<<
>>

CONCLUSION: ON SEEING AND BELIEVING

It was only a later development, under Ammisaduqa and Samsuditana, that reports were written for private clients; only in the Kassite period that we first find extispicy in school curricula.

Not until these features arise can we speak of a scholarly and scientific category of knowledge called barutu. The historically attested distribution of texts referring to and constituting extispical practice conform to the following course of change:

• first, a third-millennium southern tradition of extispicy used within the old Sumerian temple-cities for the selection of cultic personnel, a procedure which was not committed to text but existed as a local, heterodox, and orally transmitted craft down into the nineteenth century;148

• second, the nineteenth/eighteenth-century appropriation of that craft tradition by newer, north-Babylonian courts at Esnunna, Babylon, Mari, and Larsa,149 entextualized in liver models and compendia, a new techne redeveloped in the context of Mesopotamian state struggle;150

• third, a gradual, Late Old Babylonian (seventeenth century) and Kassite-period re-transmission of this codified extispicy as an epistemic form of knowledge, represented newly within the scribal curriculum through school texts[150] and in civil society through extispical reports for private clients.[151]

Assuming for the moment that these stages represent fundamentally different uses of the same technology, we see not a unitary science of extispicy under a single process of gradual development, but three extispicies, each developed and put to its own end. In Kuhnian terms, the first and third stages were paradigms, the second revolutionary. Since all three stages may also be located within the Old Babylonian period itself — four centuries long, no small timeframe! — we are looking at a perfect illustration of how periodization can sometimes mislead our thinking.

Historical periods are not necessarily coincident with paradigm; changes can come in the middle, and paradigms reign at beginnings and ends.

Do we do an injustice to divination to locate its compositional moments and purposes so precisely? After all, the system of omina ranks among the greatest signatures of Mesopotamian intellectual life. To see its composition determined by political exigencies will strike some as mechanical and reductive, eroding the “conceptual autonomy” of Mesopotamian culture, or failing to appreciate the emic sensibility of ancient beliefs and practices in needing a “practi­cal” explanation. Yet what I argue for is to see a venerable and respected tradition from one time and place, borrowed and reconfigured in highly sophisticated ways in later times and other places. Mesopotamian kings drafted liver divination into service not simply because it was legitimate (all such knowledges propagated by political actors are legitimizing, so this is truistic) — not because it was infallible or irreducible (the question of belief cannot anyway be proved) — nor because it was mere political legerdemain — but because it offered them another choice, a “third way” between traditional kingship and rule by naked force, bases of legitimacy which were, now, equally shaky in this time of prolonged warfare. A strictly historicist and minimalist survey of the temporal and geographic evidence permits this read­ing without having to see any one period through the eyes of another. “Historicizing” has to require the interrogation of all documentary classes, all texts analyzed, questioned, doubted; “context” must be established without recourse to projection of fragmentary evidence generi­cally and periodically, as if the distribution of what is recovered were purely circumstantial.

No form of human inquiry is autogenetic; since no form of knowledge is unconstructed, composition need not be at odds with belief when historical change occurs over time. As it came to be, seeing wasn’t believing — but believing in seeing was believing.

Within a very short period of time (indeed, before the end of the very dynasty which helped initiate the project), divination was released into the “stream of tradition,” where it grew and flourished in a life of two thousand years.

and away the client most commonly identified in the compendia: the king. Reports thus constitute a differ­ent form of use for extispicy, marking its emergence into civil-social use only well after the era of warring states had come to an end.

APPENDIX 1

Mesopotamian year-names referring to priestly nominations via sheep omens.a

AKKAD:

Naram-Sin: “o” variants: en/nin.dingir en.lil; “ll”: en dnanna.

LAGAS II:

Ur-Ningirsu I: “a”: sita-ab.ba; “b”: lu.mah dba.u; “c”: isib dnin.gir.su / nin. dingir diskur.*

Gudea: 19: lu.mah dinanna.b

Pirigme: “a”: en ninakl; “f”: isib dnin.gir.su.

UR III:

Ur-Namma: “d”: en dinanna unugk; “h”: en dnanna; “j”: nin.dingir diskur.

Sulgi: 15 and 43: both en dnanna.

Amar-Sin: 4: en dnanna.

Ibbi-Sin: 2: en dinanna; 10: en dnanna / dinanna*; 11: en denki eriduk.c

ISIN:

Isbi-Erra: 13: en.gaba dinanna; 22: en.bàra an.na.

Iddin-Dagan: 3: nin-dingir diskur; 5: en dinanna; 8: nin.dingir dnin.kilim.

Isme-Dagan: “a”: en dnanna; “e”: en den.lil.

Lipit-Istar: “g”: en dnin.gublalaga urik.

Damiq-ilisu: 4: lu.mah dnin.ì.si.ink.

LARSA:

Gungunum: 6: en dutu.

Abisare: 10: en dutu.

a This index compiles exempla of Frayne 1993; 1997; and 1990; Edzard 1997; and the year-names Web site of the CDLI project (http://cdli.ucla.edu/tools/ yearnames/yn_index.html). Pains have been taken to ensure that multiple listings are not presented here, but the designations of individual year-names (es­pecially where their order remains unknown) has

inclined toward the CDLI site in the interests of clar­ity.

Asterisks (*) designate directly contrary readings by those sources.

b A fragmentary year-name of Gudea may also be a nomination: mu nin.dingir [...] (Edzard 1997: 27).

c Unusually, this year-name identifies the nominee's previous position as sita-priest of Ibbi-Sin.

SETH F. C. RICHARDSON

APPENDIX 2

“Omens” from Jacobsen 1987 misunderstood as “extispicies.”

Th. Jacobsen’s oft-cited The Harps That Once... (1987) remains the most popular transla­tions of Sumerian poetry. Yet what Jacobsen often translates as “omen,” “diviner,” or “divina­tion,” however, and then annotates as an extispical procedure, are either explicitly or probably non-extispical. This list of six passages from that work serves as an example of this defini­tional drift, not an exhaustive study:

1. In “Dumuzi’s Dream,” lines 17-25, Gestinanna is said to “know the writings” (Alster 1972: 55, “tablet-knowing”), but this is for the interpretation of a dream omen, not a liver omen.

2. The so-called “Eridu Genesis” was specifically understood by Jacobsen (1987: 145) to make reference to a liver divination, but this is apparently a confusion of ki-azag (= amutu, the pure or precious metal) for amutu “liver”; cf. Poebel (1914: 13, 17 line 9': ki-azag-ga), who made no translation suggesting extispicy.

3. Jacobsen (1987: 290 and n. 30) more emphatically connects an epithet of Enki in “Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta,” to the (supposedly extispical) omen readings for the appointment of en-priests, translating “sagacious omen-revealed lord of Eridu.” Vanstiphout’s (2003: 65) translation, however, makes better sense of gestug-ge pad-da (line 153) as “chosen for wis­dom” — and avoids the logical fallacy of a god said to be chosen by men through omens!

4. In the “Hymn to Enlil,” Jacobsen’s translation of line 56 (e-a en-bi e-da mu-a) is “the en-priest was a diviner,” but the term for diviner there is mu, a kind of disputant seer, not a liver-omen diviner. Falkenstein (1960: 21) gave the altogether different “Der Herr des Hauses ist mit dem Haus zusammen grofigeworden.”

5.

In the “Nanse Hymn,” what Jacobsen translates in line 131 as “divination” is instead given by Heimpel (1981) as “decision” (es-bar-kin), which is especially unlikely to be an extispical decision, since the message “comes out of the mouth of the Apsu.” Like Sulgi’s Hymn B, this hymn in general presents a strong contrast between the uses of writing (e.g., for administra­tion) and memorized/intuitive knowledge in lines 110-35, where this reference to es-bar-kin falls.

6. Jacobsen’s (1987: 271; as van Dijk 1983: 145) translation of line 712 in “Lugal-e” men­tions “the preeminent tablets, with series (with the rites of) enship and kingship” — but the closest indication of any divinatory pratice of Nidaba indicates only that she read stars (line 726), not livers.

