References

Agazzi, E. (2014), Scientific objectivity and its contexts. Berlin: Springer.

Alai, M. (2010), “van Fraassen, Observability and Belief, in D'Agostino, Giorello, Laud- isa, Pievani & Sinigaglia (eds.) New Essays in Logic and Philosophy of Science, 663-675.

Alai, M. (2012), “Levin and Ghins on the No-Miracle Argument and Naturalism”. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2, 85-110.

Blondeau, J. and Ghins, M. (2012), “Is There an Intrinsic Criterion for Causal Law like Statements?” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 26, 381-401.

Da Costa, N. and French, S. (2003), Science and Partial Truth. A Unitary Approach to Models and Scientific Reasoning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ghins, M. (1992), «Scientific Realism and Invariance». Proceedings of the Third SOFIA Conference on Epistemology. Campinas. July 30-August 1, 1990. Philosophical Issues (Vol. 2: Rationality in Epistemology). 249-62. California: Ridgeview.

Ghins, M. (2002), «Putnam's No-Miracle Argument: a Critique» in Clarke & Lyons (eds.) Recent Themes in the Philosophy of Science: Scientific Realism and Commonsense. Australasian Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Vol. 17, 121-138. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Ghins, M. (2010), «Bas van Fraassen on Scientific Representation», Analysis 70(3): 524-536. http://analysis.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/anq043?ijkey=8y8OZR6C4lhmJCy&keytype= ref.

Ghins, M. (2016a), “Evandro Agazzi on Scientific Objectivity”. Essay review of Evandro Agazzi's Scientific Objectivity and its Contexts. Berlin: Springer. 2014. Metascience 25(1), 151-157, 2016. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11016-015-0036-7?wt_mc=internal.event.1. SEM.ArticleAuthorAssignedTolssue.

Ghins, M. (2016b), “Bas van Fraassen on Success and Adequacy in Representing and Modelling” in Lorenzo Magnani & Claudia Casadio (ed.), Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology.

Maxwell, G. (1962), “The Ontological Status of Theoretical Entities”, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. III.

Mill, J. S. (1911), A System of Logic: Ratiocinative and Inductive. London: Longmans, Green and Co. First published in 1843.

Nola, R. (2008), “The Optimistic Meta-Induction and Ontological Continuity: the Case of the Electron”. In L. Soler, H. Sankey and P. Hoyningen-Huene (eds.) Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison: Stabilities, Ruptures, Incommensurabilities. Berlin: Springer. 159­202.

Perrin, J. (1903), Traite de chimie physique. Les principes. Paris: Gauthier-Villars. http://iris.univ- lille1.fr/handle/1908/3160.

Perrin, J. (1909). «Mouvement brownien et grandeurs moleculaires». Paris: Radium 6 (12), 353­360. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00242381/document.

Perrin, J. (1913), Les atomes. Paris: Alcan.

Psillos, S. (1999), Scientific Realism. How Science Tracks Truth. London: Routledge.

Psillos, S. (2011), “Moving Molecules Above the Scientific Horizon: On Perrin's Case for Realism”, J Gen Philos Sci 42: 339-363.

Psillos, S. (2014), «The view from Within and the View from Above: Looking at van Fraassen's Perrin», in Gonzalez, W. (ed.) (2014), 143-166. M. Ghins, Universite Catholique de Louvain, Belgium.- michel.ghins@uclouvain.be.

Suppes, P. (2002), Representation and Invariance of Scientific Structures. Stanford: CLSI.

Van Fraassen, B. (2008), Scientific Representation. Paradoxes of Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Van Fraassen, B. (2010), “Reply to Contessa, Ghins, Healey”. Analysis 70(3): 547-556. http:// analysis.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/anq043?ijkey=8y8OZR6C4lhmJCy&keytype=ref.

Zalta, E. (1988), Intensional logic and the metaphysics of intentionality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.