Turkish Muslim Legal Pluralism
Turkey is, like Pakistan, a Muslim majority country. Moreover, it is also a Sunni and Hanafi majority country. Despite the fact that the Civil Code is purely secular and does not recognise any Muslim laws, similar to Pakistan, unofficial Muslim laws have continued to co-exist, defying the staunchly secularist expectations of the Kemalist nation builders.[420]
The pressing aim of the Turkish Republic’s modernising and secularising founders, the hegemonic Kemalist elite, was to transform the ‘backward’, traditional, and religious society into a modern, secular and ‘civilised’ one.
The process of ‘civilisation’, “took on the character of a cultural revolution aiming to produce radical changes in social mentality, lifestyles and world views”?9 The Kemalists espoused western modernity and its French-type secular model that did not like public expressions and manifestations of Islam and that gradually aimed to secularise society?0 In other words, unlike the Anglo-Saxon secularism model that is based on “twin tolerations’^1 that safeguard the mutual autonomy of religion and state (wall of separation), the Turkish model aimed to purge Islam from the social domain in the long run. The state has resorted to the instrumentalist use of law?2 education?3 and the strict control of religion,84 media, art and culture. But in the short and medium terms, it has used Islam through the Directorate of Religious Affairs (Diyanet) as a helping hand to manufacture the consent of the masses?5 In attempting to build a new national identity for Turkey, the secular legal system became the very foundation of the modern Turkish state?6 State law has been an effective instrument in building the new secular modern Turkish nation. Kemalist legal and judicial reforms were an essential part of the general social engineering project which aimed to westernise/modernise the newly established republic.87Hooker argues that Turkey’s experience “is an excellent example of a state undertaking the process of legal importation as a result of fundamental revolution, and under the impetus of that upheaval, attempting to establish a completely clean legal sheet”.[421] [422] [423] [424] [425] [426] Thus, the Minister of Justice of the time, Mahmut Esat Bozkurt, “declared that what he desired was not reform but a revolution of Law”.89 The transformation of society would start with the very smallest unit, the family. There are a number of differences between the secular civil law of Turkey and the unofficial Muslim laws. These differences include the secularisation of the marriage ceremony, the ban on polygamy and the secularisation of divorce proceedings. The new law gave both parties an equal right to sue for divorce. Talaq was no longer recognised. Divorce could only be granted by an official court. Nevertheless, Muslim Turks have sought other ways to adapt their unofficial Muslim laws to the modern and secular milieu. They have reconstructed their unofficial laws to meet the demands of both official and unofficial laws.93 3.1 Registration and Solemnisation of Marriage Under the official law, civil-only marriages performed by authorised marriage officers are allowed and recognised. A marriage may be solemnised in accordance with any religious rites if the parties desire, but registration of marriage preceding such a solemnisation is necessary. Only after the celebration of the civil marriage is a religious marriage (imam nikaht)s4 permitted and the parties should present their marriage document to the imam before the religious marriage. Men and women who perform a religious marriage ceremony without having concluded the legal marriage contract are punishable. Nonetheless, religious-only marriages have continued to take place. In the late 1980s and earlier 1990s, the State Planning Organization (spo) conducted a quantitative survey that is representative of the whole of Turkey (spo 1992). This comprehensive research was done with 18,210 randomly selected households from urban and rural communities. The results were then generalised to apply to all Turkey. According to this research, the percentage of civil-only marriages was 9.56, religious-only marriages was 4.89, and both civil and religious marriages was 84.92.[427] [428] A survey in 1998 based on data from interviews conducted with 599 women in 19 settlements in Eastern and Southeastern Anatolia found that the percentage of civil-only marriages was 5.8, religious- only marriages was 19.6 and both civil and religious marriages was 74.4[429] Another quantitative study9[430] that surveyed 462 married women aged between 15 and 49 in an East Anatolian city found that while 95% of monogamous women were both officially and unofficially married, only 4.6% of them had a religious-only marriage. As for the polygamists, the figures were respectively 61.5% and 38.5%. 