, Time & Society, 18 (1), 62-85.
Hope, W. (2011), ‘Global capitalism, temporality, and the political economy of communication’, in J. Wasko, G. Murdock and H. Sousa (eds), The Handbook of Political Economy of Communication, New York: Blackwell, pp. 521-40.
Huws, U. (2003), The Making of a Cybertariat: Virtual Work in a Real World, New York: Monthly Review Press.
Lee, M. (2006), ‘What’s missing in feminist research in new information and information technologies’, Feminist Media Studies, 6 (2), 191-210.
Lee, M. (2010), ‘A political economic critique of Google Maps and Google Earth’, Information, Communication & Society, 13 (á), 909-28.
Lee, M. (2011), ‘A feminist political economic critique of the human development approach to new information and communication technologies’, The International Communication Gazette, 73 (6), 524-38.
Lyon, D. (2009), Identifying Citizens: ID Cards as Surveillance, London: Polity.
Mansell, R. (2011), ‘New visions, old practices: Policy and regulation in the Internet era’, Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 25 (1), 19-32.
Mansell, R. (2012), Imagining the Internet: Communication, Innovation and Governance, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Mansell, R. and E. Berdou (2010), ‘Political economy, the Internet and FL/OSS development’, in J. Hunsinger, L. Klastrup and M. Allen (eds), International Handbook of Internet Research, New York: Springer, pp. 341-61.
Mansell, R. and K. Nordenstreng (2007), ‘Great media and communication debates: WSIS and the MacBride Report’, Information Technologies and International Development, 3 (4), 15-36.
Mansell, R. and M. Raboy (eds) (2011), The Handbook of Global Media and Communication Policy, New York: Blackwell.
Martin, M. (1991), Hello, Central? Gender, Technology, and Culture in the Formation of Telephone Systems, Montreal, QC and Kingston, ON: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Marx, K. ([1867] 1976), Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Volume 1, trans. B. Fowkes, London: Penguin Classics.
Mattelart, A. (2011), ‘New international debates on culture, information, and communication’, in J. Wasko, G. Murdock and H. Sousa (eds), The Handbook of Political Economy of Communication, New York: Blackwell, pp. 501-20.
Maxwell, R. and T. Miller (2012), Greening the Media, New York: Oxford University Press.
May, C. (2009), The Global Political Economy of Intellectual Property Rights: The New Enclosures, 2nd edition, London: Routledge.
Mazepa, P. (2007), ‘Democracy of, in and through communication: Struggles around public service in Canada in the first half of the twentieth century’, Info, 9 (2-3), 45-56.
Mazepa, P. (2015), ‘Manifest spatialization: Militarizing communication in Canada’, Global Media Journal, Canadian Edition, 8 (1), 9-30.
McChesney, R.W. (2007), Communication Revolution: Critical Junctures and the Future of Media, New York: The Free Press.
McChesney, R.W. and D. Schiller (2003), The Political Economy of International Communications: Foundations for the Emerging Global Debate about Media Ownership and Regulation, Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
Meehan, E.R. (2005), Why TV is Not Our Fault, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Meehan, E.R. and E. Riordan (eds) (2002), Sex and Money: Feminism and Political Economy in the Media, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Melody, W. (2007), ‘Cultivating knowledge for knowledge societies at the intersections of economic and cultural analysis’, International Journal of Communication, 1, 70-78.
Milberry, K. (2012), ‘Hacking for social justice’, in A. Feenberg and N. Friesen (eds), (Re)inventing the Internet, Rotterdam and Boston, MA: Sense Publishers, pp. 109-30.
Mill, J.S. (1848), Principles of Political Economy, Boston: C.C. Little and J.B. Brown.
Mosco, V. (2004), The Digital Sublime, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mosco, V. (2009), The Political Economy of Communication, 2nd edition, London: Sage.
Mosco, V. (2011), ‘The political economy of labor’, in J. Wasko, G. Murdock and H. Sousa (eds), The Handbook of Political Economy of Communication, New York: Blackwell, pp. 356-80.
