References

1. MacLennan AH, Taylor AW, Wilson DH, et al. The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders and their relationship to gender, age, parity and mode of delivery. BJOG 2000;107:1460-70.

2.

3. Abdel-Fattah M, Familusi A, Fielding S, et al. Primary and repeat surgical treatment for female pelvic organ prolapse and incontin­ence in parous women in the UK: a register linkage study. BMJ Open 2011;1:e000206.

4. Smith FJ, Holman CD, Moorin RE, et al. Lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:1096-100.

5. Lowenstein E, Ottesen B, Gimbel H. Incidence and lifetime risk of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in Denmark from 1977 to 2009. Int Urogynecol J 2015;26:49-55.

6. Mant J, Painter R, Vessey M. Epidemiology of genital prolapse: ob­servations from the Oxford Family Planning Association Study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104:579-85.

7. Vergeldt TF, Weemhoff M, IntHout J, et al. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse and its recurrence: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J 2015;26:1559-573.

8. DeLancey JO. Anatomy and biomechanics of genital prolapse. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1993;36:897-909.

9. DeLancey JO. The anatomy of the pelvic floor. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1994;6:313-16.

10. Kearney R, Fitzpatrick M, Brennan S, et al. Levator ani injury in primiparous women with forceps delivery for fetal distress, forceps for second stage arrest, and spontaneous delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2010;111:19-22.

11. Kearney R, Miller JM, Ashton-Miller JA, et al. Obstetric factors as­sociated with levator ani muscle injury after vaginal birth. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:144-49.

12. Lien KC, Morgan DM, Delancey JO, et al. Pudendal nerve stretch during vaginal birth: a 3D computer simulation.

13. Snooks SJ, Swash M, Henry MM, et al. Risk factors in childbirth causing damage to the pelvic floor innervation. Int J Colorectal Dis 1986;1:20-24.

14. Snooks SJ, Swash M, Mathers SE, et al. Effect of vaginal delivery on the pelvic floor: a 5-year follow-up. Br J Surg 1990;77:1358-60.

15. Haylen BT, Maher CF, Barber MD, Camargo S, Dandolu V, Digesu A, Goldman HB, Huser M, Milani AL, Moran PA, Schaer GN, Withagen MI. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Int Urogynecol J 2016 Apr;27(4):655-84.

16. Swift SE, Barber MD. Pelvic organ prolapse: defining the disease. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2010;16:201-203.

17. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, et al. The standardization of ter­minology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dys­function. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:10-17.

18. Haylen BT, Freeman RM, Lee J, et al. International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complica­tions related to native tissue female pelvic floor surgery. Neurourol Urodyn 2012;31:406-14.

19. Persu C, Chapple CR, Cauni V, et al. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q)—a new era in pelvic prolapse staging. J Med Life 2011;4:75-81.

20. Silva WA, Kleeman S, Segal J, et al. Effects of a full bladder and patient positioning on pelvic organ prolapse assessment. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:37-41.

21. Barber MD, Lambers A, Visco AG, et al. Effect of patient position on clinical evaluation of pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:18-22.

22. Swift S, Morris S, McKinnie V, et al. Validation of a simplified technique for using the POPQ pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2006;17:615-20.

23. Alperin M, Cook M, Tuttle LJ, et al. Impact of vaginal parity and aging on the architectural design of pelvic floor muscles.

24. Alperin M, Kaddis T, Pichika R, et al. Pregnancy-induced adapta­tions in intramuscular extracellular matrix of rat pelvic floor mus­cles. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;215:210.e1-7.

25. Vergeldt TF, van Kuijk SM, Notten KJ, et al. Anatomical cystocele recurrence: development and internal validation of a prediction model. Obstet Gynecol 2016;127:341-47.

26. Hagen S, Stark D, Glazener C, et al. Individualised pelvic floor muscle training in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POPPY): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2014;383: 796-806.

27. Piya-Anant M, Therasakvichya S, Leelaphatanadit C, et al. Integrated health research program for the Thai elderly: preva­lence of genital prolapse and effectiveness of pelvic floor exercise to prevent worsening of genital prolapse in elderly women. J Med Assoc Thai 2003;86:509-15.