100% of all women had a religious marriage. An official report from 2014 found that in 2011, 2.6% of marriages in Turkey were conducted with a religious ceremony only, along with 3.4% of marriages conducted with a civil ceremony only, and 93.9% of marriages had both a civil and a religious ceremony[431] [432] The Turkish Statistics Institute also recently found that 1.1% of marriages in Turkey were conducted with a religious ceremony only. 1.8% of marriages were conducted with a civil ceremony only, and 97.1% of marriages had both a civil and a religious ceremony.99 In the age group of 15-19, 81.85 of those who are married had both official and unofficial marriages while 0.5% had civil-only and 17.7% religious-only marriages.[433] [434] [435] [436] [437] [438] [439] [440] Most probably these religious-only marriages were child marriages that could not legally be solemnised. Thus, they were illegally solemnised through an unofficial marriage. There are some unofficial marriage (imam/religious-only marriage) cases dealt with by the secular Turkish courts. Several of these cases have reached the top level of the Court of Cassations (Yarg1tay).101 Case law shows that the Court of Cassations accommodates unofficial religious marriages, “when the matter at hand is not related to giving effect to the marriage but, for instance, to the law of obligations where the Court does not have to go into the issue,,.ιo2 For instance, for reasons of justice, the Court of Cassations has, “extended the right to compensation for death in work-related accidents to the unmarried cohabiting woman, albeit on a different basis from the married woman,,.ιo3 In these cases, women who were only married with a religious marriage applied to the courts for insurance claims after the deaths of their husbands and the Courts have generally decided for compensation, albeit for lower percentages compared to official wives.κι4 In May 2015, the Constitutional Court annulled the Criminal Code's article that provided that, for an illegal, religious-only marriage ceremony, the bride, groom, and imam who officiated the marriage could be sent to jail for two to six months.105 The majority (12 to 4) opinion argued that since it is not illegal for two persons to live together without a civil marriage, it would be discriminatory to punish two persons living together after a religious-only marriage.ω6 The Constitutional Court had unanimously ruled the opposite in a 1999 case.ω7 The Constitution has not changed on this matter between 1999 and 2015 but the membership structure of the Court did. It is no longer controlled by the Kemalists, since the majority of the members have been appointed by Islamist presidents, Abdullah Gul and R. Tayyip Erdogan, since 2007. 3.2 Age of Marriage: Child Marriages After the establishment of the Turkish Republic in 1923, the age of marriage was adopted from Swiss law as being 18 years for males and 17 years for females. The official law is in conflict with traditional Muslim laws. In the eyes of many traditional Muslims, when a girl or boy reaches puberty, he or she can marry whatever his or her age. Quantitative data show that people in many cases do not take into account the provisions of the Civil Code. In these cases, families at first employ only Muslim laws and solemnise marriages according to Muslim laws. Married only by imam nikahι, the spouses' cohabitation is legitimate for the community. After reaching the officially permitted age, they register their marriages with the state if they want. Although it is considered a crime of rape to have sexual relations with a child under the age of 15 years, in religious-only marriages such behaviour is usually not reported as a crime, and no criminal action is taken. This is one of the obstacles to the prevention of child marriages.[441] [442] [443] [444] Even official census data show the reality of under-age marriages. The above-mentioned State Planning Organization survey shows that the percentage of under-age marriages (under 16 years) in Turkey was about 9% in 1991.109 Only 0.37% of all existing marriages were conducted at or below the age of 12, 0.90% at the age of 13, 2.19% at the age of 14 and 5.38% at the age of 15.110 In 1994, according to the State Institute of Statistics (TurkStat), in the age group of 12-14, 0.54% of females and 0.88% of males were married.m It must be emphasised that these figures are not reflective of the true proportion of experience since most of the time people do not report such illegal marriages. In 1998, a survey based on data from interviews conducted with 599 women in Eastern and Southeastern Anatolia showed that 16.3% of women living in the region were married under the age of 15 and in a religious ceremony.