REFERENCES
1. Bashiri A, Burstein E, Bar-David J, Levy A, Mazor M. Face and brow presentation: independent risk factors. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2008;21:357-60.
2. Arsene E, Langlois C, Garabedian C, Cloqueur E, Deruelle P, Subtil D.
Prenatal factors related to face presentation: a case-control study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2016;294:279-84.3. Nassar N, Roberts CL, Cameron CA, Olive EC. Diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination for detection of non-cephalic presentation in late pregnancy: cross sectional analytic study. BMJ 2006;333:578-80.
4. Stitely ML, Gherman RB. Labor with abnormal presentation and position. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2005;32:165-79.
5. Phelan JP, Boucher M, Mueller E, McCart D, Horenstein J, Clark SL. The nonlaboring transverse lie. A management dilemma. J Reprod Med 1986;31:184-86.
6. Duff P. Diagnosis and management of face presentation. Obstet Gynecol 1981;57:105-12.
7. Schwartz Z, Dgani R, Lancet M, Kessler I. Face presentation. AustN Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1986;26:172-76.
8. Verspyck E, Bisson V, Gromez A, Resch B, Diguet A, Marpeau L. Prophylactic attempt at manual rotation in brow presentation at full dilatation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2012;91:1342-45.
9. Kolas T, Oian P, Skjeldestad FE. Risks for peroperative excessive blood loss in cesarean delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010;89:658-63.
10. Phelan JP, Stine LE, Edwards NB, Clark SL, Horenstein J. The role of external version in the intrapartum management of the transverse lie presentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;151:724-26.
11. Skelly HR, Duthie AM, Philpott RH. Rupture of the uterus: the preventable factors. S Afr Med J 1976;50:505-509.
12. AnimSomuah M, Smyth RM, Jones L. Epidural versus non-epi- dural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;12:CD000331.
13. Malvasi A, Barbera A, Di Vagno G, Gomovsky A, Berghella V, Ghi T, Di Renzo GC, Tinelli A.
Asynclitism: a literature review of an often forgotten clinical condition. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2015;28:1890-94.14. Ramphul M, Murphy DJ. Role of ultrasound on the labor ward. Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol 2012;7:615-25.
15. Ramphul M, Ooi PV, Burke G, Kennelly MM, Said SA, Montgomery AA, Murphy DJ. Instrumental delivery and ultrasound: a multicentre randomised controlled trial of ultrasound assessment of the fetal head position versus standard care as an approach to prevent morbidity at instrumental delivery. BJOG 2014;121:1029-38.
16. Ghi T, Youssef A, Martelli F, et al. A narrow subpubic arch angle is associated with a higher risk of persistent posterior occiput position at birth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;48:511-15.
17. Hunter S, Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R. Hands and knees posture in late pregnancy or labour for fetal malposition (lateral or posterior). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;4:CD001063.
18. Gupta JK, Hofmeyr GJ. Position for women during second stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;3:CD002006.
19. Roberts CL, Torvaldsen S, Cameron CA, Olive E. Delayed versus early pushing in women with epidural analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2004;111:1333-40.
20. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Intrapartum Care: Care of Healthy Women and their Babies during Childbirth. Clinical guideline [CG190]. London: NICE; 2014.
21. Royal College ofObstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Operative Vaginal Delivery. Green-top Guideline No. 26. London: RCOG; 2011.
22. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Operative vaginal delivery use of forceps and vacuum extractors for operative vaginal delivery. ACOG Practice Bull 2000;17:1-6.
23. Saunders NJ, Spiby H, Gilbert L, et al. Oxytocin infusion during second stage of labour in primiparous women using epidural analgesia: a randomized double blind placebo controlled trial. BMJ 1989;299:1423-26.
24. Cargill YM, MacKinnon CJ, Arsenault MY, et al.
Guidelines for operative vaginal birth. Clinical Practice Obstetrics Committee. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2004;26:747-61.25. Shaffer BL, Cheng YW, Vargas JE, Caughey AB. Manual rotation to reduce caesarean delivery in persistent occiput posterior or transverse position. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2011;24:65-72.