ABBREVIATIONS

AHw W. von Soden, Akkadisches Handworterbuch

ARM Archives Royales de Mari

CAD A. Leo Oppenheim et al., editors, The Assyrian Dictionary of the Oriental Institute

of the University of Chicago

CDLI Cuneiform Digital Library Initiative (Web site: cdli.ucla.edu)

ETCSL Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature

(Web site: www-etcsl.orient.ox.ac.uk/)

OBE Jeyes 1989

PSD Ake W. Sjoberg, editor, The Sumerian Dictionary of the University Museum of the

University of Pennsylvania

TCL Textes cuneiformes du Louvre

VS Vorderasiatische Schriftdenkmäler der Koniglichen Museen zu Berlin

YOS 10 Goetze 1947a

SETH F. C. RICHARDSON

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Al-Rawi, Farouk N. H.

1994 “Texts from Tell Haddad and Elsewhere.” Iraq 56: 35-43.

Alster, Bendt

1972 Dumuzi’s Dream: Aspects of Oral Poetry in a Sumerian Myth. Mesopotamia 1.

Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.

1976 “On the Earliest Sumerian Literary Tradition.” Journal of Cuneiform Studies 28:

109-26 (review of Biggs 1974).

1997Proverbs of Ancient Sumer: The World’s Earliest Proverb Collections. Bethesda: CDL Press.

Archi, Alfonso

1984 “The ‘Names and Professions List’: More Fragments from Ebla.” Revue d’Assyrio-

logie 78: 171-74.

Bahrani, Zainab

2003 The Graven Image. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Biga, Maria G.

1999 “Omens and Divination at Ebla.” Nouvelles Assyriologiques Breves et Utilitaires

1999, no. 109.

Biggs, Robert D.

1974 Inscriptions from Tell Abu Salablkh. Oriental Institute Publications 99. Chicago:

University of Chicago Press.

Bonechi, M., and A. Catagnoti

1998“Magic and Divination at IIIrd Millennium Ebla, 1: Textual Typologies and Preliminary Lexical Approach.” In Magic in the Ancient Near East, edited by S. Ribichini, pp. 17-39. Studi epigrafici e linguistici sul Vicino Oriente antico 15. Verona: Essedue Edizioni.

Bottero, Jean

1992 “Divination and the Scientific Spirit.” In Mesopotamia: Writing, Reasoning, and the

Gods, by Jean Bottero, pp. 125-37. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Castellino, G. R.

1972 Two Sulgi Hymns (BC). Studi Semitici 42. Rome: Istituto di studi del Vicino

Oriente.

Charpin, Dominique

1999“Hammu-rabi de Babylone et Mari: Nouvelles sources, nouvelles perspectives.” In Babylon: Focus mesopotamischer Geschichte, Wiege früher Gelehrsamkeit, Mythos in der Moderne; 2. Internationales Colloquium der Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft 24.­26. März 1998 in Berlin, edited by J. Renger, pp. 111-30. Saarbrücken: Saarbrücker Druckerei und Verlag.

Civil, Miguel

1969 The Series lu = sa and Related Texts. Materials for the Sumerian Lexicon 12. Rome:

Pontificium Institutum Biblicum.

1976 “Lexicography.” In Sumerological Studies in Honor of Thorkild Jacobsen on His

Seventieth Birthday, June 7, 1974, pp. 123-57. Assyriological Studies 20. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Cooper, Jerrold S.

1980 “Apodictic Death and the Historicity of ‘Historical’ Omens.” In Death in Mesopotamia,

edited by B. Alster, pp. 99-106. Mesopotamia 8. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.

1981“Gilgamesh and Agga: A Review Article.” Journal of Cuneiform Studies 33: 224-41.

1983 The Curse of Agade. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Coser, Μ.

2000 “An Extispicy Report in III Millennium Ebla.” Ugarit Forschungen (Gordon Memorial

Volume) 32: 169-76.