[445] [446] [447] [448] [449] [450] [451] [452] A decade later, another study underlined that in 2008, 14% of all women in Turkey aged 20 to 24 years were married before the age of 18.n3 Another quantitative survey that surveyed 462 married women aged between 15 and 49 years, found that, “(t)he percentage with age at first pregnancy of ≤14 years was 11.5% for women in polygamous marriages and 10.2% for women in monogamous marriages,,.n4 17.3% of polygamist women were married at or before the age of 14 and the figure for the monogamist women is 20.3%. About 10% of these women had their first pregnancies either at the age of 14 or below.115 The European Commission of the European Union reported in 2010 that early and forced marriages remain a cause for concern. There are no reliable figures on the incidence of such marriages. Women's organisations report deterioration in their dialogue and their cooperation with relevant public institutions, at both central and local levels.n6 With regard to gender equality and women's rights, the legal framework is broadly in place but sustained further efforts are needed to turn this legal framework into political, social and economic reality.117 A report by the United Nations stated in 2014 that child marriage is practiced in all regions of Turkey, but that there is regional variation. Whereas teenage childbearing (taken as a proxy for child marriage) is highest in Central East Anatolia (10%), it is lowest in the East Black Sea Region (3%). Teenagers in rural areas are more likely than teenagers in urban areas to have started childbearing (9% and 5%, respectively).ø But child marriage is not only a rural phenomenon or limited to uneducated & poor individuals. For instance, former Turkish President Abdullah Gul married his wife when she was fifteen.n9 At the time, he was a PhD student at Istanbul University and his wife was a high school student in Istanbul. Hacettepe University in Ankara conducts “The Turkey Demographic and Health Survey” every five years. It has a nationally representative sample survey. The target sample size of the TDHS-2013 was set at 14,496 households. In TDHS-2013, interviews were completed with 11,794 households and 9,746 women in the 15-49 age group in 641 clusters. The survey found that 0.2% of the females in Turkey gave birth to a child at the age of 16. 0.3% of them were pregnant with first child and 0.5% of them began childbearing at the age of 16.[453] [454] [455] [456] [457] [458] The survey showed that, among women aged 25-49, 22% of women in Turkey married by age 18 and 4% of all women in Turkey got married before their 15th birthdayi21 According to the state's Turkish Statistics Institute (TurkStat, τuiκ), 28.2% of women who got married in 2016 in Turkey were underage, while the ratio of men in the same category was 5.6%.m In 2016, the EU repeated its earlier criticisms: early and forced marriage continued to be a major concern, including the situation among the Syrian refugee population.123 3.3 Polygamy The 1926 Civil Code rendered polygamy impossible by requiring that both prospective spouses be single at the time they apply for a marriage certificate.^4 When polygamy was abolished by the Civil Code in 1926, the Muslim laws justifying polygamy became officially null and void. The official law does not allow polygamous marriage under any circumstances. If a person is a party to an existing marriage, he or she cannot validly contract a second or subsequent marriage. Articles 92, 113, 114, 115 of the Civil Code 1926 and Article 130 of the Civil Code 2001 provide that no person shall marry again unless he or she proves that the earlier marriage has been dissolved by death, by divorce, or by a decree of nullity. Article 145 of the Civil Code 2001 states that a second marriage is invalid if a person still has a spouse living at the time of the subsequent marriage. In other words, the second marriage is absolutely void, or void ab initio. Similarly to religious-only marriage cases and child marriages, the solemnisation of polygamous marriages has also unofficially continued in Turkey. A survey that included 599 women aged 14 through 75 in South-eastern and Eastern Turkey showed that while 89.4% of them had monogamous marriages, 10.6% were living in polygamous partnerships.^5 The Economist reported in 2005 that it is difficult to know how many men have more than one wife in Turkey, because it is illegal. The practice is known to be especially common in Kurdish regions, where life is still largely organised around tribal structures and Islam, and where status and power are measured in numbers. Across rural Turkey, the authorities turn a blind eye to polygamy.[459] [460] [461] [462] [463] [464] [465] [466] In a 2010 survey that interviewed 462 married women aged between 15 and 49 years, it was found that “while 410 (88.7%) women were in monogamous marriages, 52 (11.3%) were in polygamous marriages”.