<<
>>

CONFRONTING NIDAL MALIK HASAN'S “MARTYRDOM"

From this AP story about Nidal Malik Hasan, the devout Muslim, execution-style murderer of US soldiers and civilian personnel at Fort Hood, and surviving “martyr,” we learn the following:

At least six months ago, Hasan came to the attention of law enforcement officials because of Internet postings about suicide bombings and other threats, including posts that equated suicide bombers to soldiers who throw themselves on a grenade to save the lives of their comrades.

They had not determined for certain whether Hasan is the author of the posting, and a formal investigation had not been opened before the shooting, said law enforcement officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to discuss the case. One of the officials said late Thursday that federal search warrants were being drawn up to authorize the seizure of Hasan’s computer. Retired Army Col. Terry Lee, who said he worked with Hasan, told Fox News that Hasan had hoped President Barack Obama would pull troops out of Afghanistan and Iraq. Lee said Hasan got into frequent arguments with others in the military who supported the wars, and had tried hard to prevent his pending deployment.1

It is likely that the full Nidal Malik Hasan comments alluded to in the AP story are these:

There was a grenade thrown among a group of American soldiers. One of the soldiers, feeling that it was to [sic] late for everyone to flee jumped on the grave with the intention of saving his comrades. Indeed he saved them. He intentionally [sic] took his life (suicide) for a noble cause i.e. saving the lives of his soldier [sic]. To say that this soldier committed suicide is inappropriate. Its [sic] more appropriate to say he is a brave hero that sacrificed his life for a more noble cause. Scholars have paralleled [sic] this to suicide bombers whose intention, by sacrificing their lives, is to help save Muslims by killing enemy soldiers.

If one suicide bomber can kill 100 enemy soldiers because they were caught off guard that would be considered a strategic victory. Their intention is not to die because of some despair. The same can be said for the Kamikazees [sic] in Japan. They died (via crashing their planes into ships) to kill the enemies for the homeland. You can call them crazy if [sic] you want but their act was not one of suicide that is despised by Islam. So the scholars [sic] main point is that “IT SEEMS AS THOUGH YOUR INTENTION IS THE MAIN ISSUE” and Allah (SWT) knows best.2

Dan Greenfield has a fine post about Hasan's local Silver Springs, Maryland, imam, Faizul Khan, who is at minimum a cultural jihadist.3 Regardless, Hasan's own apparent views on jihad martyrdom4 are entirely consistent with mainstream, orthodox Islamic dogma on this sacralized killing of the enemies of Islam, which should not be conflated with “suicide” resulting from melancholia or depression.

Franz Rosenthal, the late (d. 2002) Yale University scholar of Islam, who, fifty years ago, translated Ibn Khaldun's classic Introduction to History, 5 also wrote a seminal essay titled “On Suicide in Islam” in 1946.6

Rosenthal’s research confirmed how Islam extolled “suicidal” martyrdom attacks:

While the Qur’anic attitude toward suicide remains uncertain, the great authorities of the hadith leave no doubt as to the official attitude of Islam. In their opinion suicide is an unlawful act.. On the other hand, death as the result of “suicidal” missions and of the desire of martyrdom occurs not infrequently, since death is considered highly commendable according to Muslim religious concepts. [Emphasis added.] However, such cases are no[t] suicides in the proper sense of the term.7

These orthodox Islamic views have been reiterated by Yusuf Al Qaradawi—“spiritual” leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, head of the European Fatwa Council, and immensely popular Al Jazeera television personality, as well as Muhammad Sayyid Tantawi, grand imam of Al Azhar University, the most prestigious center of Muslim learning in Sunni Islam.

Sheikh Qaradawi openly endorsed murderous Palestinian homicide bomber “martyrdom” operations against innocent Israeli citizens (all of whom are considered “combatants” who obstruct the “call to Islam”) during a fatwa council convened in the heart of Europe (in Stockholm, July 2003).8 For the past decade, Sheikh Tantawi, who is the nearest equivalent to a Muslim pope, has also confirmed the legitimacy of homicide bombing of Jews, characterizing these grisly attacks as,

the highest form of Jihad operations.the young people executing them have sold Allah the most precious thing of all.every martyrdom operation against any Israeli, including children, women, and teenagers, is a legitimate act according to [Islamic] religious law, and an Islamic commandment, until the people of Palestine regain their land.9

On July 25, 2005, historian David Littman attempted to deliver a prepared text in the joint names of three international NGOs (non-governmental organizations), but he was prevented from doing so by the intervention of Islamic members of the United Nations Sub­Commission on Human Rights. Following repeated interruptions, he was unable to complete his speech. Littman was simply trying to support the argument that those who issue fatwas to kill innocent people in the name of Islam are not real Muslims and should be treated as apostates.10 But as he noted, just before the July 7, 2005, London bombings, a major conference of 170 Muslim scholars from forty countries meeting in Amman, Jordan, gave an opinion in a Final Communique, dated July 6, 2005:

It is not possible to declare as apostates any group of Muslims who believes in Allah the Mighty and Sublime and His Messenger (may Peace and Blessings be upon him) and the pillars of faith, and respects the pillars of Islam and does not deny any necessary article of religion.11

This unfortunate communique—clearly provides immutable protection to authentic Islamic advocates of homicide bombing—like the “esteemed” clerics Yusuf Qaradawi and Al Azhar grand imam Tantawi.

And the contemporary advocacy of such “martyrdom” operations by Islam's most esteemed mainstream clerics is what ultimately gives legitimacy to the mass murderous actions of pious Muslims such as Nidal Malik Hasan. This is the unspoken, but irrefragable truth our craven “elites” in the military, government, and media must be forced to acknowledge and confront.

25.

<< | >>
Source: Bostom Andrew G.. Sharia Versus Freedom: The Legacy of Islamic Totalitarianism. Prometheus Books,2012. — 1110 p.. 2012
More legal literature on Laws.Studio

More on the topic CONFRONTING NIDAL MALIK HASAN'S “MARTYRDOM":

  1. WHICH MUSLIMS SHARE NIDAL HASAN'S VISION OF ISLAM?
  2. The "Voluntary" Civil Self-Defense Patrol System: The Bi-Polar World of "Quislings" vs. "Subversives"
  3. "Resisters" vs. "Acceptors": The Unanticipated Political Division of Guatemalan Society
  4. To the memory of Shaykh Hasan Salim Hasan Salih
  5. Resituating "Aggression" and Deflating "Power"
  6. Chapter 29 The Theory of Special Status Pictures" and "Imagining" Gilbert Ryle
  7. An empirical example of local "meta-organizer": REDASP (SR)14
  8. The second leading jurisprudent: Malik b. Anas (d. 179/795)
  9. Chapter 8 From "Identity and Necessity" Saul Kripke
  10. Taking Action: 'Closing the Gap" and 'Breaking the Sound Barrier"
  11. "The very ink with which history is written is merely fluid prejudice." —Mark Twain (Khurana, 2017)
  12. Chapter 45 From "Comments on a Certain Broadsheet" Rene Descartes
  13. Elements of a "policy-enabling space" for SHD
  14. THE CORDOBA HOUSE AND THE MYTH OF CORDOBAN "ECUMENISM"
  15. Dismembered Families: Violations of the Right to Life and the Right to "Know"