28. Panman C, Wiegersma M, Kollen BJ, et al. Two-year effects and cost-effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training in mild pelvic organ prolapse: a randomised controlled trial in primary care. BJOG 2017;124:511-20.

29. Clemons JL, Aguilar VC, Tillinghast TA, et al. Patient satisfaction and changes in prolapse and urinary symptoms in women who were fitted successfully with a pessary for pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;190:1025-29.

30. Abdool Z, Thakar R, Sultan AH, et al. Prospective evaluation of outcome of vaginal pessaries versus surgery in women with symp­tomatic pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 2011;22:273-78.

31. Lone F, Thakar R, Sultan AH. One-year prospective comparison of vaginal pessaries and surgery for pelvic organ prolapse using the validated ICIQ-VS and ICIQ-UI (SF) questionnaires. Int Urogynecol J 2015;26:1305-12.

32. Lone F, Thakar R, Sultan AH, et al. A 5-year prospective study of vaginal pessary use for pelvic organ prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2011;114:56-59.

33. Fernando RJ, Thakar R, Sultan AH, et al. Effect of vaginal pes­saries on symptoms associated with pelvic organ prolapse.

34. de Albuquerque Coelho SC, de Castro EB, Juliato CR. Female pelvic organ prolapse using pessaries: systematic review. Int Urogynecol J 2016;27:1797-803.

35. Arias BE, Ridgeway B, Barber MD. Complications of neglected vaginal pessaries: case presentation and literature review. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2008;19:1173-78.

36. Bulchandani S, Toozs-Hobson P, Verghese T, et al. Does vaginal estrogen treatment with support pessaries in vaginal prolapse re­duce complications? Post Reprod Health 2015;21:141-45.

37. Khaja A, Freeman RM. How often should shelf/Gellhorn pessaries be changed? A survey of IUGA urogynaecologists. Int Urogynecol J 2014;25:941-46.

38. Barber MD, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, et al. Defining success after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114: 600-609.

39. Colombo M, Milani R. Sacrospinous ligament fixation and modi­fied McCall culdoplasty during vaginal hysterectomy for advanced uterovaginal prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;179:13-20.

40. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Insertion of Mesh Uterine Suspension Sling (Including Sacrohysteropexy) for Uterine Prolapse Repair. Interventional procedures guidance [IPG282]. London: NICE; 2009. Available at https://www.nice. org.uk/guidance/ipg282.

41. Ridgeway BM. Does prolapse equal hysterectomy? The role of uterine conservation in women with uterovaginal prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;213:802-809.

42. Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Stekelenburg J, et al. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial. BMJ 2015;351:h3717.

43. Vault or Uterine Evaluation (VUE) study. Aberdeen: Centre for Healthcare Randomised Trials (CHaRT). Available at: http:// w3.abdn.ac.uk/hsru/vue/.

44. Marchionni M, Bracco GL, Checcucci V, et al. True incidence of vaginal vault prolapse.

45. Ross JW, Preston M. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for severe va­ginal vault prolapse: five-year outcome. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2005;12:221-26.

46. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Uterine Suspension using Mesh (Including Sacrohysteropexy) to Repair Uterine Prolapse. Interventional procedures guidance [IPG584]. London: NICE; 2017. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guid- ance/ipg584.

47. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Sacrocolpopexy using Vaginal Mesh to Repair Vaginal Vault Prolapse. Interventional procedures guidance [IPG583]. London: NICE; 2017. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guid- ance/ipg583.

48. Spelzini F, Frigerio M, Manodoro S, et al. Modified McCall culdoplasty versus Shull suspension in pelvic prolapse primary repair: a retrospective study. Int Urogynecol J 2017;26:65-71.

49. FitzGerald MP, Richter HE, Siddique S, et al. Colpocleisis: a re­view. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic FloorDysfunct 2006;17:261-71.

50. Vij M, Bombieri L, Dua A, et al. Long-term follow-up after colpocleisis: regret, bowel, and bladder function. Int Urogynecol J 2014;25:811-15.

51. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, et al. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;4:CD004014.

52. Freeman RM, Pantazis K, Thomson A, et al. A randomised con­trolled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study. Int Urogynecol J 2013;24:377-84.

53. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, et al. Epidemiology of sur­gically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:501-506.