Deimel, Anton

1969 Die Inschriften von Fara 2: Schultexte aus Fara. Wissenschaftliche Veroffentlichungen

der Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft 43. Leipzig: Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft. First printing 1923.

DeMeyer, L.

1982“Deux Prieres ikribu du temps d’Ammi-saduqa.” In Zikir Sumim: Assyriological Studies Presented to F. R. Kraus on the Occasion of His Seventieth Birthday, edited G. van Driel et al., pp. 271-78. Leiden: Brill.

Dossin, G.

1935 “Prieres aux ‘Dieux de la Nuit’ (AO 6769).” Revue d’Assyriologie 32: 179-87.

Durand, Jean-Marie

1988Archives epistolaires de Mari I/1. Archives Royales de Mari 26/1. Paris: Editions recherche sur les civilisations.

Edzard, Dietz Otto

1997 Gudea and His Dynasty. Royal Inscriptions of Mesopotamia, Early Periods 3/1.

Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Falkenstein, Adam

1960 Sumerische Gotterlieder. Part 1. Heidelberg: C. Winter.

Farber, Walter F.

1993 “‘Forerunners’ and ‘Standard Versions’: A Few Thoughts About Terminology.” In

The Tablet and the Scroll: Near Eastern Studies in Honor of W. W. Hallo, edited by Μ. E. Cohen, D. C. Snell, and D. B. Weisberg, pp. 95-97. Bethesda: CDL Press.

1995 “Witchcraft, Magic, and Divination in Ancient Mesopotamia.” In Civilizations of the

Ancient Near East, edited by J. Sasson, pp. 1895-1909. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

Foxvog, D. A.

1989“A Manual of Sacrificial Procedure.” In Dumu-e2-dub-ba-a: Studies in Honor of Ake W. Sjoberg, edited by H. Behrens, D. Loding, and M. T. Roth, pp. 167­73. Occasional Publications of the Samuel Noah Kramer Fund 11. Philadelphia: University Museum.

Frayne, Douglas R.

1990Old Babylonian Period (2003-1595 B.C.). Royal Inscriptions of Mesopotamia, Early Periods 4. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

1993 Sargonic and Gutian Periods (2334-2113 B.C.). Royal Inscriptions of Mesopotamia,

Early Periods 2. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

1997 Ur III Period (2112-2004 B.C.). Royal Inscriptions of Mesopotamia, Early Periods

3/2. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Gelb, Ignace J.

1952 Sargonic Texts from the Diyala Region. Materials for the Assyrian Dictionary 1.

Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

1956 “On the Recently Published Economic Texts from Mari.” Revue d’Assyriologie 50:

1-10.

Glassner, Jean-Jacques

2003 The Invention of Cuneiform: Writing in Sumer. Translated and edited by Z. Bahrani

and Μ. Van De Mieroop. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

Goetze, Albrecht

1947a Old Babylonian Omen Texts. Yale Oriental Studies 10. New Haven: Yale University Press. Second printing, 1966.

1947b “Historical Allusions in Old Babylonian Omen Texts.” Journal of Cuneiform Studies 1: 253-65.

1957 “Reports on Acts of Extispicy from Old Babylonian and Kassite Times.” Journal of

Cuneiform Studies 11: 89-105.

1968 “An Old Babylonian Prayer of the Divination Priest.” Journal of Cuneiform Studies

22: 25-29.

Hallo, William W.

1963 “On the Antiquity of Sumerian Literature.” Journal of the American Oriental Society

83: 167-76.

1967“New Texts from the Reign of Sin-iddinam.” Journal of Cuneiform Studies (Goetze festschrift) 21: 95-99.

Heeßel, Nils P.

1981 “The Nanshe Hymn.” Journal of Cuneiform Studies 33: 65-139.

Heimpel, Wolfgang

1981 “The Nanshe Hymn.” Journal of Cuneiform Studies 33: 65-139.

2003 Letters to the King of Mari: A New Translation, with Historical Introduction, Notes,

and Commentary. Mesopotamian Civilizations 12. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.