^7 It was also found that 78.2% of women in polygamous marriages and 57.3% of women in monogamous marriages were illiterate, and polygamy significantly decreased with literacy.128 However, similar to child marriages, polygamy is not confined to rural areas or to uneducated and poor individuals. Mr. Ali Yuksel made the headlines when he was appointed as advisor to the Prime Minister Erdogan in June 2010. He is married to three women and declared his intentions to marry a fourth. Mr. Yuksel's polygamy already made headlines in 2004, but the Turkish media highlighted the issue of his polygamous lifestyle when appointed by Erdogan in 2010.129 The social anthropologist Jenny White who has worked on Turkey since 1970s states that “polygamy is particularly common in the East, although I have encountered several examples in both the poor neighbourhoods of Istanbul and among the educated IslamistsV30 She reports that the legal wives are devastated by the situation but they cannot divorce or leave their husbands. Many of them are poor and do not have credible job prospects after several years of being housewives. For the educated ones, it would be seen as “treason to the cause” (daWa, jihad) to make a scene about polygamy which is, after all, allowed in Islam. Even educated Islamist women cannot risk losing the protection and goodwill of their community.131 A recent study aiming to investigate the sociodemographic characteristics, sexual function, and psychological status of polygamously and monogamously married men surveyed 35 polygamous and 45 monogamous men in Kahramanmara§ Province between April 2011 and February 2014.132 The main reasons for multiple marriages reported by polygamous men, in descending order, were: 1) decreased satisfaction of sexual desires by a wife (37.1%); 2) falling in love with the second wife (22.8%); and 3) incompatibility with the first wife (17.1%).133 The case law shows that the courts have had to deal with some polygamy cases.[467] [468] [469] [470] [471] [472] In some cases, courts treat the second wife with some recognition despite the fact that she was only married unofficially. In one case, the judge held that the (unofficial) second wife should be paid some compensation from the insurance company because of the death of her unofficial husband at work.i3? With the increasing authoritarianism and Islamist populism of the ruling AKP, Islamists' attitudes about polygamy have been gradually changing and they find it easier to talk positively about polygamy in the public sphere. For instance, on 18 June, 2016, on pro-AKP TV channel Kanal A, four male panellists discussed if Muslim men are/were free to observe their religion in Turkey. Two of them argued that “No, Muslims are not free. For example, they cannot get married according their religion. The laws of secular Turkey dictate just one wife, so Muslims cannot take a second or third".i36 In another case, an AKP supporter, Hasan Guray Ozuyer, advised the AKP supporters to have polygamous marriages with wives of the imprisoned Gulen Movement participants who have resisted akp's increasing Islamism and authoritarianism. Mr. Ozuyer was criticised that his remarks were reminiscent of the practices of the ISIS militants who forcefully take women (already married or not) in the territories they occupy as their second, third and fourth wives. After an outpouring of criticism on Twitter, Mr. Ozuyer had to close his Twitter account.^7 This relaxation has also influenced bureaucrats. Seval Yildirimi38 reports that when she inquired with the Turkish Institute of Statistics (TurkStat) in November 2011 about the official numbers on the rate of polygamy in Turkey, she was told that since polygamy is outlawed in Turkey, there were no official statistics on polygamy. But recently the government started publishing official statistics on the rate of polygamy in Turkey. In 2013, the Turkish Parliament's Committee on Equality for Women and Men released official numbers on women's status, including numbers on polygamy. According to this, as of 2013, 372,000 women were in polygamous marriages across Turkeyrw In May 2015, the Islamist-dominated Constitutional Court nullified the law punishing religious-only marriages. Experts raised concerns that this will increase the number of polygamous marriages. Some experts and activists have noted that the influx of Syrian refugees has revived the tradition of polygamy. In nearly 80% of all polygamy cases, financial security and dowry are the main reasons.[473] Another report[474] [475] [476] [477] [478] confirmed that the unfortunate situation of Syrian refugees in Turkey is fuelling a rise in polygamy and argued that the government is turning a blind eye to the problem. Just in the town of Kilis, with its population of 230,000, at least 5,000 religious ceremonies have been performed between 2011 and 2014, wedding already married Turkish and Syrian men to Syrian women. According to Nur Burhan, a Syrian gender researcher with the Centre for Civil Society and Democracy, the majority of second wives are child brides sold to Turkish and Syrian men by their own families. The families get money for having their daughters married. One prosecutor stated that one of the main problems is that, until May, imams were not allowed to perform religious marriages before a civil marriage had taken place but that law has been repealed, making it legal for imams to conduct “imam nikaht” without punishment.142 The percentage of polygamous marriages in Turkish society has always been relatively low.M3 The data from the 1885 and 1906 Ottoman Censuses in Istanbul show that 2.29% of all married men in Istanbul were married polygamously. The percentage is 2.51% in the 1885 census and 2.16% in the 1906 Census.144 It seems that the state's social engineering and modernisation have not made much impact on the rate of polygamy. 3.4 Divorce The Civil Code of 1926 gave husband and wife an equal right to sue for divorce. Talaq was no longer recognised. Divorce could only be granted by an official court on the ground that the marriage had irretrievably broken down.M5 The Code did not allow for a divorce by collusion or mutual consent. However, Article 166 of the new Civil Code 2001 makes a divorce by mutual consent possible again. On the other hand, since marriages are religious, divorces are also made by talaq to terminate the religious marriage, the imam nikahι. There are also many limping marriage cases in Turkey where a woman obtains a civil divorce, yet she thinks that she is not divorced by her husband in religion and her former husband blackmails her or simply prevents her re-marriage by not pronouncing talaq}-46 There is another phenomenon regarding unofficial imam nikahι marriages and its abuse. In this scenario, young people, generally university students, have an ‘imam nikahι,-only marriage without informing their parents and thus try to legitimise their sexual relationship. It is called hidden (gizli) nikah. There is no recognition of their imam nikahι-only marriage by the official authorities. The community does not know either. If the man walks away, the woman would have no rights whatsoever before the courts under the official law. In the case of other unregistered marriages, the families and community know that the couple are married, albeit unofficially. Thus, there is a Gemeinschaft pressure on the husband and his family to respect the rights of the wife. Nevertheless, in the case of hidden marriages, the woman is left to the whims of the husband.[479] [480] [481] [482] There are a few cases where the courts have had to deal with talaq. In an earlier case, the Court of Cassation did not recognise the talaq, stating that there is only one type of dissolution of the marriage under the Civil Code.w8 In a 2003 case, the Court of Cassation dealt with an under-age marriage. The woman unofficially married a man even though she was not at the legally prescribed age for marriage. They lived for some years as ‘husband’ and ‘wife’ with a view to having an official marriage when they reached the legal age. They confirmed before the court that they illegally got married before they reached the legal age limit. Nevertheless, before they could officially register their ‘marriage’, they were unable to get along with each other and got ‘divorced’. The woman asked for financial compensation which the ‘husband’ rejected. The Court of Cassation held that since the woman had entered the ‘marriage’ as a virgin, the man’s act was unjust, and she deserved some financial compensation. The Court underlined that “the petitioner’s unofficial marriage does not exist legally but social values that paved the way for this marriage put a burden of loyalty on an unofficial marriage”^9 There is abundant data on religious-only marriages (imam nikahι) in Turkey but we do not know much about any incidents of religious-only (talaq) divorces. Other than anecdotal evidence, newspaper reports and some court cases, there is no field research, survey or statistics on this issue. It is obvious that more research on this subject is needed. 4
More on the topic Turkish Muslim Legal Pluralism:
- Democratizing Muslim Legal Pluralism? Parity and Muslim Dispute Resolution
- Oberauer Norbert, Prief Yvonne, Qubaja Ulrike (eds.). Legal Pluralism in Muslim Contexts. Brill,2019. — x, 258 p., 2019
- Pakistani Muslim Legal Pluralism
- Debates about the validity of legal pluralism in legal theory
- Approaches to legal pluralism in substantive legal discourse
- Between Legal Pluralism and Discrimination
- Muslim Legal Practice in the United Kingdom: the Muslim Arbitration Tribunal
- Functions of legal pluralism
- Legal Pluralism in the UK
- The Practical Usefulness of Legal Pluralism and Comparative Law
- Causes of legal pluralism
- Superdiversity and Legal Pluralism in Malaysia: Brief Background
- An Agent-Based Approach[607] [608] to Legal Pluralism
- In addition, in response to domestic political pressure, several Muslim countries in the 1970s and 1980s attempted to Islamize their legal systems by amending commercial or criminal laws in order to make them more consistent with purported Islamic legal doctrine.
- The Impact of Soft Legal Pluralism in the UK