54. Weber AM, Walters MD, Piedmonte MR, et al. Anterior colporrhaphy: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:1299-304.

55. Chmielewski L, Walters MD, Weber AM, et al. Reanalysis of a randomized trial of 3 techniques of anterior colporrhaphy using clinically relevant definitions of success.

56. Srikrishna S, Robinson D, Cardozo L. A longitudinal study of pa­tient and surgeon goal achievement 2 years after surgery following pelvic floor dysfunction surgery. BJOG 2010;117:1504-11.

57. Kahn MA, Stanton SL. Posterior colporrhaphy: its effects on bowel and sexual function. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104:82-86.

58. Kahn MA, Stanton SL. Techniques of rectocele repair and their effects on bowel function. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 1998;9:37-47.

59. Klingele CJ, Bharucha AE, Fletcher JG, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse in defecatory disorders. Obstet Gynecol 2005;106:315-20.

60. Kahn MA, Breitkopf CR, Valley MT, et al. Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST) and bowel symptoms: straining at stool is associ­ated with perineal and anterior vaginal descent in a general gyne­cologic population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:1516-22.

61. Tsunoda A, Takahashi T, Ohta T, et al. Anterior intussusception descent during defecation is correlated with the severity of fecal incontinence in patients with rectoanal intussusception. Tech Coloproctol 2016;20:171-16.

62. Kapoor DS, Freeman RM. Reoperation rate following prolapse surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:e15.

63. Diwadkar GB, Barber MD, Feiner B, et al. Complication and reoperation rates after apical vaginal prolapse surgical repair: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2009;113:367-73.

64. Price N, Slack A, Jwarah E, et al. The incidence of reoperation for surgically treated pelvic organ prolapse: an 11-year experience. Menopause Int 2008; 14:145-48.

65. Toozs-Hobson P, Freeman R, Barber M, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)ZInternational Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for reporting out­comes of surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 2012;23:527-35.

66. Bergman I, Soderberg MW, Kjaeldgaard A, et al. Does the choice of suture material matter in anterior and posterior colporrhaphy? Int Urogynecol J 2016;27:1357-65.

67. Siddiqui NY, Geller EJ, Visco AG. Symptomatic and anatomic 1­year outcomes after robotic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:435.e1-5.

68. Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks. Opinion on the safety of surgical meshes used in urogynecological surgery. 2015. Available at: https:ZZec.europa. euZhealthZscientific_committeesZemergingZdocsZscenihr_o_049. pdf.

69. Huebner M, Hsu Y, Fenner DE. The use of graft materials in va­ginal pelvic floor surgery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2006;92:279-88.

70. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, et al. Transvaginal mesh or grafts compared with native tissue repair for vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;2:CD012079.

71. Glazener CM, Breeman S, Elders A, et al. Mesh, graft, or standard repair for women having primary transvaginal anterior or posterior compartment prolapse surgery: two parallel-group, multicentre, ran­domised, controlled trials (PROSPECT). Lancet 2017;389:381-92.

72. Glazener CM, Breeman S, Elders A, et al. Mesh, graft, or standard repair for women having primary transvaginal anterior or pos­terior compartment prolapse surgery: two parallel-group, multicentre, randomised, controlled trials (PROSPECT). Lancet 2017;389:381-92.

73. Ellington DR, Richter HE. The role of vaginal mesh procedures in pelvic organ prolapse surgery in view of complication risk. Obstet Gynecol Int 2013;2013:356960.

74. Ellington DR, Richter HE. Indications, contraindications, and complications of mesh in surgical treatment of pelvic organ pro­lapse. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2013;56:276-88.

75. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Transvaginal Mesh Repair of Anterior or Posterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse. Interventional procedures guidance [IPG599]. London: NICE; 2017. Available at: https:ZZwww.nice.org.uk/guid- anceZipg599.

76. Milani AL, Vollebregt A, Roovers JP, et al. [The use of mesh in va­ginal prolapse]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2013;157:A6324.

77. The Scottish Independent Review of the use, safety and efficacy of transvaginal mesh implants in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women. Final Report. 2017. Available at: http:ZZwwwgovscotZPublicationsZ2015Z10Z 8485Zdownloads, 2017.