<<
>>

The Mathematics of Gang Violence

Using Grossman’s 1995 formulation for killing-enabling factors in America, a mathematical representation has been fitted to characteristics of gangs in Taiwan. Five categories of factors enabling people to commit violent acts are considered.

These categories are the Demands of Authority (DA), Gang Absolution (GA), the Predisposition toward Violence (PV), the Distance from the Victim (DV), and the Target Attractiveness (TA).

Demands of Authority = Leader's Authority ? Demand Intensity ? Leader's Proximity ? Perpetrator's Respect

Gang leaders play an influential father-like role, enforce the rules, and recite the history and philosophy of the organization (Leader's Authority = LA). Gang leaders define the boundaries, the rivalries and the levels of violence. Gang leaders demand absolute obedience and instruct other members to punish those who deviate from the spoken demands (Demand Intensity = DI). If the infractions are deemed serious, then the leader may personally murder the offender with other gang members as wit­nesses. The leader hears all and knows all about the members even when far re­moved from the scene of the crime (Proximity of Leader = LP). The perpetrator of violence absolutely respects the leader since it is the leader that defines the future status, wealth, and power of the gang members (Perpetrator's Respect = PR).

Gang Absolution = Gang Support ? Group Number ? Gang Identification ? Gang Proximity

The members of a gang belong to a business organization that acts as surrogate family. As noted by Seagrave (1995), tycoons and gang leaders are sometimes hard to differentiate. The intensity of gang support for killing or for violent acts results from close teamwork in bullying others, showing off, and taking what they want (Gang Support = GS). Anything is right if the gang says it is right or if the leader pronounces the action as right.

The number in the group perpetrating violence (Group Number = GN) is not as important as the perpetrator's self-identification with the other perpetrators (Gang Identification = GI). Losing face (status) in front of one or more gang members will bring about intense shame and punishment. There­fore, the proximity of the gang to the scene of the crime will have little impact on the predisposition of the perpetrator(s) to act (Gang Proximity = GP).

Predisposition Toward Violence = Perpetrator Training ? Past Experience ? Individual Temperament

Daily exposure to violence is an important factor conditioning the perpetrator for further and greater acts of violence (Perpetrator Training = PT). The media play a conditioning role and easy access to stolen goods, violent films, pornography, prosti­tutes, drugs, and alcohol supports the corrupting mental environment of the gang. Past injustices experienced in life, such as poverty or child abuse, tend to create a violent disposition (Past Experience = PE). The intensity with which the perpetrator participates in gang consumption rituals and the distance from one's own family de­fine the individual temperament of the perpetrator (Individual Temperament = IT).

Distance from the Victim = Physical Distance x Emotional

Distance ? Social Distance

Physical distance is commonly provided by guns and on rare occasions vehicles, but knives are sometimes used to kill, torture, or dismember people (Physical Dis­tance = PD). The emotional distance between victim and assailant can be very close, considering that the island is fairly homogeneous and experiences little race conflict. Leaders may require a member to act against another member regardless of emo­tional ties (Emotional Distance = ED). A larger part of the equation is the hate and antagonism caused by envy of other people’s wealth and power. Unless the gang has evolved into a rich and powerful business organization, the social distance between rich and poor is an important factor stimulating violence (Social Distance = SD).

Target Attractiveness = Relevance of Victim ? (Payoff - Perpetrator’s Risk)

Taiwan gangs will kill to obtain weapons since weapons are the tools used to in­stantly satisfy needs. Thus, if a target has a weapon and the target is not a gang member or a police person, then the attractiveness of the target is high. The rele­vance of the victim is related to political or police pressures, rival gang actions, fam­ily ties, or business transactions that impact the gang’s welfare and status (Relevance of Victim = RV). The pay-off for violence (Payoff = PO) will be status and owner­ship of the victims’ possessions. The potential for retaliation or the creation of un­foreseen situations that endanger the payoff is called the perpetrator’s risk (Perpetra­tor’s Risk = PR).

The probability for violence (PV) is formulated as follows:

PV = Demands of Authority ? Gang Absolution ? Predisposition toward Violence ? Distance from the Victim ? Target Attractiveness

PV = DA x GA x PV x DV x TA

Each sub-factor of the model uses a baseline weight of 1. In Table 2, a sample calculation demonstrates the probability of violence for a gang. The demands for au­thority and the absolution of fellow gang members are assumed to be extremely in­fluential and therefore increase the likelihood that a gang member acts violently. For this reason, the sub-factor weights selected for the demand intensity, the leader’s proximity, the leader’s authority, individual respect, and gang support and identity exceed the baseline weight of 1. Furthermore, the stronger the influence of authority and the absolution of the gang, the more attractive is the target (higher payoff). A gang member’s predisposition toward violence and the distance from the victim fall below the baseline value if there is a strong spiritual belief (or faith) in the gang and its leader. In summary, the category totals that most strongly influence the outcome are the demands of authority, gang absolution, and the attractiveness of the target.