26. Tempest N, Navaratnam K, Hapangama DK. Does advanced operative obstetrics still have a place in contemporary practice? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2015;27:115-20.
27. Murphy DJ, Liebling RE, Verity L, Swingler R, Patel R. Cohort study of the early maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with operative delivery in the second stage of labour. Lancet 2001;358:1203-207.
28. Bahl R, Strachan B, Murphy DJ. Pelvic floor morbidity at three years after instrumental delivery and caesarean section in the second stage of labor and the impact of a subsequent delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:789-94.
29. Bahl R, Strachan B, Murphy DJ. Outcome of subsequent pregnancy three years after previous operative delivery in the second stage of labour-cohort study. BMJ 2004;328:311-14.
30. Bahl R, Patel RR, Swingler R, Ellis N, Murphy DJ. Neuro developmental outcome at 5 years after operative delivery in the second stage of labor: a cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:147. e1-6.
31. Murphy DJ, Koh DM. Cohort study of the decision to delivery interval and neonatal outcome for ‘emergency’ operative vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;196:145.e1-7.
32. Bahl R, Murphy DJ, Strachan B. Decision making in operative vaginal delivery: when to intervene, where to deliver and which instrument to use? Qualitative analysis of expert practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2013;170:333-40.
33. Johanson RB, Menon BK. Vacuum extraction versus forceps for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;2:CD000224.
34. Attilakos G, Sibanda T, Winter C, Johnson N, Draycott T. A randomised controlled trial of a new handheld vacuum extraction device.
BJOG 2005;112:1510-15.35. Groom KM, Jones BA, Miller N, Paterson-Brown S. A prospective randomised controlled trial of the Kiwi Omnicup versus conventional ventouse cups for vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery. BJOG 2006;113:183-89.
36. Tempest N, Hart A, Walkinshaw S, Hapangama DK. A re-evaluation of the role of rotational forceps: retrospective comparison of maternal and perinatal outcomes following different methods of birth for malposition in the second stage of labour. BJOG 2013;120:1277-84.
37. Bahl R, Van de Venne M, Macleod M, Strachan B, Murphy DJ. Maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to the instrument used for midcavity rotational operative vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study. BJOG 2013;120:1526-32.
38. Aiken AR, Aiken CE, Alberry MS, Brocklesby JC, Scott JG. Management of fetal malposition in the second stage of labor: a propensity score analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;212:355.e1-7.
39. O’Mahony F, Hofmeyr GJ, Menon V Choice of instruments for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;11:CD005455.
40. Maharaj D. Assessing cephalopelvic disproportion: back to basics. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2010;65:387-95.
41. Boulvain M, Senat M-V, Perrotin F, et al. Induction of labour versus expectant management for large-for-dates fetuses: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2015;385:2600-605.
42. Bofill JA, Rust OA, Perry KG, Roberts WE, Martin RW, Morrison JC. Operative vaginal delivery: a survey of fellows of ACOG. Obstet Gynecol 1996;88:1007-10.
43. Murphy DJ, Liebling RE, Patel R, Verity L, Swingler R. Cohort study of operative delivery in the second stage of labour and standard of obstetric care. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2003;110:610-15.
44. Alexander JM, Leveno KJ, Hauth JC, et al. Failed operative vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:1017-22.
45. Murphy DJ, Macleod M, Bahl R, Strachan B. A cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of sequential instruments at operative vaginal delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol 2011; 156:41-45.
46. Towner D, Castro MA, Eby-Wilkens E, Gilbert WM. Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparaous women on neonatal intracranial injury. N Engl J Med 1999;341:1709-14.
47. Ramphul M, Kennelly MM, Burke G, Murphy DJ. Risk factors and morbidity associated with suboptimal instrument placement at instrumental delivery: observational study nested within the Instrumental Delivery & Ultrasound randomized controlled trial ISRCTN 72230496. BJOG 2015;122:558-63.
48. Dexter SC, Windsor S, Watkinson SJ. Meeting the challenge of maternal choice in mode of delivery with vaginal birth after caesarean section: a medical, legal and ethical commentary. BJOG 2014;121:133-39.