<<
>>

References

Berkeley, George. 2008. Philosophical Writings. Desmond M. Clarke (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Davidson, Donald. 1990. ‘The Structure and Content of Truth'. Journal of Philosophy 87: 279-328.

Downing, Lisa. 2005. ‘Berkeley's Natural Philosophy and Philosophy of Science'. In Kenneth Winkler (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 230-265.

Dummett, Michael. 1982. ‘Realism'. Synthese 52: 55-112.

Dummett, Michael. 1991. The Logical Basis of Metaphysics. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

Dummett, Michael. 1996. The Seas of Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Dummett. Michael. 2006. Thought and Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Garber, Daniel. 1982. ‘Locke, Berkeley, and Corpuscular Scepticism'. In Colin Murray Turbayne (ed.), Berkeley: Critical and Interpretive Essays. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Jardine, Nicholas. (1986). The Fortunes of Inquiry. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Kant, Immanuel. 1998. The Critique of Pure Reason. Paul Guyer& Allen Wood (trans). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, Immanuel. 2004. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics. Garry Hatfield (tran). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Langton, Rae. 1998. Kantian Humility. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Lewis, David. 1984. ‘Putnam's Paradox'. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62: 221-36.

Musgrave, Alan. 1999. Essays on Realism and Rationalism. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

Newton-Smith, W.H. 1978.‘The Underdetermination of Theory by Data'. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Suppl. Vol. 52: 71-91.

Psillos, Stathis. 1999. Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth. London: Routledge.

Psillos, Stathis 2005. ‘Scientific Realism and Metaphysics'. Ratio 18: 385-40.

Psillos, Stathis. 2009. Knowing the Structure of Nature: Essays on Realism and Explanation.

London: MacMillan-Palgrave.

Psillos, Stathis 2012. ‘One Cannot be Just a Little Bit Realist: Putnam and van Fraassen'. In James Robert Brown (ed.) Philosophy of Science: The Key Thinkers, London: Continuum, pp. 188-212.

Psillos, Stathis. 2015. ‘Evidence: Wanted, alive or dead'. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 45: 357-381.

Putnam, Hilary. 1978. Meaning and the Moral Sciences, Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Putnam, Hilary. 1982. ‘Three Kinds of Scientific Realism'. The Philosophical Quarterly 32: 195-200.

Putnam, Hilary. 1983. Realism and Reason. Philosophical Papers Vol.3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Putnam, Hilary. 1990. Realism with a Human Face. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

Putnam, Hilary. 2001. ‘When ‘Evidence-Transcendence' is not Malign: A Reply to Crispin Wright', The Journal of Philosophy 98: 594-600.

Vision, Gerald. 2004. Veritas: The Correspondence Truth and its Critics. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

Wright, Crispin. 1992. Truth and Objectivity. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

Wright, Crispin. 1993. Realism, Meaning and Truth. Oxford: Blackwell.

<< | >>
Source: Agazzi E. (ed.). Varieties of Scientific Realism: Objectivity and Truth in Science. Springer,2017. — 411 pp.. 2017

More on the topic References:

  1. References
  2. References
  3. References
  4. References
  5. REFERENCES
  6. ADDENDUM
  7. Barger A.M., MacNeill A.L. (Eds.). Small Animal Cytologic Diagnosis: Canine and Feline Disease. CRC Press,2024. — 536 p., 2024
  8. Harker C., Horschelmann K. (Eds.). Conflict, Violence and Peace. Springer,2017. — 456 p., 2017
  9. Conclusion
  10. Oetzel John, Ting-Toomey Stella. The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Communication: Integrating Theory, Research and Practice. SAGE Publications,2013. — 912 p., 2013