The predisposition of the perpetrators of violence and the distance from the target weakly influence the category totals.

Conclusion

The mathematical model fits the argument that Taiwan gangs have the highest poten­tial for violence during the early stages of formation and during the later stages of maturity and decline. New gangs are extremely dangerous because the initial payoff (e.g., obtaining money and weapons) gives the leader immediate validity and the gang as a whole greater faith in the organization. But if the gang and its members al­ready have money, weapons, political power, and business operations, then the leader's authority is diluted, new targets are not attractive, and the potential for vio­lence is reduced. However, mature gangs become violent again when individual gang members solicit their own following or as society moves to establish law and order. Attempts to break up mature gangs leads to gang warfare, cycles of retaliation, and the internationalization of gangs.

Using the arguments above, Taiwan is experiencing increased gang violence be­cause of the breakup of older gangs by police and because of the emergence of new gangs. Some of the older gang leaders have fled the island, and the Central News Agency (Yang 1997) reports that over 100 gang leaders are hiding in Mainland China. The new gangs that emerge to take their place create the most difficult cases for the police to solve since they have fewer business assets and a very shallow, yet very faithful, network of associates. The new gangs are extremely violent and more frequently engage in kidnapping and murder rather than money laundering, bid­rigging, and game-fixing as do the mature gangs. This is not to say that mature gangs do not commit violent acts, because they do. Rather, the violent acts of mature gangs are frequently acts of retaliation that do not involve the general public (relevance of victim > payoff). New gangs have no bounds about who may be their target as long as the payoff is high (payoff > relevance of the victim).

For this reason, the emer­gence of new gangs poses the greatest threat to citizens and creates the greatest pub­lic fear.

The continuing efforts of the Taiwan police to arrest and document gang net­works are important means to control gang violence. However, serious threats re­main. First, gang leaders living abroad might return in the future or create interna­tional networks. Second, little effort has been made to study and profile individuals likely to emerge as new gang leaders. Without knowing the environment and the be­haviors that give rise to gang leadership, little can be done to eliminate the growing violence. Finally, Confucius recognized that poverty and a low position in life gen­erates contempt in the eyes of others, but taught that dedication to duty, frugality, and benevolence are the essence of wealth and respectability (Ku 1984). Since too few people are teaching and practicing traditional values, Taiwan's consumerism is defining the public's standards, priorities, and values. As long as conspicuous con­sumption is valued more than non-conspicuous civic mindedness and hard work, gangs will maintain their spiritual appeal.

References

Chaffee, Aurell, Barth, Cort, Dombrowski, Fasano, Weaver. (1969). Area Handbook for the Republic of China. Washington, D.C.: The American University Press.

European Council of Commerce and Trade (ECCT). (1996). Position Papers 1996/97. Taipei: ECCT.

Free China Review. (1997).

Gilligan, James. (1996). Violence, Our Deadly Epidemic and Its Causes. New York: Grosset/Putnam Books.

Grossman, David. (1995). On Killing—The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society. Boston: Little Brown and Company.

Kavanaugh, John F. (1982). Following Christ in a Consumer Society, The Spiritual­ity of Cultural Resistance. New York: Orbis Books.

Ku, Hung-ming. (1984). English Translation of the Analects. Taipei: Shin Sheng Daily News.

Liao, Cheng-Hao. (1996). Speak loudly and carry a big stick.

Free China Review 46.11 (November, 1996): 12-14.

Longenecker, David, and T. Yu. (1994). The Beijing-Taipei struggle for interna­tional recognition, from the Niger Affair to the U.N. Asian Survey 34.5 (May, 1994): 475-488.

Raguin, Yves. (1974). Buddhism, Sixteen Lessons on Buddhism and Christianity. Taipei: Ricci Institute for Chinese Studies.

Seagrave, Sterling. (1995). Lords of the Rim. New York: Bantam Press.

Shaw, Thomas A. (1994). “We like to have fun,” leisure and discovery of the self in Taiwan’s “new” middle class. Modern China, An Interdisciplinary Journal 20.4 (October, 1994): 416-45.

Taiwan Executive Yuan. (1996a). Taiwan Statistical Data Book. Taipei: Council for Planning and Development.

-----. (1996b). Monthly Bulletin of Statistics, Taipei: Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics. 22.10 (1996): 20.

-----. (1996c). Urban and Regional Development Statistics. Taipei: Urban and Housing Development Department, pp.136-137.

Trappey, Charles V. (1997). The Taiwan retail market. Report AIT-97-203 prepared for the Commercial Section of the American Institute in Taiwan, William Brekke, Chief.

Veblen, Thorstein. (1953/1899). The Theory of the Leisure Class. New York: New American Library.

Yang, Danielle. (1997). 100 gang leaders have fled to mainland China: Justice Min­ister. Taiwan Headline News. Taipei: Central News Agency, Wednesday, 12 February 1997.

Table 1. Violent events in Taiwan history

Year Historical Event Nature of Violence
1200 Hoklo immigrants from Fujien Province begin to arrive and challenge the Hakka's claims to land. Fighting between the Hoklo and the Hakka ends with the Hakka being pushed further inland and closer to the aborigines. The Hakkas are attacked by the aborigines in the mountains and the Hoklo in the plains.
1250 Taiwan grows as a base for pirates from China and Japan Ransacking of ships and lawlessness. The Japanese operate out of present day Kee- lung and the Chinese pirates operate out of Tainan.
1622 The Dutch construct forts in the North and the Spanish construct forts in the South Colonization of 25,000 Chinese immi­grants by the Europeans.
1642 The Dutch expel the Spanish from Taiwan Territorial war between two European powers.
1662 Dutch expelled by Chi­nese Nine-month siege of Fort Zeelandia by a land army of 120,000 and a 12,000-vessel pirate fleet under the control of Koxinga. Koxinga, fleeing the Manchus on the mainland, sets out to eliminate all traces of Dutch rule.
1683 The Manchus capture Taiwan unopposed and a two-century dark age be­gins. Widespread lawlessness and corruption spreads across Taiwan. Banditry, piracy, and inter-clan feuds create nostalgia for the rule of Koxinga. Fifteen major anti­government rebellions occur until 1850. Settlers continue to rebel against govern­ment officials that amass wealth through extortion.
1842 The British threaten to occupy Taiwan Two British vessels wreck in a storm off of the eastern coast of Taiwan. All crew members are massacred by tribesmen. Britain threatens to occupy Taiwan in re­taliation. Twenty years later, British trad­ing companies are in place selling opium to the Chinese on Taiwan.
1883 The end of the dark age of the Manchus. A rebel uprising results in the death of 20,000 of the Emperors soldiers and offi­cials. The Manchus begin political and administrative reforms on the island.
1884 The French attempt to gain control. The French gain control of Keelung and the Pescadores but abandon the attempt to take the island. The capital is moved from Tainan to Taipei.
1894 Taiwan ceded to Japan Local Chinese and intellectuals claim Taiwan an independent republic and rec­ognize the suzerainty of China. After a three-day battle, 50,000 armed Taiwanese surrender in Keelung. Skirmishes continue against the Japanese until 1902. From 1907 to 1928, only four serious uprisings against the Japanese. Intermittent warfare with aborigines as railroads are built. Taiwan achieves an overall higher stan­dard of living than mainland China.
1930 The Japanese disarm the aborigines The aborigines are forced to give up hunt­ing and assimilate. Two hundred elemen­tary schools are built for the aborigines.
1933 China and Japan go to war. Japan tries to supplant the Chinese lan­guage and culture with that of Japan.
1945 Chinese Nationalist forces take over the ad­ministration of Taiwan from the Japanese. Taiwan placed under military rule and po­litical rights postponed. Troops strip Tai­wan factories and farms for Nationalist struggle against the Communists in China. The breakdown in public health and the spread of cholera and plague leads to the deterioration of education and public mo­rale.
1947 The 2/28 incident and the beginning of “white ter­ror.” Customs police kill a woman selling ciga­rettes. A general uprising begins that leads to the death of over 20,000 Taiwanese.
1955 The communists pursue plan to capture Taiwan The communists Chinese capture Tachen and Nanchi islands and begin attacks on Matsu and Kinmen islands. More than 60,000 shells fall per day on Kinmen until the U.S. Seventh Fleet arrives. Kruschev vows to use nuclear weapons against the United States. if the United States uses nuclear weapons against China.

Table 2. Factor weights for gang violence

Factors Sub-factor Total Category Total
Demand of Authority (DA) 2.592
Leader's Authority (LA) 1.5
Demand Intensity (DI) 1.2
Leader's Proximity (LP) 1.2
Perpetrator ‘s Respect (PR) 1.2
Gang Absolution (GA) 1.440
Gang Support (GS) 1.2
Group Number (GN) 1.0
Gang Identity (GI) 1.2
Gang Proximity (GP) 1.0
Predisposition (PV) 0.512
Training (PT) 0.8
Past Experience (PE) 0.8
Temperament (IE) 0.8
Distance (DV) 0.512
Physical Distance (PD) 0.8
Emotional Distance (ED) 0.8
Social Distance (SD) 0.8
Target Attraction (TA) 1.000
Relevance of Victim (RV) 1.0
Payoff (PO) 2.0
Perpetrator's Risk (PR) 1.0
Probability of Violence (PV) 0.978

<< | >>
Source: Anderson M. (ed.). Cultural Shaping of Violence: Victimization, Escalation, Response. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press,2004. — 330 p.. 2004

More on the topic The Mathematics of Gang Violence: