Diagnosis
In the authors' opinion, the cornerstone of care for women with suspected or confirmed pregnancy hypertension is making an accurate diagnosis of both hypertension and/or proteinuria.
To place these diagnostic tests in context a brief review of cardiovascular adaptations to pregnancy is required (16).The major haemodynamic changes of pregnancy include an increase in sodium and water retention leading to blood volume expansion, an increase in cardiac output, and reductions in both systemic vascular resistance and systemic blood pressure (BP). Beginning in early pregnancy, these changes reach their sustained peak during the second trimester, remaining relatively constant until delivery. While plasma volume expands by approximately 50%, the red cell mass increases by 40%, resulting in the physiological anaemia of pregnancy. Women who are destined to develop pre-eclampsia may not have the mid-trimester fall in BP and have relative haemoconcentration.
Measurement of blood pressure
The definition of hypertension in pregnancy is a challenging task because BP levels in pregnancy are dynamic, have a circadian rhythm, and change by gestational age (16). Therefore, the diagnosis of pregnancy hypertension should be based on outpatient clinic or in-hospital BP measurements. This mirrors recommendations by general hypertension guidelines outside pregnancy, such as those of the Canadian Hypertension Education Program (17).
The accepted definition is a diastolic BP (DBP) of at least 90 mmHg and/or a sustained systolic BP (SBP) of at least 140 mmHg by repeated measurements in the same arm until a steady BP reading is achieved (15, 17, 18), rather than the historical definition of 4 or more hours apart. There is less certainty about a diagnosis of hypertension based on only SBP between 140 and 159 mmHg, as opposed to DBP criteria.
Severe hypertension should be defined, in any setting, as a SBP of at least 160 mmHg or a DBP of at least 110 mmHg based on the average of at least two measurements, repeated either until steady readings are achieved or at least 15 minutes apart, using the same arm (15, 19).
Isolated office (‘white coat') hypertension is defined as an outpatient clinic SBP of at least 140 mmHg or a DBP of at least 90 mmHg, but an ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) or home BP monitoring (HBPM) SBP less than 135 mmHg and DBP less than 85 mmHg (15). In contrast, a normal office BP with elevated ABPM or HBPM (‘masked hypertension') should be defined as an outpatient clinic SBP less than 140 mmHg or a DBP less than 90 mmHg, but an ABPM or HBPM SBP of at least 135 mmHg or DBP of at least 85 mmHg (15).
There are several issues of consideration specific to the measurement of BP during pregnancy. The technique should be standardized, as it should be outside pregnancy. BP can be measured using validated and calibrated auscultatory (mercury or aneroid devices) or automated methods. Factors to consider when selecting a BP measurement device include validation, disease specificity, observer error, and the need for regular recalibration (20).
Validation of BP devices is a process by which the accuracy of a device is assessed, over a range of BP readings, on several occasions and for women with different HDPs. Observer error (e.g. terminal digit preference to numbers ending in ‘0’ and ‘5’) can be eliminated by automated BP measurement devices. Calibration involves comparing readings from an aneroid or automated BP machine with those taken with a mercury manometer. Only some devices have been validated in pre-eclampsia (Dinamap ProCare 400, Microlife 3AS1-2, Microlife 3BTO-A, Nissei DS-400, Omron-MIT, and Omron-MIT Elite) (18, 21-25). Most other automated devices will tend to underestimate both SBP and DBP by 5-15 mmHg—a systematic error that places women at risk.
There are three categories of BP monitoring methods: (a) office BP measurement, (b) ABPM, and (c) HBPM (15, 17). In the past two decades, both ABPM and HBPM have gained popularity in confirming diagnosis and improving BP monitoring, compliance with antihypertensive medication, and achievement of BP targets.
Evidence from cross-sectional studies shows that HBPM and ABPM have modest diagnostic agreement and they are similar in identifying patients with ‘white coat’ effect and ‘masked’ hypertension. However, HBPM offers some advantages. HBPM is economical, comfortable, engages the patient, and is easy to repeat when disease evolution is suspected, a particularly important issue in pregnancy. Also, pregnant women and practitioners prefer HBPM to ABPM. There is an important cautionary note about HBPM, however; HBPM values have not been validated against adverse pregnancy outcomes, and, to date, no randomized trial has assessed the impact of either HBPM or ABPM on maternal or perinatal outcomes.However determined, a diagnosis of hypertension in pregnancy in a community setting is consistent with a daytime ABPM or average HBPM of SBP of at least 135 mmHg or DBP of at least 85 mmHg (15).
As stated previously, less developed countries bear a disproportionate burden of maternal morbidity and mortality from the HDP. While regular BP monitoring can cost-effectively reduce this disparity, less developed country health systems face unique challenges which reduce this capacity (26-39). Continued efforts to address these challenges through implementation and evaluation of interventions informed by robust needs assessments is urgently needed to strengthen the capacity of health systems to provide good maternity care and reduce maternal and neonatal outcome disparities in less developed countries.
Measurement of proteinuria
In the authors’ opinion, all pregnant women should be assessed for proteinuria, at minimum, at their first antenatal visit, and it should repeated, if not at every antenatal visit, whenever either hypertension is detected or symptoms suggestive of pre-eclampsia are declared (14, 15). Urinary dipstick testing (or sulphosalicylic acid (SSA) or heat coagulation testing if dipsticks are not available) may be used to screen for proteinuria when the suspicion of pre-eclampsia is low, and significant proteinuria should be strongly suspected when urinary dipstick proteinuria is 2+ or greater (14, 15).
Definitive testing for proteinuria (by urinary protein:creatinine ratio or 24-hour urine collection) is encouraged when there is a suspicion of pre-eclampsia, with significant proteinuria defined as at least 0.3g∕day in a complete 24-hour urine collection or at least 30 mg/mmol (≥0.3 mg∕mg) urinary creatinine in a random urine sample. It should be remembered that 24-hour urine collections are prone to both under- and over-collection approximately half of the time, with even splitting between under- and over-collections (40). Although increasingly used outside pregnancy, currently there is insufficient information to make a recommendation about the accuracy of the urinary albumin:creatinine ratio, although values less than 2 mg/mmol (21.1 Classification of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
| Comments | |
| Pre-existing (chronic) hypertension | |
| This is defined as hypertension that was present either prepregnancy or that develops at defining ‘severe’ pre-eclampsia have mixed items that increase the risks of adverse events and those events themselves, and were largely poorly predictive of adverse maternal events when tested in the PIERS dataset (57). The criteria listed here delineate between adverse conditions that should increase surveillance and lower thresholds to deliver a woman and those criteria that mandate delivery irrespective of gestational age. Women with suspected pre-eclampsia should undergo the maternal laboratory and a schedule of pertinent fetal testing as described in Table 21.3. If initial testing is reassuring, maternal and fetal testing should be repeated if there is ongoing concern about pre-eclampsia (e.g. change in maternal and/or fetal condition). For women being managed as outpatients for whom there is either concern about pre-eclampsia or the diagnosis of pre-eclampsia has been confirmed, that testing should occur at least once every week, and once women have been admitted due to either maternal and/or fetal concerns, twice weekly. This twice-weekly paradigm with testing at least as frequently as on admission, the day after admission, on Mondays and Thursdays, the day of delivery, and the day after delivery was associated with an 80% reduction in the incidence of severe adverse events in a single institutional study (45). Doppler velocimetry-based assessment of the fetal circulation, complemented by maternal fetal movement awareness and fetal heart rate assessment, may be useful to support a placental origin for hypertension, proteinuria, and/or adverse conditions (including intrauterine growth restriction), and for timing of delivery (10, 5862). However, the biophysical profile is not recommended as part of a schedule of fetal testing in women with a HDP as it appears to
More medical literature on Medic.Studio
More on the topic Diagnosis:
-
Infectious diseases -
Internal diseases -
Obstetrics and Gynaecology -
Pediatrics -
Veterinary medicine -
-
Conflictology -
Ecology -
Economy -
Finance -
History -
Law -
Medicine -
Philosophy -
Religious studies -
| |