<<
>>

CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY

There are various ways in which Roman law classified property. We have seen that, in the first place, Roman law distinguished between corporeal and incorporeal property.

Property was also classified in other ways.

As in modern law, a distinc­tion was made between moveable and immoveable property (res mobiles and res immobiles), immoveable property meaning land and things attached to land, such as buildings. This distinction was much less important than it is in modern law.

In classical Roman law, a distinction was also made between res mancipi and res nec mancipi, the former being property requiring particular formal methods of transfer (see Chapter 5) until the distinction was abolished by Justinian. Property falling into the category of res nec mancipi could be transferred or (in the case of incorporeal property) created informally. The category of res mancipi was made up of slaves, certain beasts of burden (oxen, horses, asses and mules), Italic land and rustic praedial servitudes (see below) over such land. The origin of the distinction is unclear, but it has been suggested that these types of property were marked out in the early period as important in agriculture. By the late Republic, in any case, the list became fixed, and beasts of burden (such as camels) which became known to the Romans later did not enter the list of res mancipi.

<< | >>
Source: Anderson Craig. Roman Law Essentials. Edinburgh University Press,2018. — 144 p.. 2018
More legal literature on Laws.Studio

More on the topic CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY:

  1. Transfer of Res Mancipi
  2. LIBERTAS
  3. PRAEDIAL SERVITUDES
  4. Empty opinions about the just
  5. THE APPLICABILITY OF THE INSTITUTIONAL APPROACH
  6. CONCLUSION
  7. From property rights to individual incentives
  8. As Charles Smith, one of the pioneers of “new” economic sociology, so rightly pointed out, forms of organization of economic markets and their modes of functioning are becoming an explicit issue for multiple actors and especially for economic agents themselves (Smith 2000).
  9. Abstract
  10. The Need for a New Constitution