Horwich, Paul, editor

1993 World Changes: Thomas Kuhn and the Nature of Science. Cambridge: MIT Press. Hunger, Hermann

1968Babylonische und assyrische Kolophone. Alter Orient und Altes Testament 2. Kevelaer: Neukirchener Verlag.

Jacobsen, Thorkild

1939 The Sumerian King List. Assyriological Studies 11. Chicago: University of Chicago

Press.

1987 The Harps That Once...: Sumerian Poetry in Translation. New Haven: Y ale University

Press.

1994“The Historian and the Sumerian Gods.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 114: 145-53.

Jeyes, Ulla

1980“Death and Divination in the Old Babylonian Period.” In Death in Mesopotamia: Papers Read at the XXVIe Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale, edited B. Alster, pp. 107-21. Mesopotamia 8. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.

1989 Old Babylonian Extispicy: Omen Texts in the British Museum. Istanbul: Nederlands

Historisch-Archaeologisch Instituut te Istanbul.

Kelly, John

2006 “Writing and the State: China, India, and General Definitions.” In Margins of Writing,

Origins of Culture, edited by S. Sanders, pp. 15-32. Oriental Institute Seminars 2. Chicago: The Oriental Institute.

Klein, Jacob

1981The Royal Hymns of Shulgi, King of Ur: Man’s Quest for Immortal Fame. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 71/7. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.

Koch-Westenholz, Ulla

2000 Babylonian Liver Omens: The Chapters Manzäzu, Padänu and Pän täkalti of the

Babylonian Extispicy Series Mainly from Assurbanipal’s Library. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.

2002“Old Babylonian Extispicy Reports.” In Mining the Archives: Festschrift for Christopher Walker on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday, edited by C. Wunsch, pp. 131-45. Babylonische Archive 1. Dresden: ISLET.

Kramer, Samuel Noah

1942 “The Oldest Literary Catalogue.” Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental

Research 88: 10-19.

1961“Kataloge.” In Sumerische Literarische Texte aus Nippur, Volume 1, edited by S. N. Kramer and I. Bernhardt, pp. 19-20. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.

Krecher, J.

1980 “Kataloge, literarische.” Reallexikon der Assyriologie 5: 478-85.

Kuhn, Thomas

1962 The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Lambert, Wilfred G.

1957 “Ancestors, Authors, and Canonicity.” Journal of Cuneiform Studies 11: 1-14.

1969 “Enmeduranki and Related Matters.” Journal of Cuneiform Studies 21: 126-38.

1998 “The Qualifications of Babylonian Diviners.” In Festschrift für Rykle Borger zu sei­

nem 65. Geburtstag am 24. Mai 1994: tikip santakki mala basmu..., edited by S. M. Maul, pp. 141-58. Cuneiform Monographs 10. Groningen: Styx.

Legrain, Leon

1912 Le temps des rois d’Ur: Recherches sur la societe antique d’apres des textes nou-

veaux. Paris: H. Champion.

Lieberman, Stephen J.

1977 The Sumerian Loanwords in Old-Babylonian Akkadian. Harvard Semitic Studies 22.

Missoula: Scholars Press.

Lyon, David

2007 Surveillance Studies: An Overview. Oxford: Polity.

Luckenbill, Daniel D.

1930 Inscriptions from Adab. Oriental Institute Publications 14. Chicago: University of

Chicago Press.

Meyer, Jan-Waalke

1987 Untersuchungen zu den Tonlebermodellen aus dem Alten Orient. Alter Orient und

Altes Testament 39. Kevelaer: Neukirchener Verlag.

Michalowski, Piotr

1983 “History as Charter: Some Observations on the Sumerian King List.” Journal of the

American Oriental Society 103: 237-48.

2003“An Early Dynastic Tablet of ED Lu A from Tell Brak (Nagar).” Cuneiform Digital Library Journal 2003/3. http://cdli.ucla.edu/pubs/cdlj/2003/cdlj2003_003.pdf

2006 “How to Read the Liver — in Sumerian.” In If a Man Builds a Joyful House:

Assyriological Studies in Honor of Erle Verdun Leichty, edited by A. K. Guinan et al., pp. 247-58. Cuneiform Monographs 31. Leiden and Boston: Brill.

