REFERENCES
1. Chervenak FA, McCullough LB, Brent RL. The professional responsibility model of obstetric ethics: avoiding the perils of clashing rights. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205:315.e1-5.
2. McCullough LB, Chervenak FA. Ethics in Obstetrics and Gynecology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994.
3. Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. The Professional Responsibility Model of Perinatal Ethics. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter; 2014.
4. von Staden H. ‘In a pure and holy way:' personal and professional conduct in the Hippocratic Oath. J Hist Med Allied Sci 1996;51:404-37.
5. Baker RB. The eighteenth-century philosophical background. In: Baker RB, Porter D, Porter R (eds), The Codification of Medical Morality: Historical and Philosophical Studies of the Formalization of Western Medical Morality in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries: Volume One: Medical Ethics and Etiquette in the Eighteenth Century, pp. 93-8. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1993.
6. Nutton V The discourses of European practitioners in the tradition of the Hippocratic texts. In: Baker RB, McCullough LB (eds), The Cambridge World History of Medical Ethics, pp. 359-62. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
7. Galvao-Sobrinho CR. Hippocratic ideals, medical ethics, and the practice of medicine in the early middle ages: the legacy of the Hippocratic Oath. J Hist Med Allied Sci 1996;51:438-55.
8. Jonsen AR. The Birth of Bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.
9. Reich WT (ed). Encyclopedia of Bioethics. New York: Macmillan; 1978.
10. Gregory J. Lectures on the Duties and Qualifications of a Physician. London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell, 1772. In: McCullough LB (ed), John Gregory’s Writings on Medical Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, pp. 161-248. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1998.
11. Percival T. Medical Ethics, or a Code of Institutes and Precepts, Adapted to the Professional Conduct of Physicians and Surgeons.
London: Johnson & Bickerstaff; 1803.12. McCullough LB. John Gregory and the Invention of Professional Medical Ethics and the Profession of Medicine. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1998.
13. McCullough LB. The ethical concept of medicine as a profession: its origins in modern medical ethics and implications for physicians. In: Kenny N, Shelton W (eds), Lost Virtue: Professional Character Development in Medical Education, pp. 17- 27. New York: Elsevier; 2006.
14. Porter D, Porter R. Patient’s Progress: Doctors and Doctoring in Eighteenth Century England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989.
15. Hippocrates. Epidemics. In: Jones WHS (trans), Hippocrates, vol. 1, p. 165. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1923.
16. Faden RR, Beauchamp TL. A History and Theory of Informed Consent. New York: Oxford University Press; 1986.
17. McCullough LB, Coverdale JH, Chervenak FA. Ethical challenges of decision making with pregnant patients who have schizophrenia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:696-702.
18. Buchanan AE, Brock DW Decidingfor Others: The Ethics of Surrogate Decision Making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989.
19. Brett AS, McCullough LB. When patients request specific interventions: defining the limits of the physician’s obligation. N Engl J Med 1986;315:1347-51.
20. Brett AS, McCullough LB. Addressing requests by patients for non-beneficial interventions. JAMA 2012:307:149-50.
21. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Homepage. Available at: https://www.asrm.org/splash/splash.aspx (accessed 30 March 2016).
22. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Homepage. Available at: https://www.rcog.org.uk/ (accessed 30 March 2016).
23. Human Embryo and Fertilisation Authority. Homepage. Available at: http://www.hfea.gov.uk/ (accessed 30 March 2016).
24. Braun UK, McCullough LB. Preventing pathways to lifesustaining treatment by default. Ann Fam Med 2011;9:250-6.
25. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Bioethics.
Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 1995;95:314-17.26. Freedman B. Offering truth: one ethical approach to the uninformed cancer patient. Arch Intern Med 1993;153:572-6.
27. Moaddab A, McCullough LB, Chervenak FA, Dildy GA, Shamshirsaz AA. Virginity testing is unethical in professional obstetric and gynecologic ethics. Lancet 2016:388:98-100.
28. Chervenak FA, McCullough LB, Campbell S. Is third trimester abortion justified? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;102:434-5.
29. Chervenak FA, McCullough LB, Campbell S. Third trimester abortion: is compassion enough? Br J Obstet Gynxcol 1999;106:293-6.
30. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee on Ethics. Multifetal Pregnancy Reduction. ACOG committee opinion number 369. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:1511-15.
31. Chervenak FA, McCullough LB, Sharma G, Davis J, Gross S. Enhancing patient autonomy with risk assessment and invasive diagnosis: an ethical solution to a clinical challenge. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:19.e1-4.
32. Thorp JM, Wells SR, Bowes WA Jr, Cefalo RC. Integrity, abortion, and the pro-life perinatologist. Hastings Cent Rep 1995;25:27-8.
33. Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. The ethics of direct and indirect referral for termination of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:232.e1-3.
34. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Committee on Obstetric Practice. Vaginal Delivery After a Previous Cesarean Birth. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 143. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 1994.
35. National Institutes of Health. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights March 8-10, 2010. Semin Perinatal 2010;34:351-65.
36. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 115: vaginal birth after prior cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:450-63.
37. National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE).
Caesarean Section. Clinical guideline [CG132]. London: NICE; 2011.38. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Obstetric care consensus: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Number 1 March 2014. Available at: http://www.acog.org/Resources_And_Publications/ Obstetric_Care_Consensus_Series/Safe_Prevention_of_the_ Primary_Cesarean_Delivery (accessed 30 March 2016).
39. D’Souza R, Arulkumaran S. To ‘C’ or not to ‘C’ Cesarean delivery upon maternal request: a review of facts, figures and guidelines. J Perinat Med 2013;41:5-15.
40. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ACOG Committee Opinion. Surgery and patient choice: the ethics of decision making. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:1101-6.
41. [No authors listed]. NIH State-of-the Science Conference Statement on Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request. NIH Consens State Sci Statements 2006;23:1-29.
42. Chervenak FA, McCullough LB, International Academy of Perinatal Medicine. Women and children first—or last? The New York Declaration. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;2001;35.
43. Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. Women and children first: transforming an historic defining moment into a contemporary ethical imperative. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;201:335.e1-5.
44. Historic UK.Com. ‘Women and children first’—the silent heroes of the Birkenhead. Available at: http://www.historic- uk.com/CultureUK/WomenandChildrenFirst.htm (accessed 30 March 2016).
45. United Nations. UNICEF. Available at: http://www.unicef.org/ (accessed 30 March 2016).
46. World Health Organization. Homepage. Available at: http:// www.who.int/en/ (accessed 30 March 2016).
47. The World Bank. Homepage. Available at: http:// www.worlbdbank.org/ (accessed 30 March 2016).
48. I nternational Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Homepage. Available at: http://www.figo.org/ (accessed 30 March 2016).
49. Matres Mundi. Homepage. Available at: http://www.matres- mundi.org/ (accessed 30 March 2016).
50. World Association of Perinatal Medicine. Homepage. Available at: http://www.wapm.info/ (accessed 30 March 2016).