Mosco, V. (2014), To the Cloud: Big Data in a Turbulent World, Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
Mosco, V. (2015), ‘Can the Internet of Things be democratized?’, The Monitor, Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, November/December, accessed 8 January 2016 at https://www.policyalternatives.ca/ publications/monitor/can-internet-things-be-democratized.
Mosco, V. and C. McKercher (2008), The Laboring of Communication: Will Knowledge Workers of the World Unite?, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Mosco, V., C. McKercher and U. Huws (eds) (2010), Getting the Message: Communications Workers and Global Value Chains, London: Merlin Press.
Murdock, G. (2011), ‘Political economies as moral economies’, in J. Wasko, G. Murdock and H. Sousa (eds), The Handbook of Political Economy of Communication, New York: Blackwell, pp. 11-40.
Murdock, G. and J. Wasko (eds) (2007), Media in the Age of Marketization, Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Ngai, P. (2005), Made in China: Women Factory Workers in a Global Workplace, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Nye, D. (1990), Electrifying America, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Padovani, C. and A. Calabrese (eds) (2014), Communication Rights and Social Justice: Historical Accounts of Transnational Mobilizations, Global Transformations in Media and Communication Research - A Palgrave IAMCR Series, London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pickard, V. (2007), ‘Neoliberal visions and revisions in global communications policy from NWICO to WSIS’, Journal of Communication Inquiry, 31 (2), 118-39.
Qiu, J.L. (2010), ‘Across the Great Wall we can reach every corner in the world: Network labour in China’, in V. Mosco, C. McKercher and U. Huws (eds), Getting the Message, London: Merlin Press, pp. 111-25.
Ricardo, D. (1819), On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, London: G. Bell and Sons.
Schiller, D. (1999), Digital Capitalism, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Schiller, D. (2007), How to Think About Information, Chicago and Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Schiller, D. (2011), ‘Power under pressure: Digital capitalism in crisis’, International Journal of Communication, 5, 924-41.
Scholz, T (ed.) (2012), Digital Labor, New York: Routledge.
Simmons, C. (2010), ‘Weaving a web within the Web: Corporate consolidation of the Web, 1999-2008’, The Communication Review, 13 (2), 105-19.
Simmons, C. (2011), ‘Converging competitors? Board interlocks in the changing media landscape’, Journal of Media Economics, 24 (4), 201-13.
Smith, A. ([1776] 1937), in E. Canaan (ed.), An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, New York: Modern Library.
Smith-Shomade, B.E. (2004), ‘Narrowcasting in the new world information order: A space for the audience?’, Television & New Media, 5 (1), 69-81.
Smythe, D. (1981), Dependency Road, Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Stallman, R. (2002), Free Software, Free Society, Boston, MA: Free Software Foundation.
Stevens, A. (2011), ‘Calling for resistance: The political economy of Indian and Canadian call centre industries’, doctoral dissertation, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON.
Sussman, G. (2011), The Propaganda Society: Promotional Culture and Politics in Global Context, New York: Peter Lang.
Terranova, T. (2004), Network Culture: Politics for the Information Age, London: Pluto.
Thomas, P. (2012), Digital India: Understanding Information, Communication and Social Change, New Delhi: Sage Publications India.
Tian, G. (2009), Re-Thinking Intellectual Property: The Political Economy of Copyright Protection in the Digital Era, New York: Routledge.
Wasko, J., G. Murdock and H. Sousa (eds) (2011), The Handbook of Political Economy of Communication, New York: Blackwell.
Winseck, D. and D.Y. Jin (eds) (2011), The Political Economies of Media, New York: Bloomsbury.
Winseck, D. and R. Pike (2007), Communication and Empire: Media Power and Globalization, 1860-1930, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Yu, H. (2011), Labor, Class Formation and China’s Informationalized Policy of Economic Development, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Zhao, Y. (2008), Communication in China: Political Economy, Power, and Conflict, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Zhao, Y (2011), ‘The challenge of China: Contribution to a transcultural political economy of communication for the twenty-first century’, in J. Wasko, G. Murdock and H. Sousa (eds), The Handbook of Political Economy of Communications, New York: Blackwell, pp. 558-82.