Nougayrol, Jean

1950 “Textes hepatoscopiques d’epoque ancienne conserves au Musee du Louvre.” Revue

d’Assyriologie 44: 1-44.

1976 “Les ‘silhouettes de reference’ de l’haruspicine.” In Kramer Anniversary Volume:

Cuneiform Studies in Honor of Samuel Noah Kramer, edited by B. L. Eichler, pp. 343-50. Alter Orient und Altes Testament 25. Kevelaer: Butzon & Bercker.

Oppenheim, A. Leo

1959 “A New Prayer to the ‘Gods of the Night.’” Analecta Biblica 12: 282-301.

1964 Ancient Mesopotamia: Portrait of a Dead Civilization. Chicago: University of Chicago

Press.

Poebel, Arno

1914 Historical Texts. University of Pennsylvania Publications of the Babylonian Section

4/1. Philadelphia: The University Museum.

Pohl, A.

1937Rechts- und Verwaltungsurkunden der III. Dynastie von Ur. Texte und Materialien der Frau Professor Hilprecht Collection of Babylonian Antiquities im Eigentum der Universität Jena, neue Folge, 1-2. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs.

Pongratz-Leisten, Beate

1999 Herrschaftswissen in Mesopotamien: Formen der Kommunikation zwischen Gott und

Konig in 2. und 1. Jahrtausend v. Chr. State Archives of Assyria Studies 10. Helsinki: The Neo-Assyrian Text Corpus Project.

Richardson, Seth F. C.

2002a “The Diviners’ Archive.” In The Collapse of a Complex State, by Seth Richardson, Chapter 4. Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University. University Microfilms no. 3053344.

2002b “Ewe Should Be So Lucky: Extispicy Reports and Everyday Life.” In Mining the Archives: Festschrift for Christopher Walker on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday, edited by C. Wunsch, pp. 229-44. Dresden: ISLET.

2006“gir3-gin-na and Sulgi’s ‘Library’: Liver Omen Texts in the Third Millennium (I).” Cuneiform Digital Library Journal 2006/3: 1-9. http://cdli.ucla.edu/pubs/cdlj/2006/ cdlj2006_003.pdf

2007“Omen Report No. 38.” Nouvelles Assyriologiques Breves et Utilitaires 2007: no. 47.

Rochberg, Francesca

1991 “Between Observation and Theory in Babylonian Astronomical Texts.” Journal of

Near Eastern Studies 50: 107-20.

1999 “Empiricism in Babylonian Omen Texts and the Classification of Mesopotamian

Divination as Science.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 119: 559-69.

Roth, Martha T.

1995 Law Collections from Mesopotamia and Asia Minor. 2nd edition. Atlanta: Scholars

Press.

2001 “Reading Mesopotamian Law Cases: PBS 5 100: A Question of Filiation.” Journal

of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 44/3: 243-92.

Rutten, Maggie

1938“Trente-Deux modeles de foies en argile inscrits provenant de Tell-Hariri (Mari).” Revue d’Assyriologie 35: 36-70.

Sasson, Jack

1995 “Water beneath Straw: Adventures of a Prophetic Phrase in the Mari Archives.” In

Solving Riddles and Untying Knots: Biblical, Epigraphic, and Semitic Studies in Honor of Jonas C. Greenfield, edited by Z. Zevit, S. Gitin, and M. Sokoloff, pp. 599-608. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.

Sigrist, Marcel

1984a Neo-Sumerian Account Texts in the Horn Archaeological Museum. Andrews University Cuneiform Texts 1. Berrien Springs: Andrews University Press.

1984b Les sattukku dans l’Esumesa durant la periode d’Isin et Larsa. Bibliotheca Mesopotamica 11. Malibu: Undena Publications.

Starr, Ivan

1983 The Rituals of the Diviner. Bibliotheca Mesopotamica 12. Malibu: Undena

Publications.

