Private Consumption and Money Demand in a Representative Household Model
Assume, as in the Ramsey model of chapter 4, a competitive economy in which all households are identical. Households are indexed by j, where j is uniformly distributed between zero and 1.
Thus, j ∈ [0, 1]. We therefore focus on the behavior of only one of them, the representative household.The number of members of each household is equal to L(t) and is growing at an exogenous rate n, which is also the growth rate of population L(t). Labor supply and employment is equal to L(t), and the efficiency of labor h(t) grows at an exogenous rate of technical progress g. The instantaneous utility function of households depends on consumption of goods and services, and on holdings of real money balances.
7.1.1 Money in the Utility Function of Households
Household j selects a path of consumption and real money balances to maximize the following intertemporal utility function:
The maximization takes place under the instantaneous budget constraint
and the transversality condition
where ρ is the pure rate of time preference of households, and u is a quasi-concave instantaneous utility function that depends on consumption and real money balances (assumed positive). In addition, cj(t) denotes average consumption per person of household j at time t, mj(t) denotes average per person real money balances of household j at time t, aj(t) is average assets per person (nonhuman wealth) of household j at time t, w(t) denotes the real wage per efficiency unit of labor at time t, h(t) is labor efficiency per worker, τ(t) denotes average taxes (minus transfers) per efficiency unit of labor at time t, r(t) is the real interest rate at time t, n is the population growth rate (equal to the growth rate of members per household), and π(t) is inflation (which is equal to expected inflation).
Real money balances provide utility because of their liquidity services: they facilitate payments (the exchange of goods and services) and reduce transaction costs. The instantaneous utility function is assumed to take the form
where 1/θ is the intertemporal elasticity of substitution of consumption and real money balances, and γ is the share of consumption in the utility of the household. This utility function, which is a generalization of the constant elasticity of intertemporal substitution (CEIS) utility function we used previously, is additively separable: The elasticity of substitution between consumption and real money balances is equal to unity.
7.1.2 Nominal and Real Interest Rates and the Opportunity Cost of Real Money Balances
Unlike other assets held by households (such as capital or government bonds), the nominal yield of money is equal to zero, because money balances do not pay interest. Moreover, when there is a positive inflation rate π(t), real (inflation adjusted) money balances depreciate at the inflation rate π(t).
Therefore, the opportunity cost of holding real money balances is equal to the sum of the real return of interest-yielding assets plus the expected inflation rate. This is defined as the nominal interest rate i(t), which is determined by
This relationship between nominal and real interest rates is the Fisher equation introduced and discussed in chapter 2. It was first highlighted by Irving Fisher in 1896.3
7.1.3 First-Order Conditions for an Optimum
Maximizing (7.1) under the constraint (7.2) by forming the relevant Hamilton function yields the following first-order conditions:
where λj(t) is the current value multiplier of the relevant current value Hamilton function, and its economic interpretation is that it measures the shadow value of marginal savings (assets) of the household.
The asset accumulation constraint (7.2) and the transversality condition (7.3) must also be satisfied.From (7.6), λj(t), which is the shadow value of marginal savings, is equal to the current marginal utility of consumption. At the optimum, the marginal value of savings must be equal to the marginal utility of consumption, and the household must be indifferent between consumption and savings.
From (7.7), the current marginal utility of real money balances is equal to the marginal utility of consumption λj(t) times the opportunity cost of holding real money balances. At the optimum, the marginal value of holding real money balances must be equal to the opportunity cost of holding money, evaluated in terms of the marginal utility of consumption. Thus, at the optimum, the household should be indifferent between substituting consumption for the utility services of money.
Finally, from (7.8), the marginal utility of consumption falls at a rate equal to the difference between the real interest rate and the pure rate of time preference. This is another way of saying that the expected real return on savings, including capital gains on assets, is equal to the pure rate of time preference of the household. This can be seen by rearranging (7.8):

As shown below, we can now use the first-order conditions to derive the money demand function and the Euler equation for consumption.
7.1.4 The Money Demand Function
Dividing (7.7) by (7.6) and solving for real money balances, we can derive a function for the demand for real money balances by the representative household:
We can use (7.9) to deduce aggregate money demand. Multiplying both sides of (7.9) by L(t), we get
where M(t) is the aggregate nominal money supply, P(t) is the price level, and C(t) is aggregate real consumption of goods and services.
Equation (7.10) describes the aggregate money demand function in this model. Aggregate money demand is proportional to the price level and aggregate real consumption, and it depends negatively on the nominal interest rate. Put differently, the elasticity of aggregate money demand with respect to the price level and aggregate private consumption is equal to one, whereas the elasticity of aggregate money demand with respect to the nominal interest rate is equal to −1/θ, the elasticity of intertemporal substitution.Equation (7.10) is characterized by homogeneity of degree one with respect to the price level, because households demand money for its purchasing power. For a given aggregate real consumption and nominal interest rates, doubling the money supply would cause a doubling of the price level. This property is known as the neutrality of money.
Expressing real money balances per efficiency unit of labor, we have
where c = C/hL, m = (M/P)/hL, and h is the efficiency of labor.
7.1.5 Growth Rate of the Money Supply and Inflation
One can use (7.10) or (7.11) to determine the price level and inflation, assuming that the aggregate nominal money supply and its rate of growth μ are determined by the government or a government agency, such as a central bank.
From (7.10) and (7.5), it follows that
For given aggregate real consumption and nominal interest rates, the level of the nominal money supply determines the level of prices. From (7.12), it follows that
Thus, from (7.13), inflation is determined to be
For a given rate of growth in private consumption and fixed nominal interest rates, the inflation rate π(t) is determined by the rate of growth of the money supply.
For example, in a steady state where the growth rate of consumption in equal to g + n, and inflation and nominal interest rates are constant, inflation would be determined by
Equation (7.15) is the basis of the monetary approach to the determination of inflation. In the long run, inflation is determined by the difference between the growth rate of the money supply and the long-run growth rate of aggregate output and consumption.
7.1.6 The Euler Equation for Consumption
Turning now to the first-order conditions for consumption, from (7.6) and (7.8), it follows that
which is the standard Euler equation for consumption in a representative household model. In this monetary model, it does not differ from the corresponding equation in a real model, such as the one examined in chapter 4.
The real money balances and the nominal interest rate do not appear in (7.16) because of the assumption of additively separable preferences of the household for consumption and real money balances. With additively separable preferences, the marginal utility of consumption in (7.6) does not depend on real money balances or the determinants of their demand (such as the nominal interest rate).
It is straightforward to show that without additively separable preferences, the marginal utility of consumption in (7.6) depends on real money balances as well, and (7.16) does not generally follow.
For example, consider a nonadditively separable CES instantaneous utility function of the form

where σ is the elasticity of substitution between consumption and real money balances. The first-order condition (7.6) would then take the form

With an elasticity of substitution σ different from unity (i.e., nonadditively separable preferences), the marginal utility of consumption depends on real money balances as well.
In any case, in what follows, we shall continue assuming additively separable preferences between consumption and real money balances, mainly for reasons of analytical simplicity. In this case, (7.16) holds. From (7.16), the evolution of aggregate consumption C and consumption per efficiency unit of labor c are determined by
where g is the rate of exogenous technical progress.
From (7.17) and (7.18), the rate of growth of aggregate consumption (or consumption per efficiency unit of labor) only depends on real variables and not the money supply or its rate of growth.
7.2