CONCLUSIONS

The social world problems are comprehended in the given book in the context of this philosophical analysis and a new approach in social studies. The given research is a philosophical exploration of the second nature.

Within the framework of this research we have undertaken one step only, i.e. we carried out a epistemological analysis. Furthermore most hypotheses of philosophical-methodological character offered by us at the very beginning of the research got confirmation. The hypotheses which expose the ontological aspect of social phenome­non got only mediated confirmation, and that is why demand more explicate averment. It can be done by means of employment of theory of ontogenesis to social organism.

But it should be the matter of the other separate research. It will be considerably more complex than gnoseological analysis, as it is necessary to conform the variety of social life, observed by us de fac­to, to an integral picture. Estimating the research work done, it can be said that it is another attempt of explanation of nature, man and society. Substantial incrementation here is a scheme of conceptual explanation of the social world phenomenon. Besides, there must be other suggestions. It is among them that the management system must select the algorithm of Ukrainian society subsequent develop­ment.

The above remarks prove that this current research has a para­digmatic character. It means that it sets out a specific research tra­dition in the sphere of social life study that will help to solve many existing puzzle problems within the matter of noosociogenesis cog­nition process.

The significance of the fact of organic integrity of material and spiritual foundations for self-evolvement of the universum, and for destiny of our Universe still is waiting on its realization by humani­ty. By their gnoseological and practical consequences, their concep­tual unity is considerably richer than their systemic opposition. The given semantic filter makes it possible, to our opinion, to discover much new in those conceptions, which in the crisis eve were ideolog­ically uncovered and, as it seemed, did not possess creative potential.

Secondly, today the philosophical conception of the social world as a relatively independent phase of the universum self-movement is avaluable. In addition, we have shown the mechanism of social world transformation to the higher phase of self-evolvement, i.e. the intel­ligent form. By this step the mechanism of the universum renewal is actually demonstrated. The order and chaos are complex concepts. Only now we begin to attain the proper level of understanding and knowledge which empower us, after all, to answer these questions.

Thirdly, suggested social organism image we have determined as the dialectical contradiction between person and society. It is proved that social organism is the specific form of life emerged within the boundaries of our planetary system. We know now that there exists the higher form of reality (spiritual, intelligent, informational), which includes in itself everything that exists as its substance. It is based on the informational type of interaction, which must be the fifth of the fundamental types of interaction that predetermine the Universe living functions.

Fourthly, the mutually agreed models of the animalcular produc­tion organism, specific social organism and generic social organism

aresuggested in the research work, which must become the object of a separate analysis. In addition, organizational levels in social organ­ism’s familia, which is “arranged” on the basis of holographic princi­ple, are marked.

Fifthly, now we expect the effective activity directed towards ei­ther refutation of the social organism idea viability or its implemen­tation in scientific life. This step draws us nearer to understanding of the informational phase of the world community development mechanisms; it provides the technological inclusion of Ukraine and other world community countries into continental and intercontinen­tal structures and, finally, into the planetary social organism.

We consider that the philosophical research, we have conducted, makes it possible to come to the social organism ontological analysis in the near future. In the course of such analysis it will be necessary to explain ontogenesis, at first, and then the phylogenesis of the so­cial organisms’ families; and, finally, to pass to the study of unity of all types organisms, i.e. physical, social and spiritual (logical) at more advanced stage. At the same time we understand perfectly that the conceptual rearmament of philosophical idea and social science is still distant from the completion. However, maintaining the optimistic spirit in the time of crisis we hope that the suggested philosophical research work will contribute to the nonlinear world outlook estab­lishment, updating the social philosophy thesaurus, new mode of thinking formation.

On the whole the theoretical novelty and practical value of the research comes out of the fact that it is the integral philosophical study of the social life of the planetary humanity which is realized on the brand new world vision and ideological background assumption of theoretical explanation of the universum self-development mech­anism. Finishing the research work we do not lay claim to absolute truth of the covered ideas and approaches to the explanation of the particular aspects of noosociogenesis problem. The research is inter­disciplinary, i.e. “at the junction” of Philosophy, Social science and Natural sciences, but it is similar generalizations, to our point of view, that are able to enrich Philosophy. Moreover, “chaos” is that syner­gic chaos, that “chaotic” cumulus of thought fluctuations, that vari­ety of active shoots of knowledge from which through their selection another qualitatively new organization of thought grows and cru­cially new philosophical conceptions ripen.