Moisei Rafes (1920, 1923) on the Bund in Ukraine
Moisei Rafes presents a similar view of the heterogeneous origins of the CP(B)U in his Outline of the History of the “Bund.” He argues that the Bund in Kyiv had “no doubts, no indecision” about its duty to support the Central Rada in its conflict with the Provisional Government in Petrograd (Rafes 1923, 258).
The Bund, according to him, recognized territorial autonomy for Ukraine and national-cultural autonomy for minorities. It applauded the Central Rada’s suppression of the Bolshevik attempt to organize a strike after the October Revolution. In fact, it “opposed Soviet power and waited at every moment for its fall, but did not desire an armed struggle against Soviet power, seeing the October revolution as ‘a mistake of the proletarian masses’” (ibid., 265-66). In January 1918, the Bund left the Ukrainian government as a result of the declaration of independence and the Brest-Litovsk negotiations, which led to the Germans occupying the country. The Bund cited the growth of nationalism and increasing expressions of antisemitism as reasons for not supporting the government (ibid., 266). However, at the end of January, when the Arsenal workers took up arms against a separate peace with the Germans, even with Russian troops approaching, the Bund still defended the Central Rada and rejected the Bolsheviks (ibid., 267).As Rafes tells the story, Skoropadskyi’s rule radicalized the population, crystallizing the emergence of a left wing in the Bund. The Bund’s national program, which, like the Central Rada’s, focused on cultural rights and national autonomy, was attacked in the Bolshevik newspaper Iskra (Spark). The Bolsheviks, who claimed that they alone could satisfy the national desires of the population, in June 1919 created Jewish sections
Repressed Memory 15 within their party and the commissariats for war, social security, internal affairs, and popular enlightenment. Even as the Bund’s right wing fought against Soviet power, its left wing tried to enter into an agreement with the RCP(B) through the Comintern. The two indigenous Ukrainian communist groups (the UKP, or Ukrainian Communist Party, and the Borot- bists) attempted to do the same. However, these bids were rejected. Jewish communists were told to master the Russian language, the lack of which “prevents communication in the general-proletarian milieu [sredoi] and holds back access to proletarian culture” (ibid., 300). On 1 March 1919, the Communist Bund of Ukraine fused with the CP(B)U. Ukrainians and Jews who entered the Bolshevik party were required to make an act of atonement for their previous political errors, deny the importance of their cultural identity and renounce their earlier support for national-cultural autonomy. Rafes made such an act of atonement at the end of his Dva goda revoliutsii na Ukraine (Two Years of Revolution in Ukraine, 1920).
More on the topic Moisei Rafes (1920, 1923) on the Bund in Ukraine:
- 33 War, Social Upheaval, and Anarchy in Dnieper Ukraine, 1919-1920
- In 1920, the prominent Ukrainian historian and political activist Viacheslav Lypynsky (Waclaw Lipinski) published a book entitled Ukraine at the Turning Point.
- From 1918, when the Bolsheviks created secret organs to identify and neutralize enemies, Ukraine’s intellectual elite received special attention, partly because of the country’s geopolitical and economic significance, but also because Soviet leaders viewed the independence movement, which was finally crushed only in 1920, as a dangerous threat.
- Ravich-Cherkasskii on the Party’s Dual Roots and Relations With the Bund
- Moisei’s Revelation
- Galicia and the international scene, 1918-1923
- The Language and Faith of Moisei Fishbein
- Political developments, 1923-1939
- In loving memory of my pobratym, Orest Zilynsky (1923-76)
- 3 Political Collapse, Revolutions, and Social Upheavals, 1917-1923
- The Greek and the unGreek, 1830–1920