References
Beall, JC (ed.). 2007. Revenge of the Liar: New Essays on the Paradox. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Beall, JC and G. Restall. 2006. Logical Pluralism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Birkhoff, G. and J. von Neumann. 1936. “The Logic of Quantum Mechanics.” Annals of Mathematics 37: 823-43.
Bueno, O. 2002. “ Can a Paraconsistent Theorist be a Logical Monist? ” In W. Carnielli, M. Coniglio, and I. D’Ottaviano (eds.), Paraconsistency: The Logical Way to the Inconsistent. New York: Marcel Dekker, 535-52.
Bueno, O. and M. Colyvan. 2004. “Logical Non-Apriorism and the ‘Law’ of Non-Contradiction.” In G. Priest, JC Beall, and B. Armour-Garb (eds.), The Law of Non-Contradiction: New Philosophical Essays. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 156-75.
Bueno, O. and S. Shalkowski. 2009. “Modalism and Logical Pluralism.” Mind 118: 295-321.
Carnielli, W., M. Coniglio, and I. D’Ottaviano (eds.). 2002. Paraconsistency: The Logical Way to the Inconsistent. New York: Marcel Dekker.
da Costa, N.C.A. 1997. Logiques classiques et non classiques. Paris: Masson.
da Costa, N.C.A. and O. Bueno. 2001. “Paraconsistency: Towards a Tentative Interpretation.” Theoria 16: 119-45.
da Costa, N.C.A., J.-Y. Beziau, and O. Bueno. 1995. “Paraconsistent Logic in a Historical Perspective.” Logique et Analyse 150-151-152: 111-25.
da Costa, N.C.A., D. Krause, and O. Bueno. 2007. “Paraconsistent Logics and Paraconsistency.” In D. Jacquette (ed.), Philosophy of Logic. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 791-911.
Etchemendy, J. 1990. The Concept of Logical Consequence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Frege, G. 1967. “Concept Script: A Formal Language of Pure Thought Modeled upon That of Arithmetic,” trans S. Bauer-Mengelberg. In J. van Heijenoort (ed.), From Frege to Godel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879-1931. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gabbay, D.M. and F. Guenthner (eds.). 2001. Handbook of Philosophical Logic. 2nd edn. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hacking, I. 1979. “What is Logic?” Journal of Philosophy 76: 285-318. Reprinted in R.I.G. Hughes (ed.), A Philosophical Companion to First-Order Logic. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company, 1993, 225-58.
Hughes, R.I.G. 1989. The Structure and Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hughes, R.I.G. (ed.). 1993. A Philosophical Companion to First-Order Logic. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.
Jacquette, D. (ed.). 2007. Philosophy of Logic. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Martin, R. (ed.). 1984. Recent Essays on Truth and the Liar Paradox. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
McGee, V. 1992. “Two Problems with Tarski’s Theory of Consequence.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 92: 273 - 92.
Priest, G. 2006a. In Contradiction. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Priest, G. 2006b. Doubt Truth to Be a Liar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Priest, G., JC Beall, and B. Armour-Garb (eds.). 2004. The Law of NonContradiction: New Philosophical Essays. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Putnam, H. 1968. “The Logic of Quantum Mechanics.” In Mathematics, Matter and Method. Philosophical Papers, vol. 1. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979, 174-97.
Putnam, H. 1979. Mathematics, Matter and Method. Philosophical Papers, vol. 1. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Quine, W.V. 1950. Methods of Logic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Introduction reprinted in R.I.G. Hughes (ed.), A Philosophical Companion to First-Order Logic. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company, 1993, 1-5; references are to the latter edition.
Quine, W.V. 1970. Philosophy of Logic. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Ray, G. 1996. “Logical Consequence: A Defense of Tarski.” Journal of Philosophical Logic 25: 617-77.
Read, S. 1988. Relevant Logic. Oxford: Blackwell.
Read, S. 1995. Thinking About Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Redei, M. 1998. Quantum Logic in Algebraic Approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Schirn, M. (ed.). 1998. Philosophy of Mathematics Today. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shalkowski, S. 2004. “Logic and Absolute Necessity.” Journal of Philosophy 101: 1-28.
Shapiro, S. 1998. “Logical Consequence: Models and Modality.” In M. Schirn (ed.), Philosophy of Mathematics Today. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 131-56.
Sher, G. 1996. “Did Tarski Commit ‘Tarski’s Fallacy’?” Journal of Symbolic Logic 61: 653-86.
Tarski, A. 1936a. “The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages.” In Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics: Papers from 1923 to 1938. 2nd edn. John Corcoran (ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company, 1983, 152-278.
Tarski, A. 1936b. “On the Concept of Logical Consequence.” In Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics: Papers from 1923 to 1938. 2nd edn. John Corcoran (ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company, 1983, 409 - 20.
Tarski, A. 1983. Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics: Papers from 1923 to 1938. 2nd edn. John Corcoran (ed.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.
van Fraassen, B. 1980. The Scientific Image. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
van Heijenoort, J. (ed.). 1967. From Frege to Godel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, 1879-1931. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4