1986“The Place of the Historical Omens in the System of Apodoses.” Bibliotheca Orientalis 43: 628-42.

1990Queries to the Sungod: Divination and Politics in Sargonid Assyria. State Archives of Assyria 4. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press.

1991Review of Old Babylonian Extispicy: Omen Texts in the British Museum, by Ulla Jeyes. Bibliotheca Orientalis 48: 175-80.

Steinkeller, Piotr

1980 “The Old Akkadian Term for ‘Easterner.’” Revue d’Assyriologie 74: 1-9.

2003 “An Ur III Manuscript of the Sumerian King List.” In Literatur, Politik und Recht

in Mesopotamien: Festschrift für Claus Wilcke, edited by W. Sallaberger, K. Volk, and A. Zgoll, pp. 267-92. Orientalia Biblica et Christiana 14. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.

Sweek, Joel

2002“Inquiring for the State in the Ancient Near East: Delineating Political Location.” In Magic and Divination in the Ancient World, edited by L. Ciraolo and J. Seidel, pp. 41-56. Ancient Magic and Divination 2. Leiden and Boston: Brill.

Taylor, J.

2003“Collations to Lu C and D.” Cuneiform Digital Library Bulletin 2003/3. http://cdli. ucla.edu/pubs/cdlb/2003/cdlb2003_003.pdf

Trigger, Bruce

1985 “Generalized Coercion and Inequality.” In Development and Decline: The Evolution

of Sociopolitical Organization, edited by H. J. M. Claessen, P. van de Elde, and M. E. Smith, pp. 46-61. South Hadley: Bergin and Garvey.

Van De Mieroop, Marc

2005 King Hammurabi of Babylon: A Biography. Oxford: Blackwell.

van der Meer, L. Bouke

1987The Bronze Liver of Piacenza: Analysis of a Polytheistic Structure. Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben.

van Dijk, J. J. A.

1983 Lugal ud me-ldm-bi Nir-gdl: Le recit epique et didactique des Travaux de Ninurta,

de Deluge et de la Nouvelle Creation. Leiden: Brill.

van Dijk, J. J. A., and Markham J. Geller

2003 Ur III Incantations from the Frau Professor Hilprecht-Collection, Jena. Texte und

Materialien der Frau Professor Hilprecht Collection of Babylonian Antiquities im Eigentum der Universität Jena, Neue Folge 6. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.

Vanstiphout, Herman L. J.

2003 Epics of Sumerian Kings: The Matter of Aratta. Writings from the Ancient World 20.

Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.

266 SETH F. C. RICHARDSON

Veldhuis, Niek

1999“Continuity and Change in the Mesopotamian Lexical Tradition.” In Aspects of Genre and Type in Pre-Modern Literary Cultures,” edited B. Roest and H. L. J. Vanstiphout, pp. 101-18. Groningen: Styx.

2000“Kassite Exercises: Literary and Lexical Extracts.” Journal of Cuneiform Studies 52: 67-94.

Verbrugghe, Gerald P., and John M. Wickersham

1996Berossos and Manetho, Introduced and Translated: Native Traditions in Ancient Mesopotamia and Egypt. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Westenholz, Joan Goodnick

1992 “The Clergy of Nippur.” In Nippur at the Centennial: Papers Read at the 35e

Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale, Philadelphia 1988, edited by M. de Jong Ellis, pp. 297-310. Philadelphia: The University Museum.

1997Legends of the Kings of Akkade: The Texts. Mesopotamian Civilizations 7. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.

Wilcke, C.

1976 “Kollationen zu den sumerischen literarischen Texten aus Nippur in der Hilprecht-

Sammlung Jena.” Abhandlungen der Sächsischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 65/4: 42.

Zimmern, Heinrich

1901 Beiträge zur Kenntnis der babylonischen Religion. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs.

<< | >>
Source: Annus Amar (ed.). Divination and Interpretation of Signs in the Ancient World. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press,2010. — viii, 352 p.. 2010

More on the topic CONCLUSION: ON SEEING AND